The_hunter
Member
Jealous and mad Karens
-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
Jealous and mad Karens
StreetsofBeige
Member
Not surprisingly, there will always be low browers who will eat this up.
It's like when I watch Simpsons reruns and in one episode Lisa says something like..... You'll always get followers when you cater to the lowest common denominator.
So true. It's the episode with Dustin Hoffman as substitute teacher.
Last edited:
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
Gp1
Member
There goes your sorority!
That said, she appeals to every single male, not only the right wing white etnocententry.
Last edited:
Nocty
Currently Steaming
I didnt even need to read text or pless the play button, just from that womans face and appearance I could tell her take is terrible.
OmegaSupreme
advanced basic bitch
Some ugly bitches, 15 years past their prime, are upset? I'm shocked!
SlimySnake
Flashless at the Golden Globes
women already hate her so she already had half of the people pissed off.
As for men, 99% of us are not going to get pissed off because of her politics or this jeans ad. There was nothing offensive about it and 99% of the men out there know that. the only ones bitching about it are self loathing women and mentally ill men. if anything, men are programmed to go for the most voluptuous of women because those big hips indicate fertility. its literally ingrained into our DNA to go for good genes in women.
Last edited:
Plague Doctor
Member
Yeah contraversy around Sydney Sweeney is total "bitch eating crackers" bullshit from shallow assholes on the left.
Last edited:
BigDeadFreak
Member
I think this is why so many women in movies and TV are quite flat chested. If they put women like Sidney Sweeney in there all anyone focuses on is her tits. Men from a sexual arousal point of view and women from a jealousy point of view. They know all their husbands and boyfriends would have their heads turned if she walked into the room so they hate her.
Nintendo's Witch
Member
Jesus ChristThanksgiving outfit
She seems to post sexy pics of herself every day.
I think she is EXACTLY where she wants to be.
Her appeal is to straight men, NONE of whom are bothered IN THE SLIGHTESTS, about any retarded "good jeans" comment. She can do very well with 47% of the audience, minus the 50% female audience and 3% of the gays (if they track her at all). Hell, she probably makes that up with the 3% lesbian crowd, presumably just sloppery over her as we are.
roosnam1980
Gold Member
Cyberpunkd
Member
That's because most women doing OF are desperate, so supporting them makes you f eel all fuzzy with your moral superiority. Kinda like Whites feeling happy empowering Blacks, as long as you don't empower them too much.
Windle Poons
Made a crappy phPBB forum once ... once.
Little Mac
Member
Last edited:
It's offical, Die Hard IS A CHRISTMAS MOVIE!!!!
Lethal Weapon is the outlier in that category.
John Marston
GAF's very own treasure goblin
pel1300
Member
Krystal Ball has really jumped the shark. She went from "anti-woke liberal" in 2019/2020 to this. Makes you wonder if it was just an act in the early days of The Hill Rising.
Last edited:
DragoonKain
Neighbours from Hell
Follow people like that long enough and you realize that none of them actually stand for anything. I've seen people who claim to be "anti-capitalist" to take large sums of money to promote rhetoric and propaganda.
I've seen people who claim to be "anti-racist" say some of the most racist and vile things.
They are all just grifters who want acceptance from their in-crowd. And whenever their in-crowd turns on them or the grift dries up(or they see the potential for more money elsewhere) look at how fast their stances on issues change. We're seeing a lot of "formerly woke" people who are now making a living writing and vlogging about that.
The sooner you realize none of these people have values, principles, or stand for anything, the clearer it all becomes.
I've seen people who claim to be "anti-racist" say some of the most racist and vile things.
They are all just grifters who want acceptance from their in-crowd. And whenever their in-crowd turns on them or the grift dries up(or they see the potential for more money elsewhere) look at how fast their stances on issues change. We're seeing a lot of "formerly woke" people who are now making a living writing and vlogging about that.
The sooner you realize none of these people have values, principles, or stand for anything, the clearer it all becomes.
Windle Poons
Made a crappy phPBB forum once ... once.
GymWolf
Member
Powerfull farts are just one her many qualities
Salmorejo
Neo Member
Poppinfresh
Member
Zero surprise since most leftist and many right-leaning influencers don't have a moral compass. They just go where the money/views/clout/influence is.
When Autopen Biden was in office, you could set yourself apart and make money as an "anti-woke" leftist, but now that President Trump is back in office, the left has taken another hard-left turn, just like they did during his first administration, and you're not going to gain any ground unless you go hard left and anti-MAGA.
Mattdaddy
Gold Member
Last edited:
TheMan
Member
You're not wrong that straight men want to motorboat her titties regardless. The problem for her as an actress is- how many of those thirsty boyz would ever bother to pay money to see her movies? The answer is very very few. They'll follow her on insta for those bikini pics but I do think her future career as an actress (beyond roles that are primarily focused on her godly warlocks) may have been damaged
Poppinfresh
Member
There's always the possibility that she doesn't care. I mean, she and her family are already financially set for the rest of their lives.
You look at her filmography, and aside from stuff like Euphoria, a lot of the roles, especially the recent roles, look like projects you'd take because you want to do them, not because you think they are going to propel you to super stardom, which you could argue that she's sort of already at.
Chuck Berry
Gold Member
Guys please, more pictures, less inane babble
Kyle and his mom Krystal are two of the worst political influencers out there. Krystal really went insane after October 7th. And Kyle is likely a cuck who just does what his mom/wife tells him so goes along with it.
Nintendo's Witch
Member
Preach
Well, she's an actress. NONE OF THEM command any sort of male following other than for their looks. EVERY SINGLE ONE fails when they do male fronted solo stuff. She will land some nice roles as the love interest of the hero or cast in some ensemble off to fight dinosaurs/aliens/zombies/demons/robots/all of the above and she will be fine.
IntentionalPun
Ask me about my wife's perfect butthole
Yeah, zero men have ever watched anything because they liked a woman's acting.
lol I do it all the time
Last edited:
March Climber
Member
E-Cat
Banned
I actually like most of her takes, but I think Sydney Sweeney and AI are her blind spots
Is there a non-attractive female actress that commands purely male oriented films that I'm forgetting?
I like Meryl Streep, Gillian Anderson, Kate Blanchet (though she can be quite hot, so it's a toss up), and Melissa McCarthy as much as the next guy but I don't run out to see one of their films just for them. Even stuff like Predator or Alien films, or lots of horror, have female leads that are attractive, or the villain is the real draw. I don't feel like this is a particularly controversial or obtuse opinion, it's born out by the box office and has been since the dawn of film.
Put Cruise, Pitt, Schwarzeneggar, Stallone , and a bunch of other guys in a movie and my interest is piqued before I've seen a single frame of it.
March Climber
Member
Decent pivot (because it's not what you originally said), but not the greatest goal post move.
I don't want to derail further, just know that it's okay to say 'Yeah my bad I forgot about ____' sometimes than restructure your argument lol.
? Pivot? In what way? Please elaborate. I'll refresh your memory of what I said.
Well, she's an actress. NONE OF THEM command any sort of male following other than for their looks. EVERY SINGLE ONE fails when they do male fronted solo stuff. She will land some nice roles as the love interest of the hero or cast in some ensemble off to fight dinosaurs/aliens/zombies/demons/robots/all of the above and she will be fine.
followed by
Is there a non-attractive female actress that commands purely male oriented films that I'm forgetting?
I like Meryl Streep, Gillian Anderson, Kate Blanchet (though she can be quite hot, so it's a toss up), and Melissa McCarthy as much as the next guy but I don't run out to see one of their films just for them. Even stuff like Predator or Alien films, or lots of horror, have female leads that are attractive, or the villain is the real draw. I don't feel like this is a particularly controversial or obtuse opinion, it's born out by the box office and has been since the dawn of film.
Put Cruise, Pitt, Schwarzeneggar, Stallone , and a bunch of other guys in a movie and my interest is piqued before I've seen a single frame of it.
Please, enlighten us with your insights.
March Climber
Member
Sure lol. This part:
Is not equivalent to this part:
The second one is a slight pivot. Again, it's a great pivot, but still a pivot into a good trap question.
calistan
Member
GymWolf
Member
How out of the loop you need to be to think that dudes liking swiener because she is hot and not because of her acting skill is a big gatcha moment??!
3liteDragon
Member
Krystal & Kyle lol, two retards made for each other.
Sure, if you trim what I initially said and leave out the.....EVERY SINGLE ONE fails when they do male fronted solo stuff. then the follow up may seem like a slight pivot to you, but it's obvious what I'm talking about initially, and it's consistent with what I said later.
But this is boring for the rest, I'm sure. I'm happy to debate semantics with you on DM if you prefer
March Climber
Member
No need for DMs, this will be my last response post in the SS thread bringing anything up about your post, so you can have the final word if you want. It's not a trim, you made 3 different claims:Sure, if you trim what I initially said and leave out the.....EVERY SINGLE ONE fails when they do male fronted solo stuff. then the follow up may seem like a slight pivot to you, but it's obvious what I'm talking about initially, and it's consistent with what I said later.
But this is boring for the rest, I'm sure. I'm happy to debate semantics with you on DM if you prefer
One:
Two:
Three:
None of them fully connect to each other.
For the first claim, one could easily say as a rebuttal the name: Viola Davis.
Her main draw is acting talent and everyone knows this.
The second claim is different than the first, and one could say it's a reasonable thing to argue and have a discussion on. If someone were to possibly say a rebuttal name it could maybe be Michelle Yeoh.
Now saying Michelle's name activates your trap, which is claim 3.
For the third claim, you tried to connect it to the first, but you added something very specific that makes it a different claim, which is unattractiveness. That suddenly shrinks the parameter and you are aware of this and it invalidates choices like Michelle Yeoh. You know you worded it that way on purpose to save claim 1 lol, but won't acknowledge it for who knows what reason.
This is why I was saying it's better to just say 'oops I forgot about ____'.
Apologies to the thread, I'm done going back and forth with J jason10mm
Similar threads
- Locked