Lame I got excited when rumors and news coming out saying its implemented in all games and I'll vintage games
-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
It's Official: New PSSR Confirmed For Resident Evil Requiem + FSR 4/DLSS 4.5 Comparisons
- Thread starter analog_future
- Start date
That was a fake leak mate or you didn't understand they were talking about . The realistic leaks were talking about developers need to update their games
Last edited:
JerryinSoCal
Member
It worked very well in several games.
Arsic
Loves his juicy stink trail scent
That explains why RE9 when I played last night was the best looking console/pro game I've played yet. Game is gorgeous.
adamsapple
Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
I mean,adamsapple is already claiming that paying it without RT on base consoles is better.
I am? That's news to me.
LostDonkey
Member
What's with all the PS5 Pro salt? It's one hell of a system.
Pasta la Vista
Member
Fuck you lol
Gen.Grievous
Member
None of the advanced upscaling techniques can do that. They always need developer input.
saintjules
Gold Member
SegaSnatcher
Member
This is the man right here. Without him who knows if the Playstation brand would still be as successful as it currently is.
hououinkyouma00
Member
lol a simple toggle that you turn on in the PS5 main system settings once and never touch ever again isn't really the same. At least not the last time I tried changing DLSS versions in a game.
This is literally a single toggle in settings.
Bojji
Gold Member
PSSR 2.0 is sharper with less ghosting than full fat FP8 FSR4.
This one scene where PSSR 2.0 was blurrier I think is caused by that DRS patent for PSSR we heard few days ago, as this is one of the heaviest part in the game.
PSSR has a bit higher res here (52% vs. 50%) but I doubt this makes much difference in sharpness. I wonder how it compares to FSR 4.1 released yesterday (?).
kazuyamishima
Member
CrustyBritches
Gold Member
My general impression is that FSR 4.1 is a decent step up in definition on vegetation, hair, and fine lines over FSR4. Hard to tell exactly how much impact Youtube has on the image, but I don't have time to upload a video right now. I think PSSR2 might be INT8 FSR 4.1.
Last edited:
Bojji
Gold Member
SegaSnatcher
Member
All it needs to be is a noticeable improvement over PSSR 1.0 and so far it looks promising. Honestly, probably better than some expected.
Radical_3d
Member
Hold your horses Mr. Nobel Prize for Peace aspirant! My beef with our resident Eastern European isn't over! We still have one matter to address.The fact that both Alex and Oliver (well established and vocal critics of PSSR) have stated it has crossed the "more than good enough threshold" means:
Bojji can turn full PSSR 2 fanboy in March and start shaming anyone that can't afford/don't want to spend on a Pro but still want to discuss graphics
- @Karim can retire and take a vacation
See above.
Physiognomonics
Member
And what about the FUD about PS5 Pro mere 300 Tops not been sufficient against PC 600 or 800 inflated TOPs?
All the people doubting Cerny's statements about PS5 Pro ML hardware that was not needing sparsity for that particular kind of algorithm?
And finally many were theorizing PS5 Pro would get some kind of FSR4 lite, again contrary to Cerny's statements reassuring PS5 Pro would get the full FSR4 upscaling.
Once again Cerny did it and designed a great piece of innovative hardware that even shaped AMD tech with FSR4 collaboration.
All the people doubting Cerny's statements about PS5 Pro ML hardware that was not needing sparsity for that particular kind of algorithm?
And finally many were theorizing PS5 Pro would get some kind of FSR4 lite, again contrary to Cerny's statements reassuring PS5 Pro would get the full FSR4 upscaling.
Once again Cerny did it and designed a great piece of innovative hardware that even shaped AMD tech with FSR4 collaboration.
Last edited:
diffusionx
Gold Member
has the ps5 pro been unsuccessful? I dont think so
and you have to walk before you can run etc.
This is 4.1
Mr Moose
Member
Oh, I mean on PC. In the video it says 4.0.3.
Last edited:
Zathalus
Gold Member
I doubt it has anything to do with the patent, as K KeplerL2 said it is likely just the FSR 4.1 INT8 version. So it has the advantages of 4.1, but still a few (tiny) areas where it lacks vs 4.1 FP8.
PSSR 2.0 is sharper with less ghosting than full fat FP8 FSR4.
This one scene where PSSR 2.0 was blurrier I think is caused by that DRS patent for PSSR we heard few days ago, as this is one of the heaviest part in the game.
FSR 4.1 should come out next month on PC
viveks86
Member
Nice catch on the last one. The whole frame looks blurrier (see letters on warning sign on right for reference), so it likely is dropping inference quality across the entire image to keep the framerate up (or may be it's lowering resolution when fps drops). The "not doing lines as well" is not the right conclusion. Different tradeoffs are being made based on performance target and normal viewing distance. It could also be just a difference in versions of FSR used, like pointed above.
PSSR 2.0 is sharper with less ghosting than full fat FP8 FSR4.
This one scene where PSSR 2.0 was blurrier I think is caused by that DRS patent for PSSR we heard few days ago, as this is one of the heaviest part in the game.
Last edited:
CrustyBritches
Gold Member
You can do it now. See the images I posted for reference. AMD users have to do everything themselves, unfortunately.
What's funny is that the "official" 26.2.2 driver had either notes or a site like TPU mentioned that Adrenaline might not "see" FSR4 and show it as active via the indicator/adrenaline, but when you swap for FSR 4.1 it pops correctly.
Last edited:
Sethbacca
Member
If these results translate to similar gains in other games I bet Pro is gonna do some numbers in the last part of this gen.
J Required
Gold Member
From the pics I saw It looks better than FSR4.
MazingerDUDE
Member
It's gotta be the patent because the overall perception is just so much different from the other shots. Even the leaked INT8 ver of FSR4 didn't show this kinda disparity when compared to the full fat FP8 FSR4.
Last edited:
viveks86
Member
Still not sure about that. There would be a natural shift towards pro, but that price barrier is still quite formidable. Unless something like GTA shows a big jump, like the fabled 60 fps mode, I'd still expect a 90-10 split.
The majority still have a mental block at the asking price. They will spend hundreds (or thousands) on other meaningless shit in their lives, but a videogame console should be and forever be around $500, apparently.
saintjules
Gold Member
It's mostly people who cannot afford it given the price of entry.
Last edited:
TGO
Hype Train conductor. Works harder than it steams.
Not directed at you because I never saw that thread
But it's funny how nobody was saying this when the Feb/March Thread rumours was around.
Everyone in it was all shaking their mango tree over the news and not once did anyone say that it was bullshit, but now the exact same people are making out it was this was the case all along.
Now Seriously, what shit PSSR games should we be checking out when it finally releases!!
Can you share the source so we can learn what problems can it cause if we leave it on?
S0ULZB0URNE
Member
Pretty cool update.(Hurry the F up and release it Sony)
I am interested in the rumored lower resolutions PSSR'D to higher resolution talked about via MLiD rumors.
YCoCg
Member
You also promised to give me $1,000 for helping you out the other night
adamsapple
Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
HeWhoWalks
Gold Member
Nope, but at least most people are excited for it!
Last edited:
PaintTinJr
Member
Alex's analysis of those triple shots in your picture above had the wrong conclusion because of his bias.PSSR has a bit higher res here (52% vs. 50%) but I doubt this makes much difference in sharpness. I wonder how it compares to FSR 4.1 released yesterday (?).
DLSS is overly sharp to the point of almost seeing alpha cards in the DLSS 4.5 L tree branches. And the triple shot of the document. DLSS does best with the text but does worst with the mugshot photo clarity.
In both shots you could argue either way for FSR4 or PSSR2, depending on whether the fuller but too soft tree of FSR4 is better than PSSR2's correctly sharpened tree with a little less body.
And for the document, FSR4 has maybe a smidge more detail in the mugshot, but the text is way too soft, to read Or with PSSR2 the mugshot is close with FSR4 but not equal, and the text is close to DLSS 4.5 L for sharpness, but not quite equal.
Personally I think all three did a good job, but I would have taken FSR4/PSSR2 over DLSS 4.5 L in those situations if pushed because the minor flaws, and in the other triple shot scene in the video in the rain with the Umbrella, the edge line of the Umbrella when it flexes is noisiest on DLSS 4.5 L and far more of an issue than FSR4's softer image or the soft narrow lines fading away on PSSR2 that he claimed were incomplete.
winjer
Gold Member
There is also the issue that he forced the L preset. When the game ships with the K preset.
But somehow, he still used the FSR 4.0.3, when the FSR 4.1 is out in the wild and brings big improvements to the performance mode, especially using vegetation.
PaintTinJr
Member
Yeah completely agree. If that wasn't even the preset this single player story - play once experience - game shipped with, and the one it did ship with was worse than L, then for the average gamer DLSS isn't superior in this game. Choosing a preset in a multiplayer or sports game after release is no big deal, but having to do that for a single player game just ruins the experience in the very way PC gaming has been criticised for 30years of game settings always needing adjusted, rather than just starting and playing.
Last edited:
Panajev2001a
GAF's Pleasant Genius
Their wording makes me think that games that add support for it explicitly will look a tiny bit better than the games that just have PSSR1 support and they auto enhanced… for those… PSSR1.89 ?
Not saying they will look horrible but there must be a difference if some games are updating to the new PSSR version via patch and others just use the system settings to update.
winjer
Gold Member
And mind you, the Preset L is the heaviest preset, made specifically for the Ultra Performance mode.
Even for DLSS 4.5, the base preset is the M. So Alex was trying it's best to make PSSR2 and FSR4 look inferior.
And I would not be surprised if he wasn't normalizing frame rate, when comparing temporal upscalers.
Bojji
Gold Member
This is weird, he should left default K preset in comparison.
Even setting nvidia app to "recommended" would use M preset in performance mode.
He should use default and show L as potential best case scenario.
Last edited:
MisterXDTV
Member
All the biggest games that were patched for PSSR back when PS5 Pro launched in late 2024, will be patched again....
All first party and the most important third parties
winjer
Gold Member
But that would mean he had to be honest and competent.
yogaflame
Member
Hair strands is much more seen clearly. Impressive.
Pretty cool update.(Hurry the F up and release it Sony)
I am interested in the rumored lower resolutions PSSR'D to higher resolution talked about via MLiD rumors.
Similar threads
- Locked