The Amazing Spider-Man |OT|

Status
Not open for further replies.
Getting toward the end here and I've decided that Spider-Man 3's comically bad third act makes people think it's worse than it actually is. Venom is just unreal levels of garbage.
 
Getting toward the end here and I've decided that Spider-Man 3's comically bad third act makes people think it's worse than it actually is. Venom is just unreal levels of garbage.

Yeah, basically this. If you could just somehow edit out Venom completely and just have him pop up in an after-credits scene as a teaser for the 4th film, it would have been much better. Spider-Man 3 was just a victim of far too much going on at once. Too many characters, too many plot points, too many villains, etc.

Should have saved a lot of it for the sequel. Now, that wouldn't have made Spidey 3 a good movie necessarily, but it would have certainly been a lot less frustrating to watch.
 
I really didn't think that any film could botch a villain as badly as the Greg Lantern film botched Hector Hammond, but Lizard in this film comes pretty damn close.

Nothing he did made any fucking sense.
 
Tobey crying was hilarious, with Garfield, it feels earned, real, much more sincere.

There is no way anyone can point out flaws in Andy's performance.

But I guess Amirox is one of those cynical dudes laughing out loud in the most serious scenes, God, I hate those people.
 
spider-man 3 is a disaster. i remember watching it thinking "wait... this really isn't that bad!" but it was after the twenty-minute mark or so that i said to myself "oh... it is." topher grace was so horribly miscast, too.
 
i24Pv1aXcpKeU.gif
It's funny how 90% of the SM3 GIFs are from the pirated off-screen version because the movie was THAT amazing that people couldn't wait til it was out to GIF it lol
 
It's funny how 90% of the SM3 GIFs are from the pirated off-screen version because the movie was THAT amazing that people couldn't wait til it was out to GIF it lol
I just love how the cam footage makes it seem that much better too. Seeing the DVD or Blu Ray gifs of those scenes just don't have the same impact.
 
Andrew Garfield is totally Norman Bates. I just can't stop comparing how he would be perfect for that role.

edit: or how he is scarily similar to anthony perkins
 
Spidey 3 is a brilliant parody of the first two films.
Basically, which is how I find it easy to appreciate it. It's Raimi being Raimi. Which reminded me of another article in defense of the dance scene.
BertramCooper said:
I really didn't think that any film could botch a villain as badly as the Greg Lantern film botched Hector Hammond, but Lizard in this film comes pretty damn close.

Nothing he did made any fucking sense.
I've already said too much about how bad the Lizard is, so instead I want to highlight your typo and imagine how awful of a hero Greg Lantern would be.
THE-Pink-Dagger said:
Tobey crying was hilarious, with Garfield, it feels earned, real, much more sincere.

There is no way anyone can point out flaws in Andy's performance.

But I guess Amirox is one of those cynical dudes laughing out loud in the most serious scenes, God, I hate those people.
Stop stating your opinion as a fact. (for the record I think both Tobey and Andrew did well. Tobey's writing was a lot better)

And I'll come clean, I had to try really hard not to laugh during the crane scene. The people I was with got really pissed because they LOVED it, but I was cracking up. And trying to hold it in only made it worse.
 
Just saw this. Thought it was better than Raimis Spidey 1, Not as good as Spidey 2, shits all over Spidey 3.

Better Peter, better love interest, better Spider-Man.
 
I really didn't think that any film could botch a villain as badly as the Greg Lantern film botched Hector Hammond, but Lizard in this film comes pretty damn close.

Nothing he did made any fucking sense.

Basically, you have to assume the genetic modification causes some amount of crazy. Kind of like how Norman Osbourne goes from just wanting revenge on the board members to wanting to take over the world for some reason.
 
Basically, you have to assume the genetic modification causes some amount of crazy. Kind of like how Norman Osbourne goes from just wanting revenge on the board members to wanting to take over the world for some reason.
Did everyone miss the crazy voices in his head scene when he was in the sewer? It seemed like the serum he injected into himself caused a sort of split personality. Or else why at the end
when he's "cured" would he suddenly have a change of heart to help Peter from falling off the building?
 
Tobey crying was hilarious, with Garfield, it feels earned, real, much more sincere.

There is no way anyone can point out flaws in Andy's performance.

But I guess Amirox is one of those cynical dudes laughing out loud in the most serious scenes, God, I hate those people.

haha, flawless. christ.

Listen if that's your standard for "earned" emotion, you're of course entitled to that position. I think it simply implies you're so easily manipulated as to make your point useless; let alone your follow up that the performance was 'flawless.' Absurd.

As I said, for me emotional moments need to be earned. That scene wasn't serious. Not only wasn't this earned, but Andrew Garfield make a hilarious crying face. I was the only one to laugh out loud, but I heard plenty of other snickers in the audience.

And again, trying to apply your sadly low standards to how I react to ACTUALLY emotional films just makes it seem like you're trying too hard. When a scene is genuinely emotional, whatever that emotion may be, I react appropriately. Sophie's Choice was "emotional." That scene in Amazing Spider-Man? LOLOL

anyway, if I don't leave now I'll miss the fireworks fun. I hope it's not cancelled due to thunderstorms..
 
God, it's been far too long since Sam Raimi has blessed us with a film :_(

It's been 37 months since his last film. Thankfully, its only 8 months until his next.
times like this I feel blessed for being so behind on film in general. I have a nice handful of Raimi left unwatched.
Haha. It was actually intentional.

Hah holy shit how have I never seen this. Given the choice I would have watched this 60 times instead of seeing the actual Green Lantern.
Did everyone miss the crazy voices in his head scene when he was in the sewer? It seemed like the serum he injected into himself caused a sort of split personality. Or else why at the end
when he's "cured" would he suddenly have a change of heart to help Peter from falling off the building?
For one, this isn't explained very well. Especially with
the post-credits maybe revealing the voices were a person? Confusing. Anyway, even if it caused him to be angry and then the antidote took that away, it's not at all satisfying. The character is never morally confused. He's one way, then he's a boring villain, then he's not.
anyway, if I don't leave now I'll miss the fireworks fun. I hope it's not cancelled due to thunderstorms..
better than canceled for wildfire risk
 
Basically, you have to assume the genetic modification causes some amount of crazy. Kind of like how Norman Osbourne goes from just wanting revenge on the board members to wanting to take over the world for some reason.

Yeah, but SM1 did a better job of establishing Osborn as a character before he was transformed, so when he became a psychopath, some of his motivations made a bit more sense.

Connors in ASM was basically a blank slate, and then once he was transformed, he was all like, "HUMANS SUCK I MUST EVOLVE THEM!"
 
Yeah, but SM1 at least did a better job at establishing Osborn as a character before he was transformed, so when he did become a psychopath, some of his motivations made a bit more sense.

Connors in ASM was basically a blank slate, and then once he was transformed, he was all like, "HUMANS SUCK I MUST EVOLVE THEM!"

Even before then, he loses his job and funding and decides to do a human trial on himself AFTER going against it.

It was a completely destructive move on Connors part but the film never showed him as anything but 'somber' about his lost arm.
 
3. Andrew Garfield crying over Uncle Ben's body was the most hilarious thing I've seen in a long time. His blubbering, quivering lip looked so funny I seriously had my laughs echoing throughout the movie theater.

5. The Crane LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL... *catches breath* HAHAHAHALOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL


Someone needs to make cam-ripped gifs of theses like the ones with Spider-Man 3.
 
Now that we're talking about all those superhero movies, how many modern movies do we have?
Spider-Man, Spider-Man 2, Spider-Man 3, The Amazing Spider-Man, The Punisher, The Punisher: Warzone, Hulk, The Incredible Hulk, Iron-Man, Iron-Man 2, Captain America, Thor, Hellboy, Hellboy 2, Catwoman, DareDevil, Elektra, Fantastic Four, Fantastic Four: And the Silver Surfer, X-Men, X-Men 2, X-Men 3, X-Men: Last Stand, Wolverine, The Avengers, Superman Returns, Batman Begins, The Dark Knight, Green Lantern, Blade, Blade 2, Blade 3, Jonah Hex, Kick-Ass, Ghost Rider, Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance - any more?

And what movies are coming up?
The Amazing Spider-Man 2, Man of Steel, DareDevil (reboot), Hulk (reboot), The Dark Knight Rises, Captain America 2, Thor 2, Avengers 2, Galaxy of the ???, Iron-Man 3 - any more?

And a repeat, The Amazing Spider-Man were spectacular, absolutely loved it, and it might be the first movie ever I go see a second time at the cinema.
 
It's never about how fantastical something is. It's always about how consistent a movie is with the own rules of the world it created.

Yup, exactly. "It's not what the movie is about, it's how it is about it," as Ebert used to say.

The main issue I have with ASM was that I was stone dead bored through most of it. I was going to criticize it for taking over an hour to get to the Spider-Man action, but then I checked the time and realized it had only been about 40 minutes. The whole movie just crawls along most of the time, and the brief action scenes just aren't enough. The quick flashes of action are some of the best Spider-Man done on film (although nothing in ASM tops the clock tower fight with Doc Ock in SM2, IMO), but it's really not worth much when it's in such a dull film. It constantly shows us things we've seen before, often in ways inferior to the Raimi origin film, and I just couldn't get past the fact that The Lizard looks like a Goomba from the Super Mario Bros. movie.

The cast is good, and I think Garfield is a better Spidey than Maguire, or at least has the potential to be given the right script. A sequel could really be something great, since they wouldn't have to waste time on any origin stuff and could get right to the story. Here's hoping they get to make it.
 
So much incomplete stuff in this film it it feels like what it obviously is.. chapter 1.

So far we got......

1.)
The mystery of Peter's parent's involved in something so bad with Oscorp that they had to leave him behind as a child....unresolved.

2.)
Norman Osborn needing the formula Conner's is working on because it will save his life somehow... unresolved.

3.)
The mystery man in Conner's cell. Most likely Osborn.

4.)
Peter breaking his promise to the dying captain Stacy (which makes him a dick) which will cause Gwen her inevitable death in one of the sequels.

This will probably get tied up in the sequel in which we will get.

The Green Goblin as the main villain. His back story will directly involve the Parkers and we'll get the famous bridge scene where Gwen Stacy dies. Then, Peter will feel all guilty and remorseful for breaking captain Stacy's promise.
 
Now that we're talking about all those superhero movies, how many modern movies do we have?
Spider-Man, Spider-Man 2, Spider-Man 3, The Amazing Spider-Man, The Punisher, Hulk, The Incredible Hulk, Iron-Man, Iron-Man 2, Captain America, Thor, Hellboy, Hellboy 2, Catwoman, DareDevil, Elektra, Fantastic Four, Fantastic Four: And the Silver Surfer, X-Men, X-Men 2, X-Men 3, X-Men: Last Stand, Wolverine, The Avengers, Superman Returns, Batman Begins, The Dark Knight, Green Lantern, Blade, Blade 2, Blade 3 - any more?

And what movies are coming up?
The Amazing Spider-Man 2, Man of Steel, DareDevil (reboot), Hulk (reboot), The Dark Knight Rises, Captain America 2, Thor 2, Avengers 2, Galaxy of the ???, Iron-Man 3 - any more?

And a repeat, The Amazing Spider-Man were spectacular, absolutely loved it, and it might be the first movie ever I go see a second time at the cinema.
There was also Punisher: Warzone.


and I just couldn't get past the fact that The Lizard looks like a Goomba from the Super Mario Bros. movie.
Yes. I'm curious why they gave him such a small flat head instead of a pointy one, you know, like an actual lizard.
 
Now that we're talking about all those superhero movies, how many modern movies do we have?
Spider-Man, Spider-Man 2, Spider-Man 3, The Amazing Spider-Man, The Punisher, Hulk, The Incredible Hulk, Iron-Man, Iron-Man 2, Captain America, Thor, Hellboy, Hellboy 2, Catwoman, DareDevil, Elektra, Fantastic Four, Fantastic Four: And the Silver Surfer, X-Men, X-Men 2, X-Men 3, X-Men: Last Stand, Wolverine, The Avengers, Superman Returns, Batman Begins, The Dark Knight, Green Lantern, Blade, Blade 2, Blade 3 - any more?

And what movies are coming up?
The Amazing Spider-Man 2, Man of Steel, DareDevil (reboot), Hulk (reboot), The Dark Knight Rises, Captain America 2, Thor 2, Avengers 2, Galaxy of the ???, Iron-Man 3 - any more?

And a repeat, The Amazing Spider-Man were spectacular, absolutely loved it, and it might be the first movie ever I go see a second time at the cinema.

Left out the 2 Ghost Rider films.
 
Left out the 2 Ghost Rider films.

An easy mistake, haha.

Also, Jonah Hex and maybe Kick-Ass (If you're including Batman as "super" hero).

Also, pretty sure the next Hulk would pick up after Incredible and be in the MCU, so not a reboot. (If it's even happening)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom