afreaknamedpete
Member
Did they really want to release this game with a PR shitstorm?
Wow seriously what's the main issue Japanese​ companies have with this subject? Why do they seem so adverse to the concept of Internet media?Japan gonna Japan.
We had to get Arc System Works to stop requesting takedowns of English Skullgirls videos in their defense of the Japanese release, which was much later.
We more or less had to pull rank and say "Look, this is OUR IP and we do what we want with it. If you want to take down Japanese-voiced videos to defend your investment, go ahead. But you may not target the game as a whole."
Selling your copy is different than broadcasting yourself using it.
There are many different rights involved in copyright. You can have the right to sell your copy without having the right to publicly display, perform, transmit or broadcast the work. Streaming is not as cut and dry as many people may think.
Not that I'm defending Atlus here, just talking about the law itself.
Can I just say it's fucking hilarious that the note is basically nothing but spoilers. Like actual, legit spoilers.
This. I typically hate the 'E' word, but some of the entitlement here is insane. It's their work, they can do what they like this it, implement whatever rules suit them best, even if their approach is contrary to the rest of the industry. There is no implicit right to be allowed to make money broadcasting the entirety of someone else's copyrighted work. Copyright exists to protect against precisely that kind of thing. Feel like I'm taking crazy pills reading a lot of this thread.
You want to use a few clips of the end of the game in your video review? That's fair use. You're upset you won't be able to make money streaming hours of it at a time or even the entire thing? Nah, not with you there.
I will agree with those saying that this is so futile as to be nonsensical, but it's their right, 100% to be that way.
That is why i said that we are kinda in the grey area. Game is not same thing as a movie or music. It is not same experience so public displaying is not the same as for movie for example.
You realise they even blocked taking screenshots right? No one in this thread is trying to stream the game for profit
This feels like a topic streamers and LPers have hoped would just go as long as possible without ever being addressed. The reality of the situation is publishers are under no obligation to allow people to stream the entirety of their games. It has become the norm simply because it can be construed as marketing. Compare this to how other broadcast mediums have to deal with this stuff and it is practically lawless what goes on at Twitch and YouTube.
No, but seriously, take a moment to listen to Rob and Patricia Schneider talk about all the insane hoops they have to jump through for making a TV show compared to what a YouTube show like GameGrumps goes through to show potentially hundreds of hours of a game.
I'm not advocating for tons of restrictions here, believe me I love that I can watch a full playthrough of basically anything out there. But I'm not going to shout fuck you Atlus because they want a little more control than what is currently happening. They've gone about it poorly, no doubt, but it is a very long overdo conversation. There is clearly some middle ground that can be found here that doesn't need the extreme hyperbole, boycotts, or sky is falling sort of response that is being seen.
I'm not advocating for tons of restrictions here, believe me I love that I can watch a full playthrough of basically anything out there. But I'm not going to shout fuck you Atlus because they want a little more control than what is currently happening. They've gone about it poorly, no doubt, but it is a very long overdo conversation. There is clearly some middle ground that can be found here that doesn't need the extreme hyperbole, boycotts, or sky is falling sort of response that is being seen.
Japan gonna Japan.
We had to get Arc System Works to stop requesting takedowns of English Skullgirls videos in their defense of the Japanese release, which was much later.
We more or less had to pull rank and say "Look, this is OUR IP and we do what we want with it. If you want to take down Japanese-voiced videos to defend your investment, go ahead. But you may not target the game as a whole."
Japan gonna Japan.
We had to get Arc System Works to stop requesting takedowns of English Skullgirls videos in their defense of the Japanese release, which was much later.
We more or less had to pull rank and say "Look, this is OUR IP and we do what we want with it. If you want to take down Japanese-voiced videos to defend your investment, go ahead. But you may not target the game as a whole."
It just reads as odd to me since they had no issue with this for six months until this version came out.No, but people are defending the people who want to stream the game for profit.
I think blocking the streaming and screenshot features is the very height of stupidity, but I think they're within their rights to say "please don't stream these parts of the game". Even if said request will ultimately be futile etc.
I'm just saying that no one has the right to be allowed stream said material.
I expect the same, as far as shitty things that developers and publishers do. Not letting you stream their game past a certain point is pretty low on the totem pole.
I was looking forward to the best friends or easy allies streaming this or doing a play through too.
How long is this for anyway? Is it in perpetuity? Is it for six months post release?
The fact that people have already streamed the entire game just in Japanese but suddenly now it's an issue continues to perplex me.
It just reads as odd to me since they had no issue with this for six months until this version came out.
I mean I played my version of the Japanese copy and they REMOVED the ability to stream certain sections.
It's utterly bizarre.
No, but people are defending the people who want to stream the game for profit.
I think blocking the streaming and screenshot features is the very height of stupidity, but I think they're within their rights to say "please don't stream these parts of the game". Even if said request will ultimately be futile etc.
I'm just saying that no one has the right to be allowed stream said material.
Good post. Why people think that IP rights shouldn't apply to video games as a whole is beyond me... but companies appear to have let this impression develop in the race for free marketing.
Which is stupid. The game isn't getting a big marketing push really, but somebody like Lirik streaming it would signal boost it quite hard.Gets into that territory of "what is the statute of limitations of a spoiler"
As a former GameFAQs moderator, I've literally deleted unmarked Final Fantasy VII spoilers that everyone knows because over there any unmarked spoiler for anything ever had to go.
I can't see them keeping this up forever. They just want to drive sales as much as possible on this game first. That is all it is.
Which is stupid. The game isn't getting a big marketing push really, but somebody like Lirik streaming it would signal boost it quite hard.
Just feels like they have no idea what to do with it.
Which is stupid. The game isn't getting a big marketing push really, but somebody like Lirik streaming it would signal boost it quite hard.
Just feels like they have no idea what to do with it.
Whaaaat.Japan gonna Japan.
We had to get Arc System Works to stop requesting takedowns of English Skullgirls videos in their defense of the Japanese release, which was much later.
We more or less had to pull rank and say "Look, this is OUR IP and we do what we want with it. If you want to take down Japanese-voiced videos to defend your investment, go ahead. But you may not target the game as a whole."
Damn that's super depressing.The Super Best Friend's just announced on Twitter their LP is cancelled. They have 500k potential eyes that now won't see them basically give Atlus free advertising.
You're asking why threatening people because they do something with their legally bought game is an issue?I don't know why this is an issue at all. Are people just complaining for the sake of complaining? What does it matter?
I can't see them keeping this up forever. They just want to drive sales as much as possible on this game first. That is all it is.
This feels like a topic streamers and LPers have hoped would just go as long as possible without ever being addressed. The reality of the situation is publishers are under no obligation to allow people to stream the entirety of their games. It has become the norm simply because it can be construed as marketing. Compare this to how other broadcast mediums have to deal with this stuff and it is practically lawless what goes on at Twitch and YouTube.
No, but seriously, take a moment to listen to Rob and Patricia Schneider talk about all the insane hoops they have to jump through for making a TV show compared to what a YouTube show like GameGrumps goes through to show potentially hundreds of hours of a game.
I'm not advocating for tons of restrictions here, believe me I love that I can watch a full playthrough of basically anything out there. But I'm not going to shout fuck you Atlus because they want a little more control than what is currently happening. They've gone about it poorly, no doubt, but it is a very long overdo conversation. There is clearly some middle ground that can be found here that doesn't need the extreme hyperbole, boycotts, or sky is falling sort of response that is being seen.
Japan gonna Japan.
We had to get Arc System Works to stop requesting takedowns of English Skullgirls videos in their defense of the Japanese release, which was much later.
We more or less had to pull rank and say "Look, this is OUR IP and we do what we want with it. If you want to take down Japanese-voiced videos to defend your investment, go ahead. But you may not target the game as a whole."
Japan gonna Japan.
We had to get Arc System Works to stop requesting takedowns of English Skullgirls videos in their defense of the Japanese release, which was much later.
We more or less had to pull rank and say "Look, this is OUR IP and we do what we want with it. If you want to take down Japanese-voiced videos to defend your investment, go ahead. But you may not target the game as a whole."
The Super Best Friend's just announced on Twitter their LP is cancelled. They have 500k potential eyes that now won't see them basically give Atlus free advertising.
lol (I HIGHLY RECOMMEND NOT DOING THIS, YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED) is not "please don't stream these parts of the game" Save the quote marks for things they actually said
It isn't? What's the difference, because I don't see one.
Damn that's super depressing.
I wanted to see the continued adventure of Kenpachi Ramasama.
The Super Best Friend's just announced on Twitter their LP is cancelled. They have 500k potential eyes that now won't see them basically give Atlus free advertising.
It's not quite the same, no. But what if you stream all 100 hours of a heavily story driven game? That is certainly a substantial portion of the copyrighted work. This is an open question at this point, I don't think any court has yet addressed it.
You know, I thought the complaints about spoilerphobia on this site were overblown.
And then I saw this fucking ridiculous thing.
It is kinda hard to make a law or rules regarding issues like this. For movies and music genres don't mater, for games they do mater a lot. That means that decisions would be needed to be made on per game basis. Then you have argument that people who would watch whole game would never buy game in the first place, and then you have argument that if people want to watch your game instead of play it you are kinda selling movie not a game.
And you know they were just gonna gush over it the entire time.