Karsticles
Member
Man, a lot of hate in this thread. :-/
Your post was incredibly whiny and that of a sore loser. There really wasn't anything there to not dismiss. Plus it was full of clichéd "she's so corrupt!" bullshit.
Man, a lot of hate in this thread. :-/
I think you're defending reflexively against nothing here, since I didn't say a single thing about corruption in that post.
Your post was incredibly whiny and that of a sore loser. There really wasn't anything there to not dismiss. Plus it was full of clichéd "she's so corrupt!" bullshit.
This is some embarrassing shit.
But no serious I was pissed because whoever that is both treated his/her mother like shit, and wasted food.
"Celebrate your ultra-wealthy, ultra-establishment candidate's" Oh what were you implying here then?
"ultra-wealthy" - Hillary and Bill Clinton are worth at least $140 million
"ultra-establishment" - Hillary has had the support of the entire party since day 1
What was I implying? Exactly what I said. Any questions?
"ultra-wealthy" - Hillary and Bill Clinton are worth at least $140 million
"ultra-establishment" - Hillary has had the support of the entire party since day 1
What was I implying? Exactly what I said. Any questions?
It's the same "punching-up/punching-down" nonsense you see in other areas of social discourse.
We're the underdog, so it's okay for us throw dirt in your eyes and kick you in the kneecap. But if you should win, we demand that you and all your supporters conduct yourselves in the most sportsmanlike way!
The irony is that the entire initial post was almost nothing but sour grapes.....so there's a huge element of irony to it that just went over the author's self-awareness radar.
Not to mention that "sour grapes", almost by their very definition, have to come from someone who has lost or been denied something. You can't accuse someone on the winning side of sour grapes.
Why would Clinton target white independents?
To paraphrase Sun Tzu, don't attack where your enemy is strong, attack where he's weak. Julian Castro has been floated as one of the more likely VO picks to target Hispanics.
I'm a bigger fan of Hillary picking Tom Perez for VP than someone young and handsome like Julian Castro who just doesn't have enough experience yet.
"ultra-wealthy" - Hillary and Bill Clinton are worth at least $140 million
"ultra-establishment" - Hillary has had the support of the entire party since day 1
What was I implying? Exactly what I said. Any questions?
You know, when the New York Yankees beat up the Seattle Mariners, they don't go and talk shit about the Mariners after they've won. They realize that their team is better paid, has more talented players, has a big fanbase back home in the largest metropolitan area in the country, and they are supposed to conduct themselves accordingly. They win their games quietly and fly back home.
sour grapesSure you can. Anyone can fit the term "sour grapes".
They all should be.Bernie should be embarrassed of his base.
You know, when the New York Yankees beat up the Seattle Mariners, they don't go and talk shit about the Mariners after they've won. They realize that their team is better paid, has more talented players, has a big fanbase back home in the largest metropolitan area in the country, and they are supposed to conduct themselves accordingly. They win their games quietly and fly back home.
Imagine if the Yankees were the ones kicking dirt into the faces of the Mariners and being unsportsmanlike after the fact. No one would stand for it. That's the difference between being the favored and being the underdog. It's a shame none of the Hillary supporters ever understood this.
Holy hell at the Young Turks. Look at their most recent uploads:
![]()
I genuinely feel bad for that mother. Get yelled at, food knocked out of your hand, and the door shut on you out of a shitty ass temper tantrum. I hope an apology and some serious growing up follow.
At least they are working through the stages.
I was on the losing side this election cycle but I was never convinced that it was the wrong side.
At least they are working through the stages.
Great results and now we can finally move on from the Democratic Primaries now that Hillary has made it basically impossible. We need to start preparing for the Cruz/Trump/??? Republican nomination and unite before the general election.
I've seen some of her supporters on GAF use the majority opinion of Citizens United to defend her campaign's Wall St. donations. "Can't prove quid pro quo! No impropriety here!" Also voter suppression is terrible. LMAO it is truly insane to see what GOP language/tactics some of her supporters will co-opt without the slightest hint of irony. All this bluster over some loser candidate who never had a chance and should have dropped out last summer, apparently!unless it helps my candidate
Good guys already won their first of many series against 'baseball's establishment.'Also the Mariners won the only series they've played this year. Just gonna throw that out there.
Now the St Louis Cardinals, I believe that is something we can all come together in our hatred.
Holy hell at the Young Turks. Look at their most recent uploads:
![]()
Good guys already won their first of many series against 'baseball's establishment.'
I'm on the Hillary train now I suppose, but fuck if I'll condone any of that 'yas queen' horseshit. Or deriding a young base for actually having any hope in America's political climate. Need to harness that energy for good and future elections. Y'know, like actually taking the senate and house back. Shit that matters. Not that the executive doesn't, per se, but more deadlock isn't helping anything.
Holy hell at the Young Turks. Look at their most recent uploads:
![]()
That first one is the smuggest thing I've ever seen in my life.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmaXB-NprOM
Worse than Fox News at this point
In terms of mainstream shit slinging sure but in terms of actual policies not even close.The ultra neo-liberal and the ultra neo-con are basically two sides of the same coin.
Political operatives on the extremes of all sides respect anything that achieves tangible results.The ultra neo-liberal and the ultra neo-con are basically two sides of the same coin.
This is typical sour grapes from the supporter of the candidate who was expected to win without even trying from the very first day of the primary season.
I've never seen such vindictive and appalling behavior from supporters of the front-running candidate who was supposed to steamroll all opposition on the way to coronation as Empress of the United States. And yet an insurgent underdog candidate whose name was largely unknown in 2015 ultimately forced a contest that went to late April.
Keep on winning ugly, Hillary supporters! You sure showed that underdog a thing or two! Celebrate your ultra-wealthy, ultra-establishment candidate's hard-earned victory against an obscure Senator from Vermont!
Death throes. Berns should really throw the towel and bolster support for Clinton lest this kind of thing actually bleed into the GE. Which would be a lose lose for everyone, imo. If Clinton could do it for Bams surely Berns can do it for Clinton.
Where in my post did I say I support caucuses?Some of the most egregious example of voter disenfranchisement has also happened in caucus states. I don't love closed primaries (I would prefer to do semi-open) and I think the 6 month registration to change is draconian, but people shouldn't have to wait 3-4 hours in line to vote and then stand in a gym just "because".
Where was the outrage when the only reason that dishwashers at Nevada casinos could stay at their precincts after waiting for 3 hours to caucus because their casino manager decided to eat their wages because he thought being able to vote was more important?
It's all terrible and awful and should all be called out in unison, but it's all proxy wars for your candidate of choice. Both are terrible in their own way!
In terms of mainstream shit slinging sure but in terms of actual policies not even close.
Where in my post did I say I support caucuses?
Anyway, your first paragraph is what I'm talking about. I think there's room to say that, hey, maybe a 6 month deadline is pretty outlandish, especially if we're the party that proclaims to support the right of having as many people vote as we can. But I'm watching things slowly unfold and I'm aghast at what tactics garner support in the Democratic Party these days.
That first one is the smuggest thing I've ever seen in my life.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmaXB-NprOM
Probably because Sanders isn't leading the primary? I think caucuses need to be changed FWIW.Assumes you're talking about what's occurring in New York. Which is fine. And I don't assume you support caucuses, I'm annoyed that we've been talking about voter suppression the past week where caucuses have been hand waved because reasons.
Great results and now we can finally move on from the Democratic Primaries now that Hillary has made it basically impossible. We need to start preparing for the Cruz/Trump/??? Republican nomination and unite before the general election.
Probably because Sanders isn't leading the primary? I think caucuses need to be changed FWIW.
I would also say in terms of bias and TRUTH (only one way of looking at things) as well
Good luck with that. America is more divided now than ever. If nothing else, I now fear more than ever that Trump may win the GE.
Good luck with that. America is more divided now than ever. If nothing else, I now fear more than ever that Trump may win the GE.