Edmond Dantès
Dantès the White
Monaco's the moneymaking jewel in the crown of F1, that stays along with the might of Monza. Everything else? Expendable.Like Monaco?
Monaco's the moneymaking jewel in the crown of F1, that stays along with the might of Monza. Everything else? Expendable.Like Monaco?
Like Monaco?
Edmond Dantès;39215248 said:Monaco's the moneymaking jewel in the crown of F1, that stays along with the might of Monza. Everything else? Expendable.
So what's been your favourite race thus far F1 GAF?
From my personal perspective? Melbourne. Because I was there.So what's been your favourite race thus far F1 GAF?
Edmond Dantès;39215248 said:Monaco's the moneymaking jewel in the crown of F1, that stays along with the might of Monza. Everything else? Expendable.
Yeah, same. There really is nothing not to like about Caterham at the moment. Drivers are doing their best and never getting in anyones way, improving with each race, awesome livery colours (swoooon) and just seem to exemplify the best things about Formula 1 teams. When shit like that happens, it gets me aggro, too.
Caterham will get - and deserve - points this season, I'm pretty sure of it. Heck, I could see them being competitive with Toro Rosso, too, given how the latter team's been doing lately.
Edmond Dantès;39215248 said:Monaco's the moneymaking jewel in the crown of F1, that stays along with the might of Monza. Everything else? Expendable.
While I'm here, Hamilton is an idiot. Yes, it was probably Pasta's fault for crashing into him, but (1) his tyres were shot so he'd be overtaken in the next couple of corners anyway, (2) with Vettel out he should have taken the points, and (3) its a driver with previous history in driving not quite politely, so be careful
Edmond Dantès;39215248 said:Monaco's the moneymaking jewel in the crown of F1, that stays along with the might of Monza. Everything else? Expendable.
Caterham will get - and deserve - points this season, I'm pretty sure of it. Heck, I could see them being competitive with Toro Rosso, too, given how the latter team's been doing lately.
Yeah, I was hoping they'd be far more competitive. I wonder how much is due to car and how much is due to rookie drivers?Toro Rosso has been nothing short of shite this year, really expected more from them.
Well Spa and Suzuka are really important from an "history" point ov view. And on top of that are both great track to drive and race on too, much better then the new tracks.
Plenty of us do. It's by no means a bad track.Also am I one of the odd few who actually likes Silverstone?
Edmond Dantès;39215164 said:Doesn't change the fact that those venues are shite and should be dropped from the calendar.
F1REVS said:Viewing figures for the European Grand Prix at Valencia show Sky with an average of 0.5m watching the coverage between 11.30am and 4.15pm. The BBC had an average of 3.8m with a peak of 5.0m watching the coverage between 12.10am and 3.15pm.
Last year the BBC had an average of 3.9m with a peak of 5.0m for the European Grand Prix so BBC's viewers were almost identical to this year.
So glad that I don't have to watch Sky. Getting all the races in Canada with BBC commentating is awesome![]()
And yet Bernie thinks Sky only is justifiable?
Those sponsors will not be happy seeing figures like that.
I get that too, and I don't even live in Canada!
![]()
I count a net gain of 400k viewers. Yes they will be happy...
So what's been your favourite race thus far F1 GAF?
So what's been your favourite race thus far F1 GAF?
Can't believe we're not even halfway through the season yet. Feels like such a long time ago when the season started.
how corrupt is bernie ecclestone
Login? Register?Heikki + Angrybirds = http://heikki.angrybirds.com/
http://www.facebook.com/Heikki.Kovalainen.Official.Fan.Page
WTF? lol :]
It isn't worth registering for.Login? Register?
*closes tab*
Login? Register?
*closes tab*
I count a net gain of 400k viewers. Yes they will be happy...
I think it's obvious to everyone except Bernie.Trust me when I tell you that if Sky was the only place to get F1 they would not get BBC numbers.
Much as I hate to say anything positive about Sky, it's important to bear in mind that Sky's average is spaced over a much longer period than the BBC's, taking into account support races, too. It'd be better to get the 15- or 5- minute breakdown over the actual duration of the *race*.
...not that I think it'd add too much, and I think it'd improve BBC's ratings in a similar way to Sky's, but it'd be a much more accurate comparison.
Is it me or did Jake seem a bit tipsy on the Forum?