Family of Florida boy killed by Neighborhood Watch seeks arrest

Status
Not open for further replies.
Blood doesn't pour out of a gunshot wound like it does on tv. Unless the shot ruptured his aeorta, the blood would be minimal and his clothing would absorb it. You have to remember the wound is about the size of a marble if that.

The bullet must have hit something quite vital though, by all accounts, he died almost instantly.
 
The bullet must have hit something quite vital though, by all accounts, he died almost instantly.
When people die from bullet wounds its usually internal damage not blood loss. I'm not saying he didn't bleed, just that Zimmerman not having blood on him doesn't mean anything.

Plus I really don't believe Trayvon was shot while on top of him anyways.
 
When people die from bullet wounds its usually internal damage not blood loss. I'm not saying he didn't bleed, just that Zimmerman not having blood on him doesn't mean anything.

Plus I really don't believe Trayvon was shot while on top of him anyways.



Internal damage of what? It had to have been something major, like his aorta or heart for him to have died so quickly. People were on the scene in minutes and he was already gone. I may be wrong, but I don't think he was shot in the head. I agree that it doesn't necessarily mean anything, because we don't have the details, but there must have been at least some blood.
 
Internal damage of what? It had to have been something major, like his aorta or heart for him to have died so quickly. People were on the scene in minutes and he was already gone. I may be wrong, but I don't think he was shot in the head. I agree that it doesn't necessarily mean anything, because we don't have the details, but there must have been at least some blood.
Vital organs and such. The bullet can ricochet off bone like a ping pong ball and cause severe damage and internal bleeding where you bleed to death within minutes without the blood spilling out of the body. I've seen people that had been shot and it wasn't even known until the autopsy.
 
Point blank range doesn't mean pressed up against the body.



Well considering that Trayvon was supposed to have been trying to grab Zimmerman's gun while directly on top him and then Zimmerman somehow managed to turn the gun around and shoot Trayvon, I'd say the shot would have to been pretty close don't you think.
 
Blood doesn't pour out of a gunshot wound like it does on tv. Unless the shot ruptured his aeorta, the blood would be minimal and his clothing would absorb it. You have to remember the wound is about the size of a marble if that.

Vital organs and such. The bullet can ricochet off bone like a ping pong ball and cause severe damage and internal bleeding where you bleed to death within minutes without the blood spilling out of the body. I've seen people that had been shot and it wasn't even known until the autopsy.

When people die from bullet wounds its usually internal damage not blood loss. I'm not saying he didn't bleed, just that Zimmerman not having blood on him doesn't mean anything.

Plus I really don't believe Trayvon was shot while on top of him anyways.
Thanks for the info.
 
The gun kinda negate your need to call for help. Especially if you end up using it anyway. When you have a gun it gives you some kind of confidence, feeling of safty, and the help you'd need.
 
My gripe with this is that at this point I want to see more people in jail than Zimmerman and I have the feeling that won't be happening. Those corrupted bunch are all friends it seems.

i am picturing that one Stallone/Deniro movie where all the crooked cops are untouchable.
 
The gun kinda negate your need to call for help. Especially if you end up using it anyway. When you have a gun it gives you some kind of confidence, feeling of safty, and the help you'd need.

Exactly. Zimmerman carries a gun "hunting criminals" and hes going to yell for over a minute screaming for help and before finally shooting?
 
Life doesn't work like CSI. You can shoot someone point blank and not get any blood on you unless you're using a shotgun. The stipling pattern on Trayvon will tell how close he was when he was shot. No stipling=at least 6 feet away(approx). The more pronounced the stipling pattern, the closer the shot.

Stipling is the gunpowder burns around the bullet wound for those that don't know.

He was shot through clothes, so there won't be stippling, which are burns on the body. The clothes can be analyzed for gun shot residue, though. And I think six feet is too much. Maybe two feet. It will still tell us something (if they preserved and examined the clothing).
 
So uh, just heard that apparently, they examined Trayvon's body.... no defensive wounds or offensive wounds. No marks anywhere indicating a scuffle. Just a single bullet hole.
 
He was shot through clothes, so there won't be stippling, which are burns on the body. The clothes can be analyzed for gun shot residue, though. And I think six feet is too much. Maybe two feet. It will still tell us something (if they preserved and examined the clothing).
Stipling burns would still be prevalent on his clothes. And 5 or 6 feet is the limit for stipling burns from the concussion blast. You've claimed to be a prosecutor before, you should know this.
 
There's so much wrong about the theory that it's Zimmerman screaming.

First of all, the voice doesn't match the tone/tenor of Zimmerman AT ALL. Listen to his voice on the 911 call and then the voicemail he left his friend earlier in the week. Granted he wasn't screaming on either the 911 call or the vm he left, but it doesn't match up at all.

Secondly, several witnesses said that the voice sounded young. No one equated it to a grown man. When I first heard it (before even knowing most of the details about what happened) I thought it sounded like a young guy. I mean, that's a desperate voice. Someone was pleading not just for help, but for their very life. Zimmerman (based on all that we know of him) is not the kind of person to ask for help, much less beg as openly and loudly. I mean look at him just at the personality level. He's an aggressive, stubborn person (see his multiple assault charges, the fact that he disregarded the 911 dispatcher asking him not to follow, multiple 911 calls, etc.) and he likes being in charge.

Finally, just look at him in the police footage. He looks cool and in control. There's no visible signs that he's shaken up, nervous, sad, remorseful, anything. And he was taken to the police station within 40 minutes of the shooting. A person screaming like that would NOT be as calm and collected as the person in the video. I just can't believe it.
 
So uh, just heard that apparently, they examined Trayvon's body.... no defensive wounds or offensive wounds. No marks anywhere indicating a scuffle. Just a single bullet hole.

So if neither guy has a single mark on them what was happening during that minute long yelling heard on 911 calls?
 
So uh, just heard that apparently, they examined Trayvon's body.... no defensive wounds or offensive wounds. No marks anywhere indicating a scuffle. Just a single bullet hole.

This is repeat of an off the cuff from the medical examiner I believe. Not saying it's not true, but until we see that report, I'd hold off on speculation.
 
I don't believe any sort of struggle occurred that lead Zimmerman to shoot and fire to defend himself. Know why? No blood splatter. Shoot someone at close enough range, you will get their blood on you.

There should also be smokeless gunpowder residue on Trayvon's hoodie/shirt if the gun was fired at close range.
 
So uh, just heard that apparently, they examined Trayvon's body.... no defensive wounds or offensive wounds. No marks anywhere indicating a scuffle. Just a single bullet hole.

The funeral director who prepared Trayvon's body, Richard Kurtz, said there were no marks on the boy's hands or any other signs he had been in a fight.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/world/police-...r-uninjured-20120330-1w23h.html#ixzz1qeoZi9zy

What does he know though??? We have to wait on information from the Sanford Police department to discuss this any further.
 
http://news.yahoo.com/details-darken-outlook-zimmerman-claims-self-defense-183804750.html
Richard Kurtz, the funeral director who prepared Martin’s body for burial, revealed to CBS News that he saw no bodily injuries on the youth that would indicate a physical struggle with Zimmerman.

“We could see no physical signs like there had been a scuffle [or] there had been a fight,” said Kurtz. “The hands — I didn’t see any knuckles, bruises or what have you. And that is something we would have covered up if it would have been there.”

Additionally, an unnamed witness of the incident spoke Thursday night on CNN’s “Anderson Cooper 360,” saying that the duration of the early-evening skirmish took place not on the sidewalk, but on the grass. Also, Zimmerman “didn’t appear hurt” or show any signs of bleeding from the witness’ vantage point.
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hj4RHJ0taoc

That gunshot sounds like it was shot from a distance and not point blank..

How do you not help someone while they're screaming... I just don't understand it. I'll never fucking understand it.



I'm about ready to claim Zimmerman pulled the gun on Trayvon and this of course got him yelling for help as he stood wherever he was. No skirmish, no nothing. Zimmerman thought he was the big man in the situation, pointing the gun at the kid and he shot. I don't give a fuck... that's my goddamn story. I can't believe anything else at this point. Nothing adds up, nothing looks right.
 

How skilled are morticians at making forensic observations?

How do you not help someone while they're screaming... I just don't understand it. I'll never fucking understand it.

Well, if you're talking about all the people who heard screaming, keep in mind they heard a gunshot. They weren't being heartless, they were fearful for their own safety.
 
Exactly. Zimmerman carries a gun "hunting criminals" and hes going to yell for over a minute screaming for help and before finally shooting?

You say that as if Zimmerman was just begging to shoot someone.

Again, I'm going to turn to the evidence we have, and ask you to defend your claim. Not because I think Zimmerman is innocent of anything, but only because you're making claims.


On that 911 call, you can hear someone yelling for nearly a minute. If Zimmerman was so eager to just put a bullet into this kid, why did he take so long?


Well, if you're talking about all the people who heard screaming, keep in mind they heard a gunshot. They weren't being heartless, they were fearful for their own safety.

The yelling was going on for about a minute when the gun was fired. That was plenty of time for people to look out their windows hearing that. Quite honesty, that is one of the reasons I'm surprised someone didn't see the actual shooting occur. If I heard that kind of noise outside my house, I would definitely be at a window watching carefully, and maybe would have even went outside to see what was going on.
 
How skilled are morticians at making forensic observations?



Well, if you're talking about all the people who heard screaming, keep in mind they heard a gunshot. They weren't being heartless, they were fearful for their own safety.

but that was a solid 30 seconds in that time and then even before that, it sounded like the screams were happening before the phone call. I'll take it though, I understand completely people being afraid in that position... I just couldn't do it though.
 
9E4hr.jpg



....is that Gabrielle Giffords on the back right n the red dress???????
 
I'm about ready to claim Zimmerman pulled the gun on Trayvon and this of course got him yelling for help as he stood wherever he was. No skirmish, no nothing. Zimmerman thought he was the big man in the situation, pointing the gun at the kid and he shot. I don't give a fuck... that's my goddamn story. I can't believe anything else at this point. Nothing adds up, nothing looks right.

Except for the fact that several people looked out their windows and saw one person on top of another person, fighting. Also, the police officer who arrived on the scene first stated he saw wet grass on Zimmerman's back.



Something or someone. That's pretty much what it means to own a gun.

Hey, I'm the last guy to ever own a gun. Never even fired one.


I was only responding to other people's claims that Zimmerman just wanted to shoot someone. So I pointed out that there was yelling for about a minute, and then a shot. That would seem to indicate some crazy stuff was going down for that minute, and then the gun was fired.
 
Except for the fact that several people looked out their windows and saw one person on top of another person, fighting. Also, the police who arrived on the scene first stated he saw grass on Zimmerman's back.

I'm angry after hearing the phone call. I know (have an idea) of what happened... I'm just being loud.
 
Stipling burns would still be prevalent on his clothes. And 5 or 6 feet is the limit for stipling burns from the concussion blast. You've claimed to be a prosecutor before, you should know this.

I'm not nor have I ever been a prosecutor. Stippling wounds specifically refer to abrasions on a body. You may get some stippling with a gunshot through clothing, but not much, because the gunpowder that causes the stippling (abrasions on the body) does not penetrate clothing well. Where a gun shot wound is through clothing, the stippling patterns on the body are not forensically meaningful (other than to confirm that the weapon was fired within about 3 feet). Instead, the clothing is analyzed. The gunpowder pattern on clothing is not referred to as stippling:

Forensic Pathology said:
Stippling can occur through a layer of clothing. The stippling is sparse around the gunshot wound, but is definitely present. If the range of fire needs to be estimated more accurately, test firing should be performed if the actual weapon used is available; the test fire patterns are compared with the gunpowder pattern on the outer layer of clothing and not with the stippling around the gunshot wound on the skin.

Forensic Pathology: Principles and Practice, by David Dolinak at 170. (Available on Google Books but I am not linking because the book has many graphic images)

The book says that stippling (and gunpowder patterns on clothing) are typically present from 2-3 feet, although this obviously depends on the circumstances. Which is why testing of the actual weapon used is recommended where possible to get a better idea of what distance represents the specific gunpowder pattern on clothing in a given case.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom