"The Last Night" (Milkshake Duck incarnate) E3 Trailer [XBO/Win10/Steam 2018]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Genres evolve. Cyberpunk can expand and evolve too, if it's done well. That's like saying because noir is rooted in the world-weary cynicism that arose in between the eras of the Great Depression and Cold War, that noir can only always portray subject matter with that kind of thematic outlook.

There is a certain amount of a malleability to genre because genres are human constructs, but once you start making things that are fundamentally antithetical to a genre then you are no longer working within that genre. Noir, for example, can't be redefined to include a romantic comedy whose meet cute scenes take place in smokey bars on rainy nights just because older noirs privileged scenes of smokey bars on rainy nights. There is a difference between words being elastic and words forfeiting their meaning.
 
This is just factually wrong. Cyberpunk largely originated in literature and the oppositional stance to existing power structures and hierarchies is absolutely endemic to the genre. If you claim to be making a "cyberpunk" game just cuz it looks kinda like Blade Runner and you make a game that celebrates existing power structures then you are making kitsch.
I would say for the most part, modern cyberpunk is mostly concerned with opposition or negative portrayal of a power structure -- not necessarily one that is currently existing. You could the two most common ones are anti-corporate power, which is a response to an existing power structure, but if you look at other takes on cyberpunk (e.g. the recent highly dystopic Deus Ex MD), they responses to potential existing power structures (e.g. MD evolved from past Deus Ex games to include more response to authoritarianism).

So I think it could in theory be fair game for a cyberpunk to explore other political ideologies or movements. Cyberpunk often explores existing social problems, too: urban density or urbanization; social policies; etc.

As these things evolve since the 70s I think cyberpunk should evolve to consider what happens if new ideologies and their utopian ideals because dystopic.

However, I think there has to be some rooted 'existing' believability to it. There could be some broader liberal power structures that could be explored.

Feminism in particular, though, is still such an activist cause and so far yet away from being a power structure that it seems a unbelievable choice for cyberpunk because feminism is still basically difficult to believe as the power structure rather than the punk. Feminism still is the punk. (Though, I mean, it's a free country... if that's what he wants to explore or portray than have at it). Choosing it does feel someone as a personal reaction to it rather than a societal reaction to it -- which is what cyberpunk typically explores.

But there could have been a choice other than just capitalism or authoritarianism. To explore more social-based institutionalizing could possibly work. In some ways, it could be even more punk precisely because it's such an outcast notion of what exists today as utopian ideals.
 
There is a certain amount of a malleability to genre because genres are human constructs, but once you start making things that are fundamentally antithetical to a genre then you are no longer working within that genre. Noir, for example, can't be redefined to include a romantic comedy whose meet cute scenes take place in smokey bars on rainy nights just because older noirs privileged scenes of smokey bars on rainy nights. There is a difference between words being elastic and words forfeiting their meaning.
Usually in the books where such society flaws are "eliminated", that utopia is at the cost of individuality, free will, one's humanity, etc. That classic twisted utopia like The Giver and other works. The "rampant capitalism worked after all" twist on cyberpunk could be interesting if it really didnt work, it jusr seems like it did on the surface.
 
Man, I saw the trailer, come to this thread and it's a massive downer :(.

Still would like to hear more from the developer(s) though. But for now, with the information we have, the stuff that was tweeted, it is hard to justify supporting them.
 
cyberpunk has punk in the name, being subservient to authority and spouting lines about how capitalism is great is not punk in the slightest, this guy is simply using the style of cyberpunk without any of the actual substance
 
Or maybe it's so not punk that it is punk.

if ironic punk becomes a thing i'll overdose myself on the latest designer drugs that are supposed to make me feel like i'm someone else

the core conceit of why this gets it wrong is this (handily found on a reddit post on r/cyberpunk)

c38HJbt.png
 
Definitely the most surprising game announcement that got my eyes and ears perked up. Ascetically it has a very Blade Runner feel to it and what with my enjoyment of that film (and 2049 coming out) I can absolutely get behind this game.
 
Yes, Tim Soret is a gamergater.

And, no, outing him as a gg scumbag isn't a thread derail as it will be important information for people who may be otherwise interested in the game.

I, for one, think the game looks interesting but knowing Tim is a cunt means I cannot buy it with a clear conscience.

So I won't be buying it.

Well, I'm grateful for learning about this, won't be buying despite how cool it looks.
 
That this got on stage presence is on thing...

But it being followed by an Annapurna Interactive trailer is al the more jarring. Founder of AI, Megan Ellison is openly lesbian and describes herself as a feminist. The clash couldn't be bigger.
 
That this got on stage presence is on thing...

But it being followed by an Annapurna Interactive trailer is al the more jarring. Founder of AI, Megan Ellison is openly lesbian and describes herself as a feminist. The clash couldn't be bigger.

Would've been more upset if Ashen was made by assholes tbh, that game looks sick
 
This "small" game is by far the most interesting stuff I've seen at E3 so far, along with Dragonball Warriors Z (please don't laugh)

Both have an incredibly strong personality in video and both are promising some very good time to me
 
Fucking hell, I had been looking forward to this game since the first pictures came out. So disappointing to hear the guy's a dumbass.
 
This thread is something else.

You have the writer trying their best to promote the game while increasingly damning info comes out about the developer.

I feel sorry for the writer if they didn't know who they were working alongside.
 
Well I guess I'm open to him fully explaining his supposed change of heart but as of right now I'm gonna have to pass on this beautiful looking game. What a shame
 
And here I was thinking this thread being so active meant everyone hyped about this game. Definitely looking forward to it, but I won't lie, the dev's bullshit will be tough to ignore.
 
this is totally unrelated to the game, and I have zero confidence they'll be able to write a real compelling cyberpunk story anyway

I've always wondered why "soviet cyberpunk" doesn't exist, like, the Soviet Union was essentially a corporatist dictatorship, and it'd be pretty easy to extend most major cyberpunk idea to that. It just happens to be derived from communism rather than capitalism. Plus, duh, the general contrast of setting a cyberpunk story in the Soviet Union instead of America.

It's weird that it's never been done, even in this era of barely-cyberpunk-cyberpunk. It seems so obvious.
 
This thread is something else.

You have the writer trying their best to promote the game while increasingly damning info comes out about the developer.

I feel sorry for the writer if they didn't know who they were working alongside.
I don't, when their answer on Twitter is to handwave it as haters.
 
Who gives a fuck what cyber punk is suppose to be. It has no baring what so ever.

It is a game. It can regard or disregard any "genre" cliches it wants. The game is going to deal with an overly "progressive" dystopian world with an matriarchal power structure. Which is very interesting. Ateast its not something that has been done 10000 of times.

I cannot see if its reflected in the art. But damn the game looks good.
 
How does lighting in a 2D sprite work? Because holy shit. I want an actual explanation or link to any article about that.
 
Best looking game at the MS conference if you ask me. Slick, stylish, full of colour (unlike mostly everything else shown) and naturally harkens back to games like Flash Back and movies like Blade Runner. Will get this on PC for sure.
 
KmpDjSb.png


Beyond any of his stupid personal politics, this makes the game sound dumb as fuck.

thanks for pointing this out. i really hope this limits the scope of this guy's success and has people at the top actually vet what they're getting into when they strike these deals.
 
in principle, yes, you can write a compelling story about matriarchies or whatever, and people have indeed have.

but in practice, it's pretty obvious that this isn't intended to be a thoughtful analysis of the concept, it's meant to be a platform to advocate the developer's scumbag politics, directly related to the ideology of a literal hate group.
 
MåndagSöndag;240243328 said:
Who gives a fuck what cyber punk is suppose to be. It has no baring what so ever.

It is a game. It can regard or disregard any "genre" cliches it wants. The game is going to deal with an overly "progressive" dystopian world with an matriarchal power structure. Which is very interesting. Ateast its not something that has been done 10000 of times.

I cannot see if its reflected in the art. But damn the game looks good.

Things are not automatically good just because they are different.
 
I don't necessarily think this guy being a piece of shit means you can't buy and enjoy the game. People with shit opinions are capable of creating great works.

It's just whether this particular shithead is, I guess. Wait for reviews kinda situation.
 
I don't necessarily think this guy being a piece of shit means you can't buy and enjoy the game. People with shit opinions are capable of creating great works.

It's just whether this particular shithead is, I guess. Wait for reviews kinda situation.

He's obviously using the game as a sounding board for his views though
 
MåndagSöndag;240243860 said:
I agree.

But it is not a negative either. A different take on something can make it more interesting.
there's little reason to believe he can pull it off, though
 
I don't necessarily think this guy being a piece of shit means you can't buy and enjoy the game. People with shit opinions are capable of creating great works.

It's just whether this particular shithead is, I guess. Wait for reviews kinda situation.

I don't think anybody disagrees that people will hand-wave the issue of supporting people like Tim Sorbet in the gaming industry so that they may play a game. That sort of willful ignorance is exactly what's allowed him to get to this stage to begin with so that it may permeate further.
 
He's obviously using the game as a sounding board for his views though

Doesn't mean it can't be interesting.

I don't really want to 'support' these people but it would be kinda interesting to experience things from the POV of someone you fundamentally disagree with. Uncomfortable and frustrating, sure, but at least that's evoking something from you.

Is there a comparable to this - like a film directed by a massive racist/homophobe where those themes are central to the film, perhaps?
 
He's obviously using the game as a sounding board for his views though

He can make what he wants, it's really the publisher here that should be looked at because they're basically endorsing this and giving him a platform. They either didn't do their homework, or they did and they're going to look the other way in the hopes of making money.
 
Doesn't mean it can't be interesting.

I don't really want to 'support' these people but it would be kinda interesting to experience things from the POV of someone you fundamentally disagree with. Uncomfortable and frustrating, sure, but at least that's evoking something from you.

Is there a comparable to this - like a film directed by a massive racist/homophobe where those themes are central to the film, perhaps?
Turner diaries? I'm not sure, honestly I do think people are writing it off a bit too early (even though every indication shows its gonna be some dumbass shlock that doesn't deserve the cyberpunk aesthetic)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom