• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Red Letter Media - The Star Wars Awakens Review

Status
Not open for further replies.
Almost an hour in, and it seems like a rant on Star Wars prequels again.

Aside from those problems on diet racist comments, I enjoyed the short segment on clickbait writing and videos. So much cynicism and mocking hate in that short segme topped off with a Comic Sans bullet points although that's when the rant begins to drag.

edit: Uh, get really comfortable.
 
45 minutes in and he's just reading stupid pro-prequel articles in a facetious voice.

edit: now he's mentioning the connection between prequel politics and the Iraq War era which maybe should have come before
 
"How do I make a review of TFA? Oh I can redo a review of the prequels. It's like poetry, it rhymes."
 
Half an hour in and this is the worst review yet.

So far it's just a retread of previous material - and not even compelling, at that.
 
Like fine, the ring theory shit is dumb. But why isn't it a separate movie?
Honestly, it feels obvious that because they already reviewed it in HitB, they already blew through most of their comments on the movie and are just having to resort to filler to pad out the Plinkett review.
 
Half an hour in and this is the worst review yet.

So far it's just a retread of previous material - and not even a compelling, at that.

The point is he's setting up how Lucas himself reused so much from the original movies when he made the prequels, and it still sucked. TFA reused a bunch and it was good. That's the point of this review.
 
oh-yes.gif
 
I'll give the prequels the same point as Plinkett made. They are shit, but at least they are different. TFA is just ANH rebooted.

I liked TFA more, but I respect the prequels more. Does that make sense?
 
Haha, right as they get into the discussion of the movies going over old ground, he says it's actually fine if they do it for this one movie.
 
The point is he's setting up how Lucas himself reused so much from the original movies when he made the prequels, and it still sucked. TFA reused a bunch and it was good. That's the point of this review.
Looking forward to the TFA material, then.

Think it will be interesting even if he likes it.
 
This review takes way too long to get to point. Not quite sure why the first half of the review was so meandering and repetitive.
 
55 minutes in he actually starts, and his main complaint so far is that TFA is a soft reboot and that the one good thing about the prequels were at least original even if they were terrible.
 
Feel like they could've split this into two videos, one on the praising of the prequels and another on TFA.

I still don't get the idea of people trying to look at the prequels in a new light. Like, even if they were ambitious, that doesn't make up for the fact that they're just boring poorly written movies. It's like praising Too Human because it was so ambitious and ignoring the fact that the final product was a piece of shit.

On TFA, I'll agree that it could've benefited from not playing by the ANH playbook so closely, but it was still enjoyable when it could've easily been a dumpster fire.
 
Feel like they could've split this into two videos, one on the praising of the prequels and another on TFA.

I still don't get the idea of people trying to look at the prequels in a new light. Like, even if they were ambitious, that doesn't make up for the fact that they're just boring poorly written movies. It's like praising Too Human because it was so ambitious and ignoring the fact that the final product was a piece of shit.

On TFA, I'll agree that it could've benefited from not playing by the ANH playbook so closely, but it was still enjoyable when it could've easily been a dumpster fire.

I think it can sort of make sense if you look at it in the context of how much the movies contribute to the star wars universe. Prequels gave a lot of material for good shows like the clone wars, while so far the sequel trilogy is just renaming existing stuff.
 
Feel like they could've split this into two videos, one on the praising of the prequels and another on TFA.
It's obvious though that if they did a video that was just TFA it'd be comically short for a Plinkett film.

As it stands, even the parts that do talk about TFA falls back on a lot of filler to try and pad out time.
 
*actual Jazz*

I never paid attention to this ring theroy stuff and sure as hell won't now. No idea what Mr. Plinkett is rambling about here.
 
20 minutes in, is the joke gonna be that he completely ignored The Force Awakens and this was just a review on annoying Star Wars fans and their theories? I guess I'll take that and not a review where he pretends to dislike the movie since we already know he loves it.
 
Okay the part where he's making fun of the Internet's new definition of "plot hole" (ie anything that isn't unflinchingly realistic or explicitly shown in detail) that got really annoying with TFA is actually pretty damn funny.
 
Still watching, but really I wish he had made a separate video to talk about Star Wars culture if he wanted to do something like this. And the ring theory thing really didn't need this much time devoted to it.
 
Every time I watch these Plinkett reviews, I am reminded of how bad the prequels CG has aged, nothing looks cohesive. I typed Star Wars prequels into google to check their release dates to see how old the CG actually was, and 90% of the first page results are trying to defend the films, so he ain't wrong in that regard.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom