DaciaJC
Gold Member
A literal translation is:
"Because I believe you're someone who can stop justice before it turns into madness."
So why did the official English use "bigotry" instead of "madness"?
狂器 (kyōki) is metaphorical here
In Japanese media, 正義が狂気に変わる is a common phrase meaning:
justice becoming fanaticism
righteousness turning zealous
moral conviction becoming dangerous/extremist
It often implies intolerance, judgment, or self-righteous cruelty, more than literal mental insanity. In other words, "madness" is literal, but the intended meaning is closer to:
zealotry
extremism
ideological intolerance
persecuting others in the name of justice
Which overlaps strongly with the English concept of bigotry.
ChatGPT is wildly off the mark here. I have no idea if its literal translation of the Japanese is correct, but assuming it is: "bigotry" is in no way an adequate English equivalent. Bigotry can range in expression from anything as severe as lynching a member of a group you oppose to as lukewarm as calling someone a mild ethnic slur. It is a very general term encompassing a range of attitudes, not just the extreme end of the spectrum described by the Japanese word kyōki.
Moreover, the popular understanding of a "bigot" is someone who discriminates or holds prejudices against others based on their race, religion, ethnicity, etc. Read again what the AI says:
Japanese "狂気 (kyōki)" in moral contexts is closer to:
fanatical extremism
losing sight of true justice
becoming cruel while thinking you're righteous
None of these descriptions imply an attitude of discrimination. If the King's Chief Magistrate decides to punish every single crime committed in the realm, no matter how insignificant or obscene, with death -- you would probably consider that pretty extreme, right? Cruel, certainly, perhaps even fanatical. But if he isn't biased in whom he selects for the executioner's axe - if anyone can be marked for beheading regardless of the color of their skin or their personal wealth or which god they believe in - then he would hardly be considered a bigot. What was the epithet given to Aerys II, who burned anyone and everyone whom he considered a conspirator? The Bigot King? No, I don't think that was quite it...
So, yeah, not exactly a great defense of the localization here. It doesn't seem like the AI really attempts to give an objective appraisal but rather makes pretty big leaps to arrive at its conclusion.