As usual, too late.
And if they're going with 2027, then what exciting games will they have out for launch if Gears, Halo, Forza, Fable is already out?
![]()
It looks like I've been eating really well these past few years.Phil Spencer in 2015:
![]()
Phil Spencer in 2025:
![]()
Bro, just retire. Man looks like he aged 20 years while dismantling the product he claims to love.
The wrap budget went into this "new logo"So they put a 25 under it and called it a day? I saw the title and expected a brand new design
Revenue ≠ profitThe Xbox situation is strange. Because they make more money than ever.
Xbox=gamepass. Next gen will be weird.
Twenty-five is often considered the first significant milestone toward a century, whilst 20 and 30 lack similar connotations. Phrases like 'a fifth of a century' or '0.3 of a century' don't carry much weight, whereas 'a quarter of a century' does.What's so special about 25 years compared to 20 or 30?
For now. If they keep making cod lose 300 million every year, they will be back where they were againThe Xbox situation is strange. Because they make more money than ever.
Xbox=gamepass. Next gen will be weird.
The power won't be easily noticed by the masses. If it's just old games it'll at best feel like a Series X Pro and many will need Digital Foundry to tell the differences like with PS5 Pro. It'll barely sell.Whether it's late or not, in this case it can't be said that it's their fault if the reason for the date is that AMD's new technology won't be available until 2027.
That said, clearly the "hook" of the new hardware isn't going to be the exclusive catalog or first-party games, since Microsoft has embraced multiplatform and cross-platform releases (PS5,XSand also SW2) will last longer than ever.
The hook of their new Xbox is supposed to be its power (playing games in the best graphical and performance conditions, RT/PathTracing...), improved BC, access to third-party stores, the new controller, and new features.... It's clearly aiming for a more hardcore and niche product, while its games are released on every platform.
What about the games? They supposedly have 40+ games in development... Elder Scrolls VI, Blade, Fallout, and surely those games you mentioned (Fable, Gears E-Day...) will have a NextGen version, and Third-Party Publishers will surely have "pseudoNextGen" games (The Witcher 3, etc.) that many (especially the target user type who would be willing to pay $1000+) will want to play in NextGen conditions.
But it all points to this not being a product for the masses.The power won't be easily noticed by the masses. If it's just old games it'll at best feel like a Series X Pro and many will need Digital Foundry to tell the differences like with PS5 Pro. It'll barely sell.
It sounds good and all but I just have doubts. Even at $1500 you wouldn't get a PC that shines all that much more than Series X, maybe slightly higher settings of Ray-Tracing could be done but forget about path tracing, it could also just mean not as low lows on a dynamic resolution.But it all points to this not being a product for the masses.
The goal is to offer hardware that appeals to the most hardcore fans already familiar with the ecosystem. We'll see what the power differences are, but it clearly seems the aim is for it to be, for example, the place where their first-party games shine in terms of technical and graphical aspects compared to other platforms where they're also available.
But Will se, this is all just speculation. We'll see when the details are released.
I never understood why this concept is so hard to grasp in online discussions, not only about gaming market too.Revenue ≠ profit
The video was posted on the most gaming-related platform. LinkedIn.So they put a 25 under it and called it a day? I saw the title and expected a brand new design