This was my biggest gripe. Not that it felt like a rehash (which it did to me, but whatever), but that it squandered so much potential for more interesting stories to be told following the events of Jedi. As is, it really does just feel like a reboot and that the original trilogy barely matters.
Indeed. He touched on VII being really just a reboot in the trailer for the review, so I expect he'll bring up that criticism. I really do think they chose one of the most boring and repetitive story possibilities for VII, which is a shame because the technical composition of the film is pretty good, a little too breezy and unfocused, but still done well enough.
The plot and every original trilogy character (or ones related to them) was just botched so badly that the film would be better off without them in all honesty. Both of those aspects were caught in a limbo of trying to be a tribute to the originals while also disregarding them that they come off as forced. The OT characters really seem to have been included for fan service, and not to actually do anything with them to develop them, in most cases they regressed.
It's a near-total rehash. But yeah, only showing what the OT characters built since Jedi for a few seconds, as a reaction shot, bothered me much more.
I agree. Having another Empire and
seemed really contrived, but the amount of progress they wiped out to restart is more disappointing. They could have even made nearly the same story without undoing nearly everything the OT built up. It seems like an insult to the accomplishments made in those films, especially with how nonchalantly the progress is wiped away.
If it was focused on that tragedy, the story and film could have been much better, but they just gloss over it like it was nothing. I guess they were too scared that fans would rage because they weren't seeing a fun adventure film, so they decided to have the tragedy, but barely tocuh on it and instead try to pretend it didn't even happen