That's why I don't get why people are jumping up and down for this.
Anyone mind if I make a new thread? I have an OP put together.
Or I could just post it here, but it would eventually get lost.
Loving the fact that they didn't include a second stick.
It is a bit of a disappointment, but I think I can understand the reasoning behind it. Honestly they want to keep compatibility the same across the boards.
No second analog nub. Why Nintendo why? I was waiting for that.
i read somewhere that the screen is way bigger, and battery life is better, is the thing
It is a bit of a disappointment, but I think I can understand the reasoning behind it. Honestly they want to keep compatibility the same across the boards.
But then again... how will they deal with CPP games? Will there be a new CPP attachment... will the old CCP work with this model? What's going on there?
The resolution doesn't get any better, and increasing the size of the screen only make the image quality worse.
The resolution doesn't get any better, and increasing the size of the screen only make the image quality worse. This revision should've had the second analog stick... Imagine having to get the "second analog stick XL" for this thing... Ridiculous.
Not a valid reason. If I remember right Sony went ahead with releasing the dual analog controllers despite the original Playstation controller not having them. And look how that turned out (extremely well).
The resolution doesn't get any better, and increasing the size of the screen only make the image quality worse. This revision should've had the second analog stick... Imagine having to get the "second analog stick XL" for this thing... Ridiculous.
i serously dont believe anyone really thought the rez was gonna be better on any revision, much less one this soon. and personally, im not sweating the stick unless i see more games id want using it later...but what i do need in my life is a bigger screen (3D tires my eyes, and even playing DS JRPG's like TWEWY its tricky reading item descriptions late at night) plus improved battery life. i get that this is entirely subjective, but for me, it's ridiculous to hear that there's nothing in this revision. it's way more than idve expected this early in the cycle.
i serously dont believe anyone really thought the rez was gonna be better on any revision, much less one this soon. and personally, im not sweating the stick unless i see more games id want using it later...but what i do need in my life is a bigger screen (3D tires my eyes, and even playing DS JRPG's like TWEWY its tricky reading item descriptions late at night) plus improved battery life. i get that this is entirely subjective, but for me, it's ridiculous to hear that there's nothing in this revision. it's way more than idve expected this early in the cycle.
Perhaps because the changes here are not that massive to warrant the responses of "oh, well...okay". They're nice, but they seem to be perks for comfort, not something that completely revamps and redoes something, like the screens on the Lite. Games actually had color on the damn thing, so much so games were worth playing all over again on.
At the price it launched at, wouldn't you have expected this AND more?
PMed a couple mods about getting some stuff into the OP
Maybe I missed it, where is the battery life doubled? It said 3.5-6.5 hours. The 3ds is 3-5 hours, that's a far cry from double.double battery life, 90 percent bigger screens
yeah nothing here
The fuck?
Why isn't there a straight up black model?
Good damn it, Nintendo
you lost me on the color thing, you mean the GBA or wha?
im looking forward to replaying some of my DS classics on a larger screen, myself. they should be in color too!
It is a bit of a disappointment, but I think I can understand the reasoning behind it. Honestly they want to keep compatibility the same across the boards.
But then again... how will they deal with CPP games? Will there be a new CPP attachment... will the old CCP work with this model? What's going on there?
Exactly. IQ goes down as the screen gets larger. I'll take the smaller but cleaner image over the blown up one.
Might have bit if there had been a second analog stick.
Nope.
That's why I don't get why people are jumping up and down for this.
My guess (hope) is that Nintendo just let's go and forgets... and never does a similar thing again.
By color I meant the screen brightness and quality between the original DS and the Lite. It was the backlight and sharper screens that gave every game a poppy, colorful look. The Lite and XL only upgrades the screen size, only getting fuzzier with each resolution boost.
Between the 3DS and XL, the screens are of the same quality and brightness, so it's another case of Lite vs. XL where the core difference is size, and for someone like me, that's not enough. The games on this system are not designed for such a screen size in mind.
Is the 3D sweetspot better?
Have they changed the sharp little plastic nubbins on the base which dig into your fingers when you hold it?
.
Not a valid reason. If I remember right Sony went ahead with releasing the dual analog controllers despite the original Playstation controller not having them. And look how that turned out (extremely well).
All your questions are based upon the assumptions that the CPP is a required accessory or that Nintendo actually cares for supporting the CPP. Neither of which are actually true.
ah, i get you... i never had the fatty but ive seen comparisons.
i guess they could've done more here with lighting, but honestly - especially with the larger screen - you gotta figure anything like that is gonna take a toll on the battery even more, no? i see what youre saying, and it mightve been a better tradeoff, but im not one of the people on GAF who thinks the 3DS screen looks like shit. it's not at all the vita granted, but games like KIU look great to me, and im mostly playing older eshop/ambassador shit right now anyway, so again im kinda happy they went the way they did for my purposes.
my only fear is that your point about games not designed for the screen will actually cause some text to look worse than before.
Either way, bigger screen and better battery life makes me feely plenty vindicated on never touching Nintendo hardware at launch. Good ol' Miyamoto lies.
You seem to have come to that conclusion 20 years too late.
Uk price, or are they doing that annoying 'this is the price in euros, uk retailers will set their prices' that nobody except Nintendo seems to do
And any news on a cradle? I don't care if I have to buy it separately, it's so convenient I'd need to have one
Uk price, or are they doing that annoying 'this is the price in euros, uk retailers will set their prices' that nobody except Nintendo seems to do
And any news on a cradle? I don't care if I have to buy it separately, it's so convenient I'd need to have one
Any word on if the 3D effect is improved or worsened ?
if this doesnt scream desperation, i dont know what does
3.5 to 6.5 hours for 3DS games.
6 to 10 hours for DS games.
Battery charge time 3 hours and 30 minutes.
So roughly an hour longer playtime? Not sure it's worth the extra $30 and uglier design. Don't care for the screen size either way so I guess I'll just go for whichever has the better deal/bundle/color.The charging time yes.
3DS
Battery life playing 3DS games: 3-5 hours
Battery life playing DS games: 5-8 hours