Sessions can't remember meeting with the Russians or doesn't think what they talked about was important.
This was during the DNC hack.
Sessions response:
![]()
Former Obama DOJ staffer responds to response:
Im not aware of any of those activities, he responded. He added: I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians.
So by saying it was just superficial comments, they're basically proving he did have contact
This is going to end in impeachment, isn't it?
Stage 6: Looking up prices on Polonium detectors on Google.
omg omgomgomgomg
omg omgomgomgomg
This is going to end in impeachment, isn't it?
It's touched on in the article.Here's something I'm unsure of: if none of this other Russia puppetry had happened with the Trump campaign, how uncommon would it be for someone like Sessions to meet with foreign ambassadors? I really have no idea what the context is for these interactions, but I'd imagine senators are communicating with ambassadors from a bunch of different countries multiple times throughout the year.
Obviously there is so much smoke here that treason is almost a foregone conclusion, but if this single story existed in a vacuum under an administration that wasn't insane, would the main issue be him not disclosing the ambassador conversations during the hearings?
The Washington Post contacted all 26 members of the 2016 Senate Armed Services Committee to see whether any lawmakers besides Sessions met with Kislyak in 2016. Of the 20 lawmakers who responded, every senator, including Chairman John McCain (R-Ariz.), said they did not meet with the Russian ambassador last year. The other lawmakers on the panel did not respond as of Wednesday evening.
Members of the committee have not been beating a path to Kislyaks door, a senior Senate Armed Services Committee staffer said, citing tensions in relations with Moscow. Besides Sessions, the staffer added, There havent been a ton of members who are looking to meet with Kislyak for their committee duties.
Last month, The Washington Post reported that Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn had discussed U.S. sanctions with Kislyak during the month before Trump took office, contrary to public assertions by Mike Pence, the vice president-elect, and other top Trump officials. Flynn was forced to resign the following week.
Investigators Probed Jeff Sessions Contacts With Russian Officials
WASHINGTONU.S. investigators have examined contacts Attorney General Jeff Sessions had with Russian officials during the time he was advising Donald Trumps presidential campaign, according to people familiar with the matter.
The outcome of the investigation, and whether it is ongoing, wasnt clear, these people said. The contacts were being examined as part of a wide-ranging U.S. counterintelligence investigation into possible communications between members of President Trumps campaign team and Russian operatives, they said.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation, which has been leading the investigation, didnt immediately respond to a request for comment. The White House directed requests for comment to the Justice Department.
During his confirmation hearing for attorney general in January, Mr. Sessions, a Republican senator from Alabama, testified under oath that he had no contact with Russian officials as a campaign surrogate and never discussed the 2016 election with Russian officials.
But Mr. Sessions spoke with the Russian ambassador to the U.S., Sergei Kislyak, while the Republican National Convention was under way in Cleveland last summer, according to his spokeswoman, Sarah Flores. He also spoke with Mr. Kislyak on another occasion last year, by phone from his Senate office, she said.
Ms. Flores said the contact last July occurred when Mr. Sessions spoke at a Heritage Foundation event attended by Mr. Kislyak in Cleveland, appearing in his capacity as a senator, not a campaign official. She said several ambassadors approached Mr. Sessions after his speech at the Heritage Foundation event, including Mr. Kislyak.
It was short and informal, she said.
She said the attorney general wasnt aware that his communications have been under investigation.
During his confirmation hearing in January, Mr. Sessions was asked what he would do if any evidence emerged that someone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government during campaign and said: Im not aware of any of those activities.
I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I didnt havedid not have communications with the Russians, and Im unable to comment on it, he said.
Ms. Flores said Mr. Sessions wasnt required to disclose the contacts because they took place in his capacity as a senator, not a campaign official.
The attorney general has been very clear that as a senator he had conversations with the Russian ambassador, Ms. Flores said in a statement. Last year, the senator had over 25 conversations with foreign ambassadors as a senior member of the Armed Services Committee, including the British, Korean, Japanese, Polish, Indian, Chinese, Canadian, Australian, German and Russian ambassadors.
The wide-ranging investigation is being pursued by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Central Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency and the Treasury Department, officials have said. Counterintelligence probes seldom lead to public accusations or criminal charges.
The probe, if ongoing, could create a highly unusual and sensitive political dynamic given that the FBI is part of the Justice Department that Mr. Session as attorney general, now leads. Mr. Sessions has only been in office for about a month and the investigation began before he was nominated and confirmed by the Senate.
Here's something I'm unsure of: if none of this other Russia puppetry had happened with the Trump campaign, how uncommon would it be for someone like Sessions to meet with foreign ambassadors? I really have no idea what the context is for these interactions, but I'd imagine senators are communicating with ambassadors from a bunch of different countries multiple times throughout the year.
Obviously there is so much smoke here that treason is almost a foregone conclusion, but if this single story existed in a vacuum under an administration that wasn't insane, would the main issue be him not disclosing the ambassador conversations during the hearings?
Hope sub boss Bannan goes next
This is going to end in impeachment, isn't it?
omg omgomgomgomg
They really shouldn't be from what I can gather. But that's really irrelevant regardless since he lied under oath either wayCall me just curious and maybe a bit ignorant, but why would a senator from Alabama be talking and meeting with a Russian ambassador anyway?
I suppose it's probable they met before and were on friendly terms, but I don't know if I would by that.
If they were actively working on something to do w/ Russia in the committee it'd be fine.Call me just curious and maybe a bit ignorant, but why would a senator from Alabama be talking and meeting with a Russian ambassador anyway?
I suppose it's probable they met before and were on friendly terms, but I don't know if I would by that.
What I want to know is, people like this calling for his resignation, do they have additional proof that we the public don't have, or are they coming to this conclusion based on the news reporting, and nothing more?
Call me just curious and maybe a bit ignorant, but why would a senator from Alabama be talking and meeting with a Russian ambassador anyway?
I suppose it's probable they met before and were on friendly terms, but I don't know if I would by that.
What I want to know is, people like this calling for his resignation, do they have additional proof that we the public don't have, or are they coming to this conclusion based on the news reporting, and nothing more?