I explained myself at lengths, I believe. Ignoring all that to simply chalk it all up to "personal biases" is quite disingenuous.
But then again, you seem to be on a roll with the double standards...
You have explained at lengths why you disliked something, not offering some definitive PROOF that Lindelof is "a person, as an artist or writer, who exploits, for money, his or her creative ability or training in the production of dull, unimaginative, and trite work". Lost was neither dull nor unimaginative. If for some reason you find that it was, then that was also your opinion, and therefore subject to your personal biases.
I'm not being reductive when it comes to your ad nauseum arguments against his prior work. It's NOT disingenuous of me to claim that these statements of yours were opinions and not facts.
BTW: Excellent avatar, Speeding.