4K 120 fps, 8K 60 fps.
Zero to none
Possibly means games running at 70-80fps will get higher fps due to PSSR2 taking lower share of frametime now ( lower than 2ms) or being able to lower native res for higher fps but PSSR2 keeping the same output quality.
That would be the hope, but who knows what it actually means coming from a supposed leak auto-translated from a different language.
FF7? Maybe.
Mark Cerny did say something about overwriting older version through firmware like DLSS, maybe they will include that which they should give us a toggle anyway. At the end of the day, the pro is created for the hardware enthusiast
The dev did say they might implement the extra graphical features from PC version to PS5 pro, which I think they there is a chance they might revisit. The greater foliage draw distance would be welcome for the pro.
It's so frustrating. 16 plays well on PC (at least on 1080p FSR it gives me high fps on my GPD Win 5). At least one of the two gets a PSSR patch
You mean automatically without a game-specific patch?Would Silent Hill 2 see any benefits from this vs. the Pro patch that's never coming out?
If you'd have told people RDRII was going to be full native 4k and locked 30fps on XB1X they'd have ridiculed you aswell. I think GTA VI will have a 60fps mode on the Pro.
You have no idea about its CPU demands in actual gameplay to be talking in absolutes. There's a fuckton of visually impressive open World games that run at 60fps on a base PS5. I think at worst it will have a 40fps mode which is infinitely better than 30fps.
You mean automatically without a game-specific patch?
Along with Saros, Pragmata and RE9 are also the best games to show the new update.
PSSR ML AI training.
Noticed anything similar on Horizon 2?
If they didn't have it on the Pro already, they wouldn't have the data needed to release the improved version right now.
We would have just ended up with 1.0 this year instead of 2.0. The only way to improve these models are through iteration and trial and error at a large scale
Let AMD do the work. Not like the training data cannot be used for PSSR. It's a joint effort where one's work benefits the other.
It seems even FSR 4 is an iteration on PSSR. Sony hardware design would have had to wait on AMD software, the timeline of which is not in Sony's control. They couldn't even get a production grade version for RDNA 2 and 3, let alone supporting Pro's Frankenstein implementation.
AMD would not have prioritized or even pretended to focus on an ML upscaler for consoles without this work. Like
viveks86
said, they're feeding each other. Imagine if the first iteration of PSSR we get is on the PS6. That would suck. Because they've been doing this for a year+ now, they've - hopefully - figured out how to streamline patches. Give it another 2 years when the PS6 probably comes out, and you've got 2 more years of training on console, and development on the most efficient ways to update games.
WHAT!!??? I would have laughed if you said PS5 Pro let alone base PS5.. WTF lol.. I guarantee you, it's not going to run 60fps with any acceptable resolution on base PS5. We will be very lucky to see it on Pro.
Is this classic as in PS1/ps2 gen games? If it upscales PS4-era games, then wow, game changer. I dont see many devs patching for this, sadly."- Upscales low-res classic games to high resolution"
I think youre being a bit too optimistic, quite a few ps5 pro games didnt even recieve a real ps5 pro patch, you really think alot of devs are going to go through the trouble? Only way this is happening is if Sony pushes this hard on devs and somehow enforces it.game patches...
