Last edited by a moderator:
Might finally be time to replace my trusty old 980Ti. She's been a good girl. Call her "Ol' Bessie."
But I just read Ray-tracking is a waste in the Navi thread lol
But I just read Ray-tracking is a waste in the Navi thread lol
Yeap seems like it is a waste not buy nVidia cardsI don´t know what you mean by "lol". The pattern of how nvidia operates should be clear as water by now.
I don´t know what you mean by "lol". The pattern of how nvidia operates should be clear as water by now.
Oh stop whining, Ray Tracing is the future and you know it. Stop making Nvidia out to be some boogeyman when AMD is just the same.
Yeap seems like it is a waste not buy nVidia cards![]()
Stop the arrogance, you don´t know the future.
I really see no reason except better prices if you get a good deal.You need to be some kind of a fanboy to pretend there is absolutely no valid reasons to chose an AMD card over an nvidia card.
Don't know what you are on, I worked with Vray (an offline raytracer for example 3D studio Max) for years and the stuff I did with lighting, was even years back ahead of what we have now.. the stuff that they do now with RT real time in games is amazing, and a real jump forward for the games industry, in realism. Games that are old, lake geometry and textures, but something like Quake RTX looks way better in the lighting and shadowing department, art direction is another beast ...I've yet to be impressed with any raytracing demo they have shown so far. Maybe it's because I've been working with "real" 3D render engines for years, but none of this stuff looks significantly better with RTX than without, and some games like the recently released RTX version of Quake 2 look downright hideous compared to the original.
You need to be some kind of a fanboy to pretend that is a valid reasonNvidia>AMD
I may have to PC game soon...
I really see no reason except better prices if you get a good deal.
That is a sad truth.
PS. I don't use neither AMD or nVidia... I'm PlayStation's fanboy if you want to use tags.
Let me put that way.Well, chosing amd or nvidia hardware is a far more complex situation than chosing a console, there are way more factors that can lean the balance, you have not given it much thought.
Well, chosing amd or nvidia hardware is a far more complex situation than chosing a console, there are way more factors that can lean the balance, you have not given it much thought.
How old are you exactly? Ray Tracing in gaming has been the holy grail for many many years, do some research and stop being all butthurt AMD is behind the curve like always and will not even have limited Ray Tracing until late 2020.
Let me put that way.
I don't care about any... for me makes no difference witch one sells more or have the better hardware... the only interesting part are how they build their architectures.
But I know ray-tracing is not a waste and there is no reason except price to buy AMD cards today.
nVidia is at least two generations ahead AMD in GPU tech.
So you know the past, therefore you know the future, that´s some awesome logic there.
As of right now it is as simple as this. Do you want better performance? Go with Nvidia. Do you want lower TDP typically? Go with Nvidia. Do you want Ray Tracing capability? Go with Nvidia. Do you want to save a bit of money but less performance and higher TDP typically with higher thermals? Go AMD.
Apparently i know it better than you do considering that Nvidia brought mainstream Ray Tracing to the masses and now everyone including AMD, Microsoft and Sony are adopting it. So yes, i do know the future and it is not hard to see it when it comes to Ray Tracing.