Neat
Neo Member
He's also nearing 60 years old. Wrinkles and saggy skin are inevitable.Yeah, I can see how it can easily be mistaken. Could be he lost the weight naturally, but he had that ozempic face in photos and that was a tell-tale sign.
![]()
He's also nearing 60 years old. Wrinkles and saggy skin are inevitable.Yeah, I can see how it can easily be mistaken. Could be he lost the weight naturally, but he had that ozempic face in photos and that was a tell-tale sign.
![]()
She speaks Aaron's language, she'll do just fine. I actually wanted to see the female version of Aaron Greenberg so badly.As I said before, she is charming but very weird to the point its creepy.
He's also nearing 60 years old. Wrinkles and saggy skin are inevitable.
AI slop is far, far worse.It's impossible to be worse than Phil SpendSir
Microsoft quite literally turned into a 3rd party publisher due to his immense, historical failures
They bought fucking Activision and still didn't move the needle at all. Just a completely irrelevant brand under SpendSirs watch.
She can't fail that bad. It's impossible. She will be better than him.
Nahh no way they are using me as a PR handler and the reason I say that is by what else I have heard over the years, stuff they have never want out there
Edit - I will add that sounds like things may have been heated within castle green and these two were fired
We could read this in multiple ways and the wording sounds very cunning."As monetization and AI evolve and influence this future, we will not chase short-term efficiency or flood our ecosystem with soulless AI slop. Games are and always will be art, crafted by humans, and created with the most innovative technology provided by us."
We like the word "slop" now?
Translated: you're getting AI slop. She was head of Azure AI systems. Once again, you're getting AI neposlop.We could read this in multiple ways and the wording sounds very cunning.
Even AI generated asset creation comes from assimilating human handcraft art, so it sounds like so long as the end result - in Xbox's opinion - is that their AI is "innovative technology" and isn't "flooding" - so a stream/deluge would be okay - and isn't "soulless AI slop", it is full steam ahead for Xbox game creators to use it for everything.
So no, they don't like the word slop, unless using it as a differentiator from their "innovative technology" it would seem.
What a master stroke they've had fumbling first party efforts for over a decade.Translated: you're getting AI slop. She was head of Azure AI systems. Once again, you're getting AI neposlop.
Wasn't he running the xbox studios?What really matters though is his performance, and It doesn't help that he was so shit at his previous job/s.
Only happy person in that clip is the guy going to PlaystationWhat a shit town hall…
"Yeah, he is the one that convinced me about selling, he is just so aligned to how we want to work he understands and will let us do things our way"
….
Booty: "I want to change the least amount of things possible"
…
"We are worried about MS acquiring us and going after our ideas we may develop even when they do not compete with MS / Double Fine…"
Booty: "Let me be clear if you work on it while working here we own the idea"
Schafer (with the biggest "WTF did I do?" look possible): "but… well… unless they are produced we have always maintained that we do not own their ideas if they, on their own time, work on some side things…"
Booty (reading the room): "Well, we may want to revisit that…"
(Studio is like "WTF?!?")
…
Somehow the editor of the video did not think about reshooting it or cutting the segment somehow or anything. WTF…? Quality control anyone?
She did ruin Instacart and make Home Depot online shopping worse. So there's that. Certain people fail upward depending on traits that have nothing to do with the jobHas the new CEO had any experience in the gaming side of things at all?
Translated: you're getting AI slop. She was head of Azure AI systems. Once again, you're getting AI neposlop.
This is concerning, Satya knew why he put her in that position. She is a yes man. Those are the types that succeed in the corporate world.She did ruin Instacart and make Home Depot online shopping worse. So there's that. Certain people fail upward depending on traits that have nothing to do with the job
She did ruin Instacart and make Home Depot online shopping worse. So there's that. Certain people fail upward depending on traits that have nothing to do with the job
Doesnt matter...It has Home Depot on Linkedin... All that is not working there is her fault.She didn't work for Home Depot. She is on the board.
The finest hand-crafted AI.Yeah, and she's politically savvy enough to know that this will be one of the fans' concerns about her taking over. So she has to explicitly say, "Don't worry, it won't be AI slop." [It'll be AI wonderfulness.]
LOL Xbox now led by AI woman who probably thinks Halo is an artisinal shampoo and Forza is a fruit drink.
*Edit* I was half joking, but seems she really is just a flighty career executive bouncing between unrelated companies she deems to be promotions into more prestigious roles. She has legit very likely never touched a console or "core" videogame in her entire life before Nutella started grooming her for the role.
If I thought she was nothing more than a corporate shill before, can't say I've changed my mind.Bond did say she is staying on as an advisor for a little while and that they've been working together for a few weeks on the transition. She could be lying idk.
In Satya's defence he can't sell the cost of Xbox to shareholders under an AI umbrella unless it is credible. Her lack of experience or knowledge of the Xbox console product or games in general doesn't satisfy gamers, but her involvement in Azure AI more than qualifies her as the boss of a Copilot Xbox division to use Xbox as a vehicle to promote and advertise Copilot and normalise its place in Windows as part of DirectX, even if it kills Xbox as a console in the process.This is concerning, Satya knew why he put her in that position. She is a yes man. Those are the types that succeed in the corporate world.
We could all be wrong but the writing has been on the wall for Xbox brand. Back to the Don M. Kinect era but with AI.
Probably not for a couple of years. For instance, remember how it took a couple of years before you really felt the difference over at Playstation with the transition from guys like House, Shu, and Layden to Ryan and Hulst's leadership. And it has taken many years before we are feeling the full effects, right about now. So these changes take time to be felt -- years in most cases.
So I expect that things will stay pretty much the same, for the time being. It will be a couple of years before you really begin to feel the effects.
With the way he's been getting skinny and looking older faster in the recent year or two I hope Phil isn't quietly battling some sort of cancer or something and didnt want to make a spectacle of it.
Not saying its true, just a thought..
Next year? You are being optimistic...Wont be that long. Clearly Nadella is not happy with xbox and put in a yes (wo)man as Xbox CEO to quickly pivot to whatever he wants.
We will know by what studio gets the axe by next year.
"Should bring the blade dashboard?"
New CEO can't write a proper sentence. Social media brain.
Your mistake (that most here are making) is in thinking that by talking about AI slop she is talking about all and any use of AI. She isn't. She's making a simple point about not using low quality AI outputs in a careless or lazy way, where it degrades the quality of games.
Many, many people in the industry (games and AI alike) use the term and agree with the problem it describes. But they don't see all AI outputs as 'slop', just the aforementioned low quality, poor taste, careless use of it.
AI is, of course, going to be used at Microsoft Studios just like it will eventually become commonplace across the industry. It's just a tool, it's just software. What will matter is how it is used. Nobody expects studios to hire a team of devs who do nothing but model and place trees across a game map anymore, they just use SpeedTree to procedurally generate them at scale. Gamers don't complain about SpeedTree being used and demand hand-crafted trees in games and you'd think that would be because they understand it would be a waste of time to make hundreds or thousands of them manually.
Studios will use AI to help with coding, turning human art into models, speeding up texture production, coming up with lots options for dialogue, doing pre-viz for cutscenes, working through lots of potential level designs, ideating art styles and many other things.
Sorry if it's been posted, but … yeah. This in addition to "Oh I can't just pick 3 favorite games."
FUCK. Twitter sucks.
Wont be that long. Clearly Nadella is not happy with xbox and put in a yes (wo)man as Xbox CEO to quickly pivot to whatever he wants.
We will know by what studio gets the axe by next year.
Btw, Vita in Italian means life.btw Asha in Hindi means hope. So that's a good thing? for Xbox.
the only 'vision' i can think she could possibly have as someone with no related background is xbox as third-party developer/publisher. though who knows, maybe even that amount of pullback wouldn't be enough? maybe ms sees triple-a video gaming itself as a dead end, & she's been brought in to sell it off & shut it down for good? cuz she's equipped to do that...We'll see. I agree that we might get some clues in what studios she decides to axe, but otoh, I think that will mostly be profit-driven decision, not something that comes down to her "vision" for the future of Xbox, if she has one.
She's a new CEO with no experience in the area. She isn't going to rush in with a new agenda. She needs time to learn the ropes and get a feel for the ground game. Some people seem to be expecting big changes are right around the corner (e.g., canceling hardware, full bore AI, return to glory days), but no. It will be status quo for a long while, a continuance of what we've already seen in the past two years. And whatever major changes she decides to institute will take years to be felt on the consumer end.
Yeah, talking is easy. As usual their problem is to get their strategy into reality, preferably before somebody else is beating them to the punch.The blade dashboard tweet is a good start, but Phil was all talk so let's see if it actually leads to anything.
Even if it were possible to save Xbox, we're at least 2 or 3 years away from the strategy bearing fruit.
It was just a matter of time considering the last results.If true, 10 out of 12 members is pretty significant.
That's really not the CEO playbook and a fast track way to get fired for impotence.We'll see. I agree that we might get some clues in what studios she decides to axe, but otoh, I think that will mostly be profit-driven decision, not something that comes down to her "vision" for the future of Xbox, if she has one.
She's a new CEO with no experience in the area. She isn't going to rush in with a new agenda. She needs time to learn the ropes and get a feel for the ground game. Some people seem to be expecting big changes are right around the corner (e.g., canceling hardware, full bore AI, return to glory days), but no. It will be status quo for a long while, a continuance of what we've already seen in the past two years. And whatever major changes she decides to institute will take years to be felt on the consumer end.