semiconscious
Member
for me, this's become 'the age of wait & see' when it comes to just about all 'upcoming' major releases. not assuming or hoping for anything beforehand. &, yes, this's mostly something that sony's done to me...
Number two for Tony and number one for AbeReally isn't about being fuckable. Attractiveness and charisma are important characteristics of characters whether it is games or films.
Who would you rather have playing Tony Stark?
![]()
![]()
Gaf isn't a person. If a specific person/people said it will be cancelled then just call them out with the post.Wait a minute didn't Gaf say Fable would be cancelled this year?![]()
I would call the first slightly unrealistic simply because a mega rich narcissistic person can afford braces, skincare and a hairstylist (unless their character was one who didn't care about appearances) but if Tony Stark looked like the first pic and had a matching character I wouldn't care. Elon musk, Bezos and Zuckerberg aren't exactly "charismatic" and sexy to me and I have no interest in how sexy Stark looks. I'm sure some ladies/gay men do.Really isn't about being fuckable. Attractiveness and charisma are important characteristics of characters whether it is games or films.
Who would you rather have playing Tony Stark?
![]()
![]()
I would call the first slightly unrealistic simply because a mega rich narcissistic person can afford braces, skincare and a hairstylist (unless their character was one who didn't care about appearances) but if Tony Stark looked like the first pic and had a matching character I wouldn't care. Elon musk, Bezos and Zuckerberg aren't exactly "charismatic" and sexy to me and I have no interest in how sexy Stark looks. I'm sure some ladies/gay men do.
As a hypersensitive gooner retard, I'd be just fine with that, because it means I can make the avatar I want. But I bet you're wrong. And it's never been about playing a character that's "fuckable," that's weird. It's about making an avatar that represents me in the game world. That's why I can't play female characters no matter what they look like.My favorite timeline would be Fable having a full character creator that allows you to customize everything about your character's appearance and that them showing a plain Jane character was their way of trolling hypersensitive gooner retards.
I mean we know nothing about the Fable character other than how unsexy/unattractive she looks. I don't mind characters that aren't attractive especially if that unattractive look has nothing to do with hygiene/style. the first pic just wouldn't match Starks character of a rich narcissist though who wants everybody to love him. He's not well-groomed but he would make a completely fine Stark for me if he was.Exactly why Musk, Bezos, Zuckerberg wouldn't be cast as Tony Stark either. It isn't about being realistic. It is about creating appealing characters. Appealing doesn't necessarily mean "sexy".
I mean we know nothing about the Fable character other than how unsexy/unattractive she looks. I don't mind characters that aren't attractive especially if that unattractive look has nothing to do with hygiene/style. the first pic just wouldn't match Starks character of a rich narcissist though who wants everybody to love him. He's not well-groomed but he would make a completely fine Stark for me if he was.
If stark was written as a character who didn't care about what others thought and didn't care about appearances but still was a genius/rich person that would also be an appealing character to me. The unattractive part I just wouldn't care about because I'm not trying to fuck them.
Not that there's anything wrong with that.this isn't about making the character fuckable.
![]()
Developer_Direct Returns January 22: Watch Fable, Forza Horizon 6, and Beast of Reincarnation Gameplay, Direct from the Studios - Xbox Wire
We're kicking off 2026 with the fourth installment of Developer_Direct on January 22 – bringing you new gameplay and insights for Fable, Forza Horizon 6, and Beast of Reincarnation.news.xbox.com
Hope Fable gets announced for PS5
this she doesn't have to look like a smoke show but she doesn't have to look like a white version of Shrek eitherLike I said, this isn't about making the character fuckable. Seems I can't make that clear so I'll leave it.
it looked good???Can't wait to see Fable. Holy shit it looked good in previous trailers, if there's no downgrade it might be the best looking game of the gen.
this she doesn't have to look like a smoke show but she doesn't have to look like a white version of Shrek either
I would be more excited for this game if I can get past the ugliness of this character but I just can't
I thought it was dead as well sad to be wrong.I still reckon Fable won't release. The only chance it has is if they day one the game on PS5. It's not selling shit on Xbox.
Ehhh…..
Not that there's anything wrong with that.
oh God The Witcher 3 combat in my mind is shiteI hope we get real gameplay of Fable. Jez said the combat was like Witcher 3 which is not a good sign IMO so I'm hoping it's much better than that.
And let's be real, fable 1 was the only good one in the series...
I still can't believe they're making you play as a predefined character. The whole appeal of the older games was creating my own character and doing whatever the hell I felt like doing.
![]()
that is fable 2
I still can't believe they're making you play as a predefined character. The whole appeal of the older games was creating my own character and doing whatever the hell I felt like doing.
Fable 1 doesn't have a character creator.
why did you quote me do not read my post I was saying Fable 2 is better than Fable one
sorry my mistake fixedYou should bold the part of the post you're quoting, for all I know you were talking about its first line.
Fable is probably 8-10 million sold for the entire series.
It's been a long ass time. You had a lot of control over your appearance in those games and you could choose your gender in 2so you haven't played Fable 1 and 2?
because neither let you create a character
It's been a long ass time. You had a lot of control over your appearance in those games
If I can't become a lard ass by eating pies then I'm boycotting, that's all I'm saying.yes, but the idea was that your actions and your gear change the look of your character.
which is probably the case here too.
maybe if you're a thief you look ragged. if you're a noble warrior you look heroic etc.
I thought it was dead as well sad to be wrong.
yes, but the idea was that your actions and your gear change the look of your character.
which is probably the case here too.
maybe if you're a thief you look ragged. if you're a noble warrior you look heroic etc.
A link? No screenshot?
![]()
Sir, I just want you to know that you have the privilege of discussing this with a bonafide artist.
![]()
Just imagine the possibilities for Fable…
![]()
I understand what you are trying to say, but I also don't see how-how good looking they are is a part of an "appealing character" either when I'm not attracted to them in that way. Question is why would I want Stark to have attractive looks that have nothing to do with his character? I don't find that "appealing" in any way especially as a straight man. Realism I do so the badly groomed person in the first pic just wouldn't make sense for a self-centered playboy and the only reason why it wouldn't work.Like I said, this isn't about making the character fuckable. Seems I can't make that clear so I'll leave it.
Just imagine the possibilities for Fable…
![]()
it looked good???
![]()
Yeah, the game they're about to have a deep dive showcase on in two weeks is definitely getting canceled and DOA.Fable is probably 8-10 million sold for the entire series. The sheer cost of the newest entry must be at a point where Xbox are wondering if it is even feasible to release, and not just cancel the game.
I really can't see it happening. Please quote me if wrong.
DOA!
so.,....you're saying you would have sex with Jez Corden?