Football Thread 2011/12 |OT6| doicare about injuries?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Slizz said:
Sick, I've had an amazing nutmeg with Robben in the demo.

On a sidenote my friend hates FIFA Street, he doesn't get why the defense is so unresponsive and the goalie is a moron. I tried explaining it's FIFA Street but to no avail, he says it sucks.
Click to expand...

I am vindicated?
 
Slizz said:
Sick, I've had an amazing nutmeg with Robben in the demo.

On a sidenote my friend hates FIFA Street, he doesn't get why the defense is so unresponsive and the goalie is a moron. I tried explaining it's FIFA Street but to no avail, he says it sucks.
Click to expand...

I can do all those moves, just not link them together. All the moves are available to look up in the pause menu, and a lot of them are really cool. You just can't do any of them with your created player.
 
I really enjoyed FIFA Street, it's just good fun. Wish you could replicate tricks in the real FIFA, the right stick is completely pointless for me.
 
Kyoufu said:
That face and hair man. It just touches me in that special place.
Click to expand...

obama_not_amused.gif


EDIT: Nah, Mata's head is too big for his body. AVB's pretty hot.

and of course, the most beautiful of all time...

phil%20neville%20hair.jpg
 
Looks like The Bridge is likely to go down the pan...

http://www.chelseafc.com/page/DocumentsFull/0,,10268~2629432,00.html

Conclusions

It is clear to the Board of Chelsea Football Club that a complete new build of a 60,000 seat stadium at Stamford Bridge has little chance of acceptability. We believe that, after our discussions with the council they have come to the same conclusion. A 60,000 new-build would cost over £600 million and require the club to play away for at least three seasons and, even if the economics were acceptable, the planning risks would likely be insurmountable.

Expanding Stamford Bridge to 55,000 also has a number of challenges. The cost per seat of expanding the stands is very high. The incremental revenues provide an unsatisfactory level of return, would not even cover the hypothetical financing costs, and the planning risks are significant. We believe the council recognises these challenges.

The club's exercise over the years has been to analyse a large spectrum of possible expansion options, even some which would appear to be unworkable. The Board recognises that our work will not satisfy every fan, but the Board also believes its work has been thorough, appropriate and in the best interests of the club and all of our fans.

To reiterate what was said at the beginning of this summary, the club are not in any way stating we have made a decision on the need to move.
Click to expand...
 
elsk said:
I don't like FIFA Street. At all.
Click to expand...

WELL FIFA STREET DOESNT LIKE YOU

I can understand not liking it, it feels quite automated at times. I just love watching Joleon Lescott attempt a 360 Marzipan Turnpike followed by a Semi-Special Egg Roll Salad. Or whatever.
 
http://www.chelseafc.com/page/ChelseaPitchOwnersNews/0,,10268~2631415,00.html

CPO BOARD STATEMENT ON MEETING WITH THE CLUB said:
On Friday 24 February Chelsea FC invited CPO board members Steve Frankham, Rick Glanvill, Dennis Wise and Gray Smith to a meeting where extensive and detailed presentations were made by Ron Gourlay and Bruce Buck from the club, as well as architects and planning advisors working with them, regarding the potential expansion of Stamford Bridge. CPO board member Bob Sewell was away.
Areas covered included: present club finances and the challenges to revenue generation of the present stadium capacity; potential benefits to supporters' match day experience; planning, safety, heritage, environmental, political, disruption and access issues surrounding the expansion of Stamford Bridge; the increasing demands of live TV coverage.
We were shown designs and figures from many different plans exploring ways to expand all parts of the Bridge, along with explanations of the costs involved set against future income, and benefits to match goers.
These schemes ranged from finding 2,500 new seats in corners of the ground to the total demolition and rebuild of a 55-60,000-seater stadium on the same site.
The presentations were very open, with regular input, questions and points made by the CPO board. All were responded to with clarity and transparency by the club and the experts they had brought along.
From the presentations and discussions, which lasted several hours, it was clear that an immense amount of time and money has been allocated to exploring how to expand Stamford Bridge.
Chelsea FC's conclusion is that none of the schemes would achieve the goals of giving greater access and a better experience to supporters, and increasing matchday income.
Like many of our shareholders, we have hoped and felt that there might still be some way to expand the capacity of Stamford Bridge.
Having seen the detailed analysis, we all felt that a persuasive case was put that this might no longer be feasible or viable. Since so many of the planning issues concern the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham, we are requesting further information and comments from them regarding Chelsea's presentation.
We hope that as far as possible Chelsea make the materials we have seen available for scrutiny by all shareholders and supporters so that the issue can be debated further.
Click to expand...
 
Labadal said:
Benfica - Porto will be a boring 0-0 game. Then, whoever is third will win their game.
Click to expand...

I don't think so. Today there will be goals. Both teams will want to win the game, at least I believe so. Though it might not be a great game because there will be lots of tactical worries from both teams.
 
RaGe_pt said:
I don't think so. Today there will be goals. Both teams will want to win the game, at least I believe so. Though it might not be a great game because there will be lots of tactical worries from both teams.
Click to expand...

It won't be a great game because people are going to start getting real aggressive real quick, especially once a few goals are scored.
 
I think my first run through was everyone alive except for Zaeed and Miranda. Kasumi might have died as well, I can't remember. Got wiped though, need to do it again.
 
RaGe_pt said:
I don't think so. Today there will be goals. Both teams will want to win the game, at least I believe so. Though it might not be a great game because there will be lots of tactical worries from both teams.
Click to expand...

I don't think the game will be bad per se, but not many goals will be scored. Both teams need to win the game, however I think they'll be cautious and afraid to lose.
 
Man the internet is underrating Portugal so hard. They're going to be the underdogs in the euro cup and I think they'll surprise their group despite many thinking Netherlands and Germany have it on lock.

Even if they don't make it out, at least the expectations on them weren't too high heh.
 
Wilbury said:
wat
Click to expand...

Wrex > All


Noirulus said:
Man the internet is underrating Portugal so hard. They're going to be the underdogs in the euro cup and I think they'll surprise their group despite many thinking Netherlands and Germany have it on lock.

Even if they don't make it out, at least the expectations on them weren't too high heh.
Click to expand...

If Nelson Oliveira becomes our primary striker before then, then I can see us having an awesome shot. With Almeida and Postiga, I'll be happy with second.
 
I'm nervous as fuck. Benfica are very intimidating when playing at home in these Clasicos, the full capacity crowd really gets into it and the players all overperform feeding off the energy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

College Football Opening Games!
12
710
DeafTourette replied
  • Poll
UFC 314: Volkanovski vs. Lopes - Kaseya Center - Miami - April 12
Poll Event  2
67
1K
_Idea_of_Evil_ replied
  • Poll
AI Doomer thread
2
68
3K
wondermega replied
Nobody cares about new Linkin Park
2
64
3K
No BBC=Anger replied
New School Music Thread
20
907
Audiophile replied
Top Bottom