Gordon Shumway
Banned
Fun fact: googling sad gif has Betty's Sad Affleck as the 2nd result.
Oh shit! lol..
Fun fact: googling sad gif has Betty's Sad Affleck as the 2nd result.
I hope Captain America makes fun of Star Lord for owning a Zune
I don't really see Mantis as a daughter figure for Drax, but a figure of friendship. Mantis's first friend. If she's a daughter figure that makes the scene where Drax imagines her having sex with him unnecessarily gross.
Like Inferno mentioned, Drax does comment that she reminds him of his daughter because she is naive.
Their bond is that of friends, but Mantis also was an adopted daughter of Ego in a way, since, like Thanos, he stole her away from her planet as a child and raised her, but unlike Gamora and Nebula who were raised to be killers, Mantis was raised to be a servant. It wasn't until Drax points it out that she realizes Ego treats her like his pet.
Mantis seeing (and feeling) the way that Drax cares for his own daughter realizes how the bond of parents and their children should be and not the way that Ego treats his kids (by often killing them).
I think it's fair to see that Gunn was trying to paint their friendship as one of an almost father/daughter bond, which is why there was the confusion scene with Drax thinking she was coming on to him so they can both make it clear that there wasn't any sexual or romantic component to that connection as to not undermine it.
That's not to say that there isn't the chance that the two get paired romantically in the future, but what I think Gunn is trying to do is give Drax a way to move on after losing his wife and daughter and I see it in this film as giving Mantis a new adopted father and Drax an adopted daughter rather than making it be a romantic pairing.
Different character. That was Michelle Yeoh.I'm not into the comics at all, but was that Thor 3's villain shown? Cate Blanchett's character. I could have sworn I saw Goldblum in the credits too.
Ah. They looked similar to me after seeing the Thor trailer before the movie started.Different character. That was Michelle Yeoh.
when Ego zaps Peter, he shows his son a True Celestial
![]()
Then forget him being dumb--if this is an all-new Groot he's a fucking genius for being a few months old. Also lazy to stick him with the exact same name and weird that he would have exactly the same verbal tic?Kin5290 said:No. If you cut a shoot off of a plant and replant it, you get a clone of the original plant which is obviously completely different from the existing plant. Same thing with Groot.
I took it that he decided and implemented this before leaving the third time.Besides, he had to give her cancer at some point, so he either had to a. come back and give it to her himself or
I could have sworn I saw Goldblum dancing in the credits also.Just got back. Thought it was pretty good. Not sure if I like it more than the first yet though.
I'm not into the comics at all, but was that Thor 3's villain shown? Cate Blanchett's character. I could have sworn I saw Goldblum in the credits too.
I could have sworn I saw Goldblum dancing in the credits also.
Nah. That's a celestial being, of course but, not a "celestial" in the literal sense.
touche - technically all the Guardians already saw a Celestial in Vol 1
i do think Peter spotted Eternity when his eyes glazed over though
I don't know the comic lore but is there anything that desputes Ego being an infinite stone? Are they all accounted for in the MCU already?
I ask because I just saw the Collector scene and he had a similar monologue to Ego's about "before creation itself..." and coming into existence. Maybe Thanos holds this over Peter in Avengers?
If not an infinite stone, I see people talking about an Eternity character that I'm going to have to wiki. Is this a creator? If anyone can summarize Ego and Eternity, that'd be cool too.
I don't know the comic lore but is there anything that desputes Ego being an infinite stone? Are they all accounted for in the MCU already?
I ask because I just saw the Collector scene and he had a similar monologue to Ego's about "before creation itself..." and coming into existence. Maybe Thanos holds this over Peter in Avengers?
If not an infinite stone, I see people talking about an Eternity character that I'm going to have to wiki. Is this a creator? If anyone can summarize Ego and Eternity, that'd be cool too.
Ok, so is that a vision of what Ego could have become had he been successful? Otherwise why would seeing that entity be a revelation? (Thinking out loud, not sure people have contemplated this yet).the only stone unaccounted for is the Soul Stone - and as far as we know it has not been addressed in any MCU content so far
when Ego whammies Peter, his eyes glaze over and you can see galaxies in his eyes... Peter says, "I see... Eternity"
he is referring to the cosmic being Eternity - a supreme being and leader of great cosmic entities (greater than Ego, who is a "little g" god)
![]()
the only stone unaccounted for is the Soul Stone - and as far as we know it has not been addressed in any MCU content so far
when Ego whammies Peter, his eyes glaze over and you can see galaxies in his eyes... Peter says, "I see... Eternity"
he is referring to the cosmic being Eternity - a supreme being and leader of great cosmic entities (greater than Ego, who is a "little g" god)
![]()
Just got back. Thought it was pretty good. Not sure if I like it more than the first yet though.
I'm not into the comics at all, but was that Thor 3's villain shown? Cate Blanchett's character. I could have sworn I saw Goldblum in the credits too.
Didn't Adam Warlock have the soul stone in his head? That's what I recall from back in the day.
Pretty sure they know this.You saw Jeff Goldblum on screen in the trailer for Thor 3, not just in the credits. He was the guy who had Thor put in the gladiator pit.
Just got back; it was pretty good, not great. There were a lot of fun jokes but too often it felt like the movie would keep a gag running one beat too long and it got a little grating - either explaining the joke or repeating it sometimes. I loved how weird it got, although every now and then it felt as if it was undermining its own seriousness with its humor sometimes."I'm gonna build a huge statue of Pac Man!" was funny; him becoming Pac Man with sound effects for his serious father/son duel was... hmm. Likewise the speech he gave for Yondu's viking funeral was funny, and emotional, but it felt like it was more for the sake of a joke than something the character would actually say.
It was too long by half and most of the meat of the story was crammed into the third act. I really liked the family matters the story addressed; I especially liked Gamora and Nebula's arc together. The setup of Ego and then the reveal of him being untoward just happened way too fast; we get like one scene of Peter trusting him before it starts dropping obvious hints about what is really going on.
I'm a bit confused about Ego's motivation as well. So he realized he was a god, then got bored without a purpse and didn't want to be alone... so his plan was to take over the universe and be alone? I feel like I missed something here.
Also, c'mon. Don't play The Chain if you're not going to play all of the song! Where's that bass solo!!
I knew it wasn't her because of the context but she looked SO much like Hela. Since the trailer for Thor 3 was shown during the previews, I'm sure there are a shit ton of people confused as why she showed up at the end of Volume 2.
Yeah, I wish he wasn't a fool and that he could have carried the plan on a bit longer... or that the reveal would've happened some other way.Ego's mindset is spelled out plain and clear. Yes he understands how humans work, but Peter isn't entirely human. He sees the human in Peter as a flaw and believed Peter would learn to forget his human attachments. He really believed it wouldn't matter at that point because he was a fool.
It's difficult to answer this with any definite confidence because we only have Ego's unreliable account to go on, but it's clear that Gunn is evoking the classic sci-fi trope of humanoid species going to an alien planet and mating with the population.Another question! Did he make his human form before going out to find life? And did he keep his human form regardless of the being he was trying to seduce?
I can't be the only one making proper Awesome Mix's with Come a little bit closer put onto vol. 1's mix and Ain't no mountain on 2'a right?
And would I want you back be on 2 as well considering its placement in the 1st film?
Just got back; it was pretty good, not great. There were a lot of fun jokes but too often it felt like the movie would keep a gag running one beat too long and it got a little grating - either explaining the joke or repeating it sometimes. I loved how weird it got, although every now and then it felt as if it was undermining its own seriousness with its humor sometimes."I'm gonna build a huge statue of Pac Man!" was funny; him becoming Pac Man with sound effects for his serious father/son duel was... hmm. Likewise the speech he gave for Yondu's viking funeral was funny, and emotional, but it felt like it was more for the sake of a joke than something the character would actually say.
It was too long by half and most of the meat of the story was crammed into the third act. I really liked the family matters the story addressed; I especially liked Gamora and Nebula's arc together. The setup of Ego and then the reveal of him being untoward just happened way too fast; we get like one scene of Peter trusting him before it starts dropping obvious hints about what is really going on.
I'm a bit confused about Ego's motivation as well. So he realized he was a god, then got bored without a purpose and didn't want to be alone... so his plan was to take over the universe and be alone? I feel like I missed something here.
Also, c'mon. Don't play The Chain if you're not going to play all of the song! Where's that bass solo!!
Haha, oh shit.I hope you also put Father and Son on your Zune.
What are the god like beings that were with Stan Lee called?