Clinton aides blame loss on FBI, media, sexism, Bernie, everything but themselves

Status
Not open for further replies.
You lost because you picked a much weaker candidate with a lot of baggage to take on Trump, you dolts.

Learn from your mistakes & pick a much stronger candidate with less baggage to take on Trump (or Pence) next time.

pretty sure most people TRIED to pick Bernie.

Bernie would have swept this fucking turd under the rug...

oh, what could have been...
 
Some of those like the FBI/the media/sexism were indeed factors but yeah a little self reflection is in order for the Clinton campaign(or whatever remains of it).

I agree. But the takeaway has to be on what you could have done differently. Uncontrolled factors are just that, uncontrolled. It's not like there isn't a well of unforced errors that can at least be identified by the brass.
 
Can someone remind me how the unions endorsed in the primary - did any major union in the Rust Belt actually endorse Trump?
 
Yes, I know racists were empowered by the results. They were after brexit as well and it's vile and disgusting.

That doesn't directly matter though. Clinton should have has a piss easy win against the most horrific scumbag of a person but they screwed it by having people call anyone voting for trump various things, including, yes, deplorable and racist. We all, and I'm guilty of this too, did that instead of actually debating them or trying to change the person's ideas.

so she should've coddled them a bit more, said even less on race? you're thinking what, that wouldve either

a) brought some of the diehard trump voters over somehow
b) empowered more minorities to back her, when she wouldn't even say word one on the matter?

nah, that's still a losing strategy. and any talk of not pointing out non-dog whistle, but open ended bigotry, for hopes of unifying/etc? miss me with that, too.

Pretty sure most people didn't given that he lost the primsries pretty damn handily.

thank you
 
So what exactly are you saying there is no angry working class Democrats, or that Democrats once angry turn Republican? Are Republicans simply the angrier people?
Why are we acting like the 6 million who didnt show up are not democrat working class whites inside of the rust belt?

People are conflating a state flipping red with voters flipping red. all it takes for a state to flip red is for rep voters to turn out the same number but the dem voters to turn out less.

This idea that center left angered working class whites into voting for trump is utter horse shit. Angry working class democrats simply didnt turn out...
 
I'm so sorry that you rested on your laurels and thought you simply deserved to win the election, Hillary. Unfortunately that's not how it works and will ever work. You failed your party and were unable to defeat a child like Trump. You felt entitled to win and neglected key demographics and you reap what you sow.
 
It's hard to acknowledge that Hillary may have been a really bad choice for some reasons that really weren't her fault. It's no secret that the Democratic candidate, whomever it would be, would be pitted against a party that has mastered the art of shamelessly and relentlessly finding and exploiting bullshit scandals, with a happily complicit media, and to great success. Surely they must have realized that the years of baggage a candidate like Hillary Clinton has would be a huge liability. What exactly was supposed to be so special about Hillary Clinton aside from being a woman to run that risk anyway, despite these obvious dangers, I have no idea. I guess it was "her time" or something. sigh...

It was "her time" in 2008 as well. Don't forget that the entire party sans Harry Reid and Ted Kennedy were behind her back then as well.

She is just a really bad candidate.
 
Blaming the polls isn't helping anyone.

Yes, I know racists were empowered by the results. They were after brexit as well and it's vile and disgusting.

That doesn't directly matter though. Clinton should have has a piss easy win against the most horrific scumbag of a person but they screwed it by having people call anyone voting for trump various things, including, yes, deplorable and racist. We all, and I'm guilty of this too, did that instead of actually debating them or trying to change the person's ideas. And now we're stuck with president trump come January and especially on climate change, we are fucked. There's no way that the majority of Trump voters are actually racist but since we all dumped them together instead of actually trying to convince them...

Basically what Johnathon Pie said on the subject in his typical blunt fashion is probably what I agree with.

https://youtu.be/GLG9g7BcjKs
This is utter bullshit. I have no problem saying that a vote for trump is a racist sexist and xenophobic act.
 
Those were all factors. But the blame lies on the Clinton Campaign. They fucked up. At first I thought Tim Kaine would be a good VP pick, but he proved to be too superficial, she needed a firebrand by her side. Second mistake was not traveling to the Rust Belt at all in the campaign ensuring the vote there.


No one to blame but themselves at the end of the day.

Agreed.

I was a Hillary-stan. I was so wrong on every level. The arrogance displayed on that conference call really highlights the reasons they lost.
 
Blaming the polls isn't helping anyone.

Yes, I know racists were empowered by the results. They were after brexit as well and it's vile and disgusting.

That doesn't directly matter though. Clinton should have has a piss easy win against the most horrific scumbag of a person but they screwed it by having people call anyone voting for trump various things, including, yes, deplorable and racist. We all, and I'm guilty of this too, did that instead of actually debating them or trying to change the person's ideas. And now we're stuck with president trump come January and especially on climate change, we are fucked. There's no way that the majority of Trump voters are actually racist but since we all dumped them together instead of actually trying to convince them...

Basically what Johnathon Pie said on the subject in his typical blunt fashion is probably what I agree with.

https://youtu.be/GLG9g7BcjKs

Ignoring the way that the media acquired polling data and interpreted it is absolutely missing the key factor in why they lost the election. And please, let's not pretend that Trump did not foment this ire from people, nor that the people as described in the thread I linked were not empowered by his rhetoric.

Less people voted for Trump than they did for Romney. You don't need those votes to win and never had. But you needed get-out-the-vote efforts in states that needed it. And how do you find out which states need it? You guessed it, polling data. If the polling data is wrong, you don't know where to direct your resources, and you start thinking the battleground states are places like Nevada when instead you should've been looking at Wisconsin. Running for office with bogus polling data is trying to drive the Daytona 500 while blindfolded. You simply can't do it. That the campaign didn't coddle racists will not have taken that blindfold off.
 
Statements like Bernie sweeping Trump are disingenuous.

However moderate repubs hate him less than Clinton, and they voted for trump because of some weird distaste of clinton

the benghazi and email stuff they've been pushing didn't help
 
They are floating Tim Kaine for 2020 or leading the DNC. Hilary's boring, milquetoast VP pick that did nothing for the campaign, has zero charisma, and is for the TPP.

Unbelievable.
I asked my Trump-voting colleague what he thought about Tim Kaine. "I don't even know who he is." On this we agree.
 
Those were all factors. But the blame lies on the Clinton Campaign. They fucked up. At first I thought Tim Kaine would be a good VP pick, but he proved to be too superficial, she needed a firebrand by her side. Second mistake was not traveling to the Rust Belt at all in the campaign ensuring the vote there.


No one to blame but themselves at the end of the day.

Don't take this as confrontational, I'm seriously asking. What the fuck did anybody see in Tim Kaine? He was everything people didn't like about her with a penis.
 
pretty sure most people TRIED to pick Bernie.

Bernie would have swept this fucking turd under the rug...

oh, what could have been...

He lost the primaries though, which was sad.

They could've picked a smarter, fearless candidate who's a excellent debater, has a lot of charisma & not afraid to take on Trump who's like Obama & a potential candidate for vice president who has a spine. But no, they had to pick both Hillary Clinton & Tim Kaine.
 
He won swing states and inspired people that she never did.

He was so inspiring that he lost by millions against a milquetoast, boring establishment candidate? You're not making any sense.

This blind idolatry of Bernie is a coping mechanism, I get it. But let's not pretend like this thought experiment is a viable alternative. You have no idea how Trump was gonna run against Bernie because it never happened. On day 1 of the general he could've painted Bernie as a pinko commie and it could've been even more disastrous for Bernie.
 
To clarify a bit more

Putting the blame on someone makes me and others feel better. Telling ourselves "we could have prevented this if we didn't choose this person"
 
It should never have been so close that a bunch of hullabaloo a few days before the election tanked her chances.

Run a populist candidate or lose 2020. Trump proved qualifications just don't matter.

This.

It can't be stated enough that Trump won with less votes than Romney lost. The GOP set the presidency up on a tee for Clinton, and she tried to bunt.
 
dawg she fucking lost to trump

it is fucking baffling how she fucking stumbled going up against fucking trump

Because Dems didn't show up to vote? And I agree the campaign is to blame, but let's not pretend the other factors listed weren't problematic this election. The media in particular was pretty damn bad.
 
Lol, you think most white young millennials will care in a bit? I doubt it.

Speaking as a white millennial, I know that everyone in my circle is at least somewhat distressed by this. But given that the biggest point of differentiation between Trump and Hillary supporters was highest attained education, that's obviously not a representative sample.

I think it came down to this: Most of millennials have never been on the losing side of an election before. As a consequence, I don't think they really felt like there was a chance Trump could win – and not unjustifiably. Clinton consistently led Trump in the polls, beat him in every debate, and was just generally obviously more capable. If the election was decided on merit, there's no doubt who would've won.

But more importantly, I think those feelings of security were amplified by the power of social media. When some of the most prestigious news institutions are regularly running stories about Trump's various scandals and inadequacies that are then fed to you by your friends and targeted news, you start to take it for granted. It became Hillary's election to lose, because she was so obviously the better candidate – and, thanks to the echo chamber of Facebook, you know everyone agrees.

Trump benefitted from the same phenomenon, but inverted. Being fed news about how corrupt and dangerous Hillary was by Drudge or Reddit, and mobilized to action by the collective anger at the liberal media for trying to keep your guy down, and liberals more generally for acting so smart and thinking they're so much better than you. That's what happened here.
 
Doesn't really matter when he appealed to the people that we needed to win the election. Hillary was the chosen one though and she lost to a joke.

Okay, so basically your assuming that Bernie would have gotten all of the Hillary minority turnout plus his own brand of supporters.

No sir, nothing wrong with that logic at all. Absolutely nothing.
 
He was so inspiring that he lost by millions against a milquetoast, boring establishment candidate? You're not making any sense.

This blind idolatry of Bernie is a coping mechanism, I get it. But let's not pretend like this thought experiment is a viable alternative. You have no idea how Trump was gonna run against Bernie because it never happened. On day 1 of the general he could've painted Bernie as a pinko commie and it could've been even more disastrous for Bernie.

Nah, you're delusional. He got more votes in the swing states she lost. How do you not think that is an advantage? He appealed to anti-establishment voters, something that has been a huge part in Trump winning. You're the one not making any sense here.
 
pretty sure most people TRIED to pick Bernie.

Bernie would have swept this fucking turd under the rug...

oh, what could have been...

Nope. He's jewish. He wouldn't stand a chance with whites putside of urban centers according to my american jewish friends.

Plus he did terribly with minorities, if I recall correctly.
 
If the Comey statement/re-focus on the e-mails by the media didn't happen right before the election then it very well may have been a narrow win instead of a narrow loss, but that's the whole point. Against Trump it should have been a landslide.

The party really needs to look at themselves and realize they were too arrogant and smug about the entire thing. There was definitely an air that it was all wrapped up and that Trump was a joke. Sure all the polls indicated that too, but this is a big example that you can never just be complacent and count your chickens. Stuff like the venue for the election night speech and the reported multi-million fireworks display didn't help that image. It was pure cockiness and that does not resonate with a lot of people.

Beyond that, the VP pick was simply not good. Tim Kaine is a generic body to fill the spot of VP. No one had any sort of sense of him whatsoever. Even his home state was narrowly won, which should have been a surefire lock and part of the reason he was picked. Almost any other pick would have been better.
 
So what exactly are you saying there is no angry working class Democrats, or that Democrats once angry turn Republican? Are Republicans simply the angrier people?

I'm saying I'm not convinced that Trump won on the backs of some surge of previously dormant angry working class voters. There was higher turnout in some rural counties, but overall he had roughly the same turnout as McCain and Romney had in 2008 and 2012, respectively. I obviously can't generalize here, but it seems like they weren't some kind of untapped wellspring of voters that really pushed him over the edge. The fault for Hillary's loss lies squarely on Democrats for not turning out.

I think more specifically, I was saying Hillary didn't underestimate the anger of these individuals as some kind of major force in securing Trump's win. In the end, voter turnout for Trump was exactly where you'd expect it to be based on 2008 and 2012 – even a little lower than that.
 
It must be true though. Bernie provided an enormous reference point and wake up call to an extremely influential base. And after he stopped running, they never came back to the DNC.

I wish he was better prepared, I actually don't think he was serious about going all the way. His campaign just wasn't fleshed out enough and was so focussed on a few key issues.

I want him to run again, but he will be nearing 80 in 4 years..

I totally agree that he kinda kneecapped himself by not really thinking he could win until too late in the game. But we also have to remember he didn't really have the money for many of those early months until people began to hop on board in droves later.
 
I don't ever want to hear the name "Hillary Clinton" ever again

She's got that loser stench all over her now. I guess knowing that Hilary won't get the prize she coveted her whole life is a silver lining in all this.

Damned shame it had to be Trump though. Would have preferred somebody with some dignity.
 
You know what? People can blame Clinton's campaign, the DNC, Bernie, millennials, white women, rural working class whites, whoever.

You know who's fault it is? People who fucking voted for Trump.

Don't give me some bullshit about how your needs were ignored, or how you weren't energized. People were presented a choice between the most openly racist, misogynistic, close minded and ill prepared candidate for president in the history of our country, and one who wasn't. And, when and where it mattered, they voted for the worse candidate.

Don't tell me how white voters feel marginalized and threatened. How they expect the fucking poster child of New York elitism to care about the working man. You don't want to labeled as bigots? Don't vote for the bigot.
 
Okay, so basically your assuming that Bernie would have gotten all of the Hillary minority turnout plus his own brand of supporters.

No sir, nothing wrong with that logic at all. Absolutely nothing.

What are you even talking about here? You're saying every dem would have turned against Bernie if he won the primary? Why? I'm sure those hardcore Hillary supporters would have went straight to Trump, yeah that makes more sense lol/
 
Could Clinton have run a better campaign? No doubt.

But imagine, for a second, that she had run her campaign like Donald Trump.

Imagine if she had showed up to all three debates unprepared, rambling, and quick to anger.

Imagine if she had a video where she talked about how she can molest women because of her celebrity status.

Imagine if she flip flopped on almost every policy position, frequently contradicting Tim Kaine.

Imagine if she had a 3 AM meltdown on twitter, followed by reports that she had to have her twitter taken away from her.

Imagine if she went through three campaign chairs, and if Huma's name was found in a book of illicit Russian payments.

Imagine if she hadn't released a single year of tax returns.

Clinton's campaign could have done better, but they did better than Trump's campaign by pretty much every possible metric. They lost rural whites hard, but even Trump's campaign didn't have that data; they expected to lose.

Let's face it: she could have done better, but the deck was stacked against her to begin with. If the campaign's quality was the only thing that mattered, then she would have won.
 
Nah, you're delusional. He got more votes in the swing states she lost. How do you not think that is an advantage? He appealed to anti-establishment voters, something that has been a huge part in Trump winning. You're the one not making any sense here.

There were a lot of problems with Bernie, his lack of foreign policy experience, he didn't do well with minorities, he had a very idealistic but unrealistic platform (keep in mind he said he didn't know how to break up the banks, something crucial to his campaign). You also assume that Bernie being the nom would mean he would win the swing states Clinton lost, we don't know. Fact of the matter is Bernie got a lot of young people fired up but those young people didn't know how politics works. So when he lost the young people stayed home. And there was nothing Clinton was going to do about it. The good thing about Bernie is that the democrats now have a plan to win blue-collared working class that have typically voted Red since Reagan. 2020 they'll run someone like Bernie.
 
For damn sure.. for damn sure.

And let me be clear, Hillary has perceived baggage that was blown way out of proportion. I very much feel for her. The DNC sacrificed her.

I really, really hope that liberals don't lose sight of this because the ultimate story of Hilary's career is in part a tragic tale of an ambitious, well-intentioned woman thats personal political brand was constantly toxified at every stop because of America's still present sexism and continual, unfair double-binds toward Hillary the woman.

Hillary and her team lost this election, but America's lesser qualities bear a lot of responsibility for the toxification of her brand over the years.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom