Romney tax plan: tax increases for the middle class, tax cuts for the wealthy.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hyperbole makes shitty arguments.

How is that hyperbolic? Most posts in this thread are exactly that. That is, the argument that the rich don’t pay enough taxes, the middle-class / poor pay too much, and that is why everything is in the shitter.

If anything the article itself is hyperbolic, in that Romney’s tax plan makes no mention of any tax increases for the middle class at all; and the report makes the assumption that the middle class must end up paying more taxes to make up for lost revenues, even though Romney’s actual plan says nothing of the sort.
 
The authors of the report are assuming Romney's tax cuts would be revenue neutral, meaning they'd have to be offset by eliminating tax exemptions. I haven't looked too deep into the report yet, but I haven't seen any mention of the possibility of using further spending cuts to pay for Romney's proposed income tax reduction. If that is not included as part of the analysis then I think it's probably best to ignore this report.

The study comments on this.

On the Distributional Effects of Base-Broadening Income Tax Reform said:
Spending cuts are excluded from the analysis. As a result, tax rate reductions are wholly financed by the most progressive possible combination of cuts in available income tax expenditures. If spending cuts were used as a form of partial financing for the rate cuts listed above, the precise distributional effects would depend on the composition of the cuts and which programs and government functions were reduced. It is likely, however, that cutting spending would make the plan even more regressive because government spending tends to benefit low- and middle-income households more than tax preferences do.

edit:
How is that hyperbolic? Most posts in this thread are exactly that. That is, the argument that the rich don’t pay enough taxes, the middle-class / poor pay too much, and that is why everything is in the shitter.

If anything the article itself is hyperbolic, in that Romney’s tax plan makes no mention of any tax increases for the middle class at all; and the report makes the assumption that the middle class must end up paying more taxes to make up for lost revenues, even though Romney’s actual plan says nothing of the sort.

Romney's actual plan says NOTHING SPECIFIC, so the study makes the best assumptions for his case, and his plan still sucks. Have you considered reading the report?
 
Someone needs to make a Rage Against the Romney Campaign already I mean how is he going to win I've seen someone try so hard at being so despicable.

The republican America CAN'T BE THAT STUPID
 
What's even more amazing about this is the Romney campagin is decrying the sources on this as biased when the campaign called the same people unbiased when they used their figures to say Rick Perry's plan raised taxes on millions of Americans back in the primary.
 
The study comments on this.

I thought that was the case. Regardless of the political implications I think the most interesting part of the report are the figures they calculate for what could be raised by eliminating certain tax exemptions. I am looking forward to reading what they came up with.
 
r-MITT-ROMNEY-TAX-PLAN-large570.jpg
 
Most people on here owe their jobs to a "rich" person. And yet all you want to do is take and take and take some more. Well the cow is running dry come January and people will have to get off their butts and get to work. Pleading for handouts is not work btw.
 
Waiting for that spin middle-class republicans.

Any of them here on GAF?
How do you rationalize the big gov stealing even more of your money?
 
All taxes need to go up. I applaud him raising taxes on middle class, but the top 10% should go up as well.

He won't be elected, though, and Obama won't raise taxes on the middle class.


EDIT: I am a middle-class republican, but have nothing to do with today's current crop of retardation emanating from the word holes of mouth breathers like Reince Preibus and Grover Norquist.
 
Most people on here owe their jobs to a "rich" person. And yet all you want to do is take and take and take some more. Well the cow is running dry come January and people will have to get off their butts and get to work. Pleading for handouts is not work btw.

thefuckisthisshit.jpg
 
Most people on here owe their jobs to a "rich" person. And yet all you want to do is take and take and take some more. Well the cow is running dry come January and people will have to get off their butts and get to work. Pleading for handouts is not work btw.

Are...are you serious? You're not. I think. I don't know your post history, so I'm not sure.
 
I also dislike that.

Oh well, I'll just go yell at a cloud or something.

The tradeoff is that you spend less time seeing really ridiculous status updates like "Can't wait for the new Glee tonight lol!"

At least madness doesn't make me want to kill myself.
 
I thought that was the case. Regardless of the political implications I think the most interesting part of the report are the figures they calculate for what could be raised by eliminating certain tax exemptions. I am looking forward to reading what they came up with.

In my country parties are forced to let their plans be calculated by an independent organisation, that way they can't sell bullshit.
 
All taxes need to go up. I applaud him raising taxes on middle class, but the top 10% should go up as well.

He won't be elected, though, and Obama won't raise taxes on the middle class.


EDIT: I am a middle-class republican, but have nothing to do with today's current crop of retardation emanating from the word holes of mouth breathers like Reince Preibus and Grover Norquist.

He's not raising taxes on the middle class. This study is ASSUMING he will have to, to keep his plan revenue neutral.
 
In my country parties are forced to let their plans be calculated by an independent organisation, that way they can't sell bullshit.

We've got the Congressional Budget Office for that. Unfortunately, we also have policy think tanks like the Brookings and CATO Institute that are both highly influential and politically motivated. They put out a lot of great research, but they often muddle the waters when it comes to the public getting a clear picture about the benefits/consquences of proposed or enacted policies.
 
Most people on here owe their jobs to a "rich" person. And yet all you want to do is take and take and take some more. Well the cow is running dry come January and people will have to get off their butts and get to work. Pleading for handouts is not work btw.

So what's your opinion on rising income inequality in the US and its repercussions on the economy long term?
 
In my country parties are forced to let their plans be calculated by an independent organisation, that way they can't sell bullshit.

You aren't forced, you could just not submit your plans (which I believe the PVV did at least once, and I suspect they will do again). Other parties will just use it against you as political ammo, because it basically proves it's no good anyway, and that you are aware of it.
 
Rich people work really hard to make their money so they should keep a larger percentage of it than the middle class / the poor because they're just leeches on society.
 
Wow,making up stuff and trying to scare people is something right out of The fox news playbook. The left is learning. Not going to help you much though, Obama is toast.
 
100s. He is a shitbag. Everyone needs to know who this clown is.

obama-romney-mirror.jpg

Really? He's more of a shitbag than Obama? This election is about one thing and one thing only: lesser of two evils and Romney wins handily when it comes to the economy which is what this presidential election is all about.
 
obama-romney-mirror.jpg

Really? He's more of a shitbag than Obama? This election is about one thing and one thing only: lesser of two evils and Romney wins handily when it comes to the economy which is what this presidential election is all about.

whhhhaaaaa? How can you say such a thing when Romney hasn't said one concrete thing about his budget proposals? You are pulling things out of your ass. Romney has embarrassed himself continually throughout this election cycle by refusing to take any hardline positions outside of ones that cost him politically with independents. he is going to lose this election despite Obama's weaknesses on the economy because he is THAT inept.

If he came out and said, "Raising taxes across the board is fair and necessary to maintain the country and build it for the future" Then I would consider voting for him. As he is now, he is beholden to his bundlers and donors who are complete retards.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom