• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Sam Houser and Leslie Benzies implicated in the Epstein Files

I'm not defending anyone that's on pedo island, but Epstein was also a guy that had legitimate parties too. He also ran a legitimate business.

If you think this is exclusive to Epstein, don't bother with Hollywood or the music industry. I guarantee you most people that went to a Diddy party probably heard a rumor but didn't actually go to his freak offs.
 
The craziest thing is that I don't even know for sure which document you're referring to.

Understand that there are unverified or even provably fake "documents" in these Epstein file dumps - similar to what is said at the top of the thread.

Where it seems questionable or fishy, those files are included.

Where it's damning, those files are missing or redacted.

They tried to buy extra time on the basis of redacting the identities of victims. They failed to do so while putting all the attention on their real mandate.
 
So you're just going to skip over how you incorrectly assumed that Epstein provided this poor wittle 20something Russian woman to Gates. Good for the record.
Yeah, Bill contracted STDs from just this one russian bridge player. Definitley not, as Epstein put it, sex with russian girls, like the ones he convienently also provides.
As for this claim of a Russian girl for Prince Andrew:


Oh my god... 26!

Apparently sex trafficking adult woman is okay? And they definitley weren't groomed. Absolutely not.

Definitley not the face of a predator.

d6D3Q16u0aqmv5sw.png
 
Last edited:
GAF pretending the Epstein files aren't real when they caused billionaires to get divorced, princes to lose their title, multiple suicides and prison sentences, and millions in NDAs and out of court settlements to be awarded was not on my 2026 bingo card.

I'm disappointed in y'all right now.

EDIT: I just saw the Trump accusation. LOL so now we're downplaying it because you can't bear the weight of the truth? Come on y'all, you're stronger than that. You didn't know before, but you do now.
It's hilarious seeing all the pushback / minimizing going on and at the same time tons of emails and data being released all over social media.
 
Yeah, Bill contracted STDs from just this one russian bridge player. Definitley not, as Epstein put it, sex with russian girls, like the ones he convienently also provides.
You ever been in a conversation where someone has done something or has been involved with a category of person once, and then colloquially says "so your thing is to [insert verb] with [insert plural of noun] now"? Right.

"Girls" is also constantly used in place of "women".
Until or unless there is any evidence towards there being more than one Russian woman whom Bill Gates has been with, and/or that Epstein had ever introduced or "provided" them or any other nationality of female to Gates, I think we're done with this line of inquiry that seems to be a conclusion in search for imaginary evidence by way of insinuation and rhetoric.

Apparently sex trafficking adult woman is okay? And they definitley weren't groomed. Absolutely not.
No evidence of sex trafficking, no evidence of grooming in that supposed message. It's not sex trafficking to introduce adult woman to other adult men. If that's the case, then much of the world population commits sex trafficking on a daily and casual basis!

Definitley not the face of a predator.

d6D3Q16u0aqmv5sw.png
Ugh. Low information reflexivity. It's a random image.
This reminds me of the college photos of that douchebag that used to write for Waypoint or whatever. Super duper feminist advocating for women empowerment in games, then has all of these sleazy photos on his tumblr or MySpace or some shit.

Of course the redactions of literally every female other than Ghislaine Maxwell (whether identified as a victim, already publicly known as an associate or victim, or not) makes the pictures look super scary to dummies.
 
Last edited:
You ever been in a conversation where someone has done something or has been involved with a category of person once, and then colloquially says "so your thing is to [insert verb] with [insert plural of noun] now"? Right.

"Girls" is also constantly used in place of "women".
Until or unless there is any evidence towards there being more than one Russian woman whom Bill Gates has been with, and/or that Epstein had ever introduced or "provided" them or any other nationality of female to Gates, I think we're done with this line of inquiry that seems to be a conclusion in search for imaginary evidence by way of insinuation and rhetoric.


No evidence of sex trafficking, no evidence of grooming or grooming in that supposed message. It's not sex trafficking to introduce adult woman to other adult men. If that's the case, then much of the world population commits sex trafficking on a daily and casual basis!


Ugh. Low information reflexivity. It's a random image.
This reminds me of the college photos of that douchebag that used to write for Waypoint or whatever. Super duper feminist advocating for women empowerment in games, then has all of these sleazy photos on his tumblr or MySpace or some shit.

Of course the redactions of literally every female other than Ghislaine Maxwell (whether identified as a victim or not) makes the pictures look super scary to dummies.

nush nush have you got a lighter for all this gas?
 
Where it seems questionable or fishy, those files are included.

Where it's damning, those files are missing or redacted.

They tried to buy extra time on the basis of redacting the identities of victims. They failed to do so while putting all the attention on their real mandate.
You realise that the alleged victims lawyers are the ones who have pushed for these sweeping redactions when they were drafting the legislation with Khanna and Massie?
 
Due to many factors, the only way forward is liquidating anyone mentioned or named in those documents. We could try to litigate it for decades, but no one has given a cursory argument against what society would lose if we just got rid of every named person.
 
I'm not defending anyone that's on pedo island, but Epstein was also a guy that had legitimate parties too. He also ran a legitimate business.

If you think this is exclusive to Epstein, don't bother with Hollywood or the music industry. I guarantee you most people that went to a Diddy party probably heard a rumor but didn't actually go to his freak offs.
Nuance is lost in a polarizing world of binary team sports.
 
Sarah Ransome would have been 22years old in 2006. Not sure the pedo talk in the thread is warranted. More like a Leonardo DiCaprio creepy situation.
 
I know this is probably preaching to the choir, but I wish to state for the record that anyone affiliated with Jeffrey Epstein--and especially anyone who traveled to his pedophile island--should be loaded onto a giant rocket and blasted into the sun. I don't care who it is, but I do suspect The Simpsons are right, and it turns out to be all the annoying people we always quietly hated.

Seriously, I'm beginning to wonder if Stanley Kubrick really did get whacked for making Eyes Wide Shut.
 
You ever been in a conversation where someone has done something or has been involved with a category of person once, and then colloquially says "so your thing is to [insert verb] with [insert plural of noun] now"? Right.

"Girls" is also constantly used in place of "women".
Until or unless there is any evidence towards there being more than one Russian woman whom Bill Gates has been with, and/or that Epstein had ever introduced or "provided" them or any other nationality of female to Gates, I think we're done with this line of inquiry that seems to be a conclusion in search for imaginary evidence by way of insinuation and rhetoric.


No evidence of sex trafficking, no evidence of grooming in that supposed message. It's not sex trafficking to introduce adult woman to other adult men. If that's the case, then much of the world population commits sex trafficking on a daily and casual basis!


Ugh. Low information reflexivity. It's a random image.
This reminds me of the college photos of that douchebag that used to write for Waypoint or whatever. Super duper feminist advocating for women empowerment in games, then has all of these sleazy photos on his tumblr or MySpace or some shit.

Of course the redactions of literally every female other than Ghislaine Maxwell (whether identified as a victim, already publicly known as an associate or victim, or not) makes the pictures look super scary to dummies.
I think is the usual dance from the left and biased mainstream media, where they change the reporting to suit the alleged perpetrator. If of course they report all that much on the more left leaning guys in the first place. As usual it's all about money, with the lawyers pushing these wider narratives about justice etc, when it's all really about settlements.
 
I know this is probably preaching to the choir, but I wish to state for the record that anyone affiliated with Jeffrey Epstein--and especially anyone who traveled to his pedophile island--should be loaded onto a giant rocket and blasted into the sun. I don't care who it is, but I do suspect The Simpsons are right, and it turns out to be all the annoying people we always quietly hated.

Seriously, I'm beginning to wonder if Stanley Kubrick really did get whacked for making Eyes Wide Shut.
I don't think he was whacked to be honest.
 
I think is the usual dance from the left and biased mainstream media, where they change the reporting to suit the alleged perpetrator. If of course they report all that much on the more left leaning guys in the first place. As usual it's all about money, with the lawyers pushing these wider narratives about justice etc, when it's all really about settlements.
It isn't just the left tbh. The strongest fuel of the Epstein myth is that it has something to latch onto for every extreme on the political spectrum.

The right may be looking to exculpate Trump of any wrongdoing right now, but it much of it was very keen on implicating its political opposition and using the spectre of "the list" to to energize pre-election. Now, the right that's obsessed with conspiracies involving intelligent agencies, "globalist elites" and Israel want to use it to inform the basis of the post-Trump right.
 
Due to many factors, the only way forward is liquidating anyone mentioned or named in those documents. We could try to litigate it for decades, but no one has given a cursory argument against what society would lose if we just got rid of every named person.
I fully support this post by comrade simpatico

kim jong un GIF
 
Man, Epstein really did want to fuck with everyone that made money in any place around the world.
He was mosad asset, ofc his goal was to hold richest/most powerful americans under his thumb, israel's sole existance depends on american support after all ^^

Imagine u go to school everyday, and no1 really likes u there(lets just say u arent best friend material, u look weird and have nasty personality, which tons of teenage boys do :P ), all the other classmates wanna kick the shit out of u daily, but ur cousin is baddest mofo in school and thx to that u are basically untouchable :messenger_sunglasses:
What happens if said cuisin stops caring for u/gets transfered to other school? We all can imagine :messenger_astonished:
hasbulla-hasbik.gif
 
It isn't just the left tbh. The strongest fuel of the Epstein myth is that it has something to latch onto for every extreme on the political spectrum.

The right may be looking to exculpate Trump of any wrongdoing right now, but it much of it was very keen on implicating its political opposition and using the spectre of "the list" to to energize pre-election. Now, the right that's obsessed with conspiracies involving intelligent agencies, "globalist elites" and Israel want to use it to inform the basis of the post-Trump right.
Not sure the media is reporting on this in the most unbiased way. They have their preferences.... It's plain to see. And of course both sides of the political spectrum are trying to make out that each other is more implicated etc etc.
 
"unverified"
"no investigation"
"no evidence"

Why bother? Sensationalism?

Plus, these texts as in OP's link has to be re-read like five times to make any sense of. It's just rambling with hard to follow grammar (wtf uses parentheses for like ten 10 lines) and context.
 
Top Bottom