TheExplodingHead
Banned
A new good on rails Star Fox game would be awesome.
Star Fox (especially on-rails) would be a total waste of Retro's particular talents. Not to mention when a much better dev for these types of games is available.
A new good on rails Star Fox game would be awesome.
Star Fox (especially on-rails) would be a total waste of Retro's particular talents. Not to mention when a much better dev for these types of games is available.
Yup. Leave it to Treasure.
Star Fox (especially on-rails) would be a total waste of Retro's particular talents. Not to mention when a much better dev for these types of games is available.
Whatever ends up getting developed, I hope Retro get a crack at their own IP next gen. I'd love to see what they can cook up if left to their own devices
We have seen that...
Though, to be fair, that was before they got restructured.
On the other hand, they are Retro. The studio basically created to restore and update older franchises.
I meant relocate them if they are indeed getting their hands on a big IP.
But... if Retro are making an IP, won't Nintendo end up dabbling their hands in in some fashion? I'd rather pure, Retro-made material.
A lot of people mention Ravenblade, but how much information was ever released to warrant the demand? A few screenshots and action-rpg genre, if I recall correctly. I'd much rather them make Metroid 1.5 for what its worth. Particularly if they nail that multi-player outline.
Retro is my favorite developer and easily among the best, so I'm positive they could've make something great out of it, but christ that looks terrible.
Retro is my favorite developer and easily among the best, so I'm positive they could've make something great out of it, but christ that looks terrible.
Austin is technically still closer to Japan than Dallas....
Dallas?
They aren't moving the studio out of Austin. Let alone out of the country.
That would require moving dozens of families...
Unlikely, their studio was an absolute fucking mess before Nintendo bought them.
You know it's only a guess but looking at the previous work of the two artists (one having done ancient and ruined enviroments, and the other dark, twisted and demonic characters) makes me think Eternal Darkness...
Nintendo should move their development studios to Austin not the other way around
Also I'm pretty sure silicon knights is making eternal darkness 2
Eternal Darkness? I've heard insanely good things about that franchise. I never got to check it out though.
Times like this I *really* want that Gamecube VC rumor/statement to be true.
I definitely think that is more likely, given their statements on what game they are making and Nintendo trademarking ED again.
E3 this year is going to be insane. Nintendo can drop Pikmin 3, Retro's new project, possibly Eternal Darkness 2, and who knows what else for the WiiU. So many of their studios have been silent and are presumably gearing up for next gen.
E3 this year is going to be insane. Nintendo can drop Pikmin 3, Retro's new project, possibly Eternal Darkness 2, and who knows what else for the WiiU. So many of their studios have been silent and are presumably gearing up for next gen.
Here's a pretty in-depth history of Retro article that details a lot of their unfinished projects. It seems crazy now that they were working an a football game that Nintendo wouldn't let them put Mario characters in.
http://www.n-sider.com/contentview.php?contentid=267
Oh man, why didn't I think of Eternal Darkness? It totally fits with AceBandage's rationale that they want a game to fit in with third party offerings too. Imagine an Eternal Darkness with all of the rough gameplay edges sanded off.
Although I will say that I'm a bigger fan of Metroid/Zelda-style gameplay, but I'd be willing to make an exception for Eternal Darkness since it's so unique.
Why wouldn't they let their other semi-owned studio, Silicon Knights, make another ED instead?
Why wouldn't they let their other semi-owned studio, Silicon Knights, make another ED instead?
You're very confused. Nintendo has no shares in Silicon Knights, no (current) second party agreement, no special relationship. Hence why Silicon Knights has been developing stuff for the competition this entire past generation.
Retro Studios is a wholly owned subsidiary of Nintendo, it is just as much a part of Nintendo as EAD.
I thought they still owned like 10% of it? Not sure though...
Either way it's probably not a good idea to let Silicon Knights as they are now make it, since Nintendo owns the IP there is no reason to give it to the D-team that is SK.
With Nintendo looking over their shoulder I think it would turn out alright. Their central management has a way of keeping things on the right track.
You're very confused. Nintendo has no shares in Silicon Knights, no (current) second party agreement, no special relationship. Hence why Silicon Knights has been developing stuff for the competition this entire past generation.
http://www.nintendo.co.jp/ir/pdf/2010/annual1003e.pdf
page 47
Affiliate company with equity method applied: Silicon Knights
Not only is that out of date, but it wouldn't change the fact that Retro is not "semi-owned" and its relationship with Nintendo has essentially nothing in common with Silicon Knights.
So please abstain from posting false information in the future if you are not really sure about it.
Then how are you so sure those assets have not been sold?they are not directly named in 2011
You first. There's no other way to read "their other semi-owned studio". You thought Retro was a second party.
Then how are you so sure those assets have not been sold?
If you say so.I see it's badly worded but I'm not an idiot, sorry.
If you preach absolute certainty, you should practice it as well.Of course, they could've sold their stake since March 2011 when the last annual report was published. But how likely is that if they haven't done anything in the past 5 years and nobody's willing to buy SK assets right now?
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=29873511&postcount=1If you say so.
If you preach absolute certainty, you should practice it as well.
I agree.
If Retro is actually doing a Star Fox, I'd want it to be similar to Star Fox Adventure.
I guess flying shooters aren't my favorite genre so I am biased.
Retro could do a great Star Fox though, it just kind of would be ho-hum to me in hype.
I hope not. Those Star Fox characters were so out of place in Star Fox adventures. It would be a phenomenal waste of talent.
Anyway I dont see all the fuss with this series. Fox Mcloud is Nintendo's worst designed character, worse than Tingle. He is totally awkward. The series is also grossly over rated, the last good game was Star Fox 64 - and you could clock that game in under an hour easily. Gameplay wise the series pales in comparison to serious arcade shooters like Ikaruga and Bangai-O. Heck even all the Rogue Squadron game series were better!
I hope not. Those Star Fox characters were so out of place in Star Fox adventures. It would be a phenomenal waste of talent.
Anyway I dont see all the fuss with this series. Fox Mcloud is Nintendo's worst designed character, worse than Tingle. He is totally awkward. The series is also grossly over rated, the last good game was Star Fox 64 - and you could clock that game in under an hour easily. Gameplay wise the series pales in comparison to serious arcade shooters like Ikaruga and Bangai-O. Heck even all the Rogue Squadron game series were better!