Nobody else knows that feel.
Maybe Florida tomorrow.
Please god.
Nobody else knows that feel.
Maybe Florida tomorrow.
Err, Carkner started punching him in the face without any forewarning. You don't do that. Very, very different.You're missing the point of fighting's place in hockey to begin with. If Boyle wants to punch a smaller guy a few times, he can, but he's going to pay for it. If he doesn't want to answer the bell, that's his choice, but the league's not going to jump in and save him.
I jumped up so quick after that goal that my beer flew out of my hand and the bottle broke when it hit the wall. :lol
You're missing the point of fighting's place in hockey to begin with. If Boyle wants to punch a smaller guy a few times, he can, but he's going to pay for it. If he doesn't want to answer the bell, that's his choice, but the league's not going to jump in and save him.
So dang close to a perfect night on the teams I wanted to win, ugh.
Well hopefully Detroit shows up and has a good 60 minute win tomorrow to take the series lead please, that would make up for the Nordiques blowing this game.
good job Chicago. Still all about crushing the dreams of wanna-be teams.
I hate how Chicago pulls rainbows out of their arse on a regular basis.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kmTK_eSOCN4
I know.. he's a hawks fan.
Someone needs to make a GIF out of Q's celebration after the goal
I thought we were bros, Arab. Not cool.
I'd rather not get into a discussion about fighting in the game, because that's a big can of worms, but it has no place in the game in my opinion.
It's hilarious that you can justify punching a guy a few times in the head because he'll have to pay for it. It's a load of nonsense.
edit: the whole idea of goons being in the game is that they can cause chaos, get a game misconduct, and it doesn't matter because all they were needed to do was to cause some chaos and not be in the rest of the game. gtfo. =/
GIF Master Marvie over here. Thank you
I'm not justifying Boyle punching anybody in the head. If he didn't take liberties, there wouldn't have been a problem today.
I'm justifying Carkner's actions. Without Carkners, you don't have Karlssons or Alfredssons on your team because they're not going to make it through the regular season because chumps like Boyle are going to crush them. Those are the real goons, in my opinion.
I think you're way off characterizing enforcers as chaotic-evils on skates, driven only by bloodlust and the pained screams of whoever they're playing that night. If there weren't any Boyles in hockey, there wouldn't be any Carkners.
Carkner got what he deserved: a game misconduct and a 5 minute penalty to his team which could have severely effected the outcome of the game. Haglin's 'bow to the head caused an injury (to an important player). That's the difference.
At least Quenville seems to like his assistant coaches better than Ruff.
I'm really glad Shanahan and the NHL clamped down on headshots this season, they've almost taken them right out of the game.
I don't see why it should be important that the injury happened to a star player. Starfucking should not be a part of how discipline is handled in any athletic league. That the player's "importance" is even mentioned in the discussion is fucking disgraceful and embarrassing for the NHL.
(Also, Hagelin having a hearing isn't the problem. He should face potential discipline. A blow to the head is a blow to the head. That said, Carkner REPEATEDLY hit a guy in the head, from behind while defenseless, with malicious intent and the blessing of his coaching staff and entire team. Seems just a BIT more heinous to me. What the Red Wings did to get revenge last night was vaguely acceptable and justified within the generally accepted bounds of conduct in hockey. At least that was fair and upfront. What the Senators did to get revenge tonight was clearly not.)
So everyone else agrees that Shaw's hit was unintentional, and with no prior history/Smith being fine, and because he got thrown out, there will/should be no supplemental discipline, right...?
...Guys?
So everyone else agrees that Shaw's hit was unintentional, and with no prior history/Smith being fine, and because he got thrown out, there will/should be no supplemental discipline, right...?
...Guys?
So everyone else agrees that Shaw's hit was unintentional, and with no prior history/Smith being fine, and because he got thrown out, there will/should be no supplemental discipline, right...?
...Guys?
Apparently.NHL wanted to upstage the UFC today?
We've got headsmashes, goalie runs, and flying elbows on captains, and we're not even out of the first round. Glorious.
So any Canucks-GAF want to go out and watch the game at a bar tonight? We can all watch Deshibu get piss drunk!
So everyone else agrees that Shaw's hit was unintentional, and with no prior history/Smith being fine, and because he got thrown out, there will/should be no supplemental discipline, right...?
...Guys?
It's okay, Thomas was in the crease.![]()
[edit] wait... there was no penalty on krejci or thomas. the fuck?
So any Canucks-GAF want to go out and watch the game at a bar tonight? We can all watch Deshibu get piss drunk!
You're missing the point of fighting's place in hockey to begin with. If Boyle wants to punch a smaller guy a few times, he can, but he's going to pay for it. If he doesn't want to answer the bell, that's his choice, but the league's not going to jump in and save him.
I wonder if this has anything to do with the fact that the NHL owns the Coyotes........Shaw has a hearing tomorrow.
![]()
[edit] wait... there was no penalty on krejci or thomas. the fuck?
I may be a few hours late to the Philly boxstretching of Pitts today. So sad.
It's okay, Thomas was in the crease.
Come on it's the Bruins. The rules don't apply to them.