SCULLIBUNDO
Banned
You're right. That was unfair on Woola.
Dude. Woola looked fucking AWESOME in John Carter. He would have made THG about 950% better than it was.
You're right. That was unfair on Woola.
I actually watched Battle Royale for the first time last night, just because I wanted to get my fix. I liked how balls out insane the movie was and how it dealt with the characters past with one another more, but it was still a lot weaker than I was hoping for.
I'm actually really curious if you'd find the BR sequel better or worse than The Hunger Games. Because it is godawful.
How bad is it? I got it in my complete collection which I bought because I'm a stickler for theatrical cuts (+I hear the directors cut of the first is ass anyways and the TC doesn't come with the standalone first movie release) and I got it for $20 when Amazon put it up first. Pricing error I guess.I'm actually really curious if you'd find the BR sequel better or worse than The Hunger Games. Because it is godawful.
How bad is it? I got it in my complete collection which I bought because I'm a stickler for theatrical cuts (+I hear the directors cut of the first is ass anyways and the TC doesn't come with the standalone first movie release) and I got it for $20 when Amazon put it up first. Pricing error I guess.
Is it worth a spin or should I just forget it?
I concur, and he had the disadvantage of being drenched in bright sunlight for most of the film.Dude. Woola looked fucking AWESOME in John Carter. He would have made THG about 950% better than it was.
How bad is it? I got it in my complete collection which I bought because I'm a stickler for theatrical cuts (+I hear the directors cut of the first is ass anyways and the TC doesn't come with the standalone first movie release) and I got it for $20 when Amazon put it up first. Pricing error I guess.
Is it worth a spin or should I just forget it?
Yup. BOOK 2 SPOILERSThe forest Arena is pretty straightforward, but they're gonna have to work hard on the Quarter Quell arena to make all the "obstacles" look good.
It would have made sense in that having somebody following him and his new crush in a game of last man standing puts their goddamn lives at risk. In the context of a game which started with kids slashing each ohter's throats, it makes perfect sense as a necessary action of survival.
The story is so fucking cowardly, especially given the premise.
I usually don't mind a little shaky cam but fuck, totally shit all over the last fight.
Also, pretty surprised at how early it ended. When Cato says it's just him left I thought, wait what, what happened to everyone else?
And I just want to say that the entire premise of the fiction is fucking retarded. I don't care how jaded and cynical a civilization gets, nobody's going to see a 12 year girl old take a spear to the gut and shout "Cheerio! What jolly good sport!"
Really stupid, all around, but not a bad flick for Saturday afternoon.
It would've made sense for a character who said he wasn't ready to kill and who had no survival skills (outside of hiding) to setup a trap in the woods involving poison berries he knew nothing about and baiting?
Yeah, the conclusion that they should offer up a sacrificial kid into death games as a way of keeping the peace and no explanation beyond that made me laugh. This had to be one of the dumbest societies ever depicted.
I find it hard to believe that the Districts aren't crying foul at how often (and to which extent) the producers intervene in the games. I thought these contestants were supposed to fend for themselves? Why are you trying to kill them with fireballs and giant dogs. Unfair.
This right here seriously bothered me. Not just because it would be a great way to throw the districts into riots but because it was a terrible plot device. Don't throw vicious mutant dogs into a movie about humans on the raggedy edge of morality.
In short: I'm too old for this shit.
Inspiration for the story came from reality TV shows. The producers of the games used these devices as a way to keep things interesting and create their own narrative within the game. It wouldn't be very fun to watch people camping on opposite corners of the arena for days on end, just as watching people live out their regular lives on TV wouldn't be very interesting either. It's partially manufactured to keep things interesting.
Another thing that bothered me!
So the rag-tag group of bad guys plants land mines around their supplies, hoping to kill Katniss when she attempts to steal said supplies. For no reason at all the leave a guard behind to...guard the booby-trapped pile of food and ammunition...I guess? Anyway, Katniss sees through their ruse and sets of the explosives.
But for some reason the main bad guy is pissed that the explosives went off and destroyed their supplies? Then why did you bobby-trap the supplies in the first place? They would've been destroyed regardless.
Aggghhghh, this is fucking dumb.
yeah but if youre ripping off battle royale anyway, be smart enough to ripoff the mechanism which keeps them on the move
no point half assing it if youre straight stealing already
not ah fuck it random forest fire
I believe Suzanne Collins claims to have not known about Battle Royale when she wrote the book.
And there is no reason to believe that she had, since neither property is supremely original or difficult to come up with on one's own.
What keeps them on the move in Battle Royale?yeah but if youre ripping off battle royale anyway, be smart enough to rip off the mechanism which keeps them on the move
no point half assing it if youre straight stealing already
not ah fuck it random forest fire
i couldnt wrap my head around it either
at first i assumed they wanted the supplies to themselves, so they set up mines to defend them
but then the actual stack of supplies is booby trapped as well because it explodes more than the actual mines do
why
why would you do this
What keeps them on the move in Battle Royale?
This is explained better in the book I guess.The kid who re-armed the mines and setup the trap (because that is what it was, a trap to kill anyone who tried to steal their food/supplies) did too good of a job. Ideally a single mine would have exploded killing whoever was trying to steal the stuff, instead a chain reaction occurred blowing everything up.
Another thing that bothered me!
So the rag-tag group of bad guys plants land mines around their supplies, hoping to kill Katniss when she attempts to steal said supplies. For no reason at all the leave a guard behind to...guard the booby-trapped pile of food and ammunition...I guess? Anyway, Katniss sees through their ruse and sets of the explosives.
But for some reason the main bad guy is pissed that the explosives went off and destroyed their supplies? Then why did you bobby-trap the supplies in the first place? They would've been destroyed regardless.
Aggghhghh, this is fucking dumb.
Interesting that The Hunger Games is getting reamed for this, yet nearly every action movie barring Cameron movies and Harry Potter have an incredibly useless female lead and no one seems to complain about that.and the male lead was pathetic and shitty as all fuck
goddamn he didnt do a thing
Inspiration for the story came from reality TV shows. The producers of the games used these devices as a way to keep things interesting and create their own narrative within the game. It wouldn't be very fun to watch people camping on opposite corners of the arena for days on end, just as watching people live out their regular lives on TV wouldn't be very interesting either. It's partially manufactured to keep things interesting.
Interesting that The Hunger Games is getting reamed for this, yet nearly every action movie barring Cameron movies and Harry Potter have an incredibly useless female lead and no one seems to complain about that.
Hmm.
and the male lead was pathetic and shitty as all fuck
goddamn he didnt do a thing
yeah well i believe she's full of shit so whatever
her position is incredibly implausible
Jesus christ, I fear the day that I ever accidentally write something slightly resembling anything else. Giving people the benefit of the doubt is a healthy attitude to maintain, innocent until proven guilty and all that.
If one takes reality tv to it's logical extreme, mix in a little gladiator arena shit, and being a YA author, the recipe for this book is all right there without the need for knowing Battle Royale.
why are you talking about innocent until proven guilty, am i a court of law or something? i can assume people are full of crap when their story is implausible
how is that unhealthy lol
do you literally go around believing everything people tell you without thinking about if it makes sense or not
Another thing that bothered me. The woman who announced at the reaping constantly talking about manners and such: People in the theater laughed at her comments because she was unaware there was a lot more going on than just manners, i.e. "lol she doesn't realize she's preparing a child to die."
It all goes back to the entire premise being wholly fucked. At least Battle Royale was much more tongue in cheek about it.
Another thing that bothered me. The woman who announced at the reaping constantly talking about manners and such: People in the theater laughed at her comments because she was unaware there was a lot more going on than just manners, i.e. "lol she doesn't realize she's preparing a child to die."
It all goes back to the entire premise being wholly fucked. At least Battle Royale was much more tongue in cheek about it.
She knows she's preparing a child to die, but she lives in society and class level where that is acceptable. That was the point.
It's unhealthy because it's inherently negative. A due amount of skepticism regarding anything is always good, but there is nothing to suggest that Collins couldn't have come up with this story without BR. You say it's implausible like it's a fact when it is indeed perfectly plausible.
I don't know if she copied Battle Royale or not, but I would hate to be on the receiving end of such claims if they were not true. I don't know if they're true, so I don't make that judgment.
your issue seems to be with the plot/universe. well, that's it.Capitol = evil.
And my point is that accepting that is impossible. It is simply too repulsive to represent any sort of human civilization post-barbarism. It's plain ridiculous and I don't buy it.
There are people in the Capitol who are obviously not okay with it and I can't imagine this society continuing like this without massive riots burning the streets every year during the games.
The premise is that the people of the Capitol enjoy it and enable it, and it's just not plausible. Which gets back to what I said earlier: I'm too old for this shit. I would have bought it as a teen but now I know better.
Alright guys, I can't decide if I should go see this movie tonight or not. There's a show in about an hour, I'm sitting on my butt not doing much else.
Guys from my work really like the books, and have told me I should read them, but I'm too lazy to read. I don't normally spend the high ticket prices at a movie theater either though. I really don't think it's something I'm going to like, but I try not to judge a book by it's cover either. Some of my favorite games/movies have come from low expectations.
One of my friends compared the love triangle stuff in this series to something like Twilight though, and Twilight is utter garbage (to me in my opinion anyway).
I'm usually a pretty open minded guy, but I just don't know what to make out of this movie/series. Help? What can you folks tell me about this movie to help convince me to go?