I've been reading through this thread and been thinking the exact same thing.The lack of this meme is quite surprising, it appeared on every head to head when PS5 won by a single frame difference or a cutscene difference with identical gameplay
Oh wait, never mind, the Series X has the slight advantage this time lol. The level of hypocrisy from people complaining about Xbox fans behavior is palatable
Calm down its only a few months into the generation and all these games are cross platform. Lets wait until we have some next gen only games to see if the extra horsepower is noticeable.
The problem wouldn't exist if the other side doesn't claim repeatedly the gap between the two is wiiiiiideeeer than expected just wait for the next .
they stopped shipping outside UK.
It wouldn't exist? Who are you trying to kid?
Probably would b e less extent
Only because Phil never shuts the fuck up about it.
Sony fanboys downplay the 1-5 fps xsx advantage? But If it was the other way around they'd make sure even their neighbor knows about it.
What options does it have? I think one might be called Performance mode(?), it's the other one that is RT.
I haven't seen any loading comparison videos, only thing I did see is a tweet saying that.
Who keep over a year with the "most powerful console ever created" narrative?
I downloaded it to check and yeah I don't see it anywhere.
I have heard from some users on Resetera controls aim feel imprecise and lagged on series X compared the ps5. Take your poison.
XSX definitely loads in less than 6 seconds. I don't have a scientific time, but 2 ball scratches seems about right...
Played it on the three platforms, and I can say I did not notice a difference between PS5 and XSX in that game. PC feels precise at 165hz though.
I never tried the demo but aim in RE7 is intended to be "particular". To take your shot, you don't have to take aim at the first try; first you need to lock the crosshair to the enemy, pressing the dorsal button, now the enemy is on the target wait the crosshair disappear then re-push again the dorsal button, don't release this time, move slightly the analogue stick until you find your spot for your shot and then "bang". At least in RE7 worked like that for me
I liked the castle demo, felt more like Resident Evil to me. Still not convinced though, the price is kinda high where I'm at, $85. Bought Assassin's Creed Unity for about 10 bucks instead to try fps boost.
Good for you but:
Why are you telling me to clam down? You are the one who came in here playing the victim card based on some ludicrous straw man that you concocted.
The fps checks out, we need some load time comparison videos though. From what's been said in here, it's really fast on PS5.You know times are hard when a random Pakistani Twitter account with 0 source and a pretty visible bias is posted TWICE in two pages.
Maybe he doesn't feel a difference cause hes not a complete dweeb focused on miniscule things that make no difference as to whether the game will be fun or not
Are you kidding? It's a miniscule things if aim felt more imprecise on series X? If you are interested about the issue there are other 3 users in the same thread who have a conversation where explain what is it about and surely are not ps5 fanboy. It seems something relative to the semi automatic mode setting and they hope it's just on the demo or at least covered by DF in time to report to capcom.
I can confirm it's practically instant on ps5.
Stop it , you've seen all back slapping and high fives in the chat whenever ps5 has any advantages no matter how miniscule. Both systems are too new into the generation to make any conclusions on any sort of superiority.
Remember when every other thread was about how the PS5 had a 90% advantage in SSD speed? Suddenly no one wants to talk about the minuscule difference in load times
I dont understand your response. Who the heck are you talking to?
Remember when every other thread was about how the PS5 had a 90% advantage in SSD speed? Suddenly no one wants to talk about the minuscule difference in load times
No, if it wins by a wide and unquestionable margin (20% to 40% depending on who made the assessment before launch).
I'm watching the new NXG video, hopefully he has a test for it.
Phil's been kicking his feet up living rent free on neogaf for months apparently
What are you going on about this for? Is this now how you create in your mind that the PS5 version is better?
I'm sorry, what alternative universe do you live in? After all specs were revealed, that's when the FUD really kicked in. Even before then, MS was the first one to reveal their console, which lead Xbox fans to go crazy with FUD about the PS5 being the real one behind schedule. That it was running hot and loud, so they were afraid to reveal it. PS5 was the one accused of not being able to do RT, even after Cerny had to confirm it 2 or 3 times. It was only RDNA 1.5, after all, and they must have meant just using ray tracing for sound. The XSX was the real deal. Completely RDNA 2.0, and was going to show us an advantage of 20%-40% in real world performance. So, no wonder PS fans were laughing their asses off when PS5 was winning comparisons. Or after the "tools arrived" has been performing on par with the "monster eating" beast of a console.You didn't read all the talk from the Sony faithful back then did you. I distinctly remember that XSX performance was so bad that they were hiding it and couldn't show anything running on it. For a while there XSX didn't do RT (or just did it like a GPU that didn't support the feature, like the GTX1000 series) and the SSD was really only 1GB/s and they were just lying about the 2.4/GBs. XSX went through that elongated GCN period as well.
. Xbox One killed it!! Where's the 40% difference? What an embarrassment!!
What does "Pakistani" have to do with anything? Why the qualifier?You know times are hard when a random Pakistani Twitter account with 0 source and a pretty visible bias is posted TWICE in two pages.
