• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

P R O M E T H E U S |OT| Ridley Scott goes back to Building Better Worlds

Status
Not open for further replies.
When we came out of our theater there was unbelievable fog. Couldn't see 1/6 of a mile out. It was a pretty weird experience having just seen the movie.
 
Movie was good, not great. Visuals/cinematography was beautiful but damn, I really can't believe that the trailers just showed the whole movie, LOL, and I only saw the trailers once. They could of done alot more with the story which I'm echoing what everybody else is saying. But it was nice seeing it in the IMAX 3D.


Lots of average to bad reviews, I'm kind of being scared away now. I'll see it in a few days most likely
It's worth checking out in the theaters, I can tell you that much dude.
 
This felt like the combination of two separate movies, one being that of an original scifi film and the other being an Alien prequel.

The second half of this movie was either an editing fiasco, in which they cut out a good half an hour, or this was just a shitty script. Complete mess. I loved the first half and hated the second half.
 
Last thought on the movie for tonight:

Whoever wrote the
"...FATHER" line that Theron speaks
should go home and rethink their career choice.
'
Terrible.

The rest I thoroughly enjoyed.
 
This felt like the combination of two separate movies, one being that of an original scifi film and the other being an Alien prequel.

The second half of this movie was either an editing fiasco, in which they cut out a good half an hour, or this was just a shitty script. Complete mess. I loved the first half and hated the second half.

Kingdom of Heaven 2
 
My one huge issue:
why oh why the fuck did she not inform anyone that she had her stomach ripped open and a baby alien squid pulled out of it

That was soooo jarring. My god.
 
Well the closest one to me (which isn't even really that close) is real IMAX, so I might just save the $10 and go see it at a regular theater.
 
Loved the midnight screening (digital IMAX with 80% college dudes in a packed theater who stay quiet during the movie). If you hate plot holes and fan speculation, you will hate this movie - it is its weakest point. I'm a Lost fan (come at me, bros), so obviously I can excuse the unanswered questions. Hopefully the DC and/or commentary will clear some things.

*minor spoilers, just stuff you know from the trailers*
As for the movie, it was very intense during the scenes in
the pyramid and the lifeform infecting the crew - it feels just like Alien in that area, and the hype made it even more exciting.
I thought Shaw, David, and You-Know-Who were the best characters and the crew who stayed on the ship with Vickers and Javek were pointless.

Technical stuff: the CGI and animatronics are amazing and reminded me of JP in how well they blend together to make photorealistic monsters. The 3D was very disappointing. The big scenery shots were great (especially the planets), along with the dust storm and bits in the ending, but otherwise it isn't there. I just think it was too subdued - Avatar and Hugo did it right.

I give it a 4/5 on a general movie scale - not an Alien-tier sci-fi film, but still a great one.
 
Should I see this is 3D?

Was really annoyed in Avengers with glasses just to see the screen+3d glass. All I could focus on was the out of line frame right in the middle of my right eye.


I am considering comfort vs. visuals
 
Loved the midnight screening (digital IMAX with 80% college dudes in a packed theater who stay quiet during the movie). If you hate plot holes and fan speculation, you will hate this movie - it is its weakest point. I'm a Lost fan (come at me, bros), so obviously I can excuse the unanswered questions. Hopefully the DC and/or commentary will clear some things.

*minor spoilers, just stuff you know from the trailers*
As for the movie, it was very intense during the scenes in
the pyramid and the lifeform infecting the crew - it feels just like Alien in that area, and the hype made it even more exciting.
I thought Shaw, David, and You-Know-Who were the best characters and the crew who stayed on the ship with Vickers and Javek were pointless.

Technical stuff: the CGI and animatronics are amazing and reminded me of JP in how well they blend together to make photorealistic monsters. The 3D was very disappointing. The big scenery shots were great (especially the planets), along with the dust storm and bits in the ending, but otherwise it isn't there. I just think it was too subdued - Avatar and Hugo did it right.

I give it a 4/5 on a general movie scale - not an Alien-tier sci-fi film, but still a great one.

I agree with this mostly, but I will point out my thoughts on the plot-hole thing. When people say plot-hole, I tend to think inconsistencies that break the film, which I did not experience with this movie. It was more of the open ended type that leads to discussion and speculation. And I think it was handled in a fantastic manner.
 
That was a decent movie, except for the fact I hate LOST and I hate that I left with more questions than I came in with.
 
You are right. I didn't realize Nolan is only 42...I figured he was in his 50s by now.

I still think DKR will not be nearly as good as TDK and BB, but for other reasons...one being that Nolan's original plan for the movie was scrapped because of Ledger's death....then it seems that he struggled to come up with another antagonist before settling on Bane.

Except, that isn't true. There was no "original plan" with Heath Ledger for a third film. They take it one film at a time. During the early pre-production, there was rumour that TDK would end with Harvey getting scarred by the Joker, but that obviously never happened. Ledger was never going to be the antagonist in TDKR. Pretty sure there's a few interviews floating around about that, DMc could probably find them.

I think he hasn't made a great movie in over a decade and has wasted all of the potential he showed at the beginning of his career, but whatevs. Why is the new Batman movie like 4 hours long?

tumblr_m3divfTtm91qzrdgn.gif


First of all, TDKR isn't four hours long. It's supposedly 2:45, which is like 15 minutes longer than TDK.

Second of all, no great movies in a decade?

Memento
Insomnia
Batman Begins
The Prestige
The Dark Knight
Inception

All these films are fucking great.
 
I agree with this mostly, but I will point out my thoughts on the plot-hole thing. When people say plot-hole, I tend to think inconsistencies that break the film, which I did not experience with this movie. It was more of the open ended type that leads to discussion and speculation. And I think it was handled in a fantastic manner.

It was handled in the worst possible manner. You have scenes with no build-up, no explanation, characters acting without common sense, lack of consequential responses, bullshit faith segments rammed straight down your throat that don't make a lick of sense, and stuff that seemingly contradicts itself.
 
I apologize if this has been asked before, but what are your guys' thoughts on the next Blade Runner with Ridley at the helm after seeing this?

Oh, and as for Prometheus, I quite enjoyed it. Certainly not perfect, but I liked it. Thought it was really nice visually.
 
It was handled in the worst possible manner. You have scenes with no build-up, no explanation, characters acting without common sense, lack of consequential responses, bullshit faith segments rammed straight down your throat then don't make a lick of sense, and stuff that seemingly contradicts itself.

I disagree on most points except for the lack of build-up at times, but I do agree things aren't thrust at you, you have to come to your own conclusions why certain things happened. Sometimes I hate that and sometimes I like it. I liked it. It clicked, it made sense for me.
 
I disagree on most points except for the lack of build-up at times, but I do agree things aren't thrust at you, you have to come to your own conclusions why certain things happened. Sometimes I hate that and sometimes I like it. I liked it. It clicked, it made sense for me.

That only works if the rules are consistent in what they give you.
We aren't told what the black goo does but we get a shit load of side effects that change based on the situation. It first causes mental/physical degradation(in which you have different types of degradation based on the individual), it then causes worms to grow and become big-ass snakes with similar dna as the original aliens, and if you fuck an infected guy then you get a proto-facehugger that grows to enormous sizes.
How the hell are you supposed to draw a conclusion based on all of this contradictory evidence?
 
That only works if the rules are consistent in what they give you.
We aren't told what the black goo does but we get a shit load of side effects that change based on the situation. It first causes mental/physical degradation(in which you have different types of degradation based on the individual), it then causes worms to grow and become big-ass snakes with similar dna as the original aliens, and if you fuck an infected guy then you get a proto-facehugger that grows to enormous sizes.
How the hell are you supposed to draw a conclusion based on all of this contradictory evidence?

do we really know the worms came from the goo? I believe they were separate, and we only saw pieces of the puzzle. Nothing felt contradictory in the least bit, but yes, somethings were left unexplained.

How disgusting are the scenes in this?

TBH, not bad. A little rough, but nothing like Alien. Also, this felt like a PG-13 cut. For real. I expect that it is the case.
 
Meh, thats a bit disappointing.

Kanes scene was fairly gross, but not stomach turning in my case. That other thread had me thinking this was going to be some mind bending shit.


The most gross thing I have seen in a movie is the killer in Midnight Meat train ripping off giant warts and keeping them in medicine cases.
 
Went to my first midnight showing, really thought I was going to be cussing someone out but once it started everyone shut the fuck up.

My opinion is not going to be nice to the film. Some of it is due to expectations, but there were some real flaws to it also. And here is the thing, many of them aren't entirely the scripts fault either. So if I would rank the Aliens movies now. This would be around Resurrection as of right now. Some parts I really enjoyed a lot. They did some things well. Other parts felt like what should have been 15-20 minutes, condensed down into 2 minutes.

I'm tried, so I'll do the full write up tomorrow.
 
It almost seemed like he
knew they'd have sex and create an alien baby that they could put into cryo and bring back to Earth for profit
but that sounds very convoluted, so I dunno?
That reminds me of a certain TV show where another shifty-for-the-sake-of-it character had this absurdly convoluted plan that involved hot bear cage sex...


Most likely for the same reason Paul Reiser's character from Aliens tried to have an alien impregnate Ripley/Newt. To bring back home and experiment.
It seems somewhat absurd that David would risk that one, considering the black goo and its effects were big fat unknowns...


Hey, now. It might have been Spaihts.
(... but if I had to bet...)
 
Meh, thats a bit disappointing.

Kanes scene was fairly gross, but not stomach turning in my case. That other thread had me thinking this was going to be some mind bending shit.

I'm pretty sure no one at my theater fainted, and I really wouldn't expect anyone to.
 
Going to see this tonight. Most people who've seen it seem to say that the movie was something between "eh" and "meh".

GAF, what say you? On par with Scott's earlier greats or nowhere near them?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom