Brexit |OT| UK Referendum on EU Membership - 23 June 2016

Did you vote for the side that is going to win?


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
What do they need to explain ?


They have to explain why one of the people picked to represent them and ask questions was lying. This was an audience specifically selected by both sides so it was even, he got on national TV and point blank lied, I expect they should at least distance themselves from him, don't you or is it okay to be so dishonest in such an important arena.


Oh and here he is campaigning for vote leave......

https://mobile.twitter.com/sturdyAlex/status/745368221591674882/photo/1
 
They have to explain why one of the people picked to represent them and ask questions was lying. This was an audience specifically selected by both sides so it was even, he got on national TV and point blank lied, I expect they should at least distance themselves from him, don't you or is it okay to be so dishonest in such an important arena.

They most likely selected people on the simple basis of if they are voting IN or OUT doubt very much employment background checks were involved, they have nothing to explain. Only person with some explaining to do is that bloke.
 
Is this thing on Farm subsidies actually true?

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jun/21/waste-cash-leavers-in-out-land-subsidie

I’m talking about farm subsidies. If the Brexiters have raised the subject at all, it’s only to assure recipients that these vast sums will continue to be extracted from taxpayers’ pockets if Britain leaves.

...


This racket is perhaps the strongest of all arguments for leaving the European Union, but the Brexiters’ silence resounds. Among the 13 Conservative MPs who signed an open letter last week undertaking not to cut subsidies for owning or leasing land if Britain leaves the union was Iain Duncan Smith. His wife’s family’s estate, on which he lives, receives £150,000 a year of your money, handed to them by the EU.

...

Hold on – I’ve just thought of one. Paul Dacre, editor-in-chief of the Daily Mail – which rails ceaselessly against other misuses of EU funds, real or imagined – has extracted £460,000 in European subsidies since 2011. How? By owning a shooting estate in Scotland and a tract of land in Sussex.

If true then yeah. This is orthogonal to the EU debate as it would probably be kept in place if the country left, but still, not great. (I'm not even saying whether or not Farmers should get subsidies, but at least make sure actual farmers are receiving them!)
 
Check out the Poll on that page:

"Do you trust Economic Experts Who Are Warning Against Brexit?"

62% of voters in that poll do not trust the Experts. Truly a terrible time to assess the intelligence of British People.

Well, what would they know? They've only dedicated their professional career to a particular subject. I could totally reckon something more accurate than them.

There's a lot of thick people out there and almost all of them think they know best. It's quite scary.
 
Well, what would they know? They've only dedicated their professional career to a particular subject. I could totally reckon something more accurate than them.

There's a lot of thick people out there and almost all of them think they know best. It's quite scary.

its why I am scared, sometimes we underestimate just the sheer amount of ignorant and clueless people there are out there
 
Is this thing on Farm subsidies actually true?

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jun/21/waste-cash-leavers-in-out-land-subsidie



If true then yeah. This is orthogonal to the EU debate as it would probably be kept in place if the country left, but still, not great. (I'm not even saying whether or not Farmers should get subsidies, but at least make sure actual farmers are receiving them!)

It is. I have a personal enmity towards the EU as my grandfather was a lifelong crofter and he got royally screwed as his (vastly larger) competition received massive subsidies while he barely scraped by and saw the value of his crop decline year-on-year (to the point where by the end it was essentially a hobby and he made more money by watching his fields go up in value than by selling raspberries). As I understand it, the EU subsidies made a certain degree of sense in France, but they grossly distorted the market elsewhere. I imagine something similar is happening today in Romania, judging by Monbiot's piece.

Doesn't affect the vote as such since the leave campaign have pledged to protect the subsidies (of course they did).
 
Dunno if this was posted yet...

EU referendum: More than 1,280 business leaders sign letter

More than 1,280 executives, including directors from 51 FTSE 100 companies, have signed a letter backing the UK's membership of the EU.

The Remain camp said the letter to the Times showed "unprecedented" support from across business and finance.

Many signatories have already expressed support, but Remain said new names include Sir John Parker from Anglo American, and Barclays' John McFarlane.

Companies on the list employ 1.75 million people, Remain said.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-36592782

...filthy goddamn business experts.
 
Good vid that. Covers a lot of concerns I have, and some I'd not considered.

Maybe I shouldn't be so complacent (although, to be frank, it's not like I'm politically active outside of voting anyway), but I don't quite share Jones' sense of urgency given that the polls seem to show a slight victory for Remain (and that most people whose jobs involve reading the polls, such as market traders and bookmakers, seem to agree with that).

Admittedly, the FT's poll of polls does have leave on 51% and remain on 49%, but even that doesn't concern me much. Plus, I don't find his comparison with Clinton's experience in the US election campaign so convincing. Certainly, the popularity of both Trump and Sanders is evidence of reactionary politics at work, but Sanders is now supporting Clinton and Trump seems to be a less credible threat to her with each passing day - it's not as if Trump seems to be standing any chance of winning in the general election!

(And, I guess, even at the best of times I really don't like Owen Jones.)
 
Well, what would they know? They've only dedicated their professional career to a particular subject. I could totally reckon something more accurate than them.

There's a lot of thick people out there and almost all of them think they know best. It's quite scary.

Brother economics is one of the quackiest pseudosciences out there. Alan Greenspan totally predicted the 2008 recession. Top economists literally have no merit when it comes to big macroeconomic predictions. Literally none.

UK economy will take a short speculative dip if they leave, but will be fine in the long run. It is a matter of how much autonomy they want over their own government.
 
Brother economics is one of the quackiest pseudosciences out there. Alan Greenspan totally predicted the 2008 recession. Top economists literally have no merit when it comes to big macroeconomic predictions. Literally none.

UK economy will take a short speculative dip if they leave, but will be fine in the long run. It is a matter of how much autonomy they want over their own government.
I've got some words for you, but I fear they'd get me banned, so I'll just put you on my Ignore List instead. Fucking dog whistles.
 
Owen Jones on Brexit

Has this been posted already?



When you're a Tory it does.

I do like the point he makes about anti establishmentism and how naive it is to think that "Taking back control" equates to individuals in this country actually having control, regardless of what happens there will still be a gulf between those with power and the system that keeps them in power and the working classes.

I think its one of the leave points that has irked me slightly is that some people, and I say some, are trying to turn this into a different issue than what it is.
 
The little shit must have hid my polling card. I hope my local authority has no problem telling me where my polling station is without hours of waiting in line.

Leavers do what it takes I guess.

:P

Maybe I just lost it.
 
Wow, this country is really having a meltdown.

Worrying thing is, whichever way it goes on Friday there will be a large and pissed off section of the British public.

Civil war anyone?
 
Any chance this will turn out like the scottish referendum and the "silent majority" shows up and the leave campaign is just more of the vocal minority?
 
Brother economics is one of the quackiest pseudosciences out there. Alan Greenspan totally predicted the 2008 recession. Top economists literally have no merit when it comes to big macroeconomic predictions. Literally none.

UK economy will take a short speculative dip if they leave, but will be fine in the long run. It is a matter of how much autonomy they want over their own government.

This kind of bullshit being pushed as a legitimate opinion by politicians during this poll is the worst thing.

Stupid people (nope. Not gonna mince words) who believe this might be about to doom the country.
 
Sure, our economy will be affected for the worse for an unspecified amount of time and to an unspecified degree. But after this, it will be better than it was before!
How exactly does voting leave achieve this?
Do these people also not realise the EU will have a legitimate reason to discriminate against the UK? You will essentially have the world's largest trading block - right at your doorstep - competing against you trying its best to prove to its member states that leaving the EU is a bad thing.
 
Sure, our economy will be affected for the worse for an unspecified amount of time and to an unspecified degree. But after this, it will be better than it was before!
How exactly does voting leave achieve this?
Do these people also not realise the EU will have a legitimate reason to discriminate against the UK? You will essentially have the world's largest trading block - right at your doorstep - competing against you trying its best to prove to its member states that leaving the EU is a bad thing.

Because Norway!
 
It's times like this when I realise that democracy is an incredibly flawed model of Government.

You have thousands of experts doing hours of research into the economic repercussions of Be it or Brechin and when presented to the general public, folks go "yeah but Boris Johnson is funny so now I don't believe the experts"

I think time and time again we have proven that, probably the majority, of people don't actually understand all of the arguments, benefits and downsides of either outcome.

They should do a test beforehand for your vote to count to prove that you actually have a Scrooby what you are voting for.
 
Yeah. If we actually relied on 'the people' in democracy for important decisions, rather than the expert politicians hired for that job (hang on a minute...) we'd probably still be burning witches at the stake.
 
Yeah. If we actually relied on 'the people' in democracy for important decisions, rather than the expert politicians hired for that job (hang on a minute...) we'd probably still be burning witches at the stake.

Oh I'm not for a minute saying I trust the politicians, if they actually did their job folks would actually be informed on what we are voting for.
 
Remain or Leave, I get the feeling a hell of a lot of people are voting tomorrow either way through fear or having been scared into doing so rather than having been legitimately convinced of an argument.

Cynicism aside, thats not a great way of winning.
 
It's times like this when I realise that democracy is an incredibly flawed model of Government.

You have thousands of experts doing hours of research into the economic repercussions of Be it or Brechin and when presented to the general public, folks go "yeah but Boris Johnson is funny so now I don't believe the experts"

I think time and time again we have proven that, probably the majority, of people don't actually understand all of the arguments, benefits and downsides of either outcome.

They should do a test beforehand for your vote to count to prove that you actually have a Scrooby what you are voting for.

Yeah. If we actually relied on 'the people' in democracy for important decisions, rather than the expert politicians hired for that job (hang on a minute...) we'd probably still be burning witches at the stake.


This is exactly why you need the EU. People in masses voting is unreliable at best. You need to have informed democracy in key parts of governing. MEP's vote for what happens in the EU. The EU is essentially then run as a massive coalition government with various MEP's arguing for and compromising with each other.

And this is why Gove et al. are against it, because they want final say of legislation in Britain.
 
I think people should be quietly left to think about this.

It's useless to say people on either side are stupid. They merely process the world differenly.

There are 420million+ people outside the UK who have no say on what happens to our collective Union. And it was only today, that this hit me.

So do think carefully about whether you want to Remain or not.

I am for Remain. But that has been true from when I first sat down to think about all this.
 
Explaining isn't their thing.

The EU is a shit house of high unemployment and squeezed out smaller economies.

I haven't seen any explanation how that's going to be sorted either. Probably because their isn't one as long as Germany and France is happy with the current economic arrangements.
 
This is exactly why you need the EU. People in masses voting is unreliable at best. You need to have informed democracy in key parts of governing. MEP's vote for what happens in the EU. The EU is essentially then run as a massive coalition government with various MEP's arguing for and compromising with each other.

And this is why Gove et al. are against it, because they want final say of legislation in Britain.


Oh yeah, I absolutely agree. I certainly don't need any convincing to stay in. If nothing else, so we don't kill science in the country.

Had to go to Paris last week for work, and discussed with my collaborators there to check that potentially leaving wasn't about to fuck up my phd that I'm coming to the end of, which couldn't have happened without the ease of EU collaborative works.

But as team leave says, expert opinions are worthless. But better pop down the pub and get a real opinion
 
No, but a shitload of people could end up losing their jobs or finding themselves struggling to make ends meet... which frankly feels like the end of the world.

Looking at the EU economy that could happen either way, only problem is if the EU economy really goes down the shitter (more than it is at the moment) we have no way of looking to the rest of the world to find new business.
 
They should do a test beforehand for your vote to count to prove that you actually have a Scrooby what you are voting for.

'People aren't voting the way I want, so we should ban them from voting '

What is it with this casual flirting with authoritarianism in this thread?
 
The EU is a shit house of high unemployment and squeezed out smaller economies.

I haven't seen any explanation how that's going to be sorted either. Probably because their isn't one as long as Germany and France is happy with the current economic arrangements.

But we're part of the EU. We've got record employment levels.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom