Gamer_By_Proxy
Member
Not too surprising considering they just bought Eurogamer and other outlets.
Huh?Y'all must be streamers on yt, can't think of other hideout.
Always is a big stretch.Shame, they were always great. I loved their reviews back in the day
Y'all must be streamers on yt, can't think of other hideout.
Y'all must be streamers on yt, can't think of other hideout.
Well I'm sure there's some coding courses they can enrol in.
There always truck driving. The world always needs more truck drivers. At least that's what my old teacher used to sarcastically tell us in case we flunk out.
Who?Shame, they were always great. I loved their reviews back in the day
Its the type of industry destined to thin out as normies do their own content for the masses on YT and social media.The vast majority of gaming "journalists" are a joke so can't feel sorry for then. They can always try youtube/onlyfans/twitch and find out if people are willing to watch and pay them
I was joking they were clowns here before they made their infamous Football Manager reivew.Who?
When the internet took off and game sites all shilled big time that's when the 6-10 scale meme was spot on. It wasnt like this in the 90s and even for early gaming mags in the 80s where some mags would give games a F. My bros and I bought gaming mags from the 80s to around the late 90s. My last mag was probably a GameFan mag in 96-97 when PS1/Saturn were kicking and DC wasnt even mentioned yet. My bro's last mag would be a PC Gamer mag from around that time too.I was reading from the late '90's until the early 2k's. I noticed even back in the day funny habits of previewing games with incredible excitement(more like reading a press release) and hype and then disappointing reviews after launch. Plus many games they'd poopoo I had liked, or they'd give a minor single or two paragraph review. Granted my complaint actually stretches earlier into the 90's to the likes of GamePro and EGM but the fact remains. It was IGN's oddities that led me to look up gaming sites with more dedicated forums as I could enjoy banter and impressions from actual gamers who had the pay the same price as me to gain entry with often far more respectable opinions and valid criticisms.
In a way I'm surprised all of these 10/10 quote makers for GotY edition boxes even lasted this long considering the advancements in streaming and the rise of influencers. They ate their lunch with ease as the viewer can get far more information and at little expense to the influencer or publisher. A single person or small team(editor etc) is much easier to handle than some internet rag. And when FFVII Rebirth was getting its hype train going for marketing the most notable people I saw being flown out to events were all of the streamers/influencers across YT and Twitch.
So I give this news a Too Much Water out of 10.
Very true. I used to love EGM simply for the multiple reviews for a single game. Even if they panned it generally, the reader could learn the names and different tastes of the reviewers and find some more reliable takes. Same with Electric Playground from back in the day with Vic and Tommy. My sister and I would enjoy the different takes, especially Tommy because he was so limited in what he thought was a fun game, he hated turn-based stuff and strategy games, anything not flashy and slow. Victor would try to get him to be more fair that the game didn't deserve a low score simply because he didn't enjoy it and that it was recognizably well made.When the internet took off and game sites all shilled big time that's when the 6-10 scale meme was spot on. It wasnt like this in the 90s and even for early gaming mags in the 80s where some mags would give games a F. My bros and I bought gaming mags from the 80s to around the late 90s. My last mag was probably a GameFan mag in 96-97 when PS1/Saturn were kicking and DC wasnt even mentioned yet. My bro's last mag would be a PC Gamer mag from around that time too.
For those of you who only got into reviews during the internet age, believe it or not before that game mags would give games 3/10 or PC Gamer giving shit buggy games a 20% out of 100% etc...
YT streamers werent around yet and didnt really get alive and kicking till the 2010s, and that's when game sites trended down. You can get a lot more in depth info or more honest takes than writers shilling for a publishing company giving even a bottom of the barrel game somehow a 6/10.
Oh no, who's gonna give shit games 8s now
7
The meme of IGN is 7 scores.
Hopefully, it's all the woke jerks who back-stabbed Colin Morarity along with Kinda Funny for the most insignificant of tweets.