You are"I want it my way!" The GAF NX thread story.
My fire
The one
Desire
Believe
When I say
That I want it that way
https://youtu.be/4fndeDfaWCg
You are"I want it my way!" The GAF NX thread story.
I'll own up to it if I'm wrong. I've said as much.
Out of all Wii U games, I especially expect this one to never leave the system it was made for.
Look at Nintendo 3DS. It has a lot of games by third-party and indie games which greatly compliments Nintendo's offerings, yet it's not the same as mainstream third-party support by Western publishers as seen on home consoles.
MORE! MORE! (=You are
My fire
The one
Desire
Believe
When I say
That I want it that way
https://youtu.be/4fndeDfaWCg
No. One guy at Nintendo knows. The upper positions don't know anything.
Thread 2 probablyAny predictions on what page this thread's gonna be on by the reveal?
Any predictions on what page this thread's gonna be on by the reveal?
I'm going to note in advance once again by noting that I really wish that we could stop focusing our attention so much on Emily Rogers. With that out of the away, let me ignore my own advice and talk some more about this situation.
I think part of the issue with her reporting is simply that she's not a real journalist and as such doesn't know how to properly vet or contextualize information. But as you note, I also think it's unfair to suggest that she's a complete fraud. I don't think that she outright makes things up or misleads audiences. Further, this is one of those situations where I find myself banging my head up against a desk because it never ceases to amaze me how counterproductive people can be sometimes. And by that I simply mean that I don't understand how people can react to an Emily Rogers rumor with a sentiment like "why are we listening to this bullshit con artist who has never been right about anything ever!?!?" and then still seemingly wait with bated breath for the latest rumor to be proven wrong.
"I know she's wrong, but I'm going to pull up a chair here and wait for her to be proven wrong so I can remind everyone that she's always wrong!" This is not how you should behave. If you're a sane person and you think someone else is unreliable, then you should either ignore them or actually take anything they say with a grain of salt and not just claim that you're taking what they say with a grain of salt.
See also: Michael Pachter threads. Pachter goes on record making a dubious prediction, someone makes a thread about it, and people fall over themselves trying to get in some clever "this guy is never right about anything why do we give a shit what he has to say?" response. And then you realize that it's one of the most active threads of the day and part of the reason why is because people can't help themselves from having to take shots at him. Whereas if people started actually ignoring him instead of just passive aggressively suggesting that we should ignore him, he might become a less tantalizing figure to try and make sound bites out of.
What the poster below you says. I was bemoaning where we currently are in speculation. We just aren't in crazy patent examining and piecing together rumors with viable tech phase anymore, for the most part. This kind of thread is less fun imo.What happened to those guys, all banned?
No. One guy at Nintendo knows. The upper positions don't know anything.
Can someone refresh my memory, for the last direct that was 3DS focused, how long before the direct did they announce that the direct was coming? If we are assuming we're hearing something this week, I wonder if they would use a similar announcement timeline.
3ds was cheap to develop for, the nx isn't
If you were a Nintendo employee & GAF member... will you end this suffer?
I don't even understand where you're going with this.
They announced it two days before, which is pretty standard for them.
Depends what kind of games you make. Did the PS4 version of say Shovel Knight have a much bigger budget than the 3ds version?
They announced it two days before, which is pretty standard for them.
Oooh, trust me - many people at Nintendo are aware of the ongoing insanity. I don't know for the highest of higher-ups, but I believe they are laughing at us too.
Nah, if they were aware, they would make a joke about it on the official Nintendo account, using it as a positive PR and "we are hearing you" signal to the fans. Right now it feels they just ignore their fans.
They already did that by posting a Zelda video about an Axe....Nah, if they were aware, they would make a joke about it on the official Nintendo account, using it as a positive PR and sending a "we are hearing you" signal to the fans. Right now it feels they just ignore their fans, so they don't know.
Those games doesn't sell the system, it's also not exclusive
Nah, if they were aware, they would make a joke about it on the official Nintendo account, using it as a positive PR and sending a "we are hearing you" signal to the fans. Right now it feels they just ignore their fans, so they don't know.
Only very few isolated games sell systems - libraries and guaranteed ongoing supports do.
To hopefully spark some better discussion, what do you all think will happen to Nintendo's smaller projects like box boy and Rusty's real deal baseball when every game is slated to come to an HD console? Also consider that there likely won't be a Mario Kart 7 and 8 situation, so it's likely we get more experimental games and new IPs.
Do you guys think we'll see more of those small, relatively low budget offerings or more risky medium budget experimental titles? Or more of both?
Nah, if they were aware, they would make a joke about it on the official Nintendo account, using it as a positive PR and sending a "we are hearing you" signal to the fans. Right now it feels they just ignore their fans, so they don't know.
They DID tweet about the E3 Stage Curtains last E3 after I asked for them.
While two days is pretty much a standard timespan, didn't they once announce a Direct a week before it had actually happened? (I'm not talking about Directs announced within Directs, like the upcoming Animal Crossing one.)
I think we'll see some mobile-esque, DS-esque, light software, yes.To hopefully spark some better discussion, what do you all think will happen to Nintendo's smaller projects like box boy and Rusty's real deal baseball when every game is slated to come to an HD console? Also consider that there likely won't be a Mario Kart 7 and 8 situation, so it's likely we get more experimental games and new IPs.
Do you guys think we'll see more of those small, relatively low budget offerings or more risky medium budget experimental titles? Or more of both?
They DID tweet about the E3 Stage Curtains last E3 after I asked for them.
Good post is goodI'm going to note in advance once again by noting that I really wish that we could stop focusing our attention so much on Emily Rogers. With that out of the away, let me ignore my own advice and talk some more about this situation.
I think part of the issue with her reporting is simply that she's not a real journalist and as such doesn't know how to properly vet or contextualize information. But as you note, I also think it's unfair to suggest that she's a complete fraud. I don't think that she outright makes things up or misleads audiences. Further, this is one of those situations where I find myself banging my head up against a desk because it never ceases to amaze me how counterproductive people can be sometimes. And by that I simply mean that I don't understand how people can react to an Emily Rogers rumor with a sentiment like "why are we listening to this bullshit con artist who has never been right about anything ever!?!?" and then still seemingly wait with bated breath for the latest rumor to be proven wrong.
"I know she's wrong, but I'm going to pull up a chair here and wait for her to be proven wrong so I can remind everyone that she's always wrong!" This is not how you should behave. If you're a sane person and you think someone else is unreliable, then you should either ignore them or actually take anything they say with a grain of salt and not just claim that you're taking what they say with a grain of salt.
See also: Michael Pachter threads. Pachter goes on record making a dubious prediction, someone makes a thread about it, and people fall over themselves trying to get in some clever "this guy is never right about anything why do we give a shit what he has to say?" response. And then you realize that it's one of the most active threads of the day and part of the reason why is because people can't help themselves from having to take shots at him. Whereas if people started actually ignoring him instead of just passive aggressively suggesting that we should ignore him, he might become a less tantalizing figure to try and make sound bites out of.
Those games doesn't sell the system, it's also not exclusive
You don't think tons of butthurt nintendo fans wouldn't be twice as pissed that nintendo is taunting them?
The PS4 being a PS4 hasn't stopped it from getting a ton of lower budget, creative, unique games from first/third/indies along side the huge AAA spectacles so I don't see why it would be any different for Nintendo. If anything weird experimental titles might feel more at home on a Nintendo platoform since they're usually all about new gameplay ideas and innovation, as well as more cartoony graphics which a lot of indie games seem to use to mask the lack of budget.To hopefully spark some better discussion, what do you all think will happen to Nintendo's smaller projects like box boy and Rusty's real deal baseball when every game is slated to come to an HD console? Also consider that there likely won't be a Mario Kart 7 and 8 situation, so it's likely we get more experimental games and new IPs.
Do you guys think we'll see more of those small, relatively low budget offerings or more risky medium budget experimental titles? Or more of both?
No. These fans are crying and screaming because nobody seems to hear them at Nintendo. They just ignore them, which is a extremly bad move. A little joke would help here.
It really shows that Nintendo isn't aware of how using today's social media for good PR properly.
No. These fans are crying and screaming because nobody seems to hear them at Nintendo. They just ignore them, which is a extremly bad move. A little joke would help here.
It really shows that Nintendo isn't aware of how using today's social media for good PR properly.
I think a joke right now might come off as mean spirited and people will take it the wrong way. I think once there's a PR announcement for the reveal date, they can do silly teases.
Fuck the NX. Nintendo can disappointment me the way they intend to when they're ready![]()
I know no one still knows, but do you think EA will bring FIFA 17 on NX? I mean the console wil be almost as powerful as Xbox One, so a lower resolution version of that game wouldn't be hard to achieve
Tell me if i'm wrong, but does the xbox1 has that? i think ps4 is the only one and still lacks of a hugh library.I think it probably won't have a ton of AAA ports if its even powerful enough to run them.
I'm going to note in advance once again by noting that I really wish that we could stop focusing our attention so much on Emily Rogers. With that out of the away, let me ignore my own advice and talk some more about this situation.
I think part of the issue with her reporting is simply that she's not a real journalist and as such doesn't know how to properly vet or contextualize information. But as you note, I also think it's unfair to suggest that she's a complete fraud. I don't think that she outright makes things up or misleads audiences. Further, this is one of those situations where I find myself banging my head up against a desk because it never ceases to amaze me how counterproductive people can be sometimes. And by that I simply mean that I don't understand how people can react to an Emily Rogers rumor with a sentiment like "why are we listening to this bullshit con artist who has never been right about anything ever!?!?" and then still seemingly wait with bated breath for the latest rumor to be proven wrong.
"I know she's wrong, but I'm going to pull up a chair here and wait for her to be proven wrong so I can remind everyone that she's always wrong!" This is not how you should behave. If you're a sane person and you think someone else is unreliable, then you should either ignore them or actually take anything they say with a grain of salt and not just claim that you're taking what they say with a grain of salt.
See also: Michael Pachter threads. Pachter goes on record making a dubious prediction, someone makes a thread about it, and people fall over themselves trying to get in some clever "this guy is never right about anything why do we give a shit what he has to say?" response. And then you realize that it's one of the most active threads of the day and part of the reason why is because people can't help themselves from having to take shots at him. Whereas if people started actually ignoring him instead of just passive aggressively suggesting that we should ignore him, he might become a less tantalizing figure to try and make sound bites out of.