Polygon: Xbox Scorpio will be a ~6 TFLOP system (v PS4K's 4.14), unveil soon, Fall 17

God only knows what'll really happen, but it's clear that MS want to shit all over any hype around Neo's launch.

Being first to market isn't always a good idea when your competitor is whispering, "Just wait a few months and we'll show you something even better!"
That's part of what killed the Dreamcast, since everyone was just waiting to see what Sony would do.

I wonder what MS are targeting with those specs though. 4K30? or just 1080p60 with a bit more headroom for post-processing effects compared to the Neo?

Yeah but the Xbox one is getting hammered by the ps4 right now. Sony came off with a huge win with the PS1, that's why the dreamcast never had a chance against the ps2.
MS would have to do something huge if they want to beat the ps4.
 
Isn't thi a bit of a non-story? Why would a console being released at year or more after one console be weaker?

If both the Neo and Scorpio were releasing at the same time, then a 20% difference would be significant, but if its releasing 12+ months after, then it's to be expected?

I mean I assume that any consumer laptop released 12 months from now will be roughly 20% faster than current models, it doesn't mean that models today are not going to sell because everybody is waiting for that predictable upgrade down the line.
 
I wonder what developers will say now, many seemed angry with neo. Instead of 2 they must develope for 4 consoles.

As I put in another thread:

Go look at the NEO threads where plenty of devs said they thought it is a fine idea.
a few sources:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1213419
On the NEO rumours:
I will be happy to move forward if this thing is real as I see it as a benefit for me as a dev and a consumer if they do this right. A lot can change for the worse to make this a no-go but right now I'm satisfied and not worried for the extra bit of legwork. Once I get my tools up to snuff I'll be golden.

Personally, I think if iterative consoles means we get to build-up a digital library with our platform holders that will follow us for years & years to come, then i'm all for it.
 
Scorpio!
He'll sting you with his dreams of power and wealth.
Beware of Scorpio!

His twisted UWP obsessions are his plot to rule the world
And his userbases' health.

He'll welcome you into his store
Like the nobleman welcomes his guest

With 6 teraflops and Oculus Rift support that helps you invest!
But beware of his games with gold
Plus two backwards compatible games with them
And on Fridays, theres crossplay with Xbox and Windows 10!
He loves Windows 10!
 
It's a prebuilt PC with much more convenience. I don't get how people can miss that. Do you expect 160 million people who bought a console last gen to be able to build themselves a PC although gaming was better there? Or that they only chose the consoles because of exclusives? And of course I got that but I don't think that you got the implications from that. Xbox is PC is Xbox now. Build a PC? Cool, MS customer. Buy the scorpio? Cool, MS customer. It is more or less the same platform. It seems that in your case, the Sony exclusives are just overly important and I think that doesn't apply to all gamers out there.


How can Scorpio be a PC if it will still remain a closed platform (with Xbox Live subs too)?

Quite contradictory, I'd say.
 
I wonder what developers will say now, many seemed angry with neo. Instead of 2 they must develope for 4 consoles.

We know how this works. They will work on the higher specs and just cut features and resolution until it barely runs on the lower spec.
 
The b3d post said "he didn't precise if it is Xbox One slim or Xbox Next", i'm not sure why anyone could think Xbox Next is possible release shortly later lol.

I don't think anyone thinks the Scorpio would release just after E3. I think there is a lot of confusion because of three SKUs. Xbox streamer, Xbox slim and Xbox Scorpio.

One leak says Scorpio will be announced at E3 and another in Spring 2017 but both agree release for late 2017...everyone is running round like headless chickens right now.
 
I also kind of think that if they market the scorpio as a successor to the Xbone, there might even be a bigger backlash than Neo. This gen is only just hitting its stride now, and I also don't think the leap looks particularly big as a console sequel.

The rumour is Xbox One will be forwards compatible. So this wouldn't be a new software gen.

Per EA's comments - and I guess just reasonable speculation - these new systems will be presented as offering tighter hardware iteration but longer software compatibility. That'll be the motivation for this that they'll be presenting.

That said... I think it'll be interesting to hear more specifics about MS's compatibility policy. Already with any VR software the original Xbox One will be left behind, presumably. Will Xbox One forward compatibility be watertight otherwise, for the duration of Scorpion's cycle at least?

That aside, I think it'll be interesting if either MS or Sony or both will choose to level with the audience in an explicit way about the more frequent nature of hardware updates beyond Neo and Scorpion, or will just leave it implied. I mean, will they stand up and set out a roadmap beyond these next boxes and say up front 'from now on, we're going to be iterating more tightly every 2-3 years rather than 5-6 on the hardware side, and this (Neo/Scorpion) is our new flagship for the next 2-3 years?' Or will the just try to keep the focus on one box at a time, and leave it unsaid that new frequest hardware will be the new norm.
 
I really doubt that MS will announce 'Scorpio' on E3, special event later this year or in early 2017 is more reasonable decision.
 
I don't think anyone thinks the Scorpio would release just after E3. I think there is a lot of confusion because of three SKUs. Xbox streamer, Xbox slim and Xbox Scorpio.

One leak says Scorpio will be announced at E3 and another in Spring 2017 but both agree release for late 2017...everyone is running round like headless chickens right now.

I know i just not sure what he add this part lol.

And personally i think people won't see Scorpio in this E3 if it will release at fall 2017, because they still have 2017 E3 to promo it.
 
Feeling mixed about PS4 Neo as compared to Scorpio it's a lukewarm update now :(

Feeling mixed about Xbox 2 as compared to PS5k

Feeling mixed about PS5k as compared to Xbox 3

Feeling mixed about iPhone 7 as compared to iPhone 8 as compared to iPhone 9 as compared to iPhone 10.. Guess I won't buy any phones or consoles ever again.
 
We know how this works. They will work on the higher specs and just cut features and resolution until it barely runs on the lower spec.

Giving the middle finger to the large majority of consumers who own a PS4/X1?

Yeah, that doesn't make any sense business-wise (in b4 Hyrule Warrior Legends).
 
I really doubt that MS will announce 'Scorpio' on E3, special event later this year or in early 2017 is more reasonable decision.

Yeah, announcing Scorpio around 1.5 years ahead of its release? Not gonna happen, it's not like Neo will release one day after E3 closes, if Sony reveals it there at all. And why would they want to shoot down One sales even more?

I don't believe that schedule for one second.
 
The rumour is Xbox One will be forwards compatible. So this wouldn't be a new software gen.

Per EA's comments - and I guess just reasonable speculation - these new systems will be presented as offering tighter hardware iteration but longer software compatibility. That'll be the motivation for this that they'll be presenting.

That said... I think it'll be interesting to hear more specifics about MS's compatibility policy. Already with any VR software the original Xbox One will be left behind, presumably. Will Xbox One forward compatibility be watertight otherwise, for the duration of Scorpion's cycle at least?

That aside, I think it'll be interesting if either MS or Sony or both will choose to level with the audience in an explicit way about the more frequent nature of hardware updates beyond Neo and Scorpion, or will just leave it implied. I mean, will they stand up and set out a roadmap beyond these next boxes and say up front 'from now on, we're going to be iterating more tightly every 2-3 years rather than 5-6 on the hardware side, and this (Neo/Scorpion) is our new flagship for the next 2-3 years?' Or will the just try to keep the focus on one box at a time, and leave it unsaid that new frequest hardware will be the new norm.

this is very important, because this Scorpio looks , compared to PS4-Neo differences, a much bigger jump, especially for XBO owners , almost a full generation ( 4 years and x4 power more or less) . It is all rumours now, but when they make an official announcement both, sony and MS need to be clear, since compatibility with previous and future games needs to be clear from day one
 
Feeling mixed about Xbox 2 as compared to PS5k

Feeling mixed about PS5k as compared to Xbox 3

Feeling mixed about iPhone 7 as compared to iPhone 8 as compared to iPhone 9 as compared to iPhone 10.. Guess I won't buy any phones or consoles ever again.

To be fair Neo and Scorpio are going to be around for the next 3.5 to 4 years before the next lot roll around, he's well within his rights to think that, especially with PS VR vs Oculus on the table.
 
That is a very small market. In any case, you can just as easily buy a pre-built PC and plug your Xbox controller into that. Are you seriously telling me that is too hard for the vast majority of people?

So I ask again, what is the selling point of this console other than slightly easier accessability? No unique games, not the most powerful, borrowed VR support, and all of that with all the disadvantages versus an open PC system where you can install Steam, Origin etc and upgrade yourself. This thing could be dead in the water if they don't tread carefully with the marketing, as people will quickly realise they can get a much better deal buying their own SFF PC.

Ehh yes? Not difficulty but effort and support. Id assume for vast majority of gamers, storing a box under your TV that takes care of itself is one of the main selling points.
 
I wonder what developers will say now, many seemed angry with neo. Instead of 2 they must develope for 4 consoles.

If MS are serious about having multi-tiered graphics in their games (which they seem to be), you can bet they will bundle a tool set with dev kits to automate the optimisation process for the various levels of hardware. In essence, it's no different to developing for PC.

Edit: I suppose one difference is that for the Xbox platform, devs need to cater for and test on a limited number of hardware variations as opposed to potentially hundreds for PCs. Is it as simple as I'm reading it? /shrug.
 
Giving the middle finger to the large majority of consumers who own a PS4/X1?

Yeah, that doesn't make any sense business-wise (in b4 Hyrule Warrior Legends).

And would they magically have had better graphics resolutions and effects on PS4/Xbone if the Neo & Scorpio didnt exist? Extraordinary...
 
Lastly, the thing is.. MS is such a huge company, with an immense financial warchest. Whether MS is "losing" or "winning" is totally up to MS themselves. They have the wealth to stear things at their direction. The only problem is focus. If MS can focus as they did with OG Xbox and to an extent 360, then it can be a successfull product.

So let´s see how VR will perform during next year and that will tell you how Scorpio will do..

lol
 
So you are saying that windows phone and xbox one are not doing well because there simply was not enough marketing?

There was a massive marketing push for xbox one and especially one for windows phone. The product didn't do well and now there is a small marketing push because that infinite warchest isn't so infinite and MS aren't that silly. There is a small marketing push now because they know the ROI is not there. I would say Windows phone failed badly because they failed to gain developer support for their app store, it had nothing to do with marketing and we know where xbox ones shortcomings were too.

Oh, so there was a massive marketing push for Xbox One in mainland Europe?
Please tell me more about this amazing marketing push, because any european I've talked with (excluding UK) have seen little to no marketing.

Here's a screenshot from Gamereactor Norway during the tier 2 Xbox One launch:
2YUN9b1.png
It says: We wish the new console welcome. If you clicked on on it would unveil the white PS4 with Destiny.

Here's another one from Denmark:
izRl2zk.jpg

"Welcome to the Game, Love Playstation" placed outside Microsofts HQ in Denmark.

The only way tier 2 has been exposed to the Xbox brand is through 3rd party deals like FIFA, Call of Duty or The Division.

I'm going to make this perfectly clear. How do you expect to sell your product to consumers if they don't know it exist?
 
So if the new Xbox was that powerful wouldn't it also need more ram. Doesn't sound like just a performance boost

Also see no reason why an elite console couldn't be very powerful, pricey. With a main system being 3 to 400.

I'm talking about a 600 dollar version for those of us what the full gaming experience
 
I know i just not sure what he add this part lol.

And personally i think people won't see Scorpio in this E3 if it will release at fall 2017, because they still have 2017 E3 to promo it.

I'm falling back toward my initial response after Patrick Klepeks exclusive Neo article i.e. it didn't make much sense. Then the retail leaks that made even less sense.

Then on top of that a lot of people here and elsewhere are adamant no upgraded consoles will be even mentioned at E3. At least Phil has said he will be telling their "story" at E3 even though it might shoot down all the leaks...
 
To be fair Neo and Scorpio are going to be around for the next 3.5 to 4 years before the next lot roll around, he's well within his rights to think that, especially with PS VR vs Oculus on the table.

I think 3 years is more likely. 2 is even possible if neither wants to spend too long playing second fiddle to other.

And if Neo precedes Scorpion by a year, it could well be only shortly after Scorpion's launch - relatively - before we start hearing rumblings about the next PS iteration.

The idea that you could wind up in endless procrastination if you think too much about what's around the corner in 12-18 months isn't all that far fetched really.

this is very important, because this Scorpio looks , compared to PS4-Neo differences, a much bigger jump, especially for XBO owners , almost a full generation ( 4 years and x4 power more or less)

4x power isn't really a full jump. 8x is more like the norm. This would be a pretty expected mid-gen improvement. The larger gap with XB1 might make things a little more interesting but hopefully MS is clear about compatibility policies.... it doesn't necessarily have to be a problem, the extra power here can easily be spent on dialling up the same existing games rather than requiring a new baseline.
 
I'll wait on the edge of my seat to see how powerful these consoles are however I'm pretty much converted now to PC gaming. I genuinely never thought I'd write that at the start of this year.
 
I think 3 years is more likely. 2 is even possible if neither wants to spend too long playing second fiddle to other.

And if Neo precedes Scorpion by a year, it could well be only shortly after Scorpion's launch - relatively - before we hear about the next PS iteration.

The idea that you could wind up in endless procrastination if you think too much about what's around the corner in 12-18 months isn't all that far fetched really.


To be honest. I think with the end of traditional generations I think it's the end of the head to head, the bringing out the new console within weeks or months of each other.

It'll be each to their own and if one brings another out a year or 2 later that is more powerful, then the second place customers know their new more powerful box is just around the corner. It's a very comfortable position for customers and manufactures to be in, I'd say.

But are we talking like 16gb

And?
 
To be honest. I think with the end of traditional generations I think it's the end of the head to head, the bringing out the new console within weeks or months of each other.

It'll be each to their own and if one brings another out a year or 2 later that is more powerful, then the second place customers know their new more powerful box is just around the corner. It's a very comfortable position for customers and manufactures to be in, I'd say.



And?

Yep, agree with this
 
Oh, so there was a massive marketing push for Xbox One in mainland Europe?
Please tell me more about this amazing marketing push, because any european I've talked with (excluding UK) have seen little to no marketing.

Here's a screenshot from Gamereactor Norway during the tier 2 Xbox One launch:

It says: We wish the new console welcome. If you clicked on on it would unveil the white PS4 with Destiny.

Here's another one from Denmark:
izRl2zk.jpg

"Welcome to the Game, Love Playstation" placed outside Microsofts HQ in Denmark.

The only way tier 2 has been exposed to the Xbox brand is through 3rd party deals like FIFA, Call of Duty or The Division.

I'm going to make this perfectly clear. How do you expect to sell your product to consumers if they don't know it exist?

I think Microsoft saw the writing on the wall with Xbox One outside of the US and UK. The messy message, tier 2, the European HQ shake up, PS4 on fire. They played it safe while they fixed their mess. Anyone could see they were screwed 100% and the return wasn't worth it then.

This E3, new products, new era will show if they have changed their tune for the rest of the world. They can't be so passive again and have no excuse.
 
If Nintendo just makes Nintendo games with basic controller support. On par power with ps4 and at 250. They would do more than fine.

Issue is they won't do any of that

They will be too weak, too pricey and too many gimmicks on hardware and games, very unfortunate

My feeling for Nintendo games hasn't been the same since gamecube, as are a lot of people
 
And would they magically have had better graphics resolutions and effects on PS4/Xbone if the Neo & Scorpio didnt exist? Extraordinary...

At least they'd have well-optimized games on their console instead of bad ports and a pressing wish to become a PC gamer already/quit all this console nonsense.
 
To be honest. I think with the end of traditional generations I think it's the end of the head to head, the bringing out the new console within weeks or months of each other.

It'll be each to their own and if one brings another out a year or 2 later that is more powerful, then the second place customers know their new more powerful box is just around the corner. It's a very comfortable position for customers and manufactures to be in, I'd say.

Yeah, I sort of agree.

If you absolutely need the latest and greatest always, I can see the potential for ongoing performance anxiety.

However, on the other hand, I think for most this would 'disarm' the hardware superiority question... it will never be too long, depending on their platform of choice, before they can get something better again. Users can pick the upgrade cycle that suits them (e.g. maybe every second iteration of a given platform, or maybe even every 3rd if they want something like a traditional 6or7-yearly upgrade schedule), skip intervening ones, as they often do already with other hardware.
 
Yeah, I sort of agree.

If you absolutely need the latest and greatest always, I can see the potential for ongoing performance anxiety.

However, on the other hand, I think for most this would 'disarm' the hardware superiority question... it will never be too long, depending on their platform of choice, before they can get something better again. Users can pick the upgrade cycle that suits them (e.g. maybe every second iteration of a given platform, or maybe even every 3rd if they want something like a traditional upgrade schedule), skip intervening ones, as they often do already with other hardware.


Could this mean the end of the console wars?????


Nevvvaaarrrr....!!!111!1!!

At least they'd have well-optimized games on their console instead of bad ports and a pressing wish to become a PC gamer already/quit all this console nonsense.

You seem to have a very bleak outlook... It might not be all doom and gloom, The X1 & PS4 are still closed boxes. Nothing is going to change there.
 
6 TFLOP releasing in 2017, isn't it basically than the 9th console generation? wasn't the jump from 360 to xbone about the same ? this time in only 4 year´s instead of 8, that´s a pretty big jump in performance.
 
6 TFLOP releasing in 2017, isn't it basically than the 9th console generation? wasn't the jump from 360 to xbone about the same ? this time in only 4 year´s instead of 8, that´s a pretty big jump in performance.

You could market it like a brand new 9th generation

Or market it like the Xbone+

I think Microsoft would be wise to completely rebrand, I think Sony might stick with the successful PS4 name

We're going to be stuck in some 8.5th gen limbo
 
6 TFLOP releasing in 2017, isn't it basically than the 9th console generation? wasn't the jump from 360 to xbone about the same ? this time in only 4 year´s instead of 8, that´s a pretty big jump in performance.
I was just thinking the same thing.

Xbox 360 to Xbox One was 240 to 1300 gigaflops, right?

5x jump vs 4x jump isn't that much of a difference.
 
I think Microsoft saw the writing on the wall with Xbox One outside of the US and UK. The messy message, tier 2, the European HQ shake up, PS4 on fire. They played it safe while they fixed their mess. Anyone could see they were screwed 100% and the return wasn't worth it then.

This E3, new products, new era will show if they have changed their tune for the rest of the world. They can't be so passive again and have no excuse.

So they decided to give PlayStation a freebie while at the same they time devalue their Xbox brand.

Sounds like solid strategy.
 
Top Bottom