Brexit |OT| UK Referendum on EU Membership - 23 June 2016

Did you vote for the side that is going to win?


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
This is going to be an amazing shit storm either way it goes Thursday night. Cant wait.

Still feel like Labour has been no where to be seen for the entire campaign. Useless Corbyn

Surely they are learning their lessons from the Scottish referendum?

If they go all in one way they instantly piss off about 45-55% of voters
 
I am for remain, but whatever way it goes I would hope this puts this debate to a rest for at least a few decades. We can't keep holding referendums, that's way more destabilising than just accepting the result and moving on.
 
I am for remain, but whatever way it goes I would hope this puts this debate to a rest for at least a few decades. We can't keep holding referendums, that's way more destabilising than just accepting the result and moving on.


Yeah but sadly I think it's going to be a growing phenomenon, keeps the press in work etc.
 
some guy on radio 5 was saying this morning that DC reforms (specifically the benefit ones) might not be opposed by other states but they will get taking to court (ECJ) and may get ruled against

any credence in that?
 
Oh I think it's a given a second referendum will occur after all we will be offered a choice by Europe and ultimately I think it will be put to a referendum, I don't think it's a great idea to be honest given the mess of this one but I think it will and it's probably the right move, I may be wrong but and Britain might be very different by then anyway so it's hard to tell.
Wonder what the question will be in that case. Because if they give multiple options to leave and one to remain after all, the leave vote will split and remain will win probably.

some guy on radio 5 was saying this morning that DC reforms (specifically the benefit ones) might not be opposed by other states but they will get taking to court (ECJ) and may get ruled against

any credence in that?
http://www.google.com

It's a useful site for research.
 
some guy on radio 5 was saying this morning that DC reforms (specifically the benefit ones) might not be opposed by other states but they will get taking to court (ECJ) and may get ruled against

any credence in that?

Seriously? You are still doing this despite being called on it repeatedly by numerous posters in this thread?

The child benefit laws were taken to court. Last week the court said that it was lawful for the Uk to withhold benefits.

Literally the first find on google.
 
Can we have pointless referendums to keep the people that keep wanting them occupied? Like "What should be the national dish?" so DIRECT DEMOCRACY is here... it's just pointless.
 
Seriously? You are still doing this despite being called on it repeatedly by numerous posters in this thread?

The child benefit laws were taken to court. Last week the court said that it was lawful for the Uk to withhold benefits.

Literally the first find on google.

He gave a source.

Some guy on radio 5.
 
Did anyone here the newsbeat interview with a guy (Wade) working in Zante?

He said he wanted to leave because all the migrants coming over here and taking our jobs, when challenged on the irony of him working in Greece, he said, well, they just come over to England and sit around and claim benefits.

Beggers belief that there are people like that out there.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b07f28zb

Starts about 8mins in.

See, here's where my intolerance gland starts throbbing.

I'm all for better political education/a better press (however the hell we get that). But at the same time, I'm tempted to say to people like Wade 'fuck off, no vote for you until you fucking take some responsibility for your thoughts'.

We'd all be fucked if that happened, naturally, but still, the gland, she strong...
 
some guy on radio 5 was saying this morning that DC reforms (specifically the benefit ones) might not be opposed by other states but they will get taking to court (ECJ) and may get ruled against

any credence in that?

You really are making this thread a lot worse. Please stop.
 
CleeMowWkAAdevu.jpg


Is this real?
 
Can we have pointless referendums to keep the people that keep wanting them occupied? Like "What should be the national dish?" so DIRECT DEMOCRACY is here... it's just pointless.

Go big or go home.

What's your favourite colour?

Please record the correct RGB code:

I should become a comedian and only do jokes with referendums as a punchline.
 
Speaking of the map posted earlier in this thread and growing up poor, I can say that there are a few reasons why people are voting to leave:

1) Lack of personal contact with immigrants. What I mean by that is a lot of people outside of cities hear stories about immigration, but rarely engage with immigrants themselves... It really does dehumanise a lot of people.

2) There is a genuine problem with unskilled immigration. I have never actually experienced this myself, but I can certainly see older members of my family who once only worked with British employees now working with far more eastern european ones. Is this a good thing or a bad thing? That's your choice, but that increasing sense of marginalisation on the bottom of the work ladder in incredibly real. That leads me onto...

3) Poverty. Just outside my city are the South Wales Valleys. The level of impoverishment in parts of Wales has to be seen to be believed. Whether it is rational or not, the EU is a system in which these poor areas operate. Naturally, in a system that doesn't work for the poor and unemployed, they are going to push back against that system and look towards something new. Incidentally, Wales itself recieves a lot of funding and development programs from the EU, but even then the protest vote is very real.
 
The question on Thursday is simply whether or not the UK should Leave the EU. There's nothing in there about on what terms we should Leave. I think that if it is a Leave vote, the negotiations should take place and then return the question to the British public - "how about this?"

I'm really curious how could this work. Because the British negotiators have really no mandate if Leave wins.

Maybe hold GE and send Farage to negotiate afterwards. Also the fight between BJ and Farage in the follow-up GE will be spectacular.

And let's say that UK negotiate for 3-4 years with EU and reach some kind of agreement and then makes a referendum for this agreement and it's voted against. Then what?
 
Seriously? You are still doing this despite being called on it repeatedly by numerous posters in this thread?

The child benefit laws were taken to court. Last week the court said that it was lawful for the Uk to withhold benefits.

Literally the first find on google.

I knew that, I am referring to working tax credits...this challenge is about right of residence, nothing to do with blocking working tax credits, it specifically states this

The Polish government and others are expected to challenge Cameron’s emergency brake mechanism, under which new EU migrants will be denied access to in-work welfare benefits and tax credits during their first four years in the UK.

so getting of your high horse wont hurt

http://www.theguardian.com/law/2016...back-uk-limits-migrants-access-child-benefits
 
Incidentally, Wales itself recieves a lot of funding and development programs from the EU, but even then the protest vote is very real.

That's the really sad part. If it wasn't for the EU, areas like Merthyr would have been left to rot. Good luck getting Westminster (especially a tory government) to give a shit about those areas.
 
See, here's where my intolerance gland starts throbbing.

I'm all for better political education/a better press (however the hell we get that). But at the same time, I'm tempted to say to people like Wade 'fuck off, no vote for you until you fucking take some responsibility for your thoughts'.

We'd all be fucked if that happened, naturally, but still, the gland, she strong...

But he said he WASN'T racist before he started, so that negates any bad feeling.
 
Why don't you stop replying then, no one forces you to read my posts, or forces you to be in this thread on that matter

It would be easier for us all if you'd spent a couple of minutes on Google before you post about things you've heard but aren't sure if they're true.
 
That's the really sad part. If it wasn't for the EU, areas like Merthyr would have been left to rot. Good luck getting Westminster (especially a tory government) to give a shit about those areas.

Yup. A lot of anti-EU stuff is really, I reckon, about anti-a-certain-kind-of-capitalism. The EU is another paradigm in which that capitalism lives and breathes. I don't know if we'd have a better kind within, or without, but the point is that question isn't really being asked, although some think it is. By saying no to Brussels you aren't saying no to austerity, for instance. Not really. Yet some kind of answer to this is clearly wanted and needed by people in Lincolnshire, Wales, Cornwall...

tldr: come the fuck on, Labour and the social democratic left across Europe.
 
It would be easier for us all if you'd spent a couple of minutes on Google before you post about things you've heard but aren't sure if they're true.

I quote

The Polish government and others are expected to challenge Cameron’s emergency brake mechanism, under which new EU migrants will be denied access to in-work welfare benefits and tax credits during their first four years in the UK.

http://www.theguardian.com/law/2016...back-uk-limits-migrants-access-child-benefits

but of course that does not fit you and the others agenda, sticking your head in the sand over this 'all things are great' with the EU, lets shout down anyone who dares to disagree is nonsense and actually makes you look worse than leave voters

my question was fully valid and correct....and oh look it is going to get challenged, but of course you guys dont want to hear that
 
Why don't you stop replying then, no one forces you to read my posts, or forces you to be in this thread on that matter

That's not how a forum works. You constantly derail the thread by carpet-bombing it with posts of unsourced BS.

but of course that does not fit you and the others who want to criticise 'remains' mantra, sticking your head in the sand over this 'all things are great' with the EU, lets shout down anyone who dares to disagree is nonsense and actually makes you look worse than leave voters

Still claiming you're the only pro-Brexit poster in the thread?
 
I quote



http://www.theguardian.com/law/2016...back-uk-limits-migrants-access-child-benefits

but of course that does not fit you and the others agenda, sticking your head in the sand over this 'all things are great' with the EU, lets shout down anyone who dares to disagree is nonsense and actually makes you look worse than leave voters

my question was fully valid and correct....and oh look it is going to get challenged, but of course you guys dont want to hear that

I quote (from the headline of that article)

"EU court to back UK limits on migrants' access to child benefits
European court of justice set to throw out challenge by European commission over right to residence requirement"
 
I quote

http://www.theguardian.com/law/2016...back-uk-limits-migrants-access-child-benefits

but of course that does not fit you and the others agenda, sticking your head in the sand over this 'all things are great' with the EU, lets shout down anyone who dares to disagree is nonsense and actually makes you look worse than leave voters

my question was fully valid and correct....and oh look it is going to get challenged, but of course you guys dont want to hear that
I quote

An attempt by the European commission to challenge Britain’s right to deny some EU migrants access to child benefit and child tax credits is expected to be thrown out by European judges.

The ruling from the European court of justice is expected to confirm that Britain can insist that only EU citizens with a lawful “right of residence” in the UK can claim social security benefits.
What's the issue exactly? Poland trying to get the most for its citizens? Are you also complaining if the UK challenges EU rules that are against British interest?
 
I quote (from the headline of that article)

"EU court to back UK limits on migrants' access to child benefits
European court of justice set to throw out challenge by European commission over right to residence requirement"

and?

also in the article

“But there are no guarantees that this will last forever, and future judgments may go against the UK.
 
I quote


What's the issue exactly? Poland trying to get the most for its citizens? Are you also complaining of the UK challenges EU rules that are against British interest?

No, I am saying Cameron claiming the referendum is based on a reformed EU, but he can not say that as all the changes (benefit wise) can and will be challenged, so if one gets overturned the basis for the referendum is null and void
 
No, I am saying Cameron claiming the referendum is based on a reformed EU, but he can not say that as all the changes (benefit wise) can and will be challenged, so if one gets overturned the basis for the referendum is null and void
Again, so what? Countries have the right to challenge EU rulings. You should be happy about this! Britain can do exactly the same then if they think an EU decision is against their citizens interest.
 
We are going to use hypothetical future rulings now as a reason for outrage? What is your point exactly here?

well remain and leave are using hypothetical to get your vote, but now it is not allowed?

do you think your 500 experts you remain lot keep rolling out every page really know what will happen
 
well remain and leave are using hypothetical to get your vote, but now it is not allowed?

do you think your 500 experts you remain lot keep rolling out every page really know what will happen
In those cases people have looked at the numbers and make a reasonable prediction about the outcome. We know the trade numbers, the income and outcome of money and can reasonably say "this will have a negative impact."

That is totally different then saying "well, in 10 years, maybe the court will decide differently!"
 
I am for remain, but whatever way it goes I would hope this puts this debate to a rest for at least a few decades. We can't keep holding referendums, that's way more destabilising than just accepting the result and moving on.

I imagine tension will be present with common folk for a good while no matter which way the vote goes.
 
well remain and leave are using hypothetical to get your vote, but now it is not allowed?

do you think your 500 experts you remain lot keep rolling out every page really know what will happen


"You remain lot" , that's nice and erm these experts spend years in education and gaining experience in their fields, better than old Jim down the pig and whistle for sure lol who is more experienced on how many pork scratchings you get in a packet than economic matters.
 
well remain and leave are using hypothetical to get your vote, but now it is not allowed?

do you think your 500 experts you remain lot keep rolling out every page really know what will happen

Careful, your true colours are starting to show now. Got to keep that anti-intellectual streak under wraps!

Random hypothetical about a possible future that almost certainly won't happen, versus basically the entirety of the worlds finance and economics community saying the same thing. Totally the same thing!
 
well remain and leave are using hypothetical to get your vote, but now it is not allowed?

do you think your 500 experts you remain lot keep rolling out every page really know what will happen

Remain on the whole have actually talked figures and facts. Not what ifs and our their arses, oh no the immigrants are coming. Take back control.

Basically the most right wing Tory since Thatcher is telling us it will be a dumb idea.

The wholw world is watching and waiting because what we do will have a knock on effect
 
Again, so what? Countries have the right to challenge EU rulings. You should be happy about this! Britain can do exactly the same then if they think an EU decision is against their citizens interest.
It's quite astounding the amount of people that don't understand that this is a two way street.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom