dave is ok
aztek is ok
Goddamn Bernie, forcing Hillary to appeal to young liberals instead of pivoting back to the center. What an asshole.
Chuck Todd defending himself on Twitter
Chuck Todd defending himself on Twitter
As someone in the LGBT spectrum, I didn't take it as a joke myself. I'm not going to 'rant' up and down about this but that's ridiculous language. " a good gay", as opposed to what?
How about not publicly posting thousands of illegally obtained emails that contain sensitive personal info?Yeah they could've wrote a simple algorithm to sift out social security numbers from every email. /sigh
To help a candidate on the other side that is basically Putin's dream no less.It's pretty cool seeing Wikileaks doing stuff that benefits the Russian intelligence apparatus. Good look, guys. Good look.
Goddamn Bernie, forcing Hillary to appeal to young liberals instead of pivoting back to the center. What an asshole.
Goddamn Bernie, forcing Hillary to appeal to young liberals instead of pivoting back to the center. What an asshole.
Goddamn Bernie, forcing Hillary to appeal to young liberals instead of pivoting back to the center. What an asshole.
Chuck Todd defending himself on Twitter
Well, that IS an approved narrativeAs long as we can all agree that the Sander's campaign was a disorganized mess as well.
It's like when black people joke amongst themselves that someone is "one of the good ones".
Just saw this one. Not surprised since all candidates seem to do it. Wonder how many shills (Hillary or otherwise) are lurking about?
![]()
How about not posting thousands of illegally obtained emails that contain sensitive personal info?
So you will stop mocking the narrative that the DNC was working against Bernie the entire time? You know, what Sanders supporters have been complaining about all along?
Though I already do see some people try to argue why it was okay for them to have done so.
I mean the goal of the site is too release illegally obtained documents, hence why it's called wikileaks.
I do think it's scummy, and I don't like the sites changes to be pro-russia, but I like the place existing for people like Snowden and such who can whistleblow events. You kind of take the good with the bad I guess. It sucks for those people though, but if they are sending credit card details and SSN #'s through emails, I doubt wikileaks is the only place where this stuff is readily available
I still don't see the joke here. It's insulting and divisive. That's the only way I can see it.
I have never seen such a boring pointless leak.
I still don't see the joke there.
Wha...?
This could fucking potentially ruin countless lives. This isn't some minor slip- People's address, name, and SS# are plastered all over the fucking internet now.
One thing I noticed about this is that it's from late April--when Bernie had basically lost already--and treats Clinton as the presumptive nominee.
The e-mail chains about the campaign's incompetence and the "no shit" e-mail chain about religion baiting that they didn't do proving they were against Sanders "all along" are from May, well after this message where they view Sanders as actively hurting the eventual Dem nominee.
Is there damning stuff from actually early on, like before he was mathematically not a real contender?
Wha...?
This could fucking potentially ruin countless lives. This isn't some minor slip- People's address, name, and SS# are plastered all over the fucking internet now.
and the question that should be asked is why people are sending their SSN# through email, and also, peoples names and address are really not that big of a deal considering it's probably already plastered all over the internet already
Im not defending wikileaks for doing this, but you take the good with the bad, and I doubt this will "ruin lives." This will be a major inconvenience for a lot of people, but there are steps involved for rectifying it.
It's self-deprecating humor about your own identity and stereotypes.I still don't see the joke here. It's insulting and divisive. That's the only way I can see it.
Kathy Griffin is a comedienne with a huge gay following.
The person they are talking about is obviously a gay person.
He's talking, in jest, that if the person is a good gay (ie. likes things that gay men might stereotypically like), then they'd appreciate the picture with Kathy Griffin. It's obviously ironic and not a real statement on the meaning how gayness manifests itself into the world. You're allowed to have jokes like this within your community playing with your own stereotypes.
It require context, probably a relationship between these two people, and an understanding of their own humor. It's not haha funny, but it's not supposed to be, and I understand what this person is going for. If you don't, I'm sorry, but this is also maybe not a joke for you.
I still don't see the joke here. It's insulting and divisive. That's the only way I can see it.
I can take things as a joke just fine. Language like that doesn't come across as a joke to me, regardless of how it's said or who it comes from.
and the question that should be asked is why people are sending their SSN# through email, and also, peoples names and address are really not that big of a deal considering it's probably already plastered all over the internet already
Im not defending wikileaks for doing this, but you take the good with the bad, and I doubt this will "ruin lives." This will be a major inconvenience for a lot of people, but there are steps involved for rectifying it.
Except Snowden didn't publish through WikiLeaks, but through actual journalists.I mean the goal of the site is too release illegally obtained documents, hence why it's called wikileaks.
I do think it's scummy, and I don't like the sites changes to be pro-russia, but I like the place existing for people like Snowden and such who can whistleblow events. You kind of take the good with the bad I guess. It sucks for those people though, but if they are sending credit card details and SSN #'s through emails, I doubt wikileaks is the only place where this stuff is readily available
Yeah, if nothing else comes out of these emails - they certainly solidify that the DNC was actively working against one of their own candidates
It's self-deprecating humor about your own identity and stereotypes.
Kathy Griffin is a comedienne with a huge gay following.
The person they are talking about is obviously a gay person.
He's talking, in jest, that if the person is a good gay (ie. likes things that gay men might stereotypically like), then they'd appreciate the picture with Kathy Griffin. It's obviously ironic and not a real statement on the meaning how gayness manifests itself into the world. You're allowed to have jokes like this within your community playing with your own stereotypes.
It require context, probably a relationship between these two people, and an understanding of their own humor. It's not haha funny, but it's not supposed to be, and I understand what this person is going for. If you don't, I'm sorry, but this is also maybe not a joke for you.
It most definitely isn't if they cannot get their head around this.
You're effectively eavesdropping on a private conversation of a gay person using slightly sarcastic humor. This is such a non-issue and I feel like you're reaching here, Ekai.
Oh, so US currency?you avatar quote in jest, but i am making six figures* shilling on the internet
*in imaginary money
They did this WAY too early to have an impact since there's nothing particularly damning in here. The RNConvention got Putin shook and he shot his load early.
you take the good with the bad, and I doubt this will "ruin lives."
Oh, so US currency?
and the question that should be asked is why people are sending their SSN# through email, and also, peoples names and address are really not that big of a deal considering it's probably already plastered all over the internet already
Im not defending wikileaks for doing this, but you take the good with the bad, and I doubt this will "ruin lives." This will be a major inconvenience for a lot of people, but there are steps involved for rectifying it.
Kathy Griffin is a comedienne with a huge gay following.
The person they are talking about is obviously a gay person.
He's talking, in jest, that if the person is a good gay (ie. likes things that gay men might stereotypically like), then they'd appreciate the picture with Kathy Griffin. It's obviously ironic and not a real statement on the meaning how gayness manifests itself into the world. You're allowed to have jokes like this within your community playing with your own stereotypes.
It require context, probably a relationship between these two people, and an understanding of their own humor. It's not haha funny, but it's not supposed to be, and I understand what this person is going for. If you don't, I'm sorry, but this is also maybe not a joke for you.
It's pretty cool seeing Wikileaks doing stuff that benefits the Russian intelligence apparatus. Good look, guys. Good look.
This.
I feel this is terrible for people who got personal information leaked, but if they(russians i guess) were gonna mess some stuff up they should have released this AFTER the Democratic national convention. Putin is definitely shook.
It's pretty obvious at this point that Putin is fueling the alt-right movement in America and by extension the Drumpf campaign because he knows it will actively damage the United States to a point where he will feel free to be more bold in his territorial conquests and bullying of Europe and the Middle East. It wouldn't surprise me if he and Drumpf were cohorts.
That was taken before the protest started when I was talking to Aaron. From: Miranda, Luis Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 9:42 AM To: Helmstetter, TJ; Regional Press Subject: RE: Tv coverage of protest great Yes, but going forward, when our allies screw up and don't deliver bodies in time, we either send all our interns out there or we stay away from it.. we don't want to own a bad picture:
Article from last month looking at the alt-right and Russian overlaps: http://www.smh.com.au/world/us-elec...ar-meets-the-us-election-20160609-gpf4sm.htmlIt's pretty obvious at this point that Putin is fueling the alt-right movement in America and by extension the Trump campaign because he knows it will actively damage the United States to a point where he will feel free to be more bold in his territorial conquests and bullying of Europe and the Middle East. It wouldn't surprise me if he and Trump were cohorts.
It is kinda a big deal, actually.
She has to waste time doing that instead of trying to appeal to the independents.
But he's had no affect on this campaign at all. To suggest otherwise would just be chicken-littiling it, right?