Whompa02
Member
Is youtube gonna do anything?
You trying to make me laugh? YouTube blows at quality control...PieDiePie would be stripped if he wasn't bringing in so much ad revenue though. Sadly he's, "too big to fail" at this point...
Is youtube gonna do anything?
Boogie is one of the worst of the worst
Anytime anyone goes in on him he pulls the "I'm overweight and depressed!" card and then neckbeards the world over rush to his side in unity.
The n-word in latino communities is such a strange predicament that I've seen growing up (also from NY). You have people who grew up around black people in tight knit urban communities, and are generally lumped into the same stereotypes and treatment, so they grow up with a similar cavalier attitude towards saying the n-word among themselves. But, they would similarly get heated if called an n-word by a white person.
It still weirds me out, but I always just let it slide, because a lot of latinos go through the same shit, so its "sort of" a pass, I guess? But then again, I hate hearing the word in general and never use any derivation of it.
There's also a subsection of the latino community that struggles deeply with anti-black racism and resentment. But that's another issue for another thread.
https://twitter.com/Spacekatgal/status/907226074915983360
Jesus Christ. I'm actually somewhat ashamed that I share a hobby with all of those racist fucks.
Is youtube gonna do anything?
More Devs and publishers should do this:
for anyone claiming it's not a big deal, try walking into your Boss's office (or the equivalent, depending on what your job is) and saying it*....see if you don't get a severe reprimand or fired.
*realizing that even in some jobs, this would be no big deal
for anyone claiming it's not a big deal, try walking into your Boss's office (or the equivalent, depending on what your job is) and saying it*....see if you don't get a severe reprimand or fired.
*realizing that even in some jobs, this would be no big deal
You hear a whole lot worse than this in the average PUBG lobby. I just mute the chat until I'm on the ground because there's almost always at least one person spewing racist or ignorant bullshit in every other match. Sadly, this has been a staple of online competitive shooters (and likely other genres) for as long as I can remember. People are assholes and so long as there are no consequences for their online actions, I'm not really sure what can be done about it.
Which is why it's important that PewDiePie feels the consequences now.
PDP's name should be synonymous with "that racist YouTuber" until he either makes a major effort to change and make it clear that his behaviour is not acceptable and should not be defended - not just an apology, he's been getting into these situations since the rape jokes five years ago, it's long past that point - or his career takes a major hit. Or, preferably, both.
You hear a whole lot worse than this in the average PUBG lobby. I just mute the chat until I'm on the ground because there's almost always at least one person spewing racist or ignorant bullshit in every other match. Sadly, this has been a staple of online competitive shooters (and likely other genres) for as long as I can remember. People are assholes and so long as there are no consequences for their online actions, I'm not really sure what can be done about it.
Gamegate showed that gaming as a whole is a pretty toxic hobby. Since then the evidence has really just been adding up. I don't even want to try PUBG just because I know what type of people it attracts.
5 years! Must be great getting away with shit like this when you're bringing in the $$$$ for the suits.
Must be nice to be touted as a children's entertainer and picked up by Disney when your entire career is founded on yelling "HE'S RAPING ME" into a microphone, and you're one racist slip-up away from going "oh fuck it I'll just deny climate change then".
None of those people are sponsored businesses who're a meaningful influence on kids.
So were my cousins being sexist even though some of them didnt even know what the word meant.
tbf to PUBG, the only time I've ever heard other people speak is in the lobby, but I muted that as soon as the game installed. It's the most quiet game imaginable and filled with a lot of moments of tension that group chat is never apart of. It's the only online game worth playing because I don't need to work with anyone or listen to anyone.
I don't take it to be part of gaming culture. Wouldn't you agree that that kind of thing would never happen at a local gaming event?
I think it's more that, culturally, it isn't acceptable to be bigoted, but a lot of people still are. They seek some way to vent those opinions and express them socially, and so we get things like Youtube comments. That anonymity allows them to express those opinions they have where they can't otherwise. Online gaming is just another venue for this.
I am reminded of a news story I read about a man who was "happily married" with kids, and everyone would say he was normal as could be. Nothing vile about him in person-to-person contact. But he would go online in his spare time and call women "whores" and other derogatory names. Beneath the surface of his complacent life there was a lot of hatred, and he needed to get that out somehow.
That's awful, but still an improvement - rather than people expressing their hateful opinions through something like a public lynching declared in a newspaper, they shout a slur through a microphone. I think the next step is really difficult to figure out. How do you eliminate the privation of hatred without some Orwellian measure? I mean this on a large-scale; obviously, on a small scale you just do what you can socially. But I sure wouldn't mind not having to pull a male student aside every few days to explain why he can't call another kid in my classroom a "faggot".
Side note: part of the challenges with teaching youths not to be bigoted is getting them to understand what bigotry entails. I have a student who called another student an "n word". My school is extremely diverse, and naturally all of the black kids started picking on him in response to his racism. The student was actually confused and reportedly said "Why are they all picking on me? I only called one of them an 'n word'". Which brings to mind something about that hateful word that it took me years to eliminate. At my high school, which had to be 99% non-black (we didn't even get MLK day off), the history teacher there taught all the kids that the "n word" just means "low quality black person", and so it wasn't actually a racist term. Every student who took his class came out "enlightened", and felt more justified than ever in saying "oh, that black person is an 'n word', but that other one over there isn't - it's not racist, you see". I've heard this said quite often, and maybe it's part of the key to this problem.
tbf to PUBG, the only time I've ever heard other people speak is in the lobby, but I muted that as soon as the game installed. It's the most quiet game imaginable and filled with a lot of moments of tension that group chat is never apart of. It's the only online game worth playing because I don't need to work with anyone or listen to anyone.
Yes. Unknowingly, but yes. They were.So were my cousins being sexist even though some of them didnt even know what the word meant.
So were my cousins being sexist even though some of them didnt even know what the word meant.
It's what sociopaths call empathy. They literally cannot understand why someone would feel bad for someone who is not them.
That word is different because we use words for criminal actions like "Murder", "Kill", "Steal", "Robbed" all the time in sports/gaming. Given this, using that word in context makes sense to a young male teenager because they're not going to be aware of the reasons not to do so. (i.e., kids aren't aware of the prevalance of sexual assault, how common it is to have victims and predators hidden around them, aren't growing up under the constant threat of adults males, etc.) You have to explain the reason using the word is a problem to them because kids are pretty sheltered from these elements of society.Everybodies different, in certain areas i think certain words have been normalized and people just dont think about the impacts of words outside their group. Alot of my cousins are xbox kids and i had to have talk about them saying rape all the time and they eventually stopped. Maybe im just being optimistic but I would rather think when people are using these words theyre not being malicious but ignorant which i can forgive.
Im trying to argue in good faith and I understand its wrong which is why i had a talk with them and got them to stop. However I think intent and context plays an important role in deciding whether a person is sexist/racist or just ignorant. In my cousins case I would say theyre ignorant and in pewdepies case he was being racist.Are you the type who is bringing your cousins into this argument as a shield and then going to whine when someone actually dares to criticize your family, who we don't know and have no reason to judge aside from what you told us?
Your cousins shouldn't be screaming rape and it's insensitive for them to do that. They may not know any better and that's not their fault. But it's still wrong, and if they continue to grow up doing that and they learn what the words mean, then they will no longer have the excuse of being naive children. Your cousins might end up growing up to become bad people, as upsetting as that may be for you.
You know better though. Even if you're not willing to explain what rape is - you aren't their parents - you may want to take it on yourself to tell them that it's a hurtful word that they shouldn't be saying, or tell their parents what they've been saying and where they've gotten it from.
None of those people are sponsored businesses who're a meaningful influence on kids.
Are your cousins 27 year old multi-millionaires with expansive networks and resources at their fingertips?So were my cousins being sexist even though some of them didnt even know what the word meant.
I think in those situations I say you may not be homophobic what you said was, which I stole from a poster on my campus, makes them feel less defensive.What I fucking hate about today's climate, is that I have to rationalize and justify having fucking empathy.
"Haha, stop being such a faggot"
"Hey dude, you shouldn't say that"
"Why not? You know I'm not a homophobe"
"Yeah, but you're saying stuff that homophobic people use against gay people to hurt them. Just have some empathy"
"It doesn't matter what I say; it's the intent that matters. If they get hurt by something I said that didn't have any bad intent, then it's not my fault"
I've had this argument, verbatim, like five different times with five different people over five different kinds of slurs, and yet they all still react the same way: "Why is empathy more important than my right to say a word?"
I've seen this reasoning all over Swedish social media the last day. "He's not a racist, he's just saying fucked up shit, which the mainstream media is twisting to turn him into some nazi".
IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT HE IS, WHAT MATTERS IS WHAT HE DOES, AND NOW HE DID SAY THE FUCKING N-WORD ON A STREAM, IT'S NOT THAT HARD TO NOT SAY THE WORD FFS.
Is youtube gonna do anything?
Im trying to argue in good faith and I understand its wrong which is why i had a talk with them and got them to stop. However I think intent and context plays an important role in deciding whether a person is sexist/racist or just ignorant. In my cousins case I would say theyre ignorant and in pewdepies case he was being racist.
What I fucking hate about today's climate, is that I have to rationalize and justify having fucking empathy.
"Haha, stop being such a faggot"
"Hey dude, you shouldn't say that"
"Why not? You know I'm not a homophobe"
"Yeah, but you're saying stuff that homophobic people use against gay people to hurt them. Just have some empathy"
"It doesn't matter what I say; it's the intent that matters. If they get hurt by something I said that didn't have any bad intent, then it's not my fault"
I've had this argument, verbatim, like five different times with five different people over five different kinds of slurs, and yet they all still react the same way: "Why is empathy more important than my right to say a word?"
I've seen this reasoning all over Swedish social media the last day. "He's not a racist, he's just saying fucked up shit, which the mainstream media is twisting to turn him into some nazi".
IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT HE IS, WHAT MATTERS IS WHAT HE DOES, AND NOW HE DID SAY THE FUCKING N-WORD ON A STREAM, IT'S NOT THAT HARD TO NOT SAY THE WORD FFS.
Excuse my ignorance but what is the difference between n***er and n***a and why is it considered "ok" (please note the "") using the latter?
To me (but as i said i am ignorant) it always felt and meant the same.
It always felt like "got" being "gotta" or "going to" becoming "gonna".
Dont get how the n word could become ok by just replacing the last 2 letters with A.
I mean sometimes it is even hard to distinguish between er and a.
-er is the original version, used exclusively as an insult.
-a is meant as a reclamation, reframing the word as a positive. I haven't seen the original reasoning, but I'd imagine it's from people who question why an insult based on their skin colour and race should continue to be an insult, because their skin colour and race is not bad. Not all black people are happy with the term, and it isn't for non-black people to use because it's not theirs to reclaim.
He was streaming on Youtube. But they'll probably do nothing as always.I think they would have taken it down, or at least demonetized the video, if he uploaded it on youtube. But this was apparently on a Twitch stream? So, the ball is in Twitch's court right now. Youtube of course has an indirect connection to the incident but I'm sure they won't do anything since he has 57 million subscribers and brings in a good chunk of ad revenue for the company
As a white person, just don't use both the terms. There is really no need for it and it is not our place to tell black people how to deal with a racial slur aimed at them.This doesnt make sense to me in all honesty. Both words seem like they are absolutely related to each other so just exchanging some letters really feels like a poor excuse to me.
Its like me or the gay community, deciding that faggot being changed to fagga or whatever is somehow reframing a racial slur to a positive one...
I mean come on black people using that word, whether its theirs or not, does no good to them. At least not to the eyes of ignorant people like me and I assure you 99% of non black people out there dont listen to n***a any different than n***er.
It is bad.
To me it really feels more like an excuse to justify the use of the word than anything else.
This doesnt make sense to me in all honesty. Both words seem like they are absolutely related to each other so just exchanging some letters really feels like a poor excuse to me.
Its like me deciding that faggot being changed to fagga or whatever is somehow reframing a racial slur to a poditive one...
I mean come on black people using that word, whether its theirs or not, does no good to them. At least not to the eyes of ignorant people like me and I assure you 99% of non black people out there dont listen to n***a any different than n***er.
It is bad.
Excuse my ignorance but what is the difference between n***er and n***a and why is it considered ok (please note the ) using the latter?
To me (but as i said i am ignorant) it always felt and meant the same.
It always felt like got becoming gotta or going to becoming gonna.
Dont get how the n word could become ok by just replacing the last 2 letters with A.
I mean sometimes it is even hard to distinguish between er and a.
The word "Queer" has been "reclaimed" by the LGBT community as an umbrella term.This doesnt make sense to me in all honesty. Both words seem like they are absolutely related to each other so just exchanging some letters really feels like a poor excuse to me.
Its like me or the gay community, deciding that faggot being changed to fagga or whatever is somehow reframing a racial slur to a positive one...
I mean come on black people using that word, whether its theirs or not, does no good to them. At least not to the eyes of ignorant people like me and I assure you 99% of non black people out there dont listen to n***a any different than n***er.
It is bad.
To me it really feels more like an excuse to justify the use of the word than anything else.
It's like reframing "queer" from an insult to a positive, like gay people have actually done.
Moreover, who are you to police how black people describe themselves? I'm not black, so it's not my place either.
On this addition:
There's a huge difference in the context between how the original word was originally used (by white people against the black people they oppressed) than how the revised word is used (by black people to their own community).
Black people don't need an excuse to use a word that describes black people. They aren't desperately trying to keep hold of the original word to hold themselves down.