water_wendi
Water is not wet!
The show has had its share of contrived nonsense but this wasnt one of those times.
Tie it back to Hank's statement about Mike where he says "even the most professional criminal slips up and we just have to be ready to act whe he does." (paraphrasing obviously)I look at it as Walt getting sloppy.
I look at it as Walt getting sloppy.
With Hank opening Gus's laptop and seeing Walt walk in on the recorded footage. Same epiphany, less awkward and boring.
Yes, a cheap way.It's not deus ex machina. Hank finding the book tells us something about Walt, and how at the end of the day, Walt himself was the last loose end.
There is only one piece: Gale's notebook with a similar dedication. And Walt knows that and yet he keeps that smoking gun of an evidence despite his recently exhibited evidence-wiping behavior. Lazy writing. It's not as if being 'only' a coincidence makes it better. A major aspect of the show decided by blind luck,coincidence and a spotty character?maharg said:It isn't anywhere close to deus ex machina. I really hate when people use this phrase so loosely. A coincidence is not the god in the machine. Coincidences are almost essential to creating a story that doesn't come off as overly contrived, especially in stories that focus on criminals and cops.
A deus ex machinas would have been if a brand new character popped into Hank's life and said after meeting Walt once "hey, that brilliant chemist brother in law of yours sure is kinda shifty isn't he? What if HE'S MAKING METH?!?!" Hank having all the pieces and a mistake on Walt's part forcing him to put them all together? That's completely reasonable and not at all a 'great sin of storytelling'.
Only the book being there and become the sole reason Hank would divert the attention to Walt. How convenient.Hwasong said:There was nothing about that book being in the bathroom of Walt's house that can be considered an unexpected direction.
Hank was already on the verge of catching Walt in that RV moment before getting the fake call about Mary. I don't recall having any issues with that.When you naysayers thought Hank was gonna find out about Walt, how did you exactly imagine it?
I thiught of it tieing Walt back to Hank's statement about Mike where Hank says "even the most professional criminal slips up and we just have to be ready to act whe he does." (paraphrasing obviously)I look at it as Walt getting sloppy.
It's going to be so much more interesting how they've done it now. If that's how it happened that's 100% proof right there.
As it is we'll have to see how Hank approaches it, will he be in denial? Will he be back on the hunt for more evidence before he finally confronts him? There's much more opportunities for interesting character development now.
people have it painted in their minds thatI look at it as Walt getting sloppy.
When you naysayers thought Hank was gonna find out about Walt, how did you exactly imagine it?
I expected it to be something we could have pieced together ourselves. Like a good detective story. I've gone back and re-watched all the Gale scenes and he never gave Walt that book on-screen.
I disagree. Hank knows, undeniably, regardless. If he had seen the footage on the screen he'd have to figure out whether or not he'd do something about it in that very moment. The drama would be less protracted and more exciting.
I expected it to be something we could have pieced together ourselves. Like a good detective story. I've gone back and re-watched all the Gale scenes and he never gave Walt that book on-screen.
Hank and Walt, who's going to kill who?
people have it painted in their minds that
a) walt is a horrible monster and anything even slightly positive can be attributed to something super negative because grr grr walt is horrible and. When he's actually pretty complex more often than not.
b) walt is some mastermind criminal that couldn't possibly ever make a mistake even though he spends like 4 seasons out 5 being a fumbling and bumbling guy who is making it on the seat of his pants.
The book doesn't cross any line. The guy has had it forever, he has been through so much shit. The book is the last thing on his mind after 3 months of straight up work grind and whatnot. And then his decision to be out was actually pretty sudden. The book is just what it is. Something he didn't think of. End of story. Walt is capable of fucking up folks, and imo it isn't even a big fuck up (leaving a book in your washroom). He just got screwed bad on it.
Gus' laptop will not make sense though. That's even more of a coincidence than this. Walt made sure to get rid of everything, and forgets about the damn laptop?
While the book shows his hubris (as repeated countless of times), and how proud he was keeping it there. It was a symbol of admiration by a reputable chemist. It only made sense if it was that or the watch, and the book even makes more sense since there was a link with the episode in season 4.
Y'all should stop being so nitpicky.
This isn't hubris, this is coincidence. Don't confuse the two. Hubris isn't accidentally leaving a book around. I think people need to decide if 1) Walt was leaving the book around because it gave him a boner to have a dumb expositional inscription from a guy he had killed or 2) he just forgot about it/never read the inscription.
Neither of them seem to jive with his character.
I disagree. Hank knows, undeniably, regardless. If he had seen the footage on the screen he'd have to figure out whether or not he'd do something about it in that very moment. The drama would be less protracted and more exciting.
No one has said that this one incident is anything other than a small event in an large ongoing problem.Gus' laptop will not make sense though. That's even more of a coincidence than this. Walt made sure to get rid of everything, and forgets about the damn laptop?
While the book shows his hubris (as repeated countless of times), and how proud he was keeping it there. It was a symbol of admiration by a reputable chemist. It only made sense if it was that or the watch, and the book even makes more sense since there was a link with the episode in season 4.
Y'all should stop being so nitpicky.
1) Walt was leaving the book around because it gave him a boner to have a dumb expositional inscription from a guy he had killed
Neither of them seem to jive with his character.
It would be about as ridiculous as this coincidence, as we know that he's had problems with PTSD in the past.Start of next season will be Hank having a heart attack trying to sqeeze the last poo out.
This isn't hubris, this is coincidence. Don't confuse the two. Hubris isn't accidentally leaving a book around. I think people need to decide if 1) Walt was leaving the book around because it gave him a boner to have a dumb expositional inscription from a guy he had killed or 2) he just forgot about it/never read the inscription.
Neither of them seem to jive with his character.
Also I like how a standard "I liked working with you, here's a gift" written in a gift is a "dumb expositional inscription."
Why didn't he stash\got rid of the book once he got it MONTHS ago (in S3)?The guy has had it forever, he has been through so much shit. The book is the last thing on his mind after 3 months of straight up work grind and whatnot
"I like working with you, here's a gift" is not "ha ha to my OTHER W.W. get it? like in the note that's in my personal notebook?"
did the book appear before?
I expected it to be something we could have pieced together ourselves. Like a good detective story. I've gone back and re-watched all the Gale scenes and he never gave Walt that book on-screen.
You don't need to have be a mastermind to get rid off anything that might get you in a bad spot, as was shown in the first episode.
Why didn't he stash\got rid of the book once he got it MONTHS ago (in S3)?
A major development in narrative being unfolded by luck and coincidence isn't nitpicking. It's fundamental.
Why didn't he stash\got rid of the book once he got it MONTHS ago (in S3)?
And let's be perfectly clear, I'm not saying I find this method unbelievable. I just find it uninteresting. Part of writing a serial is knowing what's going on after the scene ends. Hank sees Walt on Gus's laptop and the scene ends? Oh shit, something big is going down.
Hank sees the book while sitting on the shitter? Hmm, better finish crapping...maybe act a little awkward and find a way to leave afterwards...
Yeah, it's not like he was referring to the actual book written by Walt Whitman that he was giving Walter, he was clearly writing a joke based on a note in a notebook that Walter had no reason to know about when Gale gave him the book.
Could he not have found the book under any other circumstance than on the toilet during the mid-season finale?If we went with your laptop idea, or any kind of hard police evidence, it's Hank and the DEA gunning for Walt's ass for the rest of the series. They know it's him: the rest turns into an action show. Less suspense.
With a book, there's doubt. We're gonna have scenes where Hank and Walt are talking, acting like everything is normal, while Hank is fishing for evidence of guilt, while Walt slowly realizes that he might be under suspicion....
Could he not have found the book under any other circumstance than on the toilet during the mid-season finale?
Could he not have found the book under any other circumstance than on the toilet during the mid-season finale?
The point isn't that it's possible, the point is that it's implausible. The only reason that first part of the inscription was there was to make sure Hank had no doubt when he saw it. That's why we never saw the inscription either, because we would have figured it out. It's the easiest, dumbest way possible.
Could he not have found the book under any other circumstance than on the toilet during the mid-season finale?
why do you monkeys think it's ok to drop RDR spoilers? Some of us haven't played that game. Same thing with you z0mg Landry spoiler folks, stfu.