What was with the person saying this movie nullifies AvP? What was that about?
Edit:
Targaryen nip slips are allowed, trust.
I've seen people heavily warned for a lot less than what you haveEviLore said:As before, avatars should be G-rated, and not explicit, suggestive, or disgusting. NeoGAF readers can use their discretion for what threads to click on, but cannot use their discretion for which avatars they end up seeing, so ensure your avatars are very work-safe.
This is 100% not trueNo review from me though. Every critic in the world has the exact same opinion of the film.
Not really, considering it doesn't lead into Alien and instead sets up a sequel of it's own; I understand the point they were trying to make.
Phantom Menace was intended to be the first film in a trilogy of films that led up to A New Hope.The Phantom Menace didn't lead into A New Hope and set up a sequel of its own, too. Prometheus is an Alien prequel. It takes place 30 years before Alien. It's set in the same universe. The exact same thing could be said about the SW prequels.
They can skip around it all they want, but it's ridiculous. If they wanted to make a standalone movie nobody was forcing them to put it in the same universe as Alien.
Phantom Menace was intended to be the first film in a trilogy of films that led up to A New Hope.
I don't think Prometheus is intended to be the first film in a trilogy that leads up to Alien.
I mean, it does set up its own maybe separate sequel, but it also has that terribly stupid final shot that makes it seem to be more of a direct prequel. It's really weird, actually.
So it's not a prequel in that it leads directly into Alien, but it is one in that it definitely suggests a timeline of pertinent events that would lead to Alien.
Which I still think is different because we knew that would lead into further movies that would then lead into ANH, where Ridley's talk on Prometheus 2 doesn't convince me that it will lead directly into Alien.Just like The Phantom Menace.![]()
Which I still think is different because we knew that would lead into further movies that would then lead into ANH, where Ridley's talk on Prometheus 2 doesn't convince me that it will lead directly into Alien.
As the plot has no direct ties, it isn't a prequel.Doesn't matter what pre-release smokescreen they tried to use, this is an Alien prequel.
I think it sets up and gives some knowlege of how some bits of Alien came to be... but that doesn't mean the events of this movie directly impacted those of Alien. If that makes sense.
As the plot has no direct ties, it isn't a prequel.
"Set in the same universe and a little bit before" isn't what prequel means.
But you knew that already, Solo.
As the plot has no direct ties, it isn't a prequel.
"Set in the same universe and a little bit before" isn't what prequel means.
But you knew that already, Solo.
As the plot has no direct ties, it isn't a prequel.
"Set in the same universe and a little bit before" isn't what prequel means.
But you knew that already, Solo.
So Phantom Menace isn't a prequel then?
Uh, Phantom Menace has direct ties to the plot, characters and events of the Original Trilogy. Don't do this to me, Sculli. You're smart and educated and know the difference.So Phantom Menace isn't a prequel then?
Other question: not having seen this yet, is it worth watching? Or am i better off rewatching Blade Runner if i wanna see a good Ridley Scott movie?
It's definitely worth watching, but if you're not too bothered wait for a home release.
ok i might just do that... it's just that i am picking up negative vibes all over this thread here and i am not sure why, since the movie does have an IMDB score of 7.7 so it can't be truly bad i guess, maybe people are just disappointed because of Alien related prequel talk and expectations and what not...
I guess it does feel more like an Alien remake than a prequel.
Just because the structure and some shots pay homage to Alien... no.
Structure, characters, shots, scenes, dialogue..
You're stretching it. A lot.
Which part do you disagree with exactly?
I didn't say it WAS a remake. I said it was more a remake than a prequel. It's kind of like last year's incarnation of The Thing.
lololololololololololololololol
.................................................
lololololololololololololololololololol
The Assassination of Jesse James has better cinematography than any movie Ridley has ever made.
I'm kind of concerned that this is going to end up being the death-knell for tentpole R-rated horror films.
Word of mouth can't be very good at this point, and I don't see this one having much in the way of legs. If Lindelof had put down the pipe and written a good script, or if Scott had realized that the story needed massive improvements, maybe we'd have a good film, word of mouth would kick ass, and the film would do gang-busters at the box office.
Instead, we'll probably never get another R-rated film like this again.
Thanks a lot, Ridley and Damon.
Come on man. Alien and Blade Runner are fucking gorgeous to look at. Like 'hold your breath' beautiful.
I'm kind of concerned that this is going to end up being the death-knell for tentpole R-rated horror films.
Word of mouth can't be very good at this point, and I don't see this one having much in the way of legs. If Lindelof had put down the pipe and written a good script, or if Scott had realized that the story needed massive improvements, maybe we'd have a good film, word of mouth would kick ass, and the film would do gang-busters at the box office.
Instead, we'll probably never get another R-rated film like this again.
Thanks a lot, Ridley and Damon.
Come on man. Alien and Blade Runner are fucking gorgeous to look at. Like 'hold your breath' beautiful.
Thank fuck I didn't watch the trailers though, that 3 minute one gives so much away!
Come on man. Alien and Blade Runner are fucking gorgeous to look at. Like 'hold your breath' beautiful.