Mitt Romney announces Paul Ryan as running mate

Status
Not open for further replies.
So tell me how the birth certificate and tax return controversies are any different?

You guys need to take a chill pill, you guys have too much anger built up it seems.

As far as I'm aware, Obama is proposing no legislation about birth certificates. Romney is proposing lowering his own taxes because he says he and people like him pay way too much in taxes. One is a weird xenophobic conspiracy, and the other actually relates directly to the candidate's stances on taxes for the wealthy. Also: Obama released both his birth certificate and something like 10 years of tax returns, so even if they were the same (they're not), he's been open about both. Also also: Romney has demanded both Ted Kennedy in the 90s and his opponent for governor in 00s to release more tax returns, so he's a hypocrite/flip flopper on top of everything else.
 
The point is that Obama didn't have anything to deal with, it was all FUD meant to play into xenophonbia.

Do people really think the Democratic party would allow someone into their primaries that isn't legally an American citizen? Seriously?

Or that Hilary Clinton wouldn't have used it the very instance she found it?
 
It took Obama a long time to deal with that birth certificate thing, Romney has plenty of time also to deal with that.

LOL. A birther.
KuGsj.gif
 
Do people really think the Democratic party would allow someone into their primaries that isn't legally an American citizen? Seriously?

Or that Hilary Clinton wouldn't have used it the very instance she found it?

Fuck even going that far.

You think that a Black man would be able to even try to throw his hat in the pile if he wasn't a us citizen? We're talking about a conspiracy that would have to go back to this guys birth going all the way from the top ends of federal and various state governments. Even talking about that in public would have been enough call for plenty of people to find evidence he's not American.

Even suggesting it, with how politicians are scrutinized, is akin to insanity. Trying to put Mitt's tax returns in the same pile as Obama's birth certificate is intellectual dishonesty.
 
I've seen polls and numbers thrown around everyday. "A large amount of Americans believe...," "2/5 Americans are..." etc etc. I beginning to think that polls are the source of all America's problems.

How else will we know how we're supposed to stand on issues!?!1

3/5 Americans agree with my post.
 
Fuck even going that far.

You think that a Black man would be able to even try to throw his hat in the pile if he wasn't a us citizen? We're talking about a conspiracy that would have to go back to this guys birth going all the way from the top ends of federal and various state governments. Even talking about that in public would have been enough call for plenty of people to find evidence he's not American.

Even suggesting it, with how politicians are scrutinized, is akin to insanity. Trying to put Mitt's tax returns in the same pile as Obama's birth certificate is intellectual dishonesty.
I was trying to be nice after giving in to anger.
 
I was trying to be nice after giving in to anger.

There is zero need to be nice in a discussion that begins with "Mitt should have the same respect in dealing with his refusal to show his tax returns as Obama had for showing his birth certificate, because they're totally the same thing."
 
Announcing this early on a Saturday morning while the Olympics are still going on... bwahahahaa. Mitt Romney's got some serious confidence in this move!
 
There is NO BASIS to anything you just wrote. Ryan is an ideologue that disguises himself as an intelectual.
He may be an ideologue, but he is not a "culture warrior", as Gary Whitta said, or even much of a demagogue. If a Romney/Ryan ticket is defeated, then there is a good chance that he will be completely discredited, especially if voters reject him and his ideas. In other words, he will have lost his standing as a politician who can set the agenda of the Republican party. This scenario isn't guaranteed, but there is more of a chance than you are giving it credit for.
 
It's probably going to be that guy on late night infomercials with a suit with question marks telling you how you can use government programs to evade taxes.
 
There is zero need to be nice in a discussion that begins with "Mitt should have the same respect in dealing with his refusal to show his tax returns as Obama had for showing his birth certificate, because they're totally the same thing."
Definitely can't argue with that.
 
So tell me how the birth certificate and tax return controversies are any different?

You guys need to take a chill pill, you guys have too much anger built up it seems.

It's the meaning of having something looming over a politician that people won't drop is the point I am trying to make, Obama had time to deal with his part and Romney should be given the same.

I'll answer you honestly and earnestly, but I also hope you take the advice at the end honestly and earnestly.

The controversy over Obama's birth was largely an unsubstantiated distraction. Of course he was born in the U.S. and was a citizen, he had to go through a thorough vetting process. He released his long-form birth certificate early and still the clamor did not go away, suggesting that the certificate was not the actual problem. No other candidate was questioned over their birth place, including McCain who was born in Panama (on an American base and thus, soil).

The controversy over Romney's tax returns is largely legitimate. While we do not know (or find it likely) that he paid 0% over 10 years, we do know he pulls all sorts of shenanigans to lower his tax rate to ridiculous levels. This is key knowledge, because business, tax rates, and fairness are huge talking points for him and his party. The public really does deserve to know how his taxes have affected him. Is he paying too much, or too little? What is too much or too little, in the Romney context? Is he paying his fair share?

Romney, however, refuses to release 10 years of tax releases (a standard his own father set) because the political fallout is worse if he does release them. This sets up a legitimate question: What is so bad in his taxes that he'd rather be harassed for the next 3 months instead of reveal his taxes?

Releasing those tax returns can help illuminate the actual impact and merit of key Republican talking points, and is also an expected and standard release made by Presidential candidates. Releasing a birth certificate answered no key questions, was not about policy in any way, and was not a standard practice.

Here's the advice:

PoliGAF has pretty high expectations for argumentation. You better have solid reasoning, citations, and/or numbers to back up your thinking. Just asserting something you believe isn't enough.
 
For those who say that VP don´t matter, think of how Palin lost the election for Mccain.
That was a total outlier though, I don't know if there's ever been a VP disaster that bad. McGovern/Eagleton maybe but he was quickly replaced. There almost certainly never will be again. Palin re-wrote the rule book on vetting.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom