The rise of the far-right in Europe (and world) is worrying me a lot - what to do?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Lime

Member
Currently we are witnessing an astounding amount of people willing to vote for far-right parties who in collaboration with libertarian economic policies are flirting if not outright pushing for fascist ideology in terms of basic human rights. And people are so afraid of "terrorism" that they think that the only solution to the problem is giving up fundamental humanistic principles and discriminate people from certain areas of the world.

And the worst thing is that there's a higher chance of people being killed by their own couch than a "terrorist" attack. People are dying in traffic, by alcohol, by regular murder, by tobacco, and on and on, yet people think that they will die tomorrow somewhere because of a terrorist attack. We don't see billions of Euros thrown at these things, yet terrorism and refugees are all of a sudden the reason our societies will be destroyed. European countries are some of the richest in the world, yet they appear to completely break down because of war refugees that only amount to 0.2 percent of the European population.

This summer, I've heard the following:
  • Politicians actually saying that Muslim people shouldn't be allowed into Europe
  • Actual talk about pulling out of the human rights charter because they shouldn't count for refugees. This is supported by not only the far-right, but also the center-right parties who think the human rights should be up for discussion and maybe pull out
  • Neo-nazi parties have become eligible for election and their solution is to throw all brown people out because they are not "true European" (read: white).
  • A new party has been formed that combines libertarian economic principles (think Republican economic policies) with clearly fascist and racist ideology
  • These same parties state that Russia should be the ally of the EU without mentioning the money the receive from Russia when they run for elections.
  • All the center parties are moving further right and embracing the hate and fear in order to not lose voters.
  • Meanwhile, the welfare state is being dismantled with talk of cutting funding of public service media, of schools, of universities, relaxing labor protection laws, of healthcare, etc. Yet they have zero problem investing more money into "security" such as police, military, surveillance, intelligence agencies, and they also are cutting taxes for the top rich people in the country.
  • Climate change measures are defunded and abandoned
And people are voting for this! People are actually abandoning basic humanity and logic and reason! And it's all because people are afraid of The Other and think that they will die or lose their way of life because of brown people. So people resort to fascism just because they are afraid and the media throw more fuel onto the fire by labeling Muslims as terrorists and the far right take advantage of this Othering by fear mongering and dismantling the welfare state and humanistic principles.

People are so afraid and think that immigrants / refugees from only one part of the world will kill them (When they say immigrants and refugees, they don't think about people moving from the US, Canada, Japan, China, or any other rich country) And when the government says that we can't afford education, health, or welfare functions (because of the refugees!), they at the same time see no problem giving tax breaks to the most rich segments of the country, or giving money to meaningless security that cannot be preventive.

Frankly I'm just disgusted and worried that people are really moving into the arms of fascism and playing around with the ideology that lead to the oppression and murder of vulnerable minorities who simply just want to survive. It's unbearable to live in and engaging both voters and politicians is like throwing water up against the wall where they resort to cultural racism and irrational fear of brown people. I don't see how talking and discourse can lead to a better state of the world either, so protest and disruption to put an end to fascism seem to be the only game changers.

(It should be noted that this is not exclusive to Europe. See India's Modi for example or the Republicans in the US for the last 30 years.)
 
Maybe we're now too far removed from the horrors of WW1 & WW2. The memories of how nationalism and hatred cost millions of lives now too distant.

Which is a shame. And terrifying.
 
Maybe we're now too far removed from the horrors of WW1 & WW2. The memories of how nationalism and hatred cost millions of lives now too distant.

Which is a shame. And terrifying.

These dumbasses need to pick up a textbook and draw some obvious parallels to the early 20th century and today.
 
As a Muslim myself, its indeed worrying how the world is evolving. Just Yesterday, I was having a conversation with a friend about how sadden I am of not being able to travel around the world comfortably.
 
Maybe we're now too far removed from the horrors of WW1 & WW2. The memories of how nationalism and hatred cost millions of lives now too distant.

Which is a shame. And terrifying.

Good point. Fear has always been the most underrated root of evil.
 
And people are voting for this! People are actually abandoning basic humanity and logic and reason! And it's all because people are afraid of The Other and think that they will die or lose their way of life because of brown people. So people resort to fascism just because they are afraid and the media throw more fuel onto the fire by labeling Muslims as terrorists and the far right take advantage of this Othering by fear mongering and dismantling the welfare state and humanistic principles.

People are so afraid and think that immigrants / refugees from only one part of the world will kill them (When they say immigrants and refugees, they don't think about people moving from the US, Canada, Japan, China, or any other rich country) And when the government says that we can't afford education, health, or welfare functions (because of the refugees!), they at the same time see no problem giving tax breaks to the most rich segments of the country, or giving money to meaningless security that cannot be preventive.

I chose the bolded sentence in particular, not to deny that far-right movements (and a proportion of their supporters) are either explicitly or implicitly xenophobic or racist, but because I would that those beliefs are partially supported, if not actively created, by economic instability and inequality.

If we want to combat movements that propagate a distrust of "others" (be they white Eastern Europeans or Muslim Americans) we need to help create a society that is sufficiently successful at caring for its citizens such that they do not need to worry about the cultural or economic effects of foreign nationals arriving into their communities; on the contrary, ideally such a society would be internationalist, and would promote free movement above and beyond super-national borders like the EU.

In my opinion (and one that might be unpopular), this means actively dismantling globalisation. Globalisation, short of preventing some of the issues that trigger far-right politics, is actively dependent on the wealth inequalities that not only encourage a reduction of manufacturing in western countries (and so removing a source of wealth for many communities in them) but require the existence of poorer countries to make that outsourcing attractive.
 
This is all the left's fault.

The left gave a huge opening to the far right by refusing to admit: unfettered immigration might actually cause problems, terrorists will enter Europe while posing as refugees, Europe's wealth isn't unlimited, integration will be difficult, etc. etc.

First thing the left should do is: stop digging and admit there is a problem.

I'll never understand why immigration is the hill the European left decided to die on.
 
As a Muslim myself, its indeed worrying how the world is evolving. Just Yesterday, I was having a conversation with a friend about how sadden I am of not being able to travel around the world comfortably.

This is terrible, I am truly sorry. If it makes you feel any better I'd be happy to host you and any other Muslim that wants to visit my neck of the world. I know a lot of other people feel the same way, so try not to forget that and lose hope. We're stronger together and that will never change.
 
Doesn't Germany drill the horrors of the Nazis and holocaust into their students for the very purpose of creating more empathetic citizens and preventing this kind of thing? I know I watched a news clip about that somewhere recently. PBS I think
 
I chose the bolded sentence in particular, not to deny that far-right movements (and a proportion of their supporters) are either explicitly or implicitly xenophobic or racist, but because I would that those beliefs are partially supported, if not actively created, by economic instability and inequality.

If we want to combat movements that propagate a distrust of "others" (be they white Eastern Europeans or Muslim Americans) we need to help create a society that is sufficiently successful at caring for its citizens such that they do not need to worry about the cultural or economic effects of foreign nationals arriving into their communities; on the contrary, ideally such a society would be internationalist, and would promote free movement above and beyond super-national borders like the EU.

In my opinion (and one that might be unpopular), this means actively criticising globalisation. Globalisation, short of preventing some of the issues that trigger far-right politics, is actively dependent on the wealth inequalities that not only encourage a reduction of manufacturing in western countries (and so removing a source of wealth for many communities in them) but require the existence of poorer countries to make that outsourcing attractive.

Completely agreed, really great post, but the potential pushback against internationalist world would be so great and such a great task that I don't see it happening in our lifetime.

The wrong notion is that people voting for fascist policies think that the economic inequalities and dismantling of the welfare state is caused by The Other, when in fact it's the free-market globalized capitalism that's creating further inequality and exploiting slave-like labor in other countries. Yet people vote for fascist parties due to racism despite the fact that these fascist parties will only make it worse by marrying their cultural politics with free market capitalism.

Racism really makes people vote against their own self-interests (see Brexit as another example of this)
 
Don't worry, as capitalism inevitably collapses as resources dry up, and people even struggle to get clean drinking water, the far-right of today will seem both civil and welcoming in comparison.
 
I'd actually say this is due to the rise of the Internet and the medias obsession with ratings.
This leeds to people born in the 60's-70's being bombarded with news of extremists and wars they didn't see groing up, all showing only those involving "foreigners", leading them to vote for "security", which the far right always positions itself about.

If we survive the next 20 years (for older people to get used to this influx of information), and if education is adapted and not given up on, I expect far right parties to go down to low single digit scores again.
 
Hurry to the land of the free.

No thanks, gun laws, mass consumption, pollution, no healthcare, slave-like working conditions, corporate plutonomy, imperialistic foreign policies, drone strikes, prison industrial complex, CO2 emissions, highest military budget in the world, white supremacy, low social mobility, hating the poor, acceptance of torture, boot straps rhetoric, NSA surveillance, death penalty, supporting Israel, militarized police force, denial of man-made global warming, Christian nutjobs, for-profit education, all make me not want to move to the US.
 
Maybe we're now too far removed from the horrors of WW1 & WW2. The memories of how nationalism and hatred cost millions of lives now too distant.

Which is a shame. And terrifying.

Not to mention a swathe of students who didn't give a shit during history lessons or school who have now been given the right to vote.

Understanding what caused German hyperinflation (or what causes hyperinflation in general) should be a core life skill.
 
It's worrying to me too. History repeating.

What to do? Vote. Volunteer as much as you can, and in what ways you can, for opposing political groups.

I donated an amount that surprised me to both Obama and now Hilary, considering I am not a rich man. I gave people rides to the polls twice.

EDIT: just to add, if you're an adult with disposable income, a car, and at least several hours a week to spare, you can be extremely helpful to candidate. And it's very easy to get engaged. Show some interest by notifying them via their primary web site, and you will have volunteers crawling up your butt with ways to get you directly involved.
 
I mean it sure sucks but i don't think it's something that should be very scary for the future

I don't like blaming others for being the source of the problem but goddamn i hate babyboomers.

These are the main voters of Republicains/Brexiters/Far-right.
These people were silver spooned fed their whole life, and shit on the current generation for being lazy, even though they are the reason to blame for having such a shit economy.

Sure I'm generalizing them and they aren't all the same but a huge portion of them are racist/xenophobic and just care about themselves.


But good news man, these people are old. A current far-right will not win in 10-20years.
 
I'd actually say this is due to the rise of the Internet and the medias obsession with ratings.
This leeds to people born in the 60's-70's being bombarded with news of extremists and wars they didn't see groing up, all showing only those involving "foreigners", leading them to vote for "security", which the far right always positions itself about.

If we survive the next 20 years (for older people to get used to this influx of information), and if education is adapted and not given up on, I expect far right parties to go down to low single digit scores again.

If the rise in inequality continues, the welfare institutions we have fought for are dismantled, and if the humanistic principles are eroded, then I don't see how future generations will somehow make up for it.

Statistics show that younger people are increasingly voting libertarian, at least in Scandinavian countries
 
I've been actually reading some articles and watching some of Youtube videos about the subject about the intake of immigration/refugees in Europe the past 20 years or so. Sorry if I'm coming as very misinformed, but I'm trying grasp what's happening in Europe.

From what I comprehend, the difficulty of integrating immigrants in their culture, particularly to see them assimilate certain aspect of their culture, like secular libertarian ideology and also the quite common if I may terrorist attack in Europe are feeding a huge patch of people into the fear of the new arrivants, especially Muslims. Although the response to this anxiety is improperly expressed toward the wrong people in general (Muslims who in large have no implication with any extremist group or terrorist attack), is it right to totally dismiss people who raise any concern about the large influx of refugees/immigrants as racist/xenophobe? Isn't there's a valid concern that needs to be studied and addressed no matter how faint it may be?
 
But good news man, these people are old. A current far-right will not win in 10-20years.
This fact beings me a lot of comfort. In a few decades, a very large portion of the far-right supporters won't be around anymore which will hopefully give progressives an incredible opportunity. Now we just hope that the far-right doesn't do too much to harm social rights in the meantime.
 
I've been actually reading some articles and watching some of Youtube videos about the subject about the intake of immigration/refugees in Europe the past 20 years or so. Sorry if I'm coming as very misinformed, but I'm trying grasp what's happening in Europe.

From what I comprehend, the difficulty of integrating immigrants in their culture, particularly to see them assimilate certain aspect of their culture, like secular libertarian ideology and also the quite common if I may terrorist attack in Europe are feeding a huge patch of people into the fear of the new arrivants, especially Muslims. Although the response to this anxiety is improperly expressed toward the wrong people in general (Muslims who in large have no implication with any extremist group or terrorist attack), is it right to totally dismiss people who raise any concern about the large influx of refugees/immigrants as racist/xenophobe? Isn't there's a valid concern that needs to be studied and addressed no matter how faint it may be?

Sure, the concerns about suddenly experiencing something out of the ordinary must be addressed, and challenges stemming from multiculturalism must be met with effort and change.

But the solution to the challenges of multiculturalism and globalization is not, and I must repeat *NOT*, to close down the borders, throw out all the brown people, abandoning fundamental human rights, and dismantle the welfare state. This solution is what the far right is pushing and people are willingly embracing this solution because it's easy and it relies on some nostalgic form of "before the brown people came" that has no basis in reality and history.

Instead, it's about keeping calm and doing work on how to live with one another without compromising on your own societal ideals. Thinking that all Muslims are X, Y, Z is simply incorrect and downright toxic.
 
It's not better really.

Don't forget Trump was a viable candidate until he started completely melting down. Almost half your country supports the vile shit he stands for.

Well he's projected to get crushed at historic levels and honestly it will only get worse for republicans.
 
I just find it funny how you have to connect things like Libertarianism and American style Lockean "conservatives" with fascism. You have to stretch the definition of "fascism" beyond all meaning to get to that point.

If you think limited government and lightly regulated capitalism = fascism....you need to go read up on Franco, Mussolini, Hitler, etc. and their visions of state authority.
 
This fact beings me a lot of comfort. In a few decades, a very large portion of the far-right supporters won't be around anymore which will hopefully give progressives an incredible opportunity. Now we just hope that the far-right doesn't do too much to harm social rights in the meantime.

It shouldnt, all those old Republicans at one time were young liberals too. Do not forget the massive liberal changes the world went through during their prime! The same will happen to the current generation.
 
It shouldnt, all those old Republicans at one time were young liberals too. Do not forget the massive liberal changes the world went through during their prime! The same will happen to the current generation.

http://www.economist.com/news/brief...s-not-between-left-and-right-between-open-and

Young voters, who tend to be better educated than their elders, have more open attitudes. A poll in Britain found that 73% of voters aged 18-24 wanted to remain in the EU; only 40% of those over 65 did. Millennials nearly everywhere are more open than their parents on everything from trade and immigration to personal and moral behaviour. Bobby Duffy of Ipsos MORI, a pollster, predicts that their attitudes will live on as they grow older.
 
This fact beings me a lot of comfort. In a few decades, a very large portion of the far-right supporters won't be around anymore which will hopefully give progressives an incredible opportunity. Now we just hope that the far-right doesn't do too much to harm social rights in the meantime.

I don't want to be the pessimistic type, but I've heard this song and dance over and over again. "Wait for the old people to die out" everyone keeps saying, yet we see that this is never enough and the young people of yesterday just become the old people of yesterday.

I just find it funny how you have to connect things like Libertarianism and American style Lockean "conservatives" with fascism. You have to stretch the definition of "fascism" beyond all meaning to get to that point.

If you think limited government and lightly regulated capitalism = fascism....you need to go read up on Franco, Mussolini, Hitler, etc. and their visions of state authority.

Right, when I employ the term of fascism I am referring to the cultural and moral politics of fascism, that in turn is compatible with free market capitalism and the dismantling of the welfare state (health care, education, public service, etc.).
 
I chose the bolded sentence in particular, not to deny that far-right movements (and a proportion of their supporters) are either explicitly or implicitly xenophobic or racist, but because I would that those beliefs are partially supported, if not actively created, by economic instability and inequality.

If we want to combat movements that propagate a distrust of "others" (be they white Eastern Europeans or Muslim Americans) we need to help create a society that is sufficiently successful at caring for its citizens such that they do not need to worry about the cultural or economic effects of foreign nationals arriving into their communities; on the contrary, ideally such a society would be internationalist, and would promote free movement above and beyond super-national borders like the EU.

In my opinion (and one that might be unpopular), this means actively dismantling globalisation. Globalisation, short of preventing some of the issues that trigger far-right politics, is actively dependent on the wealth inequalities that not only encourage a reduction of manufacturing in western countries (and so removing a source of wealth for many communities in them) but require the existence of poorer countries to make that outsourcing attractive.
I was with you until the last paragraph. Globalization has reduced wealth inequality on global scale, even if it has exacerbated on rich countries. It has taken millions out of poverty, and increased cooperation of nations and citizens. And it also goes against your second paragraph. It makes no sense to stop globalization, even more if you take into account the imminent automation of many jobs.

I'm not saying that globalization has not created problems, mostly for people who were left out, but we're better trying to fix those problems instead of trying to stop progress.
 
It shouldnt, all those old Republicans at one time were young liberals too. Do not forget the massive liberal changes the world went through during their prime! The same will happen to the current generation.
You make a very good point, but looking around and at numbers seems to imply the next generation of conservatives will be more in the libertarian mold. Not perfect but it's better than the diet fascism party that is the current GOP (IMO).
 
If you've got the time: Join an activist organization or political party (that does activism), we need all the help we can get.

Even 1 afternoon a week can make a difference.
 
Lime, I respect you a lot and enjoy reading your point-of-view.

I don't understand comparing terrorism to smoking and other causes of death. I don't understand this thing you do where you suddenly trust governments to do one thing but completely lose faith in them to do others.

The thing I really don't understand is when you accuse people of voting against their self interest. The concept that someone's political beliefs should derive from their economic interests exclusively strikes me as deeply cynical. Shouldn't we believe in something because it is right, not because it helps us financially?
 
I've been actually reading some articles and watching some of Youtube videos about the subject about the intake of immigration/refugees in Europe the past 20 years or so. Sorry if I'm coming as very misinformed, but I'm trying grasp what's happening in Europe.

From what I comprehend, the difficulty of integrating immigrants in their culture, particularly to see them assimilate certain aspect of their culture, like secular libertarian ideology and also the quite common if I may terrorist attack in Europe are feeding a huge patch of people into the fear of the new arrivants, especially Muslims. Although the response to this anxiety is improperly expressed toward the wrong people in general (Muslims who in large have no implication with any extremist group or terrorist attack), is it right to totally dismiss people who raise any concern about the large influx of refugees/immigrants as racist/xenophobe? Isn't there's a valid concern that needs to be studied and addressed no matter how faint it may be?

Far right doesn't want immigration, they want assimilation (with the colonial history of most of these countries is pretty ironic). When European countries legislate against religious wear, or rail against groups living near each other, or use of their languages or the rhetoric of not being "native" it is very much part of being racist/xenophobic. Pair that with the colonial history and the use of blackface, racist caricatures and things like gollywogs there is a baked in superiority complex that most don't even acknowledge exists.

The refugee crisis really falls on deaf ears for me, the Syrian civil war didn't start: 6 months ago

1 year ago

2 years ago

3 years ago

4 years ago

It has been 5 years in the making. Even before there were people drowning in the Mediterranean by the hundreds weekly and still they did not want to do anything about it except find ways to turn them back. When you look at the relative influx of populations Lebanon and Jordan have seen a population increase of ~25% due to displaced refugees. Europe as whole still is at a fraction of 1% of refugees, yet this is the greatest threat to Europe. Again this is racism and xenophobia not being addressed by governments and allowed to fester which has gotten us here to where more of the population sees it as "acceptable" to stop the brown people from coming.
 
Maybe you should organize a couple of protests or something. It´s a start.

If you've got the time: Join an activist organization or political party (that does activism), we need all the help we can get.

Even 1 afternoon a week can make a difference.

Already doing that (anti-racism, labor laws, BLM, refugee solidarity, anti-fascist, etc.), but it's usually just peaceful stuff that doesn't seem to make any change, that politicians ignore or disregard and the people who need to be exposed to the messages are living far away from where we have protested or hold the gatherings.
 
Lime, I respect you a lot and enjoy reading your point-of-view.

I don't understand comparing terrorism to smoking and other causes of death. I don't understand this thing you do where you suddenly trust governments to do one thing but completely lose faith in them to do others.

Thanks, Maxiell. I am comparing it in terms of the hysteria and fear mongering in regards to terrorism. People die everyday, in a much, much higher frequency, from issues that we usually are fine with or simply don't care about, yet when a terrorist attack occurs, everybody panics and throws billions of euros at something that is really hard to prevent, or they think that all Muslims should be thrown out, or they resort to abandoning the principles that people have fought for with their lives.

People don't lose their minds when they hear about the much higher amount of deaths caused by all kinds of things, yet they do so to the point of voting for far-right political parties when 'terrorism' is on the menu.

The thing I really don't understand is when you accuse people of voting against their self interest. The concept that someone's political beliefs should derive from their economic interests exclusively strikes me as deeply cynical. Shouldn't we believe in something because it is right, not because it helps us financially?

It wasn't about economics, but about how people are unhappy with the state of the life they have because of rising inequality and lack of social security, so they think that the culprit is refugees and immigrants, and therefore vote for parties who fuel this hate of the Other. Yet these parties are actively contributing to rising inequality and the dismantling of the institutions that ensure equality and social security (taxes of the wealthy, healthcare, education, public service, social mobility programs, etc.)
 
There's nothing i fear more than the far right. It honestly keeps me up at night sometimes, every time there is a tragedy in the world and they spin it disgustingly in their favour and gain more support of the ignorant and scared it just chips away at me.

I'm thankful i live in Canada these days, though of course we're not immune from it. I'm from the UK and lived in American for awhile, before moving up here.
 
Right, when I employ the term of fascism I am referring to the cultural and moral politics of fascism, that in turn is compatible with free market capitalism and the dismantling of the welfare state (health care, education, public service, etc.).

I get it. You are trying to define the "right" as in opposition to the set of values held by the "left" or progressives.

In that sense you can cite a certain cultural traditionalism that may run as a thread through both....

....but historically, Fascism is an actual thing. And particularly on what passes for a "right" in the United States, it's just completely unrelated. The American right is generally Lockean, and fits well within the stream of enlightenment liberal thought.
 
This is all the left's fault.

The left gave a huge opening to the far right by refusing to admit: unfettered immigration might actually cause problems, terrorists will enter Europe while posing as refugees, Europe's wealth isn't unlimited, integration will be difficult, etc. etc.

First thing the left should do is: stop digging and admit there is a problem.

I'll never understand why immigration is the hill the European left decided to die on.

As an American, the European left's initial response to the refugee crisis always seemed incredibly naive. Like I think they actually believed they were inherently more progressive than other cultures and could solve all any issue by being a bleeding heart.

Like, no matter your position on immigration in America, nobody believes that everything will just work out no problem. You see racism all the time here. Europeans just got to pretend they weren't racist because they never had to really deal with it the way we have.
 
People voting far right parties don't want military dictatorships, they want functioning liberal democracies built for a ethnically and culturally homogeneous society. For a lot of people the thought process really is as simple as "wow we didn't have all this terrorism before multiculturalism became a thing." So of course they blame all these problems on foreigners, but also on the left, the people who let these foreigners in, and in their eyes, this was done without their consent.

It's a very simple interpretation of the problem which can make it quite convincing to the frustrated and disillusioned.

If you want it to stop then the left and centrist parties need to come up with a more satisfactory answer than "this is just the way things are now." Recently I believe the French parliament agreed to strip citizenship from French citizens who fight for ISIS, but only if they have dual citizenship (i.e, there's another nation they can call home). It's a start but many will privately, or publically, say this is too much of a soft touch.
 
Your outrage isn't going to indefinitely fund social services, or fix the disaster of Muslim integration into Western Europe, or keep people safe from ISIS groups deliberately hiding among refugees.

The left has lost in Western Europe because their solution to all of these problems is "shut up and deal with it". And the people responded, "no".

Lime said:
People are so afraid and think that immigrants / refugees from only one part of the world will kill them (When they say immigrants and refugees, they don't think about people moving from the US, Canada, Japan, China, or any other rich country) And when the government says that we can't afford education, health, or welfare functions (because of the refugees!), they at the same time see no problem giving tax breaks to the most rich segments of the country, or giving money to meaningless security that cannot be preventive.

This post encapsulates what the electorate finds frustrating. You cannot pretend that political violence in Western Europe is coming equally from all migrant groups using whataboutism. You cannot bury your head in the sand and assume that a social net built to keep the starving and underemployed afloat can indefinitely support an influx of millions of underskilled and uneducated people without collapsing on itself. These are societies that are already taxed far more than we are accustomed to in the US.

The reason the right hasn't been able to surge as much on the issue here is because the US still greatly depends on cheap migrant labor, integration is far easier with citizenship granted upon birth, and we get a fraction of the refugees that Europe does for the crisis in the middle east.

People voting far right parties don't want military dictatorships, they want functioning liberal democracies built for a ethnically and culturally homogeneous society. For a lot of people the thought process really is as simple as "wow we didn't have all this terrorism before multiculturalism became a thing." So of course they blame all these problems on foreigners, but also on the left, the people who let these foreigners in, and in their eyes, this was done without their consent.

It's a very simple interpretation of the problem which can make it quite convincing to the frustrated and disillusioned.

If you want it to stop then the left and centrist parties need to come up with a more satisfactory answer than "this is just the way things are now." Recently I believe the French parliament agreed to strip citizenship from French citizens who fight for ISIS, but only if they have dual citizenship (i.e, there's another nation they can call home). It's a start but many will privately, or publically, say this is too much of a soft touch.

Totally agreed.
 
It shouldnt, all those old Republicans at one time were young liberals too. Do not forget the massive liberal changes the world went through during their prime! The same will happen to the current generation.
That's a popular myth that isn't supported by any data. All the data indicates that people form voting patterns early in life and sick with them to old age. Reagan was swept into office, in part, by the youth vote. Both him and Bush senior dominated among young voters. Those same voters that are now in their late 50s/60s and support Trump. The baby boomers have always been conservative reactionaries as a voting bloc
 
Far right doesn't want immigration, they want assimilation (with the colonial history of most of these countries is pretty ironic). When European countries legislate against religious wear, or rail against groups living near each other, or use of their languages or the rhetoric of not being "native" it is very much part of being racist/xenophobic. Pair that with the colonial history and the use of blackface, racist caricatures and things like gollywogs there is a baked in superiority complex that most don't even acknowledge exists.

The refugee crisis really falls on deaf ears for me, the Syrian civil war didn't start: 6 months ago

1 year ago

2 years ago

3 years ago

4 years ago

It has been 5 years in the making. Even before there were people drowning in the Mediterranean by the hundreds weekly and still they did not want to do anything about it except find ways to turn them back. When you look at the relative influx of populations Lebanon and Jordan have seen a population increase of ~25% due to displaced refugees. Europe as whole still is at a fraction of 1% of refugees, yet this is the greatest threat to Europe. Again this is racism and xenophobia not being addressed by governments and allowed to fester which has gotten us here to where more of the population sees it as "acceptable" to stop the brown people from coming.

Assimilation has to happen or multiculturalism in Europe is never going to work. The refugees moving to Europe must embrace secularism or they'll fall into the same trap that broke their home countries in the first place.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom