GoldenEye98
posts news as their odd job
I think it could be done for cheaper than a Lite model right now because it wouldn't require a die shrink. Yeah it would need a Pro Controller.... but no joycons, screen, battery....
LmfaoNo. Everyone (except blind Nintendo acolytes) knows that Switch lacks a TRUE system selller, so it's just a matter of releasing a GOOD Zelda or 3D Mario game, if we are being honest (ill DARE to say that Mario Kar world wasn't the smash hit Nintendo expected).
I think it could be done for cheaper than a Lite model right now because it wouldn't require a die shrink. Yeah it would need a Pro Controller.... but no joycons, screen, battery....
I agree that the main marketing point is the portability but I also know that there is a certain segment of people only use these things docked anyway.I doubt Nintendo would ever consider a TV only Switch 2. The main selling point of the Switch is its portability. A Lite 2 is probably on the cards with how successful the OG lite was.
I think a bigger issue for Nintendo is the cost of their software and their dumb variable pricing model. That's putting people off. The console is priced fine as it is.
They also need a big "system seller" game this year.
Yep, they're on course:
Lower production numbers -> TV only model -> doomed
I agree that the main marketing point is the portability but I also know that there is a certain segment of people only use these things docked anyway.
If they are able to offer it a lower entry point it may boost sales(espically outside Japan). It's not like they would be abandoning the Switch 2 platform. Just offering a different device.
Lite model is gonna require a more advanced chip node. TV model wouldn't...Understood, but from Nintendo's point of view that might mean ditching the Lite 2. I doubt they would make the normal Switch 2, the Lite 2 and a dock only version, and to be honest I think the Lite 2 would be more of a money maker than a dock only version.
My take on this:I think it could be done for cheaper than a Lite model right now because it wouldn't require a die shrink. Yeah it would need a Pro Controller.... but no joycons, screen, battery....
Not really, legacy portables could be plugged into a TV too. The Switch Lite (no TV support) accounts for 25M switch sales aswell. People just have a hard time admitting that Switch attracted the majority of the 3DS audience and merged the two, and Nintendo lost the home console race with Wii U. If Nintendo wanted to enter the home market they could offer a cheaper Switch without a screen but even they know that it wouldn't be that popular as a home console. They relied on that 3DS audience moving on to the next portable and merged development cost because it was over for them in the home console space.
lite model is gonna require a more advanced chip node. TV model wouldn't...
True, but the lite would be a better seller internationally than the dock only version.
I guess my point is just about how much they would actually be able to get the price down using more advanced chip node...
A theoretical Switch TV model could lose the battery, screen, and dock. That's a lot of components that Nintendo no longer has to include in the box price. A lot of people never use their switch portably. More choice is always better right, that's what people love to say? So why is that not true here? Nintendo is no stranger to making a portable ONLY version, a version that completely loses native joycon functionality. But the benefit of that was it was cheaper, right? Otherwise, you'd just get the regular switch because it's a more capable device. But... price is often the most important factor in someone making a purchase.Why? If you want just play on TV then you can do that with Switch 2.
Do you think the "power" is going stronger if it was TV only? You guys know if by a chance they do make "tv only" mode its still going same power as Switch on dock, the only difference would be you lose the portability option.