-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
The Hunger Games (Dir. Gary Ross) |OT| May The Odds Be Ever In Your Favor
- Thread starter Replicant
- Start date
- Status
ohhthegore
Member
lol all the soccer moms at my work knew I went and saw this last night and they would ask how it was
and I told them it sucked!
Mr. B Natural
Member
You made me snicker like a villain.
ohhthegore
Member
lol they get this look of horror on their face like they are just shocked
Messofanego
Banned
Moviebob's review on Hunger Games
He also mentioned it looked very cheap, and the bad hand-held cinematography. Ok, good thing I waited for reviews and your impressions. Looks like I'm avoiding it in theatres much like John Carter if it's just a mediocre movie not worth spending full price on.
He also mentioned it looked very cheap, and the bad hand-held cinematography. Ok, good thing I waited for reviews and your impressions. Looks like I'm avoiding it in theatres much like John Carter if it's just a mediocre movie not worth spending full price on.
Perspicacity
Banned
So then why did you go see it at midnight?
Saw it last night it was pretty good. It's a fun time and to it's credit it doesn't feel like it's three hours long. I can understand why alot of people are disappointed in this thread, it's not an action movie on the level of Schwarzenegger or anything, it's a simple story of survival. It might be better to think of this as Castaway with violence and explosions. If you go in to it with that mindset I think you'll have a good time.
Also I didn't mind the shaky came thing. I think a lot of people are blowing this aspect out of proportions there's a couple scenes that use the camera shaking to emphasize points but more or less the majority of film uses standard camera techniques.
Also I didn't mind the shaky came thing. I think a lot of people are blowing this aspect out of proportions there's a couple scenes that use the camera shaking to emphasize points but more or less the majority of film uses standard camera techniques.
a secret-boss
Banned
Should I read the book first or just jump in to this
I wasn't going in expecting The Expendables 2, nor was I expecting Battle Royal. I was going in expecting - as many critics had promised - a teen drama that doesn't pander or compromise. On that basis, I was disappointed. It's very much a by-the-numbers teen movie, complete with dull and convoluted characters. Interesting questions could have been asked, but weren't.
As for it not feeling like it's "three hours long", I'll echo what others have said in this thread and say that it draaagged. I'll applaud it for wrapping it up as quickly as it did though - I was expecting some serious Return of the King syndrome. They'll save that for the third film, I suppose.
Well, no. Only a doofus really uses shaky cam outside of action, which this movie doesn't have much of. Unfortunately, its use in the action scenes was gratuitous to say the least.
keeblerdrow
Member
The books aren't that great and would probably hold up better as a movie. Just go see the movie. Maybe come back to the books after you've seen them all and you want to know how truly empty all the characters are on the inside, especially Katniss.
I guess you're right, but still the way some people are talking about you'd think the second coming of the Blair Witch Project. I will say that this movie does suffer from "Transformer syndrome" where during some points you can not distinguish between who is who .
The
beginning of the games
final fight
ohhthegore
Member
My wife made me go
I thought it worked more often than not I also agree that in that instance the camerawork was effective. My favorites instances of it though were the
Fire
Tracker Jacker
The kid is engulfed in Tracker Jackers
I quite liked the movie but the lasting taste it left me with was that of a movie that could have and probably should have been so much more. I felt that the concept was so ripe with potential but unfortunately it kept things mostly superficial and never really delved too much into social commentary aside from in some very basic ways. But I think my biggest problem was that the emotional core of the film really didn't work. The beats were all laid out, but they didn't have the gut punch effect on me they were intended to, so I felt a bit detached from it. Throw in the awful use of shakey cam and those are the three pillars of my disappointment.
However, I did still like the movie. After Winter's Bone and now The Hunger Games, Jennifer Lawrence is without a doubt completely legit and at the very top of the class of her generation of actors. In fact, I think the movie wouldn't have worked have as well had a lesser actress played Katniss. Lawrence really brought a lot more to the role than I bet was on paper. For a two and a half hour film, I thought it was nicely paced and felt pretty brisk, and I really liked a lot of the secondary characters. I enjoyed James Newton Howard's work too.
In the end, this is more frustrating experience for me than a total stinker is, because I got a 6/10 type movie that I liked when I know there is a 9/10 movie I would love buried deep in there.
However, I did still like the movie. After Winter's Bone and now The Hunger Games, Jennifer Lawrence is without a doubt completely legit and at the very top of the class of her generation of actors. In fact, I think the movie wouldn't have worked have as well had a lesser actress played Katniss. Lawrence really brought a lot more to the role than I bet was on paper. For a two and a half hour film, I thought it was nicely paced and felt pretty brisk, and I really liked a lot of the secondary characters. I enjoyed James Newton Howard's work too.
In the end, this is more frustrating experience for me than a total stinker is, because I got a 6/10 type movie that I liked when I know there is a 9/10 movie I would love buried deep in there.
SCULLIBUNDO
Banned
I think the best way I can describe the story is cowardly. It is too scared to explore the harder or more complex themes that are right there, ripe for the picking and instead puts all of its focus on the superficial, immature elements of the story. Clunky character chemistry and dialogue all around, with borderline retarded decisions made by these characters at every turn. It was quite frustrating to watch.
Oh, and as if we didn't know already, this movie is going to be HUGE. My 10 screen multiplex is showing it on HALF the screens, all 8-10 of tonight's showings are sold out, and I left work early and caught a 2:10pm MATINEE and that ended up being sold out, even with kids at school and most people at work.
$160M doesn't sound so crazy.
$160M doesn't sound so crazy.
Snowman Prophet of Doom
Member
Solo: It's a multimillion dollar adaptation of a book that wasn't good in the first place. It was NEVER going to be anything more than what it, apparently, is.
SCULLIBUNDO
Banned
BOMBA GAMES
Never read the book so I can't comment on that, but I don't see why it couldn't have been more.
SCULLIBUNDO
Banned
Solo, read Ender's Game before Gavin Hood hood and company go and fuck up one of the best stories around.
Did we read the same book?
Yeah I wasn't expecting that at all, Considering how the rest of the movie was.
Spoilers for the first movie/book:
The first half is Katniss coping with the fallout from the first Games--the President is NOT happy about the berry trick--and going on a 'victory tour' style thing through the districts with Peeta, witnessing the impact her defiance in the first movie had. The second half deals with the 75th Hunger Games.
I seriously believe it stands a good chance of being the best movie in the trilogy if they do it right.
TUROK
Member
This is the only part of the movie that truly resonated with me. I felt pretty detached from the rest of it.
Oh well. Decent enough movie, but it doesn't make me want to read the books or make me look forward to the movie sequels.
I wish The Raid was playing near me.
Barack Lesnar
Banned
This movie has an 87% on RT but mostly meh/bad impressions from gaf. Not sure what to believe. I usually go the gaf/regular person route as it tends to be the most honest and unbiased.
SCULLIBUNDO
Banned
My guess is not, if you think it's bad.
It's so much worse if you actually know who's involved
in the new games and why, lol. So ridiculously contrived.
SCULLIBUNDO
Banned
Hunger Games has three good things in it: Jennifer Lawrence, Stanley Tucci and Elizabeth Banks.
I even found myself disappointed with Newton-Howard's score.
I even found myself disappointed with Newton-Howard's score.
I didn't even know Elizabeth Banks was in this. I agree though I found the score lacking.
Phoenician_Viking
Banned
I just watched the movie and i found it great. Just some minor grips.
. Anyone who compares the Hunger Games to Twilight needs to be slapped as far as the first movie´s concern.
. All in all i was very surprised of how good the movie is.
It was never explained why the girl from district 11 saved Katmis´s life, or why the dude who loves Katmis was with the enemy
I can see the love triangle happening in the second movie
I don't know if it's that ridiculous given that the implication is that (specific book 2 spoilers)
Katniss is basically in there as a government hit to quell the revolution she started, in a very public manner that all districts could witness.
Also (general book 2 spoiler)
the new arena
Peeta felt that his only chance of surviving was teaming up with the careers and then double crossing them when the time came
TUROK
Member
You know, the 87% isn't a rating, it's the percentage of reviewers that thought it was at least decent.
SCULLIBUNDO
Banned
One thing that wasn't really clear, or maybe it was, but I want to believe I missed something and that there was more to it than in the film:
Where do the dogs come from? Do they seriously just materilize these things in an instant? Or were there some secret holding points for these things Gladiator-style that I never saw? I suppose what I'm asking is whether I'm watching a fantasy film or not.
The dude from District 11 saved Katmis' life because the girl who was attacking Katmis admitted to killing Rue, the little girl from District 11.
SteveWinwood
Member
Lol in the book:
They were all the already dead tributes crossed with evil wolves. They had their human faces and stood on their back dog legs. It sounded retarded then. Glad to hear they sort of changed it now, but with little context. Oh well. Evil dogs. Same as the fire, just a "gamemaker" thing they did.
- Status