ecosse_011172
Junior Member
Anyone who argues against gun control is basically a fucking psychopath, unbelievable.
WTF is wrong with you?
WTF is wrong with you?
Worthless,terrible, garbage post.i hate that the gun control thing is always the first thing the far left goes to. its the most simplistic route of logic possible. lazy even. if guns were illegal or even made "harder to get" with laws, it will not prevent things like this from happening.
besides, he could have just as easily killed as many by driving over people. probably more effective actually. anyone who has been to vegas before can tell you those sidewalks on the main strip or even the old vegas under that overhang are always packed with pedestrians.
Honestly, I think we're more likely to have hotel patdowns and x-rays after this than sensible gun laws.
Which is insane to me. Apparently he was 32 floors up and far away. How can he hit with precision like that.
okay cool soooo you admit if he didnt have a gun he would have driven people over. so you admit that its not the guns to blame but the killer? so then youd have to admit that banning guns would not have prevented this crime from happening.
okay cool soooo you admit if he didnt have a gun he would have driven people over. so you admit that its not the guns to blame but the killer? so then youd have to admit that banning guns would not have prevented this crime from happening.
okay cool soooo you admit if he didnt have a gun he would have driven people over. so you admit that its not the guns to blame but the killer? so then youd have to admit that banning guns would not have prevented this crime from happening.
I don't understand how it went from 2 to 58, did the 56 people die in hospital?
okay cool soooo you admit if he didnt have a gun he would have driven people over. so you admit that its not the guns to blame but the killer? so then youd have to admit that banning guns would not have prevented this crime from happening.
The first time I learned about those, I just thought it was insane that they were legal. Can see one in action here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_SWefYWKw0
This country's gun laws are so fucking dumb.
i hate that the gun control thing is always the first thing the far left goes to. its the most simplistic route of logic possible. lazy even. if guns were illegal or even made "harder to get" with laws, it will not prevent things like this from happening.
besides, he could have just as easily killed as many by driving over people. probably more effective actually. anyone who has been to vegas before can tell you those sidewalks on the main strip or even the old vegas under that overhang are always packed with pedestrians.
Im very confused with the injured number. Surely a great majority of those are people that were trampled/hurt during escape, right?
He wouldn't have been able to drive over 500+ people in a car. You're an absolute moron.
i hate that the gun control thing is always the first thing the far left goes to. its the most simplistic route of logic possible. lazy even.
i hate that the gun control thing is always the first thing the far left goes to. its the most simplistic route of logic possible. lazy even. if guns were illegal or even made "harder to get" with laws, it will not prevent things like this from happening.
besides, he could have just as easily killed as many by driving over people. probably more effective actually. anyone who has been to vegas before can tell you those sidewalks on the main strip or even the old vegas under that overhang are always packed with pedestrians.
Really? Most hunters I know hunt to get deer in their freezer. or a combination.
We don't need to hunt for food anymore, therefore it's for recreation.
Get a bow if you want to be bad ass.
i hate that the gun control thing is always the first thing the far left goes to. its the most simplistic route of logic possible. lazy even. if guns were illegal or even made "harder to get" with laws, it will not prevent things like this from happening.
besides, he could have just as easily killed as many by driving over people. probably more effective actually. anyone who has been to vegas before can tell you those sidewalks on the main strip or even the old vegas under that overhang are always packed with pedestrians.
Im very confused with the injured number. Surely a great majority of those are people that were trampled/hurt during escape, right?
Heck, Nevada's law:
![]()
Seems to work for UK and Australia. Not perfectly, but exponentially better than US.i hate that the gun control thing is always the first thing the far left goes to. its the most simplistic route of logic possible. lazy even. if guns were illegal or even made "harder to get" with laws, it will not prevent things like this from happening.
okay cool soooo you admit if he didnt have a gun he would have driven people over. so you admit that its not the guns to blame but the killer? so then youd have to admit that banning guns would not have prevented this crime from happening.
That is not the agreed definition of Terrorism. There are sorts of reasons why Nevada might have defined it that way. Probably to get more federal aid in cases like this after 9/11..
While we're at it, how the fuck is it still acceptable that you can buy semi-auto rifles at Walmart?Let me strip down to my underwear at a Hotel lobby so some fuck wit somehwere can have the freedom to walk around in Wal-Mart with a semi automatic hoisted on his back.
i hate that the gun control thing is always the first thing the far left goes to. its the most simplistic route of logic possible. lazy even. if guns were illegal or even made "harder to get" with laws, it will not prevent things like this from happening.
besides, he could have just as easily killed as many by driving over people. probably more effective actually. anyone who has been to vegas before can tell you those sidewalks on the main strip or even the old vegas under that overhang are always packed with pedestrians.
Yeah, I mean, the United States only has 10 gun deaths per 100,000 people, that's basically the same as the UK's 0.23 gun deaths per 100,000 people (both per annum).i hate that the gun control thing is always the first thing the far left goes to. its the most simplistic route of logic possible. lazy even. if guns were illegal or even made "harder to get" with laws, it will not prevent things like this from happening.
besides, he could have just as easily killed as many by driving over people. probably more effective actually. anyone who has been to vegas before can tell you those sidewalks on the main strip or even the old vegas under that overhang are always packed with pedestrians.
Look, we get it, youre trolling.i hate that the gun control thing is always the first thing the far left goes to. its the most simplistic route of logic possible. lazy even. if guns were illegal or even made "harder to get" with laws, it will not prevent things like this from happening.
besides, he could have just as easily killed as many by driving over people. probably more effective actually. anyone who has been to vegas before can tell you those sidewalks on the main strip or even the old vegas under that overhang are always packed with pedestrians.
While we're at it, how the fuck is it still acceptable that you can buy semi-auto rifles at Walmart?
It's not the laws that are the joke, its the way the ATF regulates everything that is the joke.
People write letters to the ATF asking if something is legal and someone from the ATF then makes something legal by responding and saying "that's OK"
i hate that the gun control thing is always the first thing the far left goes to. its the most simplistic route of logic possible. lazy even. if guns were illegal or even made "harder to get" with laws, it will not prevent things like this from happening.
besides, he could have just as easily killed as many by driving over people. probably more effective actually. anyone who has been to vegas before can tell you those sidewalks on the main strip or even the old vegas under that overhang are always packed with pedestrians.
Sad thing is this guy has killied and injured more people than isis has or will in an attak. But this will go unnoticed
Sad thing is this guy has killied and injured more people than isis has or will in an attak. But this will go unnoticed
It's crazy that some people seem so unwilling to admit that the USA has a serious problem regarding guns.![]()
Dumb lazy logic always ruining everything
This is not true though, they have not succeed in their attempts but it is certainly possible.Sad thing is this guy has killied and injured more people than isis has or will in an attak. But this will go unnoticed
Doesn't matter the reason when they list these numbers usually.
No, it's just the definition of terrorism in the state where this attack happened.That is not the agreed definition of Terrorism. There are sorts of reasons why Nevada might have defined it that way. Probably to get more federal aid in cases like this after 9/11..
i hate that the gun control thing is always the first thing the far left goes to. its the most simplistic route of logic possible. lazy even. if guns were illegal or even made "harder to get" with laws, it will not prevent things like this from happening.
besides, he could have just as easily killed as many by driving over people. probably more effective actually. anyone who has been to vegas before can tell you those sidewalks on the main strip or even the old vegas under that overhang are always packed with pedestrians.
I don't even know why I myself bother engaging with these folks.
They know other countries with stringent gun regulations have far fewer gun deaths per capita than the US.
They know you can't kill and injure nearly 600 people with a knife or a car.
They know doing so from 32 floors up and a safe distance is only possible with a gun.
But desperately they want to deflect from these points.