Mass shooting at the Mandalay Bay Las Vegas; 58 dead, 500+ injured.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've noticed that at least in Dallas, they now set up barricades so cars don't have access to the space where large gatherings are.

But this 'let's ban cars too' argument is still stupid. Cars, kitchen knives, etc -- these are utilitarian items that have uses that make them worth having, despite the dangers. Guns are just killing machines -- society operates just fine without 'shooting stuff' being a popular hobby, just look at most other modern countries.

Absolutely. I disagreed with his post about 'ban cars'. Just wanted to get the facts out there. We've had several large terror incidents in recent months in Europe involving large vehicles
 
Not being able to find a motive would be far scarier than finding an easy one. What it means is that because of our culture of guns and violence in the US, literally anyone you think is “normal” or “nice” can become a mass killer with ease.
It's scary AF. No motive, no reason? Certainly this dude didn't just wake up one morning, had his coffee and orange juice, and said "ya know... I think I wanna kill a large amount of people because fuck this planet"

And Congress? Yeah fuck Congress

Can we add this to the OP, mods?
 
But guys, it won't matter! If we ban guns the thugs will still find a way to get them and then we won't have anything to defend ourselves!

Yes. I've actually heard this.

I love how this logic is never applied for abortion.
 
One could argue that an attack like this will be far less effective in the future as concert venues and nearby hotels/buildings with clear line of sight increase and improve security measures.

Concert venues/stadiums already have large concrete pillars etc. The problem is going to be parades, blockparties, open air markets etc
 
Shout outs to the people using the “cars are weapons too defense.”

Last time I checked no one injured 500+ people and killed close to 60 using a car

Like, at least fucking try to argue

EDIT
should have clarified. Their arguement was anyone using their car to do this. Nice was not just someone hopping in their car, they used a cargo truck
 
Nothing will change on federal gun control.
I will not stop advocating for sensible Gun Control (anything more is unfortunately pretty much impossible in the US), but frankly after Sandyhook Elementary (which made me cry grown up man tears irl) I have pretty much lost all hopes for something to happen in my lifetime.

Horrific event, and my thoughts go to all the victims, their families and friends.
 
I don't own or particularly like guns, but i watch demolition ranch who has an ultra popular youtube channel. Mostly because it amazes me that people have access to high power guns that I thought only existed in the military or videogames. Maybe I'm contributing to the problem and should unsubscribe
 
I fucking hate when people compare guns to cars or even knives while completely disregarding the fact that unlike guns they have a civilian primary function.
 
Would stricter gun laws have even stopped a case like this (besides barring all gun ownership)? Man had no criminal records nor had a history of mental disease.

Stricter gun laws would hopefully turn the tide on gun culture.

America has a gun problem because they have a gun culture problem. The fact that in this thread people are posting about how family members are getting more upset at people talking about stricter gun laws now instead of the person that just killed over 50 people now.
 
It was pretty eery driving to work this morning. It was the only time I have ever seen the marquees of the big casinos all turned off. Schools are still open, trying to keep things as normal as possible I guess.
 
I was watching trump's speech this morning before heading to my university and my uncle came in and when he noticed the news the first thing he said was, " was it a nigger that started shooting?"

I hate my family...
 
If all those people also had guns they could've shot the guy in a random window on the 32th floor of one of those buildings surrounding the area in the middle of the night, and none of this would've happened.
 
One could argue that an attack like this will be far less effective in the future as concert venues and nearby hotels/buildings with clear line of sight increase and improve security measures.
At one point you have to decide, how much freedom do you want to give up, just to keep one kind of freedom alive.
 
Would stricter gun laws have even stopped a case like this (besides barring all gun ownership)? Man had no criminal records nor had a history of mental disease.

Well I presume all the guns were bought legally. Guy doesn't seem to have any criminal connections.

Stricter gun laws could(and should) include a limit on how many and what type of guns one may own.
 
Would stricter gun laws have even stopped a case like this (besides barring all gun ownership)? Man had no criminal records nor had a history of mental disease.

Yes it would have if gun ownership and licensing was limited to clip sizes and amounts. Also ammo can be controlled through volumes not exceeding X in a given month. If you are past a threshold of gun ownership per person you may want to apply for a collectors permit which is expensive and so on. Checks and balances to these sorts of things are possible and anyone premeditating something for months prior is likely to have a change of perspective or be discovered.
 
I will not stop advocating for sensible Gun Control (anything more is unfortunately pretty much impossible in the US), but frankly after Sandyhook Elementary (which made me cry grown up man tears irl) I have pretty much lost all hopes for something to happen in my lifetime.

Horrific event, and my thoughts go to all the victims, their families and friends.
This me too. Post Sandy Hook what hope do we have?

Still have to try though.

The share price of gun companies isn't the only thing that should change after something like this.
 
Shout outs to the people using the “cars are weapons too defense.”

Last time I checked no one injured 500+ people and killed close to 60 using a car

Like, at least fucking try to argue
In the Nice, France terror attack 86 people were killed and 458 were injured by a semi-truck.

But, that has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with what happened last night. People are trying to deflect with bringing that shit up.
 
Would stricter gun laws have even stopped a case like this (besides barring all gun ownership)? Man had no criminal records nor had a history of mental disease.

If it stopped even a single case it's worth it. Stop looking for the perfect fix, just fucking start fixing something
 
Man seeing this, horrible..so many dead and wounded. Also i saw that 'speech' from trump that sounded hollow and cold hearing only two things 'thoughts' and 'prayers'.

It stuns me that nothing will be done against gun violence no matter what.
 
I fucking hate when people compare guns to cars or even knives while completely disregarding the fact that unlike guns they have a civilian primary function.

It's what people do when they don't really have anything else to add or any type of solution. Just throw out some "what about this" and toss more into the pot to try and derail the conversation.

First sign of someone throwing that stuff out there is the first sign they really don't have an argument. Can't talk direct about guns? Bring up cars. Somehow that = logic.
 
I was watching trump's speech this morning before heading to my university and my uncle came in and when he noticed the news the first thing he said was, " was it a nigger that started shooting?"

I hate my family...

Jesus! How about calling him out on his despicable behaivor, instead of crying about your family to GAF? Never too late to try to 'fix" your shitty family, at least that's your family...GAF will never be your family.
 
But guys, it won't matter! If we ban guns the thugs will still find a way to get them and then we won't have anything to defend ourselves!

Yes. I've actually heard this.

How can people live with this kind of paranoia and fear all day, all night, constantly ready to defend themselves, constantly in fear of intruders that are out there to murder you?

I mean, if mental health is an issue, most gun owners already sound mentally ill with all the paranoia, fear and probably schizophrenia when talking about how everyone is out to get them.

"I need my gun to protect my family from murderous intruders, it's the mentally ill that shouldn't have guns" - this line of thought (to me as european) sounds absolutely mentally ill already and so such a person shouldn't have a gun.
 
I’m quite surprised that switzerland is so high up on that graph. But man, America is hurting itself by not implementing gun proper gun control. It can still be legal, but make the people who want one, really work for it.

Well maybe suicides are also a part of homicides? I don't know and is that graph for a specific year or some kind of average? In Switzerland recruits/soldiers bring their assault rifles home and a couple of years ago we even had to bring a box with 50 rounds home, so it's pretty easy to end it when the rifle sits at home every day. Switzerland has a shitload of guns too, shooting at the range is like a national sport.
 
Would stricter gun laws have even stopped a case like this (besides barring all gun ownership)? Man had no criminal records nor had a history of mental disease.

It's about lessening the total number, not doing every individual event. But, yes, it would, because when guns are harder to get, it's more obvious when someone is collecting a lot of them around with ammunition, meaning law enforcement may get a heads up.

After the massacre in Australia, they enacted gun control and it made a huge difference -- with quantitative proof; things changed.
 
Yes it would have if gun ownership and licensing was limited to clip sizes and amounts. Also ammo can be controlled through volumes not exceeding X in a given month. If you are past a threshold of gun ownership per person you may want to apply for a collectors permit which is expensive and so on. Checks and balances to these sorts of things are possible and anyone premeditating something for months prior is likely to have a change of perspective or be discovered.
That's an interesting approach. Monitoring ammunition sales instead of the guns themselves would be a more effective strategy.
 
One thing I still find odd is we still don't have the details of the weapon used (other than the fact he had 10+ of them). The police would've had those details right away right? I still see people speculation about the weapon used but why don't we know for sure by now?
 
In the Nice, France terror attack 86 people were killed and 458 were injured by a semi-truck.

But, that has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with what happened last night. People are trying to deflect with bringing that shit up.

It's relevant when everyone is saying nothing like this could happen without guns. Not deflection at all.
 
You should check again, you are factually incorrect on this one

It’s still a hell of a lot harder to pull off than what this guy did. We have had three or so car rammings in the last 6 months? Casualties have not been near this high. Indiscriminate fire into a crowd from a 32nd story window is a fuck of a lot easier to do with the tools legally available to him.
 
How can people live with this kind of paranoia and fear all day, all night, constantly ready to defend themselves, constantly in fear of intruders that are out there to murder you?

I mean, if mental health is an issue, most gun owners already sound mentally ill with all the paranoia, fear and probably schizophrenia when talking about how everyone is out to get them.

"I need my gun to protect my family from murderous intruders, it's the mentally ill that shouldn't have guns" - this line of thought (to me as european) sounds absolutely mentally ill already and so such a person shouldn't have a gun.
You have a point. People who feel the absolute need to arm themselves when they live in a relatively safe area, to me at least, immediately comes off as mentally unstable onto it's self.
 
That's an interesting approach. Monitoring ammunition sales instead of the guns themselves would be a more effective strategy.

I mean, not to argue the point because any extra monitoring can't hurt, but I know a few guys that only buy in bulk a few times a year because it's cheaper and easier.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom