Mass Effect 3 SPOILER THREAD: LOTS OF SPECULATION FROM EVERYONE

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm tempted to go back to my save and chose the destruction option and have that ending as my save file for DLC. Eh.
 
Bioware wiped out player choices in Dragon Age 1 to 2, so there's a canonical ending in there, or being worked on.

Unless Bioware truly did want to remove any possibility of ever continuing and growing this franchise by destroying all life and methods of transportation in their sci-fi universe.
They just might have wanted it that way....They just might have
 
To be fair, having something after the end of...that...would be a little hard. Three different realities where the reapers are still out there, synthesized and everyone is on a higher plane of existence, or destroyed reapers. All while there are still no Mass Relays, your game would suck if you didn't choose synthesize.

If they are biosynthetic... They don't have to worry about eating or sleeping?
 
Watching the ending again on Youtube it turns out that the Catalyst outlines the Destroy choice, then Control, then Synthesis, and finally says "You have a difficult decision. Releasing the energy of the Crucible will end the cycle, but it will also destroy the Mass Relays". Hearing it again and knowing what happens I see that he means that last bit as an addendum to all the choices, but in the moment I figured that only the Synthesis option would destroy the Relays.

I specifically ruled out that option because I wanted all my bros to be able to get home to their families. And then it turns out all the Relays are destroyed no matter what you do. There's just no explanation for what any of the choices mean. I pictured Synthesis like the weird ending of Neon Genesis Evangelion; how could I possibly have known it would just turn Joker into Robo-Joker?
 
So the reapers would rather indoctrinate an unconscious vulnerable half-dead shepard rather than just...kill him?

Chances are they want him for something.

My theory since ME2's harbinger tried to trade for Shepard's body, is that the reaper creation process may benefit from a great base individual, and they want Shepard to make the best possible human reaper.
 
Watching the ending again on Youtube it turns out that the Catalyst outlines the Destroy choice, then Control, then Synthesis, and finally says "You have a difficult decision. Releasing the energy of the Crucible will end the cycle, but it will also destroy the Mass Relays". Hearing it again and knowing what happens I see that he means that last bit as an addendum to all the choices, but in the moment I figured that only the Synthesis option would destroy the Relays.

I specifically ruled out that option because I wanted all my bros to be able to get home to their families. And then it turns out all the Relays are destroyed no matter what you do. There's just no explanation for what any of the choices mean. I pictured Synthesis like the weird ending of Neon Genesis Evangelion; how could I possibly have known it would just turn Joker into Robo-Joker?

Which destroyes nearly all life in that system.. Even the ME3 codex says that
Galaxy doomed either way
 
Watching the ending again on Youtube it turns out that the Catalyst outlines the Destroy choice, then Control, then Synthesis, and finally says "You have a difficult decision. Releasing the energy of the Crucible will end the cycle, but it will also destroy the Mass Relays". Hearing it again and knowing what happens I see that he means that last bit as an addendum to all the choices, but in the moment I figured that only the Synthesis option would destroy the Relays.
Guess I did forget... or more likely thought the same as you, I didn't think the other endings would do it too, at least not Control.
Which destroyes nearly all life in that system.. Even the ME3 codex says that
Galaxy doomed either way
You really need to come up with a better argument than "but the codex!"
 
No doubt Bioware gave us LOTS os intentional hints about Shepard's possible indoctrination.

But it doesn't mean anything more to me that it showed us. Indoctrination, of course. Shepard was the one who was the most in contact with reaper tech along the three games.

I don't believe in the dream theory.

Or people want to believe it as such because they don't want to know/believe that they were just shitted apon
 
Guess I did forget... or more likely thought the same as you, I didn't think the other endings would do it too, at least not Control.

You really need to come up with a better argument than "but the codex!"

Arrival DLC.. how about that? That's not "but the codex"
 
Chances are they want him for something.

My theory since ME2's harbinger tried to trade for Shepard's body, is that the reaper creation process may benefit from a great base individual, and they want Shepard to make the best possible human reaper.

Yeah you're right. They want the one guy who's killed the most reapers and been the biggest thorn in their side from day one as part of their crew instead of just saving themselves the trouble.

Makes the most sense.
 
Arrival DLC.. how about that? That's not "but the codex"
I've ALREADY argued that the manner of destruction is different and thus could explain why these wouldn't be obliterating star systems. One's smashing a giant rock into the Relay, the other is USING the Relay to send out an energy wave that spreads across multiple star systems. Seriously, this is like arguing with a brick wall.
 
I hope they stick to their guns and don't change it. I would lose a lot of my love for Bioware and Mass Effect if they changed it. I've never seen so much childish whining as I have in this thread. I was hoping to come in here and discuss the whole game without tags but everyone just proves that they can't handle anything less than a "ride off into the sunset" ending. The whole game was essentially fanservice so I'm glad the end went in a different and very cool direction.

Look at you completely missing the point. But not surprising, because everyone who claimed to like the ending ends up saying this.
 
Yeah you're right. They want the one guy who's killed the most reapers and been the biggest thorn in their side from day one as part of their crew instead of just saving themselves the trouble.

Makes the most sense.

No body = No death

They wanted proof of his death
 
Wow the cycle continues a new day a new set of people beating the game and drawing a line in the sand saying the ending is what we got or indoctrination. I thought the indoctrination stuff would have stopped after yesterday. I guess it gives Bioware reason to say LOLZ WES GOT UZ GAIZ.
 
Wow the cycle continues a new day a new set of people beating the game and drawing a line in the sand saying the ending is what we got or indoctrination. I thought the indoctrination stuff would have stopped after yesterday. I guess it gives Bioware reason to say LOLZ WES GOT UZ GAIZ.

If it gives us a better ending I don't see how it matters what reason they choose to use to fix their mistake. We do seem to be going in a loop during discussion though.

Bioware needs to come out and announce something.
 
I've ALREADY argued that the manner of destruction is different and thus could explain why these wouldn't be obliterating star systems. One's smashing a giant rock into the Relay, the other is USING the Relay to send out an energy wave that spreads across multiple star systems. Seriously, this is like arguing with a brick wall.
It could explain it? So trying to convince someone otherwise would be like trying to argue with a brick wall? The 'using' of the relays is still causing them to explode into a million tiny pieces, it'd make only slightly more sense if they at least stayed intact before the giant shockwave occurs.
 
Speculation is pointless. The ending is crap, pretend it's indoc or wait till Bioware change it. They will have people camped out in front of their offices soon. I'm sure this will start getting mainstream media coverage when the mass suicides over on BSN begin.
 
People are saying Casey Hudson said that future games will only take place during or before ME3, not after. Link?

I thought the quote was that no DLC would take place after ME3, which is a big distinction.
 
Speculation is pointless. The ending is crap, pretend it's indoc or wait till Bioware change it. They will have people camped out in front of their offices soon. I'm sure this will start getting mainstream media coverage when the mass suicides over on BSN begin.

Even if fanboys start setting themselves on fire, nobody will care or notice, least of all Bioware
 
I've ALREADY argued that the manner of destruction is different and thus could explain why these wouldn't be obliterating star systems. One's smashing a giant rock into the Relay, the other is USING the Relay to send out an energy wave that spreads across multiple star systems. Seriously, this is like arguing with a brick wall.
http://youtu.be/rPelM2hwhJA?hd=1&t=1m38s

Let me know how big you think those explosions and shockwaves are.
 
People are saying Casey Hudson said that future games will only take place during or before ME3, not after. Link?

I thought the quote was that no DLC would take place after ME3, which is a big distinction.

It's in the Final Hours app. He states that he has no interest in exploring the ME universe after the events of ME3.
 
Speculation is pointless. The ending is crap, pretend it's indoc or wait till Bioware change it. They will have people camped out in front of their offices soon. I'm sure this will start getting mainstream media coverage when the mass suicides over on BSN begin.

If they go with indoc or change it

To me it's saying "We fucked up" and I will expect more "convenient fuck ups"
 
People are saying Casey Hudson said that future games will only take place during or before ME3, not after. Link?

I thought the quote was that no DLC would take place after ME3, which is a big distinction.

Why would there be ME3 DLC that happen before ME3? How does that make sense? We would play it right when we start a new game, before the Earth invasion?
 
Has anyone noticed how Shepard has brown eyes instead of blue, which is his eye color, during the last part of the game, when Anderson, TIM and Shepard are talking to each other?
 
I've ALREADY argued that the manner of destruction is different and thus could explain why these wouldn't be obliterating star systems. One's smashing a giant rock into the Relay, the other is USING the Relay to send out an energy wave that spreads across multiple star systems. Seriously, this is like arguing with a brick wall.
Exactly. Just hitting a Relay with a big rock caused it to explode so hard it obliterated an entire star system. Now what about using a Relay to channel an energy pulse so unimaginably powerful that it took who-knows-how-many galactic cycles simply to put the thing together, that was strong enough to cascade across the entire Milky Way galaxy. Now how hard is it going to explode?

It's just nonsense science fiction phlebotinum. Maybe all the Relays just crumbled harmlessly and everyone in the galaxy is fine and dandy, or maybe the Milky Way was wiped out of the universe. The ending doesn't offer any hints as to which happened.
 
Or people want to believe it as such because they don't want to know/believe that they were just shitted apon

I mean, the entire dream sequence screams for indoctrination. I believe Shepard is fighting it without knowing it.

But the dream theory is just garbage. And as it has already been said : the game is very good. Only the ending sucks
 
Has anyone noticed how Shepard has brown eyes instead of blue, which is his eye color, during the last part of the game, when Anderson, TIM and Shepard are talking to each other?

Which Shepard? Because custom Sheps can have brown eyes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom