LordOfLore
Banned
Link.
Civil War II has Marvels superheroes fighting each other again; this time, its over whether its better to try and stop evil when you have foreknowledge in advance. Captain Marvel is leading the charge on predictive justice and its a stance thats making the heroine almost totally unlikeable.
The heroine who leads up Earths defense against extraterrestrial threats is taking a hardline stance on predictive justice. Despite the loss of her boyfriend and the reasoning shes been given in various stories, its a hard one to sympathize with. Heres the exact moment that the storyline lost me, when Captain Marvel says that shed act on information that might have only a 10% chance of being right:
Part of whats chilling about Carols beliefs is the nature of the action taken. When its a street-level interception like the guy-with-a-gun example in the panels above, bad intel might result in hurt feelings and/or litigation. A handful of lives could get ruined but one could still write that off as known costs of securing safety in a flawed system. But bad intel on a superhero-vs-supervillain level means the risk of exponentially higher loss of life and massive property damage, along with human rights violations. Most importantly, the knowledge that superheroes might be acting on predictions with unreliable accuracy almost certainly leads to a lack of public trust, which has been slowly playing out across the fiction.
Note that the list of things miss a couple of things in other books like Ms. Marvel dealing with pretty much internment camps made with Danvers blessing.In many ways, the Civil War events are executions of the classic Marvel ethos, which is to present superheroes who have all the foibles and failings of real people. But anyone in the real world who spouted Carols beliefs would come under a whole lot of justifiable criticism. You might even call them a villain.