Clinton aides blame loss on FBI, media, sexism, Bernie, everything but themselves

Status
Not open for further replies.
others blamed Bernie Sanders for “poisoning” millennial voters who never came back on board.

Yes, that was Bernie's fault. It wasn't Hillary's fault when she stood on stage and told a straight out lie about their candidate

I don't know where he was when I was trying to get health care in '93 and '94

Well, he was right behind you

cdxcnl7uiaelx0faqsea.jpg


You even thanked him in a written note

cdxepmow8aagteydnszu.jpg


But then Hillary and her supporters wonder why people don't trust her and think she's phony.

It also apparently wasn't Hillary's fault when she stood beside Madeleine Albright as she told young women that "there's a special place in hell for women that don't help each other", because those young women were more supportive of Bernie than Hillary. You remember that right, Hillary? Because you and your supporters thought it was absolutely hilarious to try to shame young women into voting for you

https://youtu.be/QRimyfmz0MA?t=14

You then defended it days afterwards

Clinton appeared on NBC’s Meet the Press on Sunday and described Albright’s comment as a “light-hearted but very pointed remark”.

“Madeline has been saying this for many, many years,” Clinton said. “She believes it firmly, in part because she knows what a struggle it has been, and she understands the struggle is not over.”

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...efends-madeleine-albright-women-female-voters

But again, i'm sure that's still somehow Bernie's fault.
 
He got more votes against her in the swing states, not against Trump, because Bernie wasn't running against Trump. You're making loony comparisons.

Trump didn't get a "huge" anything. His turnout was anemic, smaller than even that of Romney.

People don't like hearing this, but I'll keep repeating it. Clinton's strategy and campaign was winnable. The problem was bad polling data that led her campaign in the wrong direction. But that's not a reason that lets you bash Clinton in cathartic glee so people are simply going to continue ignoring it.

She had bad polling. He seemingly had worse to none done internally. So how did that put her at a disadvantage vis a vis him?
 
Obama pulled in a minority vote that neither Sanders or HRC managed to pull in. It was too much for the DNC to ignore - they were backing HRC in '08 just as fully, and only relented because the voter base Obama pulled in was too large to ignore. The Obama coalition didn't come out to vote for HRC in this GE.

Hillarys primary lead over Bernie was way bigger than Obama's primary lead over Hillary.
 
Please tell me, why were white supremacists voting for Obama?

I'm not denying that Donald has racist voters; the point is - its not ALL of them. If Democrats keep blaming the fringe for Donald's victory, they will lose again and again.

It was an attack by all sides - Media, the internet, the FBI, Russia, Bernie bros. It destroyed her turnout. She ran an amazing campaign but the voters just wanted another Obama and let all the bullshit keep them home. The "she should be in jail" narrative was pushed by fucking everyone. The country is sexist to the core, too. Maybe in a decade the people who stayed home will admit it.
 
I really, really hope that liberals don't lose sight of this because the ultimate story of Hilary's career is in part a tragic tale of an ambitious, well-intentioned woman thats personal political brand was constantly toxified at every stop because of America's still present sexism and continual, unfair double-binds toward Hillary the woman.

Hillary and her team lost this election, but America's lesser qualities bear a lot of responsibility for the toxification of her brand over the years.

agreed, but fuck if page 1 doesn't leave me less hopeful about that

He got more votes against her in the swing states, not against Trump, because Bernie wasn't running against Trump. You're making loony comparisons.

Trump didn't get a "huge" anything. His turnout was anemic, smaller than even that of Romney.

People don't like hearing this, but I'll keep repeating it. Clinton's strategy and campaign was winnable. The problem was bad polling data that led her campaign in the wrong direction. But that's not a reason that lets you bash Clinton in cathartic glee so people are simply going to continue ignoring it.

First page is full of reactionary crap. OMG TEH HUBRIS! FRAUD! BURN IT DOWN!

You folks need to realize, Hillary won the democratic primary because she appealed to it's core groups. No one can dispute she won the AA, hispanic and women, the core constituency of democratic party. Obama won this constituency, and he became the nominee. So did Hillary. Bernie didn't. Rural white voters and millenials who don't even vote most of the time are not the core contituencies of democratic party. Yes, the DNC shenanigans cast doubt on the proceedings but nothing suggests that the system was indeed rigged for Hillary. She won the groups she needed to win fair and square. DNC favored Hillary and rightly so. Hillary gave Obama a run for his money in 2008. Of course she was favored to win, just like Jeb was supposed to be RNC's favored to win. The various factors listed in the actors absolutely played a part. Media in particular, going absolutely insane over the emails and private server crap and treating her owning a private server, which was not illegal, to Trump's litany of abuse and scandals in the hopes of horserace equivalency destroyed her.

Lets not forget, Bernie started going down the personal attack route against Hillary during the primaries (bad judgement, transcripts, corrupt, etc) which made themselves into tailor-made attack ads for Trump to use. In fact, he brought up Bernie during the debates in order to criticize her. Her campaign is well within its rights to criticize Bernie for poisoning the well for Millenial voters. Just look at this thread.

And yes, Comey's unprecedented interference absolutely hurt Hillary. Before he sent that letter to chaffetz, the Republican enthusiasm was down. After the letter, it was fully back up and then some. That was just enough to tip the scales in areas where she was expected to win. She was fighting against Trump, Russia, Wikileaks and the fucking FBI.

This however does not mean Clinton couldn't have handled things better and addressed problems earlier. For example, the wikileaks hack showed the contents of the Wall Street speeches. Nothing was in them, as everyone guessed. But she refused to release the transcripts, turning it into a politically charged stick to beat her with. Her reasoning was that no one has been ever asked to release the private speeches they do to various groups, so why her? It was a legitimate grievance. But sometimes in politics you have to take it on the chin and get back up. She should have released them during the primaries and put the thing to rest.

In the end, stop with BURN IT DOWN nonsense. You need Clinton supporters if you want to build a new democratic party. Play party purity games, start losing elections then. Her defeat was a combination of various many things. FBI, media, sexism, Bernie, Trump galvanizing the white nationalists, racists, homophobes and Clinton missteps. Doesn't mean everything fucking sucks.

damn fine post here

That's only part of the problem. There was also non-internal polling that constantly gave Clinton laughably huge chances of winning and comical polling percentage leads. That also plays considerably in the political climate, because it tells people to not vote. Every pollster got it wrong, not just the internal ones.

yeah i can't help but wonder how much those silly %'s made special snowflakes feel safe in their protest votes
 
Yes, that was Bernie's fault. It wasn't Hillary's fault when she stood on stage and told a straight out lie about their candidate



Well, he was right behind you

cdxcnl7uiaelx0faqsea.jpg


You even thanked him in a written note

cdxepmow8aagteydnszu.jpg


But then Hillary and her supporters wonder why people don't trust her and think she's phony.

It also apparently wasn't Hillary's fault when she stood beside Madeleine Albright as she told young women that "there's a special place in hell for women that don't help each other", because those young women were more supportive of Bernie than Hillary. You remember that right, Hillary? Because you and your supporters thought it was absolutely hilarious to try to shame young women into voting for you

https://youtu.be/QRimyfmz0MA?t=14

You then defended it days afterwards



https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...efends-madeleine-albright-women-female-voters

But again, i'm sure that's still somehow Bernie's fault.

She may have lied but so did Bernie. It's the damn primary.
 
Yeah dude, minorities were surely gonna vote for Trump over Bernie. Keep telling yourself that. Keep acting like swing states didn't matter in the primaries when she lost them. She even lost white voters which is clearly more important if you want your "side" to win.

I never said that and you're being intentionally obtuse. They could have abstained or cast symbolic votes for third parties. Keep acting like the DNS should have ignored people overwhelming choosing Hillary during the primaries
 
looking back, her deplorables comment was probably the ultimate thing that screwed her over. That really caught on with the trump base. I can't believe she fucking said that. What an idiot.

I can't blame her for saying that because everyone with half a brain knew that. I think she said that because she assumed Trump supporters were a vocal minority and people would agree with her on that. In the end there wasn't one thing that did her in. This is such an anomaly within the political system that nobody will be able to accurately explain it for years to come.
 
uh, you could say that about anybody. Are you saying Trump's win was absolutely inevitable no matter who the Dems ran?

And you are right that this was not an election of ideas and qualifications etc. There were a lot of people who wanted to vote just to "shake things up" and, for reasons shallow or not, Bernie Sanders was very much seen as someone who was doing that.

I'm saying the lessons to be learned aren't really about the rust belt. The lesson is that your uncle and dad have FB pages now. It wasn't a strategic victory. They openly just eroded her base with lies, cheap tricks and light treason. Nobody is immune to that. It's a new illness and we should be talking about a vaccine.

Obviously Hillary fucked up. The media fucked up. The pollsters fucked up, but those fuck-ups all stem not just from complacency but from the rules of the game changing and them not noticing.

We keep attacking each-other about Bernie v Hillary this shit in thread after thread, but Trump literally tricked every expert from beginning to end. There is no amount of hindsight that can figure it out using some cold logic about polls and shit.
 
Hillary should have:

Swallowed her pride and chosen Sanders as her running mate (and actually attempted to unite the party).

Hired David Axelrod (whatever the cost) to run her campaign.
 
When did GAF become so anti-Hillary?
The people who stood silent about their dislike for Clinton are finally speaking up now that it's obvious how much of an unappealing candidate she truly was.

Also she essentially handed the White House to a megalomaniac tyrant-in-the-making by mishandling her campaign strategy. Surely you can understand the high emotions.
 
Some her fault especially her email server but there were way too many other external factors to not consider also. Trump had way more flaws that were because of him than she did. In the end, Trump supporters had a much lower threshold for flaws.
 
looking back, her deplorables comment was probably the ultimate thing that screwed her over. That really caught on with the trump base. I can't believe she fucking said that. What an idiot.

It was the truth. No matter what, she will never win with you fucking people. Not a politician in the history of America has ever been so needled - if she lies, she gets shit on. If she tells the truth, she gets shit on.
 
Yes, that was Bernie's fault. It wasn't Hillary's fault when she stood on stage and told a straight out lie about their candidate



Well, he was right behind you

cdxcnl7uiaelx0faqsea.jpg


You even thanked him in a written note

cdxepmow8aagteydnszu.jpg


But then Hillary and her supporters wonder why people don't trust her and think she's phony.

It also apparently wasn't Hillary's fault when she stood beside Madeleine Albright as she told young women that "there's a special place in hell for women that don't help each other", because those young women were more supportive of Bernie than Hillary. You remember that right, Hillary? Because you and your supporters thought it was absolutely hilarious to try to shame young women into voting for you

https://youtu.be/QRimyfmz0MA?t=14

You then defended it days afterwards



https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...efends-madeleine-albright-women-female-voters

But again, i'm sure that's still somehow Bernie's fault.
I completely forgot about this. Oh man.
 
When those of us on the left who had been shamed and abused by her supporters withdrew again from the shadows. The bullying and intimidation was appalling for months on end.

I have no interest in tarring and feathering Hillary Clinton or the Clinton campaign, but the Bernie Bros stuff from her diehards in the media that went on during the primaries was fucking stupid and we need to be better than that.
 
looking back, her deplorables comment was probably the ultimate thing that screwed her over. That really caught on with the trump base. I can't believe she fucking said that. What an idiot.

yeah man, that adjective to calmly describe an open appeal to white supremacy - via the alt-right, if not directly - that sure did it, really fired up those non-racists to rush out & prove her wrong by supporting said white supremacy platform

how has this line of logic caught on for some of ya'll? assuming you're progressives/liberals/what have you
 
We're also not bringing up the impact of having her emails hacked and selectively leaked, and in at least one case, shown to be flat out altered. I mean, what other candidate has had a fucking foreign government take a vested interest in them losing and aided in doing so? It was beyond ridiculous.

At least with Obama's first run, the heat came from people, other politicians, etc. Not foreign governments, the FBI and hackers. Each of those alone would be unprecedented, yet she was hit with all 3
 
blowback from how gaf acted with hilary

people should vent but hopefully realize that we can't just vent

I agree.

If people want to vent their frustrations, fine. But there would be a neccesary time where we'll have to suck it up and discuss what we should do next and with civil cooperation.
 

It's actually pretty easy. Cenk is the living, breathing definition of an entitled dipshit liberal who doesn't even realize how hypocritical he is. The concept of compromise is foreign to him, he thinks the DNC needs to cater to exactly what he wants or else he'll do nothing but heap scorn. The reason why we lose all the time is because we don't get in line like Republicans do and realize we can't always get what we want. Do you guys have any idea how much the people who voted for Trump hated him? Probably only 40% of his followers loved everything he said, maybe less. Cenk thinks even though Hillary got more primary votes the DNC should have screwed her out of the nomination in exchange for an untested white male just because his people wanted it. It's fucking outrageous.
 
yeah man, that adjective to calmly describe an open appeal to white supremacy - via the alt-right, if not directly - that sure did it, really fired up those non-racists to rush out & prove her wrong by supporting said white supremacy platform

how has this line of logic caught on for some of ya'll? assuming you're progressives/liberals/what have you

telling someone who is voting for trump out of their own ignorance that they are a shitheel will have them tell you to fuck off

people become blinded when you accuse them of something. doesn't even matter if you're right. people will lash out
 
In some alternate reality, Hillary tries to court the rural white vote, has middling success, gets decried by minorities for prioritizing white issues, and loses both the popular vote and the EC.

Like, 20/20 hindsight, she lost the EC. Of course she should have done things differently.

But it isn't fair to paint her strategy as a disaster or obviously ill-fated. She still won the popular despite a whole lot of shit getting slung at her (notably Comey). The majority of analysts praised her strategy up until the point that it failed.

The game is different this year, and very few people (on both sides of the aisle) recognized that until it was too late.
 
When did GAF become so anti-Hillary?

The sentiment was always there. It was just being suppressed and mocked.

A lot of us toed the line. I can understand the hostility. It's an absolute shame there wasn't more outreach when it mattered the most.
 
When did GAF become so anti-Hillary?
A lot of us have always been skeptical of her, but if you said that in any discussion thread you would get mobbed by Hil-Gaf. Hil-Gaf is still around, they just don't post in threads that contain valid criticisms against her.
 
First page is full of reactionary crap. OMG TEH HUBRIS! FRAUD! BURN IT DOWN!

You folks need to realize, Hillary won the democratic primary because she appealed to it's core groups. No one can dispute she won the AA, hispanic and women, the core constituency of democratic party. Obama won this constituency, and he became the nominee. So did Hillary. Bernie didn't. Rural white voters and millenials who don't even vote most of the time are not the core contituencies of democratic party. Yes, the DNC shenanigans cast doubt on the proceedings but nothing suggests that the system was indeed rigged for Hillary. She won the groups she needed to win fair and square. DNC favored Hillary and rightly so. Hillary gave Obama a run for his money in 2008. Of course she was favored to win, just like Jeb was supposed to be RNC's favored to win. The various factors listed in the actors absolutely played a part. Media in particular, going absolutely insane over the emails and private server crap and treating her owning a private server, which was not illegal, to Trump's litany of abuse and scandals in the hopes of horserace equivalency destroyed her.

Lets not forget, Bernie started going down the personal attack route against Hillary during the primaries (bad judgement, transcripts, corrupt, etc) which made themselves into tailor-made attack ads for Trump to use. In fact, he brought up Bernie during the debates in order to criticize her. Her campaign is well within its rights to criticize Bernie for poisoning the well for Millenial voters. Just look at this thread.

And yes, Comey's unprecedented interference absolutely hurt Hillary. Before he sent that letter to chaffetz, the Republican enthusiasm was down. After the letter, it was fully back up and then some. That was just enough to tip the scales in areas where she was expected to win. She was fighting against Trump, Russia, Wikileaks and the fucking FBI.

This however does not mean Clinton couldn't have handled things better and addressed problems earlier. For example, the wikileaks hack showed the contents of the Wall Street speeches. Nothing was in them, as everyone guessed. But she refused to release the transcripts, turning it into a politically charged stick to beat her with. Her reasoning was that no one has been ever asked to release the private speeches they do to various groups, so why her? It was a legitimate grievance. But sometimes in politics you have to take it on the chin and get back up. She should have released them during the primaries and put the thing to rest.

In the end, stop with BURN IT DOWN nonsense. You need Clinton supporters if you want to build a new democratic party. Play party purity games, start losing elections then. Her defeat was a combination of various many things. FBI, media, sexism, Bernie, Trump galvanizing the white nationalists, racists, homophobes and Clinton missteps. Doesn't mean everything fucking sucks.

You point out that the primary was won fairly by her. But then go on to blame Bernie for having the audacity to actually campaign against her because Trump brought it up once in the debate?

So she did the right thing by playing by the rules, but he did the wrong thing for doing the same?

And let's be clear I'm already seeding you a lot of ground by assuming her staff actually did play by the rules. Debatable in an of itself.
 
Don't get me wrong: they fucked up. They lost.

But Trump went into Election Day thinking he was going to lose. Their data was just as bad as the Clinton's.

Hillary's campaign lost, but it's hard for me to buy that her campaign was more poorly run in an objective sense.* She lost despite running the more gaf-free campaign.

* Side-note: while I want to point out that Hillary's campaign was a thousand times cleaner than Trump's, I don't think that's necessarily a good thing. There was a time when running a well-organized, well-funded, clean campaign was a boon.

But now, in the age where a single tweet or a controversial sentence can give you media coverage for weeks? Being clean, organized, and prepared no longer makes you presidential - it makes you a politician. And, in this climate, that's the worst thing you could be.

TL;DR: I think Hillary's team ran the "better" campaign by far, and they deserve recognition for that. Unfortunately, that strong campaign was also their greatest weakness.

They aren't stupid or lazy. The political climate is just changing fast, and Trump is (by sheer chance) the type of person who grows stronger in this type of culture.

He was saying the whole time that his polls told him he was ahead. Obviously, anything Trump says should be taken with a grain of salt, but to say that he expected to lose seems like a stretch. Do you have anything to back that up?

Clinton's campaign was a bust. Charisma and inspiration are not shallow, anti-intellectual drivel. They are vital attributes to leadership.

If you ask the average person what Clinton's slogan was, they will almost certainly scratch their heads.
 
First page is full of reactionary crap. OMG TEH HUBRIS! FRAUD! BURN IT DOWN!

You folks need to realize, Hillary won the democratic primary because she appealed to it's core groups. No one can dispute she won the AA, hispanic and women, the core constituency of democratic party. Obama won this constituency, and he became the nominee. So did Hillary. Bernie didn't. Rural white voters and millenials who don't even vote most of the time are not the core contituencies of democratic party. Yes, the DNC shenanigans cast doubt on the proceedings but nothing suggests that the system was indeed rigged for Hillary. She won the groups she needed to win fair and square. DNC favored Hillary and rightly so. Hillary gave Obama a run for his money in 2008. Of course she was favored to win, just like Jeb was supposed to be RNC's favored to win. The various factors listed in the actors absolutely played a part. Media in particular, going absolutely insane over the emails and private server crap and treating her owning a private server, which was not illegal, to Trump's litany of abuse and scandals in the hopes of horserace equivalency destroyed her.

Lets not forget, Bernie started going down the personal attack route against Hillary during the primaries (bad judgement, transcripts, corrupt, etc) which made themselves into tailor-made attack ads for Trump to use. In fact, he brought up Bernie during the debates in order to criticize her. Her campaign is well within its rights to criticize Bernie for poisoning the well for Millenial voters. Just look at this thread.

And yes, Comey's unprecedented interference absolutely hurt Hillary. Before he sent that letter to chaffetz, the Republican enthusiasm was down. After the letter, it was fully back up and then some. That was just enough to tip the scales in areas where she was expected to win. She was fighting against Trump, Russia, Wikileaks and the fucking FBI.

This however does not mean Clinton couldn't have handled things better and addressed problems earlier. For example, the wikileaks hack showed the contents of the Wall Street speeches. Nothing was in them, as everyone guessed. But she refused to release the transcripts, turning it into a politically charged stick to beat her with. Her reasoning was that no one has been ever asked to release the private speeches they do to various groups, so why her? It was a legitimate grievance. But sometimes in politics you have to take it on the chin and get back up. She should have released them during the primaries and put the thing to rest.

In the end, stop with BURN IT DOWN nonsense. You need Clinton supporters if you want to build a new democratic party. Play party purity games, start losing elections then. Her defeat was a combination of various many things. FBI, media, sexism, Bernie, Trump galvanizing the white nationalists, racists, homophobes and Clinton missteps. Doesn't mean everything fucking sucks.

We don't need Clinton supporters if they can't look in the mirror because their heads are still up their asses. It's their turn to fall in line until they can come up with new strategies instead of the same old shit that caused their girl to lose an election and a primary to newcomers.
 
telling someone who is voting for trump out of their own ignorance that their a shitheel will have them tell you to fuck off

people become blinded when you accuse them of something. doesn't even matter if you're right. people will lash out

so they're already supporting said bigoted platform, and you think they'll come over if we coddle them?

those minorities that didn't show up (and of course many put the blame on them first), those special snowflake protest votes, etc - you're really then gonna argue theyd've come out in better numbers if we sang kumbaya & ignored said bigotry?

the mistake wasn't the use of the word "deplorable" (which, yes, much of trump's shitheel base then ran with), it was not attacking that angle further.
 
it's really messed up when voters need a shiny pony to go out an vote instead of voting on policy and issues

WTF, okay, she isn't charismatic, big fuckin deal


voters makes me sick

People are flawed and everybody knows this. The job of a politician is to convince these flawed and selfish individuals that they're worth the 'inconvenience'. As a career politician, Hillary failed massively at this.
 
So it's personal and not even about the candidate? How petty

It's not petty when her supporters were treating her win as destiny and thought nothing could get in her way. If you aren't willing to accept criticism to help make you better, you become weaker. That can be applied to anyone or anything.
 
She had bad polling. He seemingly had worse to none done internally. So how did that put her at a disadvantage vis a vis him?

In low-energy political climates, Republicans win by default. Liberals need to be coaxed more into voting, but when more voters show up they tend to lean Democrat.

If you have something like Wisconsin, where Clinton never even set foot in, they'll be gravitating toward Republican if the lead there is not large like they thought it was.
 
We don't need Clinton supporters if they can't look in the mirror because their heads are still up their asses. It's their turn to fall in line until they can come up with new strategies instead of the same old shit that caused their girl to lose an election and a primary to newcomers.

Saying "we don't need X supporters", be it Clinton or Bernie, is about the dumbest thing in the world you could be saying if you're a liberal.

We need everyone. Everyone has to fall in line and wake the fuck up, if we somehow manage to not all die in the next 4 years. What's depressing is it's now clear that the threat of destruction doesn't motivate people, and a woman won't, so we need to somehow find another Barack Obama. Which probably won't happen.
 
It was the truth. No matter what, she will never win with you fucking people. Not a politician in the history of America has ever been so needled - if she lies, she gets shit on. If she tells the truth, she gets shit on.

Hey dude, chill. I am a Clinton supporter. I gave her my full support. And you are right...she told the truth. Trump supporters are a bunch of racist ass shitheads. But man, that comment made me diablos for that whole month. I think it would have benefitted more if she just held her tongue that night 😪 the double standards do suck though--Trump pretty much got away with anything ugh
 
When did GAF become so anti-Hillary?

The argument about how Hilary was the "sensible and pragmatic" pick was blown out of the water. As the drip drip of information about how Hilary ran her campaign comes to light, and the advantage of hindsight, it becomes clearer and clearer that Hilary wasn't this great "pragmatic" choice her diehard defenders painted her as.

If I heard words like "pragmatic" "sensible" "experienced" again, it'd be too soon.

Also, people venting after months of abuse and mocking from arrogant Hilary supporters on this forum that treated anyone that had even mild questions about Hilary as a leper.
 
He was saying the whole time that his polls told him he was ahead. Obviously, anything Trump says should be taken with a grain of salt, but to say that he expected to lose seems like a stretch. Do you have anything to back that up?

Clinton's campaign was a bust. Charisma and inspiration are not shallow, anti-intellectual drivel. They are vital attributes to leadership.

If you ask the average person what Clinton's slogan was, they will almost certainly scratch their heads.

Yes, his campaign was surprised he won, this was said and talked about as it was happening. They figured it was gonna be a rough night.

https://politicalwire.com/2016/11/09/trump-campaign-thought-lose/
 
Her and her staffers certainly had some major screwups, and she came with lots of baggage (some deserved, some not)... but the FBI and Russian government both directly meddling in the election in Trump's favor is a pretty big problem on its own.

I don't think anybody rational would argue that the FBI and the Russia stuff didn't have an impact. But I think focusing on them instead of things we can change is pointless.
 
In some alternate reality, Hillary tries to court the rural white vote, has middling success, gets decried by minorities for prioritizing white issues, and loses both the popular vote and the EC.

Like, 20/20 hindsight, she lost the EC. Of course she should have done things differently.

But it isn't fair to paint her strategy as a disaster or obviously ill-fated. She still won the popular despite a whole lot of shit getting slung at her (notably Comey). The majority of analysts praised her strategy up until the point that it failed.

The game is different this year, and very few people (on both sides of the aisle) recognized that until it was too late.

Obama had no issue juggling the rust belt and the massive city life that exists across the expanse of the Democratic Party. He made sure to not only visit those regions but he made sure Campaign material was constantly focusing on the fact the region was being brutalized and that he would try to help while also pointing out how the Republicans assisted in the abuse
 
It was the truth. No matter what, she will never win with you fucking people. Not a politician in the history of America has ever been so needled - if she lies, she gets shit on. If she tells the truth, she gets shit on.

Shitting on the electorate is NEVER the answer. You can say what you want about their candidate but you STFU about them. All it does is motivate them AGAINST YOU. And she had the nerve to try and co-opt "when they go low, we go high".

SMH.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom