Rumor: Xbox 3 = 6-core CPU, 2GB of DDR3 Main RAM, 2 AMD GPUs w/ Unknown VRAM, At CES

Status
Not open for further replies.
[Nintex];33986651 said:
But it was a for a system targetting a fall 2012 release and no way PS4 is hitting fall 2012.

Delays can always happen. But at the same time we don't know if Vita will gain steam or not. They may very well have been targeting a Fall '12 release (fits their normal release schedule) and Vita doing poorly may keep that plan on target. Or they may wait a little bit if it is doing decent. Or they could delay it just to get devs more time or make sure the hardware is on point. After all they were targeting an earlier release for PS3 as well. Whatever the case I personally believe all three consoles will be launched in at least one market by the time E3 2013 rolls around.
 
I didn't realise the first Xbox was announced at CES.

Famed Toy Story 2 comparison.
Gates said the 3-D chips in the Xbox would be three times faster than anything on the market and offer nearly unlimited graphical visuals. "We're approaching the level of detail seen in Toy Story 2," he said, referring to the computer-generated kids film from Disney/Pixar.

"Game developers will finally be able to develop games as they can visualize it in their minds, without having restrictions placed on them due to performance."

During the demos, Gates repeatedly stressed that the current hardware and software were reflecting only one-fifth of the Xbox's capabilities. One of the first games on Xbox will be WWF Raw is War, and Gates decided rather than show one-fifth of a wrestler to have the full demo.

With that, in came World Wrestling Federation star Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson, who amused the audience by constantly talking about himself in the third person and putting Gates over with terms not usually associated with the turnbuckle-and-tights show he belongs to. It looked like one of the few times, if ever, that the Microsoft boss looked intimidated.

Link
 
[Nintex];33986790 said:

I will eat my dick if next XBOX launches in 2012 (so my girlfriend doesn't bother me when the only thing I want is spend time with it).

Or MS learned from Nintendo and would rather announce something themselves rather than let the Wall Street journal do it.

Honestly though, there's no chance in hell we're going to see anything related to the next gen xbox in a couple of days ? Right?

Yes, we can (as the company is gearing up towards its release before 2014, no doubt about it) . But if so (early?), then MS enters the danger zone, where fortunes and minds are made or lost.
 
Honestly though, there's no chance in hell we're going to see anything related to the next gen xbox in a couple of days ? Right?
 
Honestly though, there's no chance in hell we're going to see anything related to the next gen xbox in a couple of days ? Right?

My internal logic says there's simply no way they will reveal the next Xbox before E3 2013, but that tweet from MS just seems weird.
 
My internal logic says there's simply no way they will reveal the next Xbox before E3 2013, but that tweet from MS just seems weird.

One reason could be if XBOX and WINDOWS 8 convergence is so big, they cannot not start gearing up for it now.
MS has a lot of partners, and gaming is big money, so keeping secrets is probably impossible.

I can see a speech like that :

Ballmer : "2012 is a big year. Windows Phone is going places, Windows 8 is coming along just fine and our company is proudly moving beyond the digital frontier. We're building a great ecosystem where our customers and partners get the best of digital life. Be it communication, work or gaming. Our windows ecosystem is blurring digital lines, and today I'm proud to announce apps designed for Windows 8 will run on all variety of hardwares. As you know we're no strangers to hardware ourselves, and we've decided the time has come to push the living room experience to some new heights. Ladies and gentlemen, I'm proud to announce a new member to the Windows 8 family, XBOX Loop".
Cue lots of jumping and sweating on stage.
 
Patent is so generic it's pretty meaningless. Could be for 360 or nothing at all just another patent to throw on the pile.

Filed in 2007 too.

Hasn't the same thing been available for the PS3 in Europe for a long time, including background recording while playing a game? Hope MS getting the patent first doesn't affect it appearing again in the PS4...
 
I forgot to comment on this earlier, but that picture seemingly lines up with the 6-core rumor. But the question still remains if that's true then is that a multi-ARM set-top box or the actual 360 successor.

Assuming you mean this picture:

b7b8248179b66237f4fae4a22b31396e.jpg


That's what the Xbox 360 has. Three cores with two threads each.

e1e0534nppt.jpg
 
Assuming you mean this picture:

http://cache.kotaku.com/assets/images/9/2012/01/b7b8248179b66237f4fae4a22b31396e.jpg

That's what the Xbox 360 has. Three cores with two threads each.

http://www.abload.de/img/e1e0534nppt.jpg

Thanks for the pictures. I let the labeling of the cores as a CPU throw me of because I kept saying to myself, "Why am I not seeing two threads?" And it was right in front of me the whole time. :P

That's what a lack of eating and sleeping will do a person's brain kids.
 
They might make a DVR 360 that has a beefier CPU that dedicates the excess power toward DVR and Kinect functionalities. Hopefully that's what gets announced at CES and not the Nexbox, which would be too early.
 
Honestly though, there's no chance in hell we're going to see anything related to the next gen xbox in a couple of days ? Right?

They might make a DVR 360 that has a beefier CPU that dedicates the excess power toward DVR and Kinect functionalities. Hopefully that's what gets announced at CES and not the Nexbox, which would be too early.

Releasing 7(!!) years after the Xbox 360 shipped is not 'early'.
 
I don't think it is too early at all. MS shouldn't allow a Wii type situation to happen, because eventually what happened to the Wii is going to happen to Kinect. The software support just isn't there for long term growth.
 
I am pretty confident that they will release in 2013. I think announcing the console at CES 2012 is early compared to MS's usual timeline.
 
It is when Microsofts biggest game to date is launching next year on the 360.

I don't know how many times we've argued this over and over. Are you saying people are not going to buy Halo 4 because the new xbox is coming?

It's very probable that Halo 4 will launch in September like the three other major Halo games this year. If MS does release a console this year (I don't think they will), it will likely hit November. That's a two month gap, plenty of time for Halo to sell like crazy and plenty to launch a new console.
 
The people who care about those technical details would know that it does not. Uhm.. or it should not.
I meant the uninformed consumer, or the "casuals." If the next Playstation is named PS1080, the average consumer may relate those numbers to numbers they see on TV advertisements and pick the "superior" PS1080.
 
I meant the uninformed consumer, or the "casuals." If the next Playstation is named PS1080, the average consumer may relate those numbers to numbers they see on TV advertisements and pick the "superior" PS1080.

I would agree if there would be a PS 720 and a PS 1080. But you can't compare that really because it is from two different manufactors. Not to mention that those names are silly for the Playstation brand.
 
lol 2GB ofDDR3? Anyone in their right mind would debunk this rumor right away.
 
that helicopter footage looks AMAZING! it should be possible on next gen systems
 
Are we still expecting a new MS hardware announcement for ces2012?
i don't think we ever expected a hardware announcement. I wouldn't expect much of anything announced. January and CES doesn't fit Microsoft's schedule anymore. I'd expect most of the stuff announced at their own events.
 
2GB sounds about right. DDR3 is also possible, depending on the GPU's bus.

Yes BurntPork, but DDR4 is coming this year, why wouldn't Microsoft wait for it and get an edge on the competition? The console is going to cost us a lot, better make it fancy for the consumer? I'm willing to bet one of the big 2 is going to use DDR4.

I'm also expecting GDDR5 for the gpus, no joke, if we're dishing out specs we might as well go all the way, since consoles are becoming identical to PCs now.

It's not like companies to use more or less dated tech to power their consoles, except for Nintendo, they have another mentality, hoping it changes.
 
2GB sounds about right. DDR3 is also possible, depending on the GPU's bus.

Possible ram configurations

4GB DDR3 + 1 GB GDDR5
2GB DDR3 + 1.5 GB GDDR5
2GB GDDR5.

Personally I am a fan of the first two configurations provided that the GDDR5 pool can be used for non-graphics related work. Speed sensitive data, such as Kinect readings, with high priority can use the GDDR5 pool, while less important data can reside in the DDR3 pool.

If they use DDR3 only they have enough mobo space for 8GBs.
 
Yes BurntPork, but DDR4 is coming this year, why wouldn't Microsoft wait for it and get an edge on the competition? The console is going to cost us a lot, better make it fancy for the consumer? I'm willing to bet one of the big 2 is going to use DDR4.
I'm willing to bet that both Sony and Microsoft wont go for bleeding edge tech unless they absolutely, positively, have to.

They've both had a launch period / console where they lost ridiculous amounts of money, and I doubt they're in any massive rush to repeat the experience.
 
Yes BurntPork, but DDR4 is coming this year, why wouldn't Microsoft wait for it and get an edge on the competition? The console is going to cost us a lot, better make it fancy for the consumer? I'm willing to bet one of the big 2 is going to use DDR4.

I'm also expecting GDDR5 for the gpus, no joke, if we're dishing out specs we might as well go all the way, since consoles are becoming identical to PCs now.

It's not like companies to use more or less dated tech to power their consoles, except for Nintendo, they have another mentality, hoping it changes.

If Xbox Next and PS4 are coming out in 2015, I can see chances for DDR4 being used.
 
Possible ram configurations

4GB DDR3 + 1 GB GDDR5
2GB DDR3 + 1.5 GB GDDR5
2GB GDDR5.

Personally I am a fan of the first two configurations provided that the GDDR5 pool can be used for non-graphics related work. Speed sensitive data, such as Kinect readings, with high priority can use the GDDR5 pool, while less important data can reside in the DDR3 pool.

If they use DDR3 only they have enough mobo space for 8GBs.

Did you somehow forget about the discussion of motherboard chip density say, oh... a page or so back?

Yes BurntPork, but DDR4 is coming this year, why wouldn't Microsoft wait for it and get an edge on the competition?

Low yield parts in mass produced hardware ftw.
 
There needs to be enough memory such that Shang Tsung can once again morph into any character in the MK games. Based on DLC sizes I think character skins/models/sounds are around 40MB. Lets say that goes up to 60MB next generation. 60MB * 30 characters = 1800MB. Almost 2GB just to hold those characters in memory. So 2GB is not enough :(.
 
I'm willing to bet that both Sony and Microsoft wont go for bleeding edge tech unless they absolutely, positively, have to.

Conceptually, I agree, but I could see at least one of them going balls-out in order to distance itself from Nintendo as much as possible. Neither company wants Nintendo to be seen as a viable source for 3rd party titles; it's too damaging.

Here's how I could see it playing out:

Nintendo launches Wii U

MS launches 720/Fusion/Hot-Box a year later with a major hardware boost

Sony waits for a couple of years so that it can match or exceed MS without taking a total bath on the hardware again, possibly with some new idea to get people's attention - whatever that is
 
2gb seems so low ugh

Yep

PS1 -> PS2 = 13.3X
N64 -> Gamecube = 10.75X
Xbox -> Xbox 360 = 8.16X
PS2 -> PS3 = 12.8X

2GB would only be 3.92X
 
Let's do a bgassasin post here:

bgassasin said:
It's not that complex. This isn't like the doubling we saw with Xbox 360. Current GDDR5 densities are a max of 2Gbit. It would take eight chips to reach 2GB which isn't an issue. To reach 4GB at current densities would take 16. You're facing the purchasing of that amount of chips, creating a bus to handle that many chips, and designing the motherboard to accommodate that many chips. Now they could invest the money into making larger densities. That's way more plausible. All I'm saying is that based on what's currently availability, going over 2GB is not cost effective.
 
I'm willing to bet that both Sony and Microsoft wont go for bleeding edge tech unless they absolutely, positively, have to.

They've both had a launch period / console where they lost ridiculous amounts of money, and I doubt they're in any massive rush to repeat the experience.

Yes, but we wouldn't want them trapped within the limitations of last-gen components.
If these consoles are going to last us a good bit without being upgradable (that's a given), we're going to need the initial splash to draw us in.

DDR3 has become cheap, and the graphic cards still using such technology have become ridiculously discounted to a point where the consumer is getting paid to clear out such technology. (Well here in Canada, rebates forever!)

There is being callous, granted, but what allure do the systems have if they aren't able to compete with the PC? All this, and the possibility of cloud gaming has got me thinking if all game compatible systems will work in harmony for online play.

If we are going for egregious spending and risky choices, then my choice is Sony, they have proven themselves capable of that numerous times.

It would be better to delay these system until 2013, but we can only speculate the hardware and nitpick the selection for now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom