Doesn't Title IX require equal funding for athletics in college?
This, shamefully. I don't watch much in the way of sports, but when I do I want to see the best of the best compete. I'd rather not have gender-exclusive leagues at all and have all major sports just be co-ed. As long as women are relegated to a second-rate league, they'll be competing for attention with minor-league equivalents for male leagues.
Is this obvious? Am I nuts?
Seems like the truly feminist position is to make all the pro sports non-gendered.
Read up on unequal athletic funding from highschool on.
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/2010-04-20-title-ix-policy-repealed_N.htm
Yeah then Bush implemented some bullshit which basically allowed institutions to "survey" women on campus and use said survey results to rationalize their inadequate funding or coaching.
Read up on unequal athletic funding from highschool on.
I would be interested in reading an argument that women's sports' cultural relevance is exceedingly impacted by lesser funding at the high school and collegiate levels. While I'm sure there is some correlation, given the peak ability of each gender in sports in which they both compete, it's much more likely people would rather see more impressive feats and higher thresholds.
Sports where there is some actual parity between then genders like Bowling or Chess just don't draw spectators, because they aren't impressive spectacles to the layperson.
Does anyone truly give a shit about mens' figure skating?
My point is the "athleticism" you're going to see on display in women's sports is impacted by less encouragement and financial support.
As a Canadian reading this thread getting responses mostly from Americans, i think peak ability is a key factor, but there's more to it than that.
I mean, why don't Canadian football fans exclusively watch/follow the NFL? As I understand it, the NFL is higher level play than the CFL, but at least where I live, there is fervor over comparatively inferior teams competing against each other. So why does inferiority in this case not seem to matter as it does when comparing the ability of men versus women?
Does anyone truly give a shit about mens' figure skating?
All that grunting and athletic women in short skirts.I watch women's tennis because of the grunting. It's hot.
That would put women at a serious disadvantage in many sports unless you also mandated that teams needed to have equal representation between the sexes. If you go that route, you no longer have the best of the best.
There are sports where women are the more popular/better athletes, but males typically don't watch them.
My point is the "athleticism" you're going to see on display in women's sports is impacted by less encouragement and financial support.
We do? My dad is obsessed with all sporting events, no matter the gender or sport...
As a Canadian reading this thread getting responses mostly from Americans, i think peak ability is a key factor, but there's more to it than that.
I mean, why don't Canadian football fans exclusively watch/follow the NFL? As I understand it, the NFL is higher level play than the CFL, but at least where I live, there is fervor over comparatively inferior CFL teams competing against each other. So why does comparative inferiority in this case not seem to matter as it does with the ability of men versus women in a given sport?
They're just not as exciting as men's, usually.
There is. The fifa women's cup.I personally don't know, i just follow football/soccer during the world cup/Euro cup, that's it.
I don't know if there's a female soccer world cup, but if there is, is not as strongly advertised.
Why waste money for something no one wants to watch?This, shamefully. I don't watch much in the way of sports, but when I do I want to see the best of the best compete. I'd rather not have gender-exclusive leagues at all and have all major sports just be co-ed. As long as women are relegated to a second-rate league, they'll be competing for attention with minor-league equivalents for male leagues.
Is this obvious? Am I nuts?
Seems like the truly feminist position is to make all the pro sports non-gendered.
Women also ignore women sports in favor of football with men players.
Did you ever think this might be because they never advertise or air these sports on tv?
Did you ever think this might be because they never advertise or air these sports on tv?
Not really. I'd say they are about as exciting as men playing sports.
Do you ever wonder why this is?
Because women are not traditionally encouraged to be athletes, and there's little money being pumped into pro women's teams?
As a Canadian reading this thread getting responses mostly from Americans, i think peak ability is a key factor, but there's more to it than that.
I mean, why don't Canadian football fans exclusively watch/follow the NFL? As I understand it, the NFL is higher level play than the CFL, but at least where I live, there is fervor over comparatively inferior CFL teams competing against each other. So why does comparative inferiority in this case not seem to matter as it does with the ability of men versus women in a given sport?
Never heard of it.There is. The fifa women's cup.
Not disagreeing but do you think that is the absolute only reason?
Of course not.
I absolutely do not think its because 'women playing sport is less exciting'. I would enjoy watching a women's soccer team as much as a men's soccer team. Women's tennis is no less exciting than men's.