• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

NXG - HZD 60fps Patch

The individual in op vid was running a pc lower specced than a ps5. Older gen CPU as well ass weaker gfx card. 2070 only beats ps5 with RT as was evident in WD2.
… and? I am not sure what is your point? You are free to make your own "is there a PC faster than a PS5 and can I buy it now?" (Hint: yes) video on YouTube, but I do not think it was NXGamer NXGamer 's point.
 
He's running it on a card that's slower than the PS5. It's not a fair comparison. He'd need to run it on a 2080 or 2080 Super to have an equal comparison to the PS5, and in 2021 a 2080 is hardly considered high end anymore.
You can always make that argument. You can always find a PC setup that exactly matches or exceedes the consoles performance.

In my region a 2070 alone costs more than a ps5, so based on price this is a very fair comparison.
 
… and? I am not sure what is your point? You are free to make your own "is there a PC faster than a PS5 and can I buy it now?" (Hint: yes) video on YouTube, but I do not think it was NXGamer NXGamer 's point.
And what is your point in defending the guy in op vid? You've been told multiple times now by multiple people in this thread that the guy chose the CPU that is Zen1+ [PS5 got a newer gen Zen 2] and a gfx card that is weaker than the one in ps5 in games without RT. Maybe it was done deliberately to make ps5 look great or he's just clueless which I doubt on latter.

edit rtx2070 gets beaten by RDNA1 5700xt and you have RDNA2 10TF in PS5.
 
Last edited:
Well it's not exactly hindering it 🤣
I think it's because PS5 running in bc is not flexing the PS5, it's running with one arm tied behind its back. A proper PS5 title would have access to the full cpu/GPU/ram etc.

Edit: actually I have no idea what he means. Carry on
 
Last edited:
Love the way he makes our the PS5 design is helping it out perform the PC 😂

Yeah, I don't wanna claim it without a doubt, but I'm starting to think he did this deliberately, for sure.

I mean you only need to look at his choice of hardware:

PC: Zen1 CPU + 2070 [keep in mind that 10TF RDNA1 5700xt edges it]
PS5: Zen2 CPU + 10TF RDNA2

So PS5 gets newer gen CPU and a newer gen 10TF RDNA2 gfx chip that is newer gen than 5700xt that already beats 2070.... hmm]

Looks very amateurish, if we're being very forgiving.
 
Yeah, I don't wanna claim it without a doubt, but I'm starting to think he did this deliberately, for sure.

I mean you only need to look at his choice of hardware:

PC: Zen1 CPU + 2070 [keep in mind that 10TF RDNA1 5700xt edges it]
PS5: Zen2 CPU + 10TF RDNA2

So PS5 gets newer gen CPU and a newer gen 10TF RDNA2 gfx chip that is newer gen than 5700xt that already beats 2070.... hmm]

Looks very amateurish, if we're being very forgiving.
Only thing is, game is ps4 game. It's not doing any zen2 or rdna2 specific workloads. PS5 is essentially overclocking a PS4 - 2013 era hardware.
 
I'm quite confused why you would do this, if you're expected to be taken seriously?

Pretty embarrassing. A 3 year old graphics card and cpu vs the ps5 and with higher settings than what's running on the ps5 version?
 
And what is your point in defending the guy in op vid?

I could ask you the same thing. Why are you attacking the guy and assuming a nefarious agenda here?

You've been told multiple times now by multiple people in this thread
Right… and? People describe the HW, I am not disputing the statement about HW components being faster or slower than PS5.

So? To me it looks like you have your interpretation of the following and are trying to force it on others.
You make statement A, I question the conclusion extrapolated from it (or better the reasons he chose that HW), you essentially tell me to shut up by just repeating statement A and telling me others have made the same statement A as you which adds little to no value.

"I have done A and B? Why? Well… because I wanted to do A and B? Why? Well… I told you already I wanted to do A and B!" I would like to avoid this kind of reasoning.
[…] Maybe it was done deliberately to make ps5 look great
Maybe he wanted to generate positivity about XSX and Windows PC's by making it look like he was deliberately trying to make PS5 look great until people found out his master plan or that was something he knew would happen and the blowback would hurt PS5… :rolleyes:.

I think he was trying to compare it to a PC you could reasonably buy and that a good number of gamers on PC would have (trying not to go too much above the $399 budget you would spend for a PS5 DE).
 
Last edited:
I'm quite confused why you would do this, if you're expected to be taken seriously?

Pretty embarrassing. A 3 year old graphics card and cpu vs the ps5 and with higher settings than what's running on the ps5 version?
That's what I'm trying to say. It's not like there's no Zen2 + RDNA2 available for pc [not in apu spec, but still]

He could have easily chose 3700 + 6700xt to make it more honest.
 
I could ask you the same thing. Why are you attacking the guy and assuming a nefarious agenda here?


Right… and? People describe the HW, I am not disputing the HW characterisation being faster or slower than PS5. So? To me it looks like you have your interpretation of the following and are trying to force it on others.

You make statement A, I question the conclusion extrapolated from it (or better the reasons he chose that HW), you essentially tell me to shut up by just repeating statement A and telling me others have made the same statement A as you which adds little to no value.

"I have done A and B? Why? Well… because I wanted to do A and B? Why? Well… I told you already I wanted to do A and B!" I would like to avoid this kind of reasoning.

Maybe he wanted to generate positivity about XSX and Windows PC's by making it look like he was deliberately trying to make PS5 look great until people found out his master plan or that was something he knew would happen and the blowback would hurt PS5.

I think he was trying to compare it to a PC you could reasonably buy and that a good number of gamers on PC would have (trying not to go too much above the $399 budget you would spend for a PS5 DE).

Expecting someone to do a genuine comparison at a Bear minimum us not attacking them, when it's literally what they are setting out to do isn't it?

If they aren't doing the right work and spreading misinformation, it's just as bad as that Austin walker video that came out this week.

Does he know what the bottleneck is? Is it his weaker gpu or cpu? Slower memory? Ssd? Is it because he is using higher settings?

How does the pc perform at low and medium settings. If he drops everything to low does it still have drops? What does this suggest?

I'm pretty positive Alex at DF would deliver answers to many of these questions and more. I'm not trying to start a war between the two outlets I'm just providing evidence of someone I know looks into these things when comparing pc ports to console.

It's also well documented that the pc port was shit and required multiple patches to run better. Does he comment on this and mention that Sony purchased Nixxes to support ports in the future due to this first attempt being poor. This stuff should be covered.
 
Last edited:
Not to mention that console games are made for specific hardware. And are also optimized for that specific hardware, every frame counts. And with console games your almost access the GPU directly. On PC there is a lot of overhead DirectX -> Drivers -> GPU. Same reason we see an uplift in performance with Vulcan since this is a rendering technique which is closer to the hardware.
 
Expecting someone to do a genuine comparison at a Bear minimum us not attacking them, when it's literally what they are setting out to do isn't it?

I am not saying you are attacking a person if you state your expectation and it differs from what they did.

Trying to directly or indirectly say "Sony Pony set it all up to make PS5 look good" would be as it also assuming intent.

You are comparing the same game on PC vs the latest back compact patch (so not the same performance you could expect from a game built natively around PS5 either, we could agree on that, right?). Is the comparison purposely trying not to show you cannot build a PC that can push this version to 60 FPS or to compare how a mid range PC not too dissimilar on price to PS5 performs? Why cannot it be the latter? I am not saying it is that the REAL reason, there may be others, but I am not sure what is so controversial about it and worth causing an alarmed reaction.

I am not sure he is trying to paint the PC platform under a bad light either, so while you can mention Nixxes, all the patches it took to improve performance, etc… it seems like the most pertinent point and also the most irrelevant too in a way. The point of PC's for the PC fans is that you can keep improving the HW as the games run on a versatile abstraction layer that helps game run and adapt… so not sure the PCDF apparently being up in arms that is all.

I do agree with seeing more profiles and trying to match the PS4 Pro visual settings and go above and under it being interesting, but also how the defaults are set on both. Battaglia has its good bits and pieces, but he speculates a lot and after the whole RT speculations on PS5 (vs his approach to the same RDNA2 based device on the XSX) I am not seeing him as a more objective source.
 
Last edited:
I don't know about fanboyism but he's definitely barking up the wrong tree there. Like, pixel fillrate hasn't mattered for almost a decade and bringing PCIe bandwidths into question just screams that he doesn't have much experience with computers.

The main bottleneck in HZD is already fairly well established. The game relies on GPU compute for draw call processing and geometry culling which have nothing to do with either of these things. Even my 2080Ti will often hit 100% load while running at just 640x360 which flat out proves that it's not a fillrate issue. And performance even scales with GPU clockrate at this resolution.
I think this is a very bold statement to make, what's the factual basis on that?
 
A bit weird people are so triggered by the comparison. Just like a setup like this would crush the PS5 in an RTX game it also loses handily in other games. 🤷‍♂️


only-game.gif
 
I am not saying you are attacking a person if you state your expectation and it differs from what they did.

Trying to directly or indirectly say "Sony Pony set it all up to make PS5 look good" would be as it also assuming intent.

You are comparing the same game on PC vs the latest back compact patch (so not the same performance you could expect from a game built natively around PS5 either, we could agree on that, right?). Is the comparison purposely trying not to show you cannot build a PC that can push this version to 60 FPS or to compare how a mid range PC not too dissimilar on price to PS5 performs? Why cannot it be the latter? I am not saying it is that the REAL reason, there may be others, but I am not sure what is so controversial about it and worth causing an alarmed reaction.

I am not sure he is trying to paint the PC platform under a bad light either, so while you can mention Nixxes, all the patches it took to improve performance, etc… it seems like the most pertinent point and also the most irrelevant too in a way. The point of PC's for the PC fans is that you can keep improving the HW as the games run on a versatile abstraction layer that helps game run and adapt… so not sure the PCDF apparently being up in arms that is all.

I do agree with seeing more profiles and trying to match the PS4 Pro visual settings and go above and under it being interesting, but also how the defaults are set on both. Battaglia has its good bits and pieces, but he speculates a lot and after the whole RT speculations on PS5 (vs his approach to the same RDNA2 based device on the XSX) I am not seeing him as a more objective source.

Oh no you typed so much, but have clearly NOT even watched the video.

Here let me point you to the more interesting part, listen closely:




Interesting claim , when you can have double resolution plus other improvements on PC such as:

 
Jebus, some PC fanboys are so insecure.

Seriously, he stresses the performance issues are a product of engine design not a failing on your precious' part multiple times. Relax.
 
Last edited:
I don't agree someone who speaks about things he can't possibly know... as if he does..
Uh DF talks a lot of things who can't possibly knows many, many times but why barely anyone point a finger against them like to him? Quite the contrary, if you dare to have such opinion of DF, you are assault by their fans because they are "professional" and it can't be they could be sided because they have more viewers I guess. The level of stupidity they have spitted out implicitly about the gap between the ps5 and series X says how opinable can be anyone who talks about tech stuff.
 
Last edited:
I think this video only proved that NX has something seriously wrong with his PC or mine is magically super powered. Here is my 2070s at PS settings at 1440p at the same bit that drops to 46fps on his PC.

hu6kh3N.jpg


pPfM7Zj.jpg
IoLqX2x.jpg
e87FFcb.jpg
hXO0gMN.jpg
9d3zqkX.jpg
 
I'm quite confused why you would do this, if you're expected to be taken seriously?

Pretty embarrassing. A 3 year old graphics card and cpu vs the ps5 and with higher settings than what's running on the ps5 version?


"Astroturfing"?

Oh only df does that for ms. What's funny is how people were just saying "who cares about updating a 4 year old game" when Hellblade update was mentioned. Now its a great thing for an older game lol.
 
Uh DF talks a lot of things who can't possibly knows many, many times but why barely anyone point a finger against them like to him? Quite the contrary, if you dare to have such opinion of DF, you are assault by their fans because they are "professional" and it can't be they could be sided because they have more viewers I guess. The level of stupidity they have spitted out implicitly about the gap between the ps5 and series X says how opinable can be anyone who talks about tech stuff.
I find nxgamer a lot more in-depth than DF 🤷‍♂️
 
I think this video only proved that NX has something seriously wrong with his PC or mine is magically super powered. Here is my 2070s at PS settings at 1440p at the same bit that drops to 46fps on his PC.

hu6kh3N.jpg


pPfM7Zj.jpg
IoLqX2x.jpg
e87FFcb.jpg
hXO0gMN.jpg
9d3zqkX.jpg
But nxgamer is not the only one observing issues. You have neogaf members on here testifying they cannot get solid performance out of the title on their rigs.

Anyway who cares, ps players finally get a rock solid 60 with the best 4kcb implementation in the biz. The only issue with it is….wtf took so long.
 
Last edited:
Oh wow, I actually missed that part.
That's a stupid claim lol.
Yeah, I understand if you wouldn't be able to lock to 60 on most PC's, then maybe it's not such an outrageous claim.



whats happened to youtube? why does it take 5 hours to reencode 5 min clip..?
 
And what is your point in defending the guy in op vid? You've been told multiple times now by multiple people in this thread that the guy chose the CPU that is Zen1+ [PS5 got a newer gen Zen 2] and a gfx card that is weaker than the one in ps5 in games without RT. Maybe it was done deliberately to make ps5 look great or he's just clueless which I doubt on latter.


Or... Maybe he's using the card he owns and he always uses in his videos, not just in this one.

On the other hand it's not a standard 2070, it's been overclocked and in other videos Michael has stated that its performance is around a 2070 Super.

Anyways HZD runs pretty poorly on PC and Michael is not making that up, PC gamer have been complaining about it ever since the game launched. It's not his fault either, so I don't get all the hate. He's just showing us how the game performs on PS4 Pro, PS5 and his PC. Should he get a 3090 just to bruteforce the game and make it look like it runs fine on PC? 🤷‍♂️
 
Or... Maybe he's using the card he owns and he always uses in his videos, not just in this one.

On the other hand it's not a standard 2070, it's been overclocked and in other videos Michael has stated that its performance is around a 2070 Super.

Anyways HZD runs pretty poorly on PC and Michael is not making that up, PC gamer have been complaining about it ever since the game launched. It's not his fault either, so I don't get all the hate. He's just showing us how the game performs on PS4 Pro, PS5 and his PC. Should he get a 3090 just to bruteforce the game and make it look like it runs fine on PC? 🤷‍♂️

dumb and dumber GIF



-----------
jk aside. He could have at least got comparable hardware, something in line 3700x + 6700xt
 
dumb and dumber GIF



-----------
jk aside. He could have at least got comparable hardware, something in line 3700x + 6700xt
I have 3700x and 3080. On native 4k, max settings game is about 70fps. not sure how much it drops since I've not played much but it feels really weird for a 70fps game
 
I never understood why this game in particular performs so poorly on PC. I know it's been created with PS4 in mind and all that, but so was Days Gone and I don't remember people complaining about its performance. Maybe something engine-related, since Days Gone uses UE4, while Decima was created for PS4, but Death Stranding uses Decima like Horizon and seems to get along with most PCs. I still don't get what makes Horizon so demanding on PC.
It's because PC has non unified design with bottle necks, it's truly a fundamental flaw of PC gaming
 
Even at Ultra settings 1440p on a 2070s I can't get it to drop below 60fps at that bit that was 46fps on his PC.

0dEDlaw.jpg

It could be one of the following:
  • Shader compilation issues. IIRC, Horizon can compile all the shaders before playing, or it can do it while it's running. He may not have had a fully compiled shader cache while he ran the game. That can cause FPS dips, especially when transitioning to new areas.
  • Old patch. The game was improved greatly by the patches that came out for it post-release. He may have simply not been up to date.
 
my bet on the drop is shader compilation crap this game rely on on pc.
edit : beaten by mere seconds :D
 
Last edited:
This guy is the only analyst that I actually respect. DF are just pixel counters and now they don't even bother doing that they always just say they can't rule out dynamic resolution and leave it at that. Every other Youtuber is even worse. Praise the gods for NXG.
 
I fired it back up to take a look at the difference. So so good. I forgot how awesome it is to fight the robotic animals in this.

Beyond excited for the new one to come out. Day 1 buy.
 
I fired it back up to take a look at the difference. So so good. I forgot how awesome it is to fight the robotic animals in this.

Beyond excited for the new one to come out. Day 1 buy.

Yeah, the battles are immense especially when you're fighting different species at once that require different tactics and you have to utilize them all at the same time while staying alive and having 360° situational awareness.
 
It could be one of the following:
  • Shader compilation issues. IIRC, Horizon can compile all the shaders before playing, or it can do it while it's running. He may not have had a fully compiled shader cache while he ran the game. That can cause FPS dips, especially when transitioning to new areas.
  • Old patch. The game was improved greatly by the patches that came out for it post-release. He may have simply not been up to date.
Yeah I guess shader cache or maybe single core CPU bottleneck as I have no clue how multithreaded this engine is (I think Ryzen 2700 has about the single core performance of a 4770k which is a 2013 CPU).

Here is some combat on a 2070s with alpha effects.

At PS equivalent settings:

28uoSFz.jpg


At Ultra settings so way above the PS settings:

lNiYRer.jpg


Bonus running around for 10min with the Afterburner benchmark going at PS settings:

icLKJXx.jpg


Not a perfect port but the comment that the PS5 is the best version isn't true compared to my 2019 PC and definitely won't be true for anyone with anything more beefy.
 
He's running it on a card that's slower than the PS5. It's not a fair comparison. He'd need to run it on a 2080 or 2080 Super to have an equal comparison to the PS5, and in 2021 a 2080 is hardly considered high end anymore.

The game is running at BC mode, don't forget, games on BC run much worse than native ports. Checkerboard rendering is not free too, you lose performance compared to 1440p native res
 
Top Bottom